Full Answer
In a procedure called voir dire, lawyers and, sometimes, judges question potential jurors from a pool of citizens summoned to court to serve jury duty. Voir dire (vwar deer) means “to speak the truth."
The defendant’s lawyer will then question the witness in an effort to discredit or at least shed doubt on the testimony. Generally, questions should address matters covered during the direct examination, but the attorney may also ask questions related to the witness’s credibility.
That's why some defense lawyers joke that the most important question for a prosecutor is, "Then what happened?" On cross examination, however, there are only limited restrictions on questioning. For example, lawyers can't "ask" argumentative questions.
When they're depicted on television, prosecutors and other lawyers are often aggressive and seem to make statements to, rather than ask questions of, witnesses. Is this how it goes in a real courtroom? On direct examination, lawyers generally can't ask leading questions. A question is leading if it suggests the answer.
Examination, Direct Examination, Examination-in-chief: The questions which the lawyer asks his own client or witnesses called by him.
Oral arguments are spoken presentations to a judge or appellate court by a lawyer (or parties when representing themselves) of the legal reasons why they should prevail.
Search Legal Terms and Definitions Direct examination is interrogation by the attorney who called the witness, and cross-examination is questioning by the opposing attorney.
leading. 1) v. short for "leading the witness," in which the attorney during a trial or deposition asks questions in a form in which he/she puts words in the mouth of the witness or suggests the answer.
Definition. Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of whatever it asserts.
to be more fully informedA type of writ, meant for rare use, by which an appellate court decides to review a case at its discretion. The word certiorari comes from Law Latin and means "to be more fully informed." A writ of certiorari orders a lower court to deliver its record in a case so that the higher court may review it.
Questioning of a detained person by the police in connection with a criminal investigation. A person is not only detained when under arrest, but also whenever not free to leave.
Non-custodial interrogation is an informal interview that is provided by the police to a suspect, witness or person of interest. This interrogation is necessary to collect information about someone who is not officially declared to be a suspect.
Definition. The act of implicating oneself in a crime or exposing oneself to criminal prosecution.
Leading Question Defined Under The Indian Evidence Act The purpose of an examination in chief, that is, questioning of the witness by the party who has called him, to enable the witness to tell to the court by his own mouth the relevant facts of the case.
The direct examination or examination-in-chief is one stage in the process of adducing evidence from witnesses in a court of law. Direct examination is the questioning of a witness by the lawyer/side/party that called such witness in a trial.
Speculation. The speculation objection can be used in two different situations. First, if a witness does not know a fact to be true or not, but testifies about it anyway, this testimony would be objectionable as speculation.
Victims' rights laws apply to victims whether or not the victim testifies as a witness. The right to be treated with fairness and respect for the victim's dignity and privacy; The right to be reasonably protected from the accused offender; The right to be notified of court proceedings;
However, if the defendant is found guilty or pleads guilty, the victim has several opportunities to let the court know how the crime affected his/her life.
Restitution is the payment of money by the defendant to the victim or to the court for damages caused by his/her actions. The court will issue an order of restitution in cases where restitution is mandatory and will consider issuing a restitution order in cases where restitution is discretionary.
The date, time, and location of each court proceeding that the witness and victim is either required to or permitted to attend; The release or detention status of an offender or suspected offender. The acceptance of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or the rendering of a verdict after trial.
Federal Bureau of Prisons Notification Program. If the defendant is sentenced to a period of time in a federal prison, victims may choose to enroll in the Bureau of Prisons notification program. Once enrolled, you will receive information directly from the Bureau of Prisons.
If you are a victim or a witness, the Victim-Witness Program of the United States Attorney's office can help you understand the rights given to you by law. The United States Attorney 's office is committed to ensuring that crime victims and witnesses are treated fairly by the criminal justice system. This pamphlet will provide answers ...
What Happens in Felony Cases. Victims of crime, and other people who have knowledge about the commission of a crime, are often required to testify at a trial or at other court proceedings. The federal criminal justice system cannot function without the participation of victims and witnesses.
The plaintiff initially decides where to bring the suit, but in some cases, the defendant can seek to change the court. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases. A federal court in one state, for example, can usually only decide a case that arose from actions in that state.
To make such a request is "to appeal" or "to take an appeal.". Both the plaintiff and the defendant can appeal, and the party doing so is called the appellant. Appeals can be made for a variety of reasons including improper procedure and asking the court to change its interpretation of the law.
