Jun 20, 2020 · Men’s Rights Lawyers Free Consultation When you need legal help with child custody, divorce, separation, and family law for men, please call Ascent Law LLC for your free consultation (801) 676-5506. We want to help you. Ascent Law LLC 8833 S. Redwood Road, Suite C West Jordan, Utah 84088 United States Telephone: (801) 676-5506 Ascent Law LLC
By understanding the basic history of divorce in the United States, and having an in-depth knowledge and experience of the biases against men in family law courts, father’s rights attorneys are able to give men more than just a fighting chance at obtaining equality in the eyes of the law. While many states specifically have outlawed the use of the “Tender Years Doctrine” …
Men have all of the rights that women have including the right to. custody and visitation of their children, a fair distribution of assets, fair distribution of. all debts, maintenance and child support. The problem lies in the factual reality that most men are the primary breadwinners, and most women have been the primary caretakers of the ...
Sep 06, 2018 · The National Coalition for Men, a men’s rights organization based in Southern California, has formed the beginnings of an all-volunteer law firm seeking to change legal systems that it claims are...
Don’t be fooled – a man can lose his house, his income, and his children in a divorce for a variety of reasons without the proper knowledge of the...
Men have always had a difficult time obtaining certain rights when going through a divorce because of the outdated divorce laws that were written a...
Why is this important to know and understand? Because of the way the laws have been written decades ago (and in many instances, with few updates),...
Originally, every state in the U.S. had a series of individual “grounds”, or reasons, why a divorce could be granted. These reasons needed to be pr...
In fact, numerous studies have been completed by the government’s National Center for Health Statistics that show that, as early as the 1980’s, wom...
By understanding the basic history of divorce in the United States, and having an in-depth knowledge and experience of the biases against men in fa...
Because men have historically been treated with an unfair bias against them in family court, it is essential to have an experienced divorce lawyer for men counsel and guide males through the process. When men begin thinking about how their lives will be affected when a divorce appears imminent, it is important to understand the history ...
Originally, every state in the U.S. had a series of individual “ grounds ”, or reasons, why a divorce could be granted. These reasons needed to be proven in court with witnesses, evidence, and testimony for the judge to grant a divorce. The most common “grounds” for divorce were: 1 Adultery; 2 Incurable Insanity; 3 Chronic Alcoholism; 4 Mental or Physical Abuse; 5 Abandonment for greater than 1-year; or 6 Commission of a Felony.
The most common “grounds” for divorce were: Commission of a Felony. This all changed in the 1960’s when California began the process of allowing “no-fault” divorces, starting a trend that many other states soon followed (many states now only allow no-fault divorces even!).
This doctrine presumed that a mother was the better caregiver of the children of the marriage, especially for children age 7 or younger.
Don’t be fooled – a man can lose his house, his income, and his children in a divorce for a variety of reasons without the proper knowledge of the laws and rules that apply against them in divorce court. Because men have historically been treated with an unfair bias against them in family court, it is essential to have an experienced divorce lawyer for men counsel and guide males through the process. When men begin thinking about how their lives will be affected when a divorce appears imminent, it is important to understand the history of how men and women have been treated differently in terms of marital property, custody of their children, and the divorce process in general. These biases have changed over the years but there is still an uphill battle to climb for equal rights in a divorce for a man.
Men's and fathers' rights groups interest in "paternity fraud" or mistaken paternity falls into two main categories: men who are compelled to provide financial support for a child that has been proven by DNA testing not to be their biological offspring, and men who have been led to believe that the children they are raising are their own, and have subsequently discovered otherwise. They hold biological views of fatherhood, emphasizing the imperative of the genetic foundation of paternity rather than social aspects of fatherhood. They state that men should not be forced to support children fathered by another man, and that men are harmed because a relationship is created between a man and non-biological children while denying the children and their biological father of that experience and knowledge of their genetic history. In addition, they say non-biological fathers are denied the resources to have their own biological children in another relationship.
The term "men's rights" was used at least as early as February 1856 when it appeared in Putnam's Magazine. The author was responding to the issue of women's rights, calling it a "new movement for social reform, and even for political revolution", which the author proposed to counter with men's rights.
The men's rights movement ( MRM) is a branch of the men's movement. The MRM in particular consists of a variety of groups and individuals who focus on general social issues and specific government services which adversely impact, or in some cases structurally discriminate against, men and boys.
He proposes that women be legally required to make every reasonable effort to notify the father of her pregnancy within four to five days. In response, philosopher James P. Sterba agrees that, for moral reasons, a woman should inform the father of the pregnancy and adoption, but this should not be imposed as a legal requirement as it might result in undue pressure, for example, to have an abortion.
Karen DeCrow was an American attorney, author, and activist and feminist, who served as president of the National Organization for Women from 1974 to 1977, She was also a strong supporter of equal rights for men in child custody decisions, arguing for a "rebuttable presumption" of shared custody after divorce. She also asserted that men as well as women should be allowed the decision not to become a parent, and was an avid supporter of father's rights movements, and argued that domestic violence is a "two-way street." As a result, DeCrow found she was "increasingly at odds with the organization she had once led, though she never broke with it."
