what is one lesson that can be learned from joe flom's experiences as a lawyer?

by Roxanne Heller 5 min read

What lessons did Joe Flom’s parents teach him?

However, the nature of the Joe Floms’ garment work taught them lessons they passed on to their son. His parents’ trade was yet another opportunity for Joe Flom. From the late 19th century until the mid 20th century, the garment trade was the largest industry in New York City.

Was Joe Flom a Jewish lawyer?

Another important point is that the Joe Flom was a Jewish lawyer in New York when it was the perfect time to be a Jewish lawyer in New York. There is such a thing, argues Gladwell, as being “demographically unlucky.” If you became old enough to enter the work force at the very beginning of the Great Depression, you were demographically unlucky.

Why did Joseph Flom have such a good job?

University tuition was lower, presumably to attract more students, and employers were always looking to hire. Because his generation was small, Joseph Flom’s opportunities were more numerous and the competition for jobs less fierce. Being born at a time when relatively few others were born was an advantage.

What college did Joe Flom go to?

After being accepted at the prestigious Townsend Harris public high school, Joe Flom pushed a hand truck in the garment district for two years and went to night school. With only a piecemeal college education, he applied and was accepted to Harvard Law School.

image

What was the first lesson of Joe Flom?

Summary/Gist: The first lesson was that Joe was born luckily into the "perfect" time period for lawyers: the 1930s. Joe was also born with Jewish heritage which was an ongoing struggle that eventually served him well in the world of law-firms.

How did Joe Flom become successful?

Once again, a bevy of things came together to help ensure Joe Flom's success. He was presented with opportunities, his timing was perfect, and his cultural heritage had taught him important lessons about how to succeed in this culture, as was the case with many other Jewish lawyers in New York.

What lessons did borgenicht learn in his eighteen hour work days?

It was a lesson of the modern economy. Borgenicht was getting in his eighteen-hour days. He was learning manufacturing, market research, and negotiations. He was spending all his time in the industry and culture to understand new fashion trends.

What kind of lawyer was Joe Flom?

Joseph Harold "Joe" Flom (December 21, 1923 – February 23, 2011) was an American lawyer and pioneer of mergers and acquisitions, specializing in representing companies in takeover battles.

What makes Joe Flom an outlier quizlet?

Terms in this set (58) 4- What made Joe Flom an outlier? disadvantages to advantage making him work harder. He was jewish.

What did Joe Flom accomplish at Harvard?

In 2005, with the Petrie Foundation, he founded the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School in response to the need for leading legal scholarship in these fields.

What are the three lessons of Joe Flom?

The Three Lessons of Joe FlomLesson 1: The Importance of being Jewish. During the time Joe Flom was in law school, it was very hard for Jewish lawyers to get a job with the more "successful" law firms. ... Lesson 2: Demographic Luck. ... Lesson 3: The Garment Industry and Meaningful Work.

What is Joe Flom a product of quizlet?

What is Joe Flom a product of? Joe Flom was a product of the world (places and environments) he grew up in.

What does Gladwell mean by the miracle of meaningful work?

The miracle of meaningful work is To let his students see the clear relationship between effort and reward.

What golden opportunity did the Borgenichts get when coming to America?

People like the Borgenichts and their children and grandchildren had a golden opportunity with this industry. Section 10: The Borgenichts did very well making and selling their aprons. They soon started making other clothing items and had about twenty immigrants working for them. No clothes were made by factory.

How did Joe Flom get into Harvard?

Joe Flom wanted to become a lawyer since he was six years old. He got into Harvard without a college degree by simply writing them a letter explaining he was the answer to slice bread and was named to the Law Review – an honor reserved for the very top students in the class. During the hiring season, Mr.

What purpose does the description and background of the rice paddies serve?

What purpose does the description and background of the rice paddies serve? Gladwell wanted to illustrate the tremendous amount of work that goes into building rice paddies. It is painstakingly laborious work. Anyone who works in rice fields has an incredible work ethic.

