Some states, such as California, have ruled that the client is not entitled to "absolute work product." These would include documents that reflect the attorney's impressions, opinions, and legal theories, as well as legal research.
Full Answer
Attorney work product privilege permits attorneys to withhold from production documents and other tangible things prepared in anticipation of litigation by or for another party or its representative. See: Fed. R. Civ. P. § 26 (b) (3). As with attorney-client privilege, work product privilege does not protect underlying facts. See also: Hickman v.
Sep 01, 2015 ¡ The key to the end-product approach, states Formal Opinion 471, is that âa client is not entitled to papers and property that the lawyer generated for âŚ
Jan 22, 2014 ¡ The attorney-client privilege clearly belongs to the client alone, although the client's lawyers must assert the privilege when they can. In contrast lawyers have at least some ownership interest in their work product â but few courts have applied that abstract principle to real-life situations. In Gruss v.
Mar 08, 2001 ¡ In contrast to the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine focuses on lawyersâ trial preparation rather than communications with the client. Thus, the court in In re Grand Jury Proceedings , 219 F.3d 175, 192 (2d Cir. 2000) held that "work-product not communicated to the client remains shielded."
The work product doctrine states that an adverse party generally may not discover or compel disclosure of written or oral materials prepared by or for an attorney in the course of legal representation, especially in preparation for litigation. However, under Rule 26 (b) (3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure , an adverse party may discover or compel disclosure of work product upon a showing of "substantial need" and "undue hardship."
The work product doctrine states that an adverse party generally may not discover or compel disclosure of written or oral materials prepared by or for an attorney in the course of legal representation, especially in preparation for litigation.
Specifically, the Court clarified that there is a presumption that an adverse party may not have access to materials prepared by a party's lawyers in anticipation of litigation . The Court maintained that this presumption may be overcome when a party has relevant ...
The attorney-client privilege clearly belongs to the client alone, although the client's lawyers must assert the privilege when they can. In contrast lawyers have at least some ownership interest in their work product â but few courts have applied that abstract principle to real-life situations.
The attorney-client privilege clearly belongs to the client alone , although the client's lawyers must assert the privilege when they can. In contrast lawyers have at least some ownership interest in their work product â but few courts have applied that abstract principle to real-life situations. In Gruss v.
Because clients generally "control" privileged and work product material in their lawyers' possession, they normally cannot resist discovery of their lawyers' documents if a court has stripped away any privilege and work product protections.
Attorneys have an ethical obligation to promptly return a former clientâs papers and property upon a clientâs request when representation ends. After a brief representation, that duty may sound simple enough.
California Rule of Professional Conduct 3-700 (D) (1) defines âclient papers and propertyâ to include âcorrespondence, pleadings, deposition transcripts, exhibits, physical evidence, expert reports, and other items reasonably necessary to the clientâs representation, ...
Ethics in Brief is designed to present ethical issues that practitioners might well face on a daily basis. It is a service of the Legal Ethics Committee of the San Diego County Bar Association.
[1] A lawyer or a person* related to a lawyer may accept a gift from the lawyerâs client, subject to general standards of fairness and absence of undue influence. A lawyer also does not violate this rule merely by engaging in conduct that might result in a client making a gift, such as by sending the client a wedding announcement. Discipline is appropriate where impermissible influence occurs. (See Magee v. State Bar (1962) 58 Cal.2d 423 [24 Cal.Rptr. 839].)
lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a client, or knowingly* acquire an ownership, possessory, security or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client, unless each of the following requirements has been satisfied:
A lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client in conduct that the lawyer knows* is criminal, fraudulent,* or a violation of any law, rule, or ruling of a tribunal.*
A lawyer shall not , without informed written consent* from each client and compliance with paragraph (d), represent a client if the representation is directly adverse to another client in the same or a separate matter.
A lawyer shall not directly or indirectly purchase property at a probate, foreclosure, receiverâs, trusteeâs, or judicial sale in an action or proceeding in which such lawyer or any lawyer affiliated by reason of personal, business, or professional relationship with that lawyer or with that lawyerâs law firm* is acting as a lawyer for a party or as executor, receiver, trustee, administrator, guardian, or conservator.
[1] After termination of a lawyer-client relationship, the lawyer owes two duties to a former client. The lawyer may not (i) do anything that will injuriously affect the former client in any matter in which the lawyer represented the former client, or (ii) at any time use against the former client knowledge or information acquired by virtue of the previous relationship. (See Oasis West Realty, LLC v. Goldman (2011) 51 Cal.4th 811 [124 Cal.Rptr.3d 256]; Wutchumna Water Co. v. Bailey (1932) 216 Cal. 564 [15 P.2d 505].) For example, (i) a lawyer could not properly seek to rescind on behalf of a new client a contract drafted on behalf of the former client and (ii) a lawyer who has prosecuted an accused person* could not represent the accused in a subsequent civil action against the government concerning the same matter. (See also Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6131; 18 U.S.C. § 207(a).) These duties exist to preserve a clientâs trust in the lawyer and to encourage the clientâs candor in communications with the lawyer.
[1] The requirement that the sale be of âall or substantially* all of the law practice of a lawyerâ prohibits the sale of only a field or area of practice or the sellerâs practice in a geographical area or in a particular jurisdiction. The prohibition against the sale of less than all or substantially* all of a practice protects those clients whose matters are less lucrative and who might find it difficult to secure other counsel if a sale could be limited to substantial* fee-generating matters. The purchasers are required to undertake all client matters sold in the transaction, subject to client consent. This requirement is satisfied, however, even if a purchaser is unable to undertake a particular client matter because of a conflict of interest.