This is why criminal defense lawyers go above and beyond to prove their client is innocent; they donât care about your actual guilt or innocence, because itâs not their job. They are there to preserve the integrity of the system and keep it honest, and itâs their duty to present a fair case.
Another reason that lawyers can defend people regardless of guilt is that our society gives each citizen the right to be vigorously defended in a court of law. The U.S. Constitution assures every citizen due process and the right to legal counsel. Lawyers are bound to deliver this legal right to their clients.
Their innocence tends to blind them from seeing the imminent danger. With such an attitude, they often prison without knowing it. Eventually, the lawyers will have a hard time proving your innocence.
Second, if the lawyers are not too smart to counter the evidence, either way, it is the job of your lawyer to ensure you donât end up in jail. But worry not, you are innocent until proven guilty.
1. Between 2% and 10% of convicted individuals in US prisons are innocent. According to the 2019 annual report by the National Registry of Exonerations, wrongful convictions statistics show that the percentage of wrongful convictions is somewhere between 2% and 10%.
According to Black's Law Dictionary, wrongful conviction is "1. A conviction of a person for a crime that he or she did not commit. 2. Broadly, a conviction that has been overturned or vacated by an appellate court.
6 Most Common Causes of Wrongful ConvictionsEyewitness misinterpretation. The leading cause of wrongful convictions is eyewitness misinterpretation. ... Incorrect forensics. ... False confessions. ... Official misconduct. ... Use of informants. ... Inadequate defense.
The Innocence Project only accepts cases on post-conviction appeal in which DNA testing can prove innocence. If the case does not involve biological evidence or DNA, visit the Innocence Network to see if there is a program in your area that provides broader legal and investigative assistance, and if, so, write to them.
A recent Mother Jones article attempts to answer this question with help from the Innocence Project, the Center on Wrongful Convictions and experts in the field. estimate is that 1 percent of the US prison population, approximately 20,000 people, are falsely convicted.
Mistaken witness id Eyewitness error is the single greatest cause of wrongful convictions nationwide, playing a role in 72% of convictions overturned through DNA testing.
Persuaded (or internalized) false confessions occur when interrogation tactics cause an innocent suspect to doubt his memory and he genuinely becomes persuadedâwhether temporarily or permanentlyâthat it is more likely than not that he committed the crime, despite having no memory of committing it.
the State of IllinoisThe Innocence Project succinctly answers the question of which state has the most wrongful convictions (as evidenced by exonerations), and that answer is the State of Illinois. Consider the following statistics: In 2019, there were 143 exonerations for the wrongfully accused in the United States.
The idea was simple: if DNA technology could prove people guilty of crimes, it could also prove that people who had been wrongfully convicted were innocent. Research shows that 99.9% of human DNA is identical, but that . 1% can be used in forensic labs to differentiate one individual from another.
DNA evidence is not unassailable, however. Errors in the collection and/or handling of the biological samples used for the DNA analysis can result in it being excluded at trial. Similarly, if a lab contaminates the biological sample or is found to use unreliable methods, a judge may reject it at trial.
In 2018, a record number of exonerations involved misconduct by government officials. Other leading causes of wrongful convictions include mistaken eyewitness identifications, false or misleading forensic science, and jailhouse informants. Faulty forensics also lead to wrongful convictions.
More than 330 people have been exonerated by post-conviction DNA testing, unequivocally proving their innocence. False confessions, a narrative admission to a criminal act that one did not commit, have been a contributing factor in approximately 25% of the DNA exoneration cases (The Innocence Project).
The public often fails to understand that when it is clear the client is guilty of committing a crime, the job of defense counsel is to be sure the actual charge fits the crime, and that the sentence imposed is reasonable. âIn most jurisdictions, less than 5 percent of all charged criminal cases ever go to trial.
At times the defendant proceeds to trial with no defense, despite the lawyerâs advice. It is the clientâs choice at that stage. âA trial is a right that belongs to the client, not the lawyer. Trying a hopeless case is not a situation most lawyers want to be in.