Why did Joe flom have so much success?

In the 1930s, because of the hardships of the Great Depression, people stopped having children. The result was a small generation (of which Flom was a part.)

Who is Joe Flom?

Joe Flom is the last living named partner of one of the most prestigious law firms in New York, “Skadden, Arps.”. Flom grew up in a Jewish family during the depression, did well in school, and eventually got into Harvard law without a college degree, and graduated as one of the very top in his class. When it came time to search for ...

Why did Gladwell push Jewish lawyers into the legal profession?

A complicated scene begins to unfold. Because of cultural prejudice against Jewish lawyers , these lawyers were pushed into a certain sector of the legal profession in New York. They were forced to do the kind of work that other firms didn’t like to do. This, Gladwell will show, eventually made them perfectly positioned for huge success.

What did Gladwell say about the garment industry?

The garment industry in New York, was, Gladwell argues, characterized by meaningful work. Garment workers lived in a culture where effort was met with appropriate reward, and creativity and flexibility were essential.

Why did Gladwell face discrimination?

They faced discrimination because of their faith. They all faced very similar setbacks: though they were qualified, though they were great lawyers, they were not hired. Gladwell begins his discussion of how heritage, cultural identity, and social systems of advantage and disadvantage play a role in individual success.

Who said Jewish doctors and lawyers did not become professionals in spite of their humble origins?

Overwhelmingly, researchers saw the children of these families becoming educated professionals. Gladwell says that “Jewish doctors and lawyers did not become professionals in spite of their humble origins.

Is Flom a good luck?

Flom was born into a small generation, in a year that would put him at his professional peak right around the time there would be a corporate takeover boom in New York. This is utterly arbitrary good luck— but we can see that it played a formative role in ensuring Flom’s success.

Did you know?

In an interview with Alexander Bickel he was told that a boy of his "antecedents" had certainly come far. As Alexander said this he paused before repeating how his immigrant background was talked about. This view on Jewish immigration was not rare during his time of trying to find a job in law, and was faced by an abundant amount of people.

Did you know?

People that were born before 1911 were considered unlucky while people born from 1912 to 1915 were considered more lucky when it came to opportunity. People born before 1911 had to find a job as the Great Depression started and when jobs were scarce, while some also had to be drafted into WWII and leave their families in shock as they left.

Did you know?

It was found that in 1915 there are almost three million babies, then in 1935 the number drops to almost six hundred thousand, then in nearly fifteen years back over three million. This change in babies was suspected to lead to differences in daily life.

Did you know?

In a study performed by Louise Farkas in 1982, she found that in nearly every Jewish family she researched about, all of the doctors and lawyers in the families were in the most recent generation, while the past generations had all been in more of the lower side of social class.

How did Joe flom learn to be successful?

To become successful not only do you have to have things mentioned in previous chapters, but you must come from origins that provide you with that advantage, luck with when you born and how big/small your generation is, and meaningful work. Each person doesn't magically become successful sometimes skills you need to become successful come from desirable disadvantages. The people mentioned in the chapter either have one, two, or even all three of these advantages, but they weren't always thought as of advantages sometimes they could be disadvantages.

Why was Mort Janklow not successful?

Maurice Janklow had everything the experience, the education, and the skills. He didn't become successful though because he wasn't born in the "correct" time period where he his skills could flourish. Mort on the other hand had similar assets to Maurice, but he became successful. This is because he was born in the perfect time. He was born in a time period where there wasn't too many difficulties whether family matters or world matters in the way.

What is the story of the Janklows?

The story of the Janklows tells us that the meteoric rise of Joe Flom could not have happened at just any time. Even the most gifted of lawyers, equipped with the best of family lessons, cannot escape the limitations of their generation. Just like Maurice Janlow, Flom had many unfavorable circumstances but Flom seized those adversities and turned them into opportunities and became wealthy like Mort Janklow. (Page 138)

What were the benefits of Mort Janklow?