Federal criminal juries consist of 12 persons. Federal civil juries consist of six persons. plaintiff - The person who files the complaint in a civil lawsuit. plea - In a criminal case, the defendant's statement pleading "guilty" or "not guilty" in answer to the charges in open court.
bail - Security given for the release of a criminal defendant or witness from legal custody (usually in the form of money) to secure his/her appearance on the day and time appointed.
A. acquittal - Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. affidavit - A written statement of facts confirmed by the oath of the party making it. Affidavits must be notarized or administered by an officer of the court with such authority.
appellate - About appeals; an appellate court has the power to review the judgment of another lower court or tribunal. arraignment - A proceeding in which an individual who is accused of committing a crime is brought into court, told of the charges, and asked to plead guilty or not guilty.
charge to the jury - The judge's instructions to the jury concerning the law that applies to the facts of the case on trial. chief judge - The judge who has primary responsibility for the administration of a court. The chief judge also decides cases, and the choice of chief judges is determined by seniority.
Victims and the Court Process – Frequently Asked Questions. As a victim or witness, your role is critical. You have seen, heard, know or experienced something that is important to the investigation of a case. If you have been the victim or witness of a crime, the first step in the criminal justice process is to immediately report ...
The defense attorney has the right in a criminal case to interview all witnesses. You have the choice of whether you want to speak with him/her. If you would feel more comfortable having the Assistant State’s Attorney or advocate that is assigned to your case present at the interview, let them know that.
Sometimes additional investigation may occur throughout the pretrial phase. There may be plea negotiations between the State and defense during the pretrial phase. If the case is not resolved with a plea, the case will most often proceed to trial.
A trial is held to determine if the prosecution can show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant committed the crimes he or she is accused of. In a jury trial, 12 citizens from the County area determine whether a defendant is found guilty or not guilty. In a bench trial, a judge will make that decision.
A subpoena is an order requiring the person named on it to appear in court. The subpoena will tell you when and where to appear and will have a telephone number on it should you have any questions. If your name, address or telephone number should change, notify the State’s Attorney’s Office immediately. Failure to abide by the subpoena may result ...
If charges are filed and the accused person is arrested, he or she will soon appear in court. The Judge will set bond, any conditions of bond and advise the defendant of the charges against him. The court considers several things when determining bond for the accused:
If you have been the victim or witness of a crime, the first step in the criminal justice process is to immediately report the crime to your local police or sheriff’s department. The police will ask you questions regarding the incident and will then prepare a police report. Tell the police exactly what happened: date, time, place, ...
A victim has a right to be heard by making oral or written statements to the court. In most (if not all) states, victims have the right to be heard at sentencing. Sometimes called a "victim impact statement," it offers victims a chance to tell the judge and defendant how the crime impacted their lives.
Crime Victims' Rights to Notice and Information. Although it might seem obvious, the most basic and essential right is providing victims "notice of their rights .". Typically, law enforcement, victim services, or a prosecutor's office automatically provides this initial notification of rights to victims.
Most states require victims to be notified when an offender will be released from jail ( bail, probation) or from prison (supervised release, parole, or clemency) or if the offender escapes from confinement.
But even once the crime is over, crime victims face a daunting and long road ahead as the case winds its way through the criminal justice system. To assist victims and their families, states enacted crime victims' rights laws to protect victims who are stuck in the system through no fault of their own.
Right to a Prompt Resolution (or Speedy Trial) Several state laws provide victims the right to have the criminal case proceed in a reasonably timely manner. These laws usually limit the continuances and delays that a court can allow in a criminal case.
Many notice provisions aim to ensure victims know when criminal proceedings are taking place so they can avail themselves of other rights , such as the right to be present and heard at trial and sentencing (discussed below).
Many notice provisions aim to ensure victims know when criminal proceedings are taking place so they can avail themselves of other rights, such as the right to be present and heard at trial and sentencing (discussed below).
For those who are victims of a crime, it can often feel like the criminal justice system is leaving them behind when it comes to addressing their needs and desires for the outcome of their case . Many victims don’t realize that only the defendant will be provided with an attorney if necessary, ...
One of the most frustrating aspects of a crime victim’s case is that the prosecutor will sometimes try and cut a deal with the defendant’s attorney to avoid going to trial. This frequently means the defendant will receive a less severe punishment than if they had gone to trial and been convicted.
Working with a private attorney means that crime victims will have a dedicated advocate to appear in court and object to any proposed plea deals.
Marsy’s Law (also known as the Victim’s Bill of Rights) states that: It is the unequivocal intention of the People of the State of California that all persons who suffer losses as a result of criminal activity shall have the right to seek and secure restitution from the persons convicted of the crimes causing the losses they suffer.