At this early stage, as odd as it sounds to the public, it isnât an issue of whether the defendant did or did not do it. The real issue is the right to rely on protection of the United States Constitution, protections guaranteed us by law. We are, after all, a nation of laws, and this is where you see it in action.â
You will never find a lawyer asking their client whether or not they committed the crime because itâs not their job to do so. Even if the defendant admitted guilt, they might be protecting someone, or they might be accused of something far less than theyâre being charged with. This is why a fair and solid defense is needed, and it will always be a defense attorneyâs job to provide it.
This is why criminal defense lawyers go above and beyond to prove their client is innocent; they donât care about your actual guilt or innocence, because itâs not their job. They are there to preserve the integrity of the system and keep it honest, and itâs their duty to present a fair case.
Protecting the rule of law is perhaps the main reason why lawyers defend their clients, no matter what. If those attorneys didnât do that, it would be up to the police to determine the guilt of a person. Theyâd basically be judge, jury, and executioner because all their evidence will be accepted and admissible. But when lawyers go above and beyond to defend their clients, it becomes up to an actual judge and citizens to determine if the defendant is guilty or not. It is left to impartial parties to decide if that person did, in fact, commit the crime they are accused of, and that ensures that justice and law prevail in society.
Theyâd basically be judge, jury, and executioner because all their evidence will be accepted and admissible . But when lawyers go above and beyond to defend their clients, it becomes up to an actual judge and citizens to determine if the defendant is guilty or not.
That job is assigned to the prosecution, who is charged with doing everything within their capabilities ââ and within the boundaries of the law ââ to prove a defendant is guilty.
It is left to impartial parties to decide if that person did, in fact, commit the crime they are accused of, and that ensures that justice and law prevail in society. You will never find a lawyer asking their client whether or not they committed the crime because itâs not their job to do so.
There have been hundreds of cases all over the world where people were found guilty, only to have that sentence revoked decades later after new evidence emerges and technologies arise. By then, it becomes too late. The person is either dead or served too many years in prison to be a normal human being.
The single most important thing you can do to protect your rights and your freedom if you are accused of a crime, especially a crime you did not commit, is to hire a skilled and experienced trial lawyer. Call us, we can help.
Ninety nine out of a hundred times this leads to a client making statements that cement the prosecutionâs case. Nobody is intentionally hurting their own case, but when speaking directly with the prosecution, their statements can be used against them. Even seemingly harmless or helpful statements can destroy a defense.
Many people believe that if they didnât do anything wrong, even if theyâre charged with a crime, they donât need a lawyer . This belief springs from the notion that the truth will come out. Sometimes this is compounded by the belief that if somebody hires a lawyer that means they must be guilty.
Itâs simply amazing how many people believe that if youâre not guilty of a crime you donât need the help of a good criminal defense lawyer . It seems like every day the news is filled with stories about people who spent long periods of time in prison for crimes they did not commit. Our system of justice is not perfect, it is simply the best that we have been able to develop over the course of human history.
Never forget that though Lady Justice has a scale that it is not always in balance. And do not forget that her sword, though supposedly that of righteousness, often draws the blood of the innocent as well as the guilty.
For the reasons mentioned above, most criminal defendants plead not guilty at the arraignment hearing. By pleading not guilty, the criminal defendant buys time. This gives his or her defense lawyer the opportunity to review the case and to assert all possible defenses. The criminal defense lawyer may explain the defendantâs rights. He or she may be able to work on motions to keep damaging evidence from being entered and to show that the prosecution does not have sufficient evidence to establish the defendantâs guilt.
If the criminal prosecutor cannot meet this burden, the defendant should be found not guilty. When making a decision regarding whether to plead guilty or not guilty, a criminal defendant must weigh important considerations. Many criminal defendants believe that they are guilty of a crime that they are charged with.
Pleading Guilty at an Arraignment. An arraignment is usually held within 30 days of a criminal defendantâs first appearance. At this hearing, the criminal defendant pleads guilty, not guilty or no contest. At this stage in the case, the prosecutor may not have thoroughly reviewed the case.
The criminal defense lawyer instead may only be able to advise the defendant about the possible maximum sentence that a criminal defendant may receive if convicted of the offense either by pleading guilty or by being found guilty by a judge or jury.
The prosecutor is required to supply the criminal defense lawyer with evidence acquired in the case and that will be used against the defendant . The prosecutor is also required to provide the defense lawyer with evidence that weighs in favor of the defendantâs innocence.