Consequent benefits included spacious hospitals and newer schools with plenty of staff and teachers, less crowded high schools and universities and cafeteria. The professors were solicitous and job market was very favorable with plenty of jobs available. Mort Janklow benefited by getting a chance to attend high quality public schools with ample, quality staff. He was able to select and attend Columbia Law School. Economy was strong and he was able to sell his cable business for millions of dollars. (Pages 137 - 138)

Who was Maurice Janklow?

Maurice Janklow was born in 1902, and those who were born prior to 1911 were considered to be demographically unlucky. Maurice Janklow was a Jewish Lawyer. The schools he attended was over crowded. He went to Brooklyn Law School, The doors were closed for him at the big downtown law firms, lead him to become solo practitioner who were able to get minor cases of divorce, wills and minor disputes, that eventually disappeared during the time of Depression. When the Depression started, he was newly married, and had just bought his new car, moved to Queens, and made his great gamble on the writing-paper business. In short, timing (Depression) turned out to be unfavorable for him that killed him economically and mentally. (Page 133 - 138)

What is the idea of Gladwell's introduction?

Doctors tested this finding and could find no reasonable proof which developed it to be known as the ¨Roseto Mystery.¨ The idea that Gladwell is establishing in his introduction is that these people came from Italy and had advantages that other people in Pennsylvania and this leaves the reader asking questions about why that might be. The author will then go on to explain how people have opportunities in life and advantages which helps cause this so the introductions helps evoke thought and curiosity out of the reader.

Why did Gladwell include Terman's evaluations?

Gladwell included Terman's evaluations to show that even though tons of people think the geniuses are the ones that always succeed, it isn't always true. Overall, the Termites study supports his claim by emphasizing that other qualities shine above IQ.

How does Gladwell explain success?

Gladwell creates a metaphor about Ecology to explain how he thinks success is made. He describes how the tallest oak tree in the forest is not the tallest because its seed just happened to be good. He continues his analogy by saying that the tree grew the tallest because no trees blocked its sunlight, it was planted in rich soil, no lumberjack cut it down and so on. That is how he believes successful people are created. His purpose with this metaphor was to show that people aren't just born with success. They may have a talent that gives them a head start, but there are many factors like the soil and sunlight in this case that truly make them succeed and reach the top. This compares to his view of success and what he wants people to know that there are advantages out of sight that boost people's levels of success.

Who was Lewis Terman?

Lewis Terman, a professor at the University of Stanford, was very interested in intelligence testing and wanted to compile a group of the "young geniuses" of the world as his life work.

Why didn't Flom work at other law firms?

I find it interesting how discrimination seemed to work in Flom's favor. He wasn't able to work at other law firms simply because of his religion, but he was able to work for a Jewish law firm, which worked the unwanted cases that other firm's didn't want to deal with. Eventually, the number of those "unwanted" cases increased, and the best firms for the job were those that had already been working them for some time, the Jewish firms. It's just the complete opposite of what you would think discrimination would result in.

What is Malcolm Gladwell's lesson?

In his chapter “The Lessons of Joe Flom ,” Malcolm Gladwell traces the backgrounds and experiences of a select group of people whose “world -- culture and generation and family history – gave them the greatest opportunities.” In particular, he pays close attention to the importance of ethnic background, demographic luck, and meaningful work. Given my remark that “hard work is often overrated” in the comments section of our last post, I was especially intrigued with Gladwell's alternative or refined consideration of work.

What does Gladwell mean by "meaningful work"?

So rather than champion “hard work,” Gladwell makes distinctions and highlights “meaningful work,” indicating that such work heightens people's possibilities for success when they find their efforts freeing, thought-provoking, and fulfilling. What aspect of the chapter did you find most compelling or interesting, and why?

