However there are many disadvantages. Whilst there is some legal aid, often the cost of lawyers is such that many cannot afford their help, especially if a case has to go to the higher courts. There is often significant delay, considering the quantity of cases going through the system and subsequent backlog that arises. This leads to lawyers ...
Sep 22, 2017 · Community service is often being regarded as a waste of time. This is because the time taken for the offenders to complete a service is too long and sometimes unreasonable. For example, a traffic offender needs to work unpaid for 100 hours over a $100 fines.
Answer (1 of 9): There are many factors that a party needs to bear in mind before committing to any litigation, including the time; expense; and risk of an adverse outcome. Litigation certainly has disadvantages. First of all, litigation is time consuming. Litigation process is a very complicate...
Advantages The main advantages are that the parties may choose their own arbitrator, be it a technical expert or by a lawyer or by a professional arbitrator. This could save the expense of having to call upon an expert in the particular field and saving the need to explain technicalities to a judge. For example, a maritime dispute over damaged ...
If the agencies of community service where the offenders serve do not have the capacity to provide required punishment, the rehabilitation of the offenders will be affected. Thus little chances of recovery for the offenders and later lead to re-offending.
The advantages and disadvantages of Community service or social service as modes of criminal punishment. Community service or social service is a mode of punishment provide by the law which the offender can escape imprisonment or fines. Community service acts as an alternative to the harsh criminal punishment. Generally, community service is handed down by a judge or magistrate to the first-timer offender or teenage offender. This punishment can also be handed down in the case of minor offences for example traffic violations, petty theft, and other nonviolent offenses. The offender is required to perform unpaid work or other activity in the community under the direction of a probation officer or supervisor. Among the community work undergo by the offender are cleaning up roadside or parks, attending educational programs and presenting speeches and seminars concerning the negative effect of crime. The community work may be a specific community service which imposed a particular service, depending on the types and degrees of the offences. For instance, offender of littering will have to clean a park so that he understands the effect of littering, thus change his perception towards littering.
Community service sends the offenders back to public as a method of rehabilitate them. However, the public exposure may result in stigmatization towards the offenders. Negative perception from public will affect the offenders’ psychology in recovering from the offences.
This is because the time taken for the offenders to complete a service is too long and sometimes unreasonable. For example, a traffic offender needs to work unpaid for 100 hours over a $100 fines.
This situation is seen to be an impractical and unproductive method in favor of the offender because the time use for the work can be used for the offender to improve his living. Moreover, the long hours of community service may affect the offender normal life as he needs to juggle his life with the service.
The community service is imposed for a specific period which measured by hour of service. The hours imposed is vary, depending on the nature of the offence.
Secondly, community service is healthier than imprisonment. This is because, community service offer help to the offenders to rehabilitate themselves more effectively than in prison. This is mainly because; by community service the offenders are able to give something back to the community as prove that they have change.
government), almost all of what litigation attorneys actually do is pre-trial, primarily discovery.
The United States and other countries that come from a common law tradition use the adversarial system. The idea is that if both sides of a dispute are represented by well-trained advocates, who argue for their position vigorously, the truth will emerge. When I first started the practice of law, my mentor explained the system as being like going in for surgery, and there being a highly skilled surgeon desperately working to save your life on one side of the table, and an equally qualified surgeon on the other side of the table who was desperately trying to kill you. So let me tell you, the attorney on the other side, if they're highly skilled, can cause you a lot of pain. Imagine that surgeon with a sharp scalpel swiping at you. But here's the thing, imagine that the surgeon on the other side of the table is horrible. It turns out that a surgeon who is no good at all can do a lot of damage. Same with a bad attorney. Maybe you'll win, but the process might not be much fun anyway.
There are many factors that a party needs to bear in mind before committing to any litigation, including the time; expense; and risk of an adverse outcome.
Litigation is very costly and financially. Every citizen has the right to seek satisfaction for his or her grievances in the courts. The problem is paying the bills. A trial of a complex bus
In litigation, at least in the big commercial case world, the lawyer is - or thinks of herself/himself at least - the “player,” and the client, while formally in charge, is kind of the bystander.
It can be a very distracting process (particularly if you’re trying to do something else like run your business);
Your medical, education and employment records will be subpoenaed when you file a personal injury suit, so opposing counsel will know if you are lying about that accident being the entire reason your knee hurts, or if you have had 4 k nee surgeries in the past 10 years. Even mental health records are subpoenaed. It's a total invasion of privacy.