Many individuals have heard the phrase âinnocent until proven guilty.â. This means that all criminal defendants are presumed to be innocent. The only thing that overcomes this presumption is if the prosecutor proves that the defendant is guilty by proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
If the defendant has little to gain by accepting a plea agreement, he or she may agree to move forward with the trial.
Since it is up to the prosecution to prove that the defendant committed the crime alleged, if the prosecution does not provide any proof (in the form of evidence), the case must be dismissed. ââŚbeyond a reasonable doubt.â.
Witness testimony â If someone saw you commit a crime, his or her testimony would be considered evidence against you.
To many people, evidence means physical evidence â a literal smoking gun or drugs in the possession of someone caught red-handed. But, in reality, the definition of âevidenceâ is much broader.
Electronic evidence â In computer crime, domestic violence and certain other types of cases, text messages, emails, computer files, and other types of electronic records may be admissible as evidence, as well. Keep in mind that whether something ...
Can a person be convicted without evidence? The simple answer is, âno.â You cannot be convicted of a crime without evidence. You cannot be convicted of a state crime. You cannot be convicted of a federal crime. If there is no evidence against you, under the law, it simply is not possible for the prosecutorâs office to obtain a conviction at trial.
Never rely on an article for legal advice as the law frequently changes, information may not be accurate, there may be exceptions to a rule, and reliance may be detrimental. Always consult one of our experienced attorneys for competent, current, and accurate legal advice.
If the police obtained evidence against you in violation of your Constitutional rights, you may be entitled to have that evidence deemed inadmissible at trial.
To prove youâre innocent of a crime, hire a lawyer as soon as possible, so they can support you through the process. Although you might be eager to clear your name, avoid talking to the police until you meet with your lawyer, since they might try to extract a false confession out of you.
If you are being falsely accused of a crime you did not commit, do not fall into this trap and do not admit to anything you didn't do. If you feel threatened by police or attorney questioning at any time, stop talking and request a criminal defense attorney.
False identifications occur when an eyewitness wrongly identifies a person as being the one that committed a crime. Eyewitness testimony can be incredibly persuasive to a judge or jury but DNA has proven time and again that their identifications and testimony are often inaccurate.
If you were wrongly convicted of a crime and your conviction has been overturned, you may want to petition a court for a certificate of innocence. A certificate of innocence is a court order conclusively stating that you did not commit the crime for which you were convicted.
Be prepared to be arrested. If the state has already charged you with a crime, then presenting evidence to them will do little good. They are already confident of their case against you. Nevertheless, all the evidence you have gatheredâyour alibi evidence, witnesses, etc.âwill be useful at trial.
To start this process, you should either obtain or write a petition to the court asking for a certificate of innocence. When you fill out a petition, you will need to tell the court: (1) you were convicted of a crime; (2) your conviction was reversed; and (3) you did not bring about the conviction on your own.
Stay calm. You probably wonât know that youâve been accused of a crime until the police show up at the door. Undoubtedly, you will be shocked and confused. Nevertheless, you must remain calm so that you do not make mistakes.
Many clients usually say âIf I just have a few words with the accuser, I may save myself.â We have never seen that turn out well. Once you are accused, such thoughts should be discarded from your mind immediately. Having any contact with your accuser can make matters worse than they are. By doing that, you will be helping the complainant to build a strong case.
This is because they often take the accusations lightly. Their innocence tends to blind them from seeing the imminent danger. With such an attitude, they often prison without knowing it. Eventually, the lawyers will have a hard time proving your innocence.
Some accusers usually want to run things fast and get what they want. The only way they can do this is by convincing you to enter a plea deal. We strongly advise that you should not fall for it. A plea deal is where you are asked to plead guilty in exchange to some leniency. Most plea deals tend to reduce your sentence.
Most plea deals tend to reduce your sentence. No matter how good the plea deal is, try and avoid it as much as possible. Any great lawyer will tell you to keep off the plea deal and take your chances. You might end up taking a plea deal, and yet you would have won the case.
During your arrest, the police will read your rights as they handcuff you. The only phrase to pay attention to is âYou have the right to remain silent.â As lawyers, we always advise our clients to make use of that rightfully. Keep your mouth completely shut. This is because anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law.