What are the questions that Gladwell asks readers?

Gladwell poses many open questions to make his readers think about it: What do people usually think of the successful? Do people know enough about the sunlight that warms successful people, the soil in which they are putting down their roots, and the hindrances they were lucky enough to avoid? Do people see the consequences of their understanding of success? Can the pattern of special opportunities function in the real world also? Is there such a thing as an inborn talent? Is the ten-thousand-hour rule a universal principle of success? Where does practical intelligence come from? The reader cannot ignore such questions – he has to react somehow.

Why is Gladwell's deep practice concept weird?

Gladwell realizes that his deep practice concept is weird. Firstly, because people think that talent does not need much practice. Secondly, people need to have a meaningful work. He suggests the opposite: the talent is not born – it is grown. According to Gladwell, everybody can get better results with some efforts. Furthermore, these efforts do not necessarily produce perfection. A 10,000 hours rule implies that there are some obstacles on the way to success. Gladwell shows rather unexpected patterns, which do not meet society expectations: talented people spend much of their time on improving their skills. His view differs so much from the one that is constantly promoted on television. All those talents’ shows “profess another faith”: you have a talent or you do not. Therefore, writing such a book seems to be a challenge for the author.

Why did Langan lose his scholarship?

Their “studying stories” do not have a happy end. Langan lost his scholarship for his mother missed a deadline for his financial aid. Oppenheimer tried to poison his teacher so he was put out for probation. Nevertheless, Oppenheimer became famous afterwards for he had invented a nuclear bomb.

What does Daniel Coyle call deep practice?

The similar ideas are there in the book of Daniel Coyle – The Talent Code. What Coyle calls “deep practice”, Gladwell calls “ten thousand hours rule ”. Geoff Colvin calls this kind of practice “deliberate practice” in another book Talent is overrated, which was published in 2008.

What is Malcolm Gladwell's book about?

Malcolm Gladwell is also the author of the famous books Blink and The Tipping Point. He is currently The New Yorker writer. He started his career as a reporter at the Washington Post. In his Outliers, he writes about people that are above average. In this book, he proves that success does not depend solely on the individual talent. He tries to find out what are the key factors for success. For that, Gladwell analyzes the life stories of famous people and searches for something they have in common. He is looking forward to spotlight the secret of talented people. For that, he observes their distinctive patterns of practice, motivation, and coaching.

Which of the following is the second component of success?

The second component of success is practice . It seems that Gladwell was the first one to proclaim the ideas of deep practice :

Did Oppenheimer go to Harvard?

Oppenheimer was a child thinking in a similar way as Chris Langan did. His parents believed he was a genius. He left behind his peers in studying Physics and Chemistry. He knew Latin and Greek. Oppenheimer went to Harvard. He wanted to pursue a doctorate in physics so he went to Cambridge University.

How to assess yourself as a coworker?

This led me to realize that it's kind of useful to assess yourself as a coworker. Try to put yourself in others' shoes to see how they might see you. Do you interrupt others' work very often? Do you gossip? Do you borrow things and never return them? Do you take credit for others' work or talk loudly on the phone on personal calls (or even business ones)? Do you only shower once a week, or are you a downer, always complaining about things? There are lots of ways in which you might be an annoying coworker without ever realizing it.

How can coworkers be good teachers?

Your coworkers can be great teachers, and you can learn by watching, asking questions, and finding ways to work alongside people. That can lead to important lessons that help not just at the office, but also in life. Coworkers can teach you a lot. Image source: Getty Images.

Do coworkers have lessons?

Your coworkers have lessons to teach even if they're not intending to actually do so. Not every lesson, of course, is positive. You might learn what not to do by watching the actions of someone else, but that's certainly better than learning it by making your own mistakes. Your coworkers can be great teachers, and you can learn by watching, ...

Can coworkers teach you a lot?

Coworkers can teach you a lot. Image source: Getty Images.

image