Rawls defines civil disobedience as a “public, nonviolent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government”. Read More.
Yi Ding BUSN201-86N Ms. Richards 19 June 2016 Tort reform Nowadays, tort reform is a controversial problem in the United States. By comparing the pros and cons of tort reform from different aspects, I think that tort reform is necessary. The textbook, “Business law today” (2014), clarifies that tort is a wrongful act that results in harm or injury to another and leads to civil liability. Tort law is designed to compensate those who have suffered a loss or injury due to another person 's wrongful act. Many people are in favor of tort law because the purpose of the tort law is to “provide remedies for the invasion of various protected interests (Miller & Jentz, 2014)”.
2. Jury systems work to eliminate conscious and unconscious bias from the system. The reason why most people in a community get added ...
In one famous incident, a jury found a millionaire to be not guilty of murder because of what a lawyer argued was “dementia Americana.” It was a supposed phenomenon where American men became temporarily insane when someone tainted the virtue of their wives.
New Zealand allows verdicts to pass at a similar ratio. It may be possible in some situations to have a 7-5 decision go through with a 12-person jury in some situations . If a unanimous decision can’t be reached, the criminal trials may offer a reduced sentence to the defendant because of this outcome.
Although no system is 100% perfect, the accuracy rate of this legal structure makes it one of the most effective systems in the world. It is because of these high accuracy levels that the average person accepts the verdict of a case when there isn’t apparent bias, even if they disagree with the decision. 6.
1. Juries are under no obligation to offer a decision based on facts. Although this disadvantage doesn’t occur as often today as it did in the past, the jury system isn’t under an obligation to make a decision based on the facts of the case.
Lawyers help with everything from setting up your business entity to settling disputes and reviewing contracts.
Online legal services are growing in popularity. These platforms give you access to legal help without having to leave your home or office. Plus, you won’t always be limited to attorneys in your area.
LegalNature gives you all you need for legal filings and templates. It’s fast, reliable, and easy for anyone to use.
Rocket Lawyer offers an online legal service that helps individuals and business owners create legal documents and get legal advice—and do so very quickly. As their name suggests, they give you a variety of ways to quickly access attorneys and their advice including through phone, email, or chat.
Alternatively, you pay per use based on what you need. Think of it like the a la carte offering. For example, Rocket Lawyer charges $39.99 per document.
A lot can get throw at you as a small business owner and not all of it will be things you can see coming. Having legal counsel in your corner is a huge plus, which is why LegalShield offers three affordable plans with 360-degree legal service.
Lawyers help with everything from setting up your business entity to settling disputes and reviewing contracts. But not everyone has a lawyer on retainer. For those that do, your lawyer might not specialize in the type of legal practice you need for all of your business and personal needs.
In addition, discipline (reprimand, suspension, termination, etc.) can only be based on just cause. For example, in my agency you can only be disciplined under the following circumstances:
Your friend is right. In a non-civil service agency you serve at the pleasure of the chief. He can fire you at any time, for any reason or for no reason. He can also promote and make appointments based solely on whim rather than on merit.
Heed all agreement changes. If a company switches the terms of its contract to include mandatory arbitration, it must notify you in writing first.
Others, however, lament that this lack of transparency makes the process more likely to be tainted or biased, which is especially troublesome because arbitration decisions are so infrequently reviewed by the courts.
Importantly, arbitration dispenses with the procedure called discovery that involves taking and answering interrogatories, depositions, and requests to produce documents -- often derided as a delaying and game-playing tactic of litigation. In arbitrations, most matters, such as who will be called as a witness and what documents must be produced, ...
Speak your mind. If you find an arbitration clause objectionable, be sure to make your feelings known to company management. It is sometimes possible to negotiate the provisions away if the company wants your business badly enough. And even large behemoths have been known to change their mandatory arbitration policies if they cause enough distress among their customers.
Promoted as a way to resolve disputes efficiently, proponents of arbitration commonly point to a number of advantages it offers over litigation, court hearings, and trials.
Adding possible complication: Many of the national arbitration groups actively market their services to companies that issue credit cards or sell goods to consumers, casting additional questions on the alleged neutral's objectivity. And an arbitrator chosen by a party within an industry may be less objective, more likely to be biased in favor of the appointing group.
Private. Arbitration proceedings are generally held in private. And parties sometimes agree to keep the proceedings and terms of the final resolution confidential.