Civil cases are common when: A victim is injured by a drunk driver. A landlord provides inadequate security. A school or business fails to provide a safe environment for students or employees.
If a crime victim feels that their goals and desires are different that the prosecutor’s, they should consider hiring their own attorney. This can help with several factors in their case.
In our experience, few victims are told by the district attorney’s office that, under Marsy’s Law, victims are entitled to hire their own attorney to represent their interests in court.
The prohibition against leading questions on direct examination forces lawyers to ask non-suggestive questions instead. So, a prosecutor can't guide the testimony of a prosecution witness too much. The prosecutor has likely spoken to the witness before testimony begins and prepared him or her at least somewhat.
On direct examination, lawyers generally can't ask leading questions. A question is leading if it suggests the answer. For example, "You couldn't see very well, could you?" or, "Did you get to the scene at 8 p.m.?"
But, as long as they follow the rules of evidence, attorneys don't have to be cordial with opposing witnesses. Lawyers might want to restrain themselves somewhat when cross-examining witnesses for fear of coming across as a bully, but they sometimes determine that being aggressive is the best course of action.
Experienced attorneys ask questions to get a sense of how a juror will respond to the evidence and arguments in the case about to be tried. In most federal courts, lawyers submit questions to the judge, who will then question the potential jurors in open court. In state courts, however, lawyers are typically permitted to question ...
Similar personal experiences could cause a potential juror to ignore the judge’s instructions to decide the case based on the evidence and the law without “passion or prejudice.”. When a potential juror has had a life experience closely resembling the facts of the case, that person will likely be excused by the court.
Its primary purpose is to make sure that the jurors can listen fairly and impartially to the evidence and render a verdict in accordance with ...
The process of jury selection should result in a fair jury, though lawyers will often use the selection questions to make sure that jurors will be receptive to their theory of the case.
By using a peremptory challenge, a lawyer can dismiss a potential juror from the case without giving any reason to the judge.
If questionnaires are not used, lawyers or judges simply ask all of their questions in open court. Potential jurors may be questioned as a group or one at a time.
A “for cause” dismissal means the court has agreed with at least one lawyer’s argument about the unsuitability of a potential juror (or has reached this conclusion on its own). A lawyer can raise an unlimited number of “for cause” challenges during jury selection.
As part of their trial strategy, lawyers will call their witnesses in an order that’s most helpful for convincing the jury of the guilt or innocence of the defendant. However, the judge has the ultimate say over when witnesses testify.
Criminal defendants have the right under the Sixth Amendment’s “confrontation clause” to be present when witnesses are testifying against them and to cross-examine those witnesses. There may be exceptions, however, when witnesses aren’t available to testify at trial. Depending on the circumstances, certain types of reliable statements from unavailable witnesses might be admitted as evidence, such as previous testimony at a preliminary hearing or deposition where the defendant’s attorney was able to question the witness.
Before the trial, as part of the evidence-sharing process known as “ discovery ,” defendants are normally entitled to receive the names and statements of the witnesses that the prosecution plans to call (although prosecutors may not always have to reveal the names of confidential informants). Defendants also have a right to any information that prosecutors have about the identity or whereabouts of other witnesses who might be able to provide relevant testimony for the defense.
Criminal trials follow the same basic order. Following opening statements, the prosecution presents its evidence, including its witnesses. For each witness, there may be two or more steps to the testimony: 1 Direct examination. First, the prosecutor will ask questions intended to bring out the witness’s story. 2 Cross-examination. The defendant’s lawyer will then question the witness in an effort to discredit or at least shed doubt on the testimony. Generally, questions should address matters covered during the direct examination, but the attorney may also ask questions related to the witness’s credibility. 3 Redirect and recross examination. After the cross-examination, the prosecutor may ask the witness more questions, usually to clarify parts of the testimony or address issues that came up during the cross. Then, the defense attorney also has another chance at further questioning, usually to discuss new subjects discussed during the redirect.
That personal knowledge is one reason witness testimony can be so persuasive to juries. Sometimes, witness testimony is the only evidence that places the defendant at (or far from) the crime scene. Other times, witnesses provide the context that supports or undermines other evidence. Either way, there are general rules for how ...
After the cross-examination, the prosecutor may ask the witness more questions, usually to clarify parts of the testimony or address issues that came up during the cross. Then, the defense attorney also has another chance at further questioning, usually to discuss new subjects discussed during the redirect.
Cross-examination. The defendant’s lawyer will then question the witness in an effort to discredit or at least shed doubt on the testimony. Generally, questions should address matters covered during the direct examination, but the attorney may also ask questions related to the witness’s credibility.