A good attorney will look at every angle and collect all the evidence without living any behind. These include text messages, call logs, and anything to prove you are being accused falsely. This is the only way you will be able to prove that you are not the perpetrator.
This is because anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law. To avoid making matters worse, simply ask for a lawyer. So far, those are the only words you should utter. Exercising this right will give us an easy time when dealing with the case.
The businessman must prove four elements in order to win his malicious prosecution case: 1 the original case (involving criminal charges) was resolved in the businessman's favor 2 the prosecutor was actively involved in the original case 3 the prosecutor did not have the probable cause necessary to file the charges, and 4 the prosecutor initiated or pursued the original case for improper purposes.
You can help the attorneys better evaluate your case by providing information about the alleged crime, dates, and locations of any court appearances. First Name Step 1 of 4. Last Name Step 2 of 4. Email Address Step 3 of 4. Phone Number Step 4 of 4.
To prove improper purposes, the person filing a malicious prosecution suit must show that the prosecutor didn't just make a mistake or get bad information and reasonably rely on that information. In the example above, the businessman must prove that the prosecutor instigated the criminal case because of his anger or with the intent to bring false charges, harass the businessman, or damage his reputation. Without direct evidence of intent, the businessman can argue that the decision to pursue the case without probable cause proves improper purpose (perhaps the businessman can prove the prosecutor knew or should have known the evidence was insufficient).
An Example of Malicious Prosecution in a Criminal Case. A county prosecutor runs for mayor and loses the election. He believes that a local businessman who is active in politics played a large role in sabotaging his campaign. The prosecutor becomes obsessed with the idea that the businessman caused him to lose the election.
The businessman must prove four elements in order to win his malicious prosecution case: the original case (involving criminal charges) was resolved in the businessman's favor. the prosecutor was actively involved in the original case. the prosecutor did not have the probable cause necessary to file the charges, and.
Malicious prosecution refers to a criminal or civil case that is filed without an adequate basis and for an improper purpose, such as harassing the defendant, ruining another person's reputation, or to knowingly place blame on someone other than the actual wrongdoer. If a prosecutor files such a case and the charges are dismissed, ...
Without direct evidence of intent, the businessman can argue that the decision to pursue the case without probable cause proves improper purpose (perhaps the businessman can prove the prosecutor knew or should have known the evidence was insufficient).
Just because the defendant says he did it doesnât make it so. The defendant may be lying to take the rap for someone he wants to protect, or may be guilty, but guilty of a different and lesser crime than the one being prosecuted by the district attorney.
Way back in 1840, Charles Phillips, one of the finest British barristers of his era, defended Benjamin Courvoisier against a charge that Courvoisier brutally murdered his employer, wealthy man-about-town Lord Russell. Courvoisier privately confessed to Phillips that he was guilty.
Defendant a guilty client may mean committing professional suicide. Criminal defense attorneys may vigorously defend guilty clients, but as a couple of examples make clear, they risk committing professional suicide by doing so.
Courvoisier privately confessed to Phillips that he was guilty. Nevertheless, Phillipsâs aggressive cross examinations suggested that the police officers were liars and that other members of Lord Russellâs staff might have killed him. Courvoisier was convicted and executed.
Yes. The key is the difference between factual guilt (what the defendant did) and legal guilt (what a prosecutor can prove). A good criminal defense lawyer asks not, âWhat did my client do?â but rather, â What can the government prove? â No matter what the defendant has done, he is not legally guilty until a prosecutor offers enough evidence to persuade a judge or jury to convict. However, the defense lawyer may not lie to the judge or jury by specifically stating that the defendant did not do something the lawyer knows the defendant did do. Rather the lawyerâs trial tactics and arguments focus on the governmentâs failure to prove all the elements of the crime.
For these reasons, among others, many defense lawyers never ask their clients if they committed the crime. Instead, the lawyer uses the facts to put on the best defense possible and leaves the question of guilt to the judge or jury.
Perhaps no one has ever put the duty as eloquently as Henry VIIIâs soon-to-be-beheaded ex-Chancellor Sir Thomas More, who, before going to the scaffold, insisted, âIâd give the devil the benefit of law, for mine own safetyâs sake.â.