The modern men's rights movement emerged from the men's liberation movement, which appeared in the first half of the 1970s when scholars began to study feminist ideas and politics. The men's liberation movement acknowledged men's institutionalized power while critically examining the consequences of hegemonic masculinity. In the late 1970s, the men's liberation movement split into two separate strands with opposing views: the pro-feminist men's movement and the anti-feminist men's rights movement. Men's rights activists have rejected feminist principles and focused on areas in which they believe men are disadvantaged, oppressed, or discriminated against. Masculinities studies scholar Michael Kimmel states that their critiques of gender roles 'morphed into a celebration of all things masculine and a near infatuation with the traditional masculine role itself.' In the 1980s and 1990s, men's rights activists opposed societal changes sought by feminists and defended the patriarchal gender order in the family, schools and the workplace.
Marc Angelucci was an American attorney, men's rights activist, and the vice-president of the National Coalition for Men (NCFM). As a lawyer, he represented several cases related to men's rights issues, most prominently National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System, in which the federal judge declared the male-only selective-service system unconstitutional, and Woods v. Horton, which ruled that the California State Legislature had unconstitutionally excluded men from domestic violence victim protection programs.
The down economy, which by all accounts has hit men hardest, continues to boost MRA recruitment and sympathy. Dan Moore, the publisher of Menz magazine , has been active in the movement for nearly 20 years. He’s “bullish” on the immediate prospects of social change.
The Men’s Rights Movement (MRM) is a growing and disproportionately vocal group that believes Western culture and its institutions are contemptuous of men. Men and boys, they argue, are systematically disenfranchised and discriminated against by feminists and their allies. Once dismissed as the looniest and fringiest of the lunatic fringe, ...
MRAs believe Western culture is feminist culture, and that culture, whatever you call it, is oppressive toward men.
The self-proclaimed “anti-feminist lawyer” Roy Den Hollander positioned himself as a key figure in “men’s rights activism,” a movement animated by grievances that men are ceding their rights to feminism writ large.
Investigators are also looking into whether Den Hollander was behind the fatal shooting of lawyer Marc Angelucci, vice president and board member of the National Coalition for Men and the founder of the National Coalition for Men Los Angeles chapter, at his Crestline, California, home on July 11, the Los Angeles Times reported Tuesday.
In Canada, Marc Lépine, a 25-year-old Montreal man, killed 14 women in 1989 at École Polytechnique, an engineering school, because he said he was motivated by "fighting feminism.". Police found Den Hollander's body hours after the shooting at the Salas home.
Den Hollander, 72, died this week from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound after a shooting at U.S. District Judge Esther Salas’ home left her son dead and her husband in critical condition. Den Hollander, who once described Salas as “a lazy and incompetent Latina judge," is suspected of carrying out the shooting.
What exactly is a lawyer? A lawyer (also called attorney, counsel, or counselor) is a licensed professional who advises and represents others in legal matters. Today’s lawyer can be young or old, male or female.
In some countries, a lawyer is called a “barrister” or a “solicitor.”.
Before being allowed to practice law in most states, a person must: Have a bachelor’s degree or its equivalent. Complete three years at an ABA-accredited law school. Pass a state bar examination, which usually lasts for two or three days. The exam tests knowledge in selected areas of law.
Not automatically. To become licensed in more than one state, a lawyer must usually comply with each state’s bar admission requirements. Some states, however, permit licensed out-of-state lawyers to practice law if they have done so in another state for several years and the new state’s highest court approves them. Many states also have provisions for lawyers to participate in specific cases in states where they are not licensed. The lawyer in such a case is said to be appearing pro hoc vice, which means “for this one particular occasion.”
Not necessarily – you may represent yourself. And, in some specialized situations, such as bringing a complaint before a government agency (for example, a dispute over Social Security or Medicare benefits), nonlawyers or paralegals may be qualified to represent you. (Paralegals are nonlawyers who have received training that enables them to assist lawyers in a number of tasks; they typically cannot represent clients in court.) If you are in this situation, ask the government agency involved what types of legal representatives are acceptable.#N#There are many matters you can deal with yourself, if you know how to go about it. For example, you can represent yourself in traffic or small-claims court, or engage in negotiations and enter into contracts on your own. But if you are not sure about the consequences of your actions or are uncertain about how to proceed, getting some quick legal advice from a lawyer could be very helpful in preventing problems down the road.
Most lawyers normally spend more time in an office than in a courtroom. The practice of law most often involves researching legal developments, investigating facts, writing and preparing legal documents, giving advice, and settling disputes.
These words and phrases, many rooted in Latin, are often jokingly referred to as a foreign language—legalese. Although some legalese may be necessary in order to communicate certain ideas precisely, a document that is understood by very few of its readers is just plain poor communication.
The men's rights movement (MRM) is a branch of the men's movement. The MRM in particular consists of a variety of groups and individuals (men's rights activists or MRAs) who focus on general social issues and specific government services which adversely impact, or in some cases structurally discriminate against, men and boys. Common topics discussed within the men's rights movement include family law (such as child custody, alimonyand marital property distribution), re…
Most men's rights activists in the United States are white, middle-class, heterosexual men. Prominent advocates include Warren Farrell, Herb Goldberg, Richard Doyle, and Asa Baber. Several women have emerged as leading voices of the MRM, including Helen Smith, Christina Hoff Sommers, Bettina Arndt, and Erin Pizzey.
Karen DeCrow was an Americanattorney, author, and activist and feminist, who served as preside…
Many authors have characterized the men's rights movement as misogynistic. The Southern Poverty Law Centerhas stated that while some of the websites, blogs and forums related to the movement "voice legitimate and sometimes disturbing complaints about the treatment of men, what is most remarkable is the misogynistic tone that pervades so many." After further research into the movement, the SPLC elaborated: "A thinly veiled desire for the domination of women an…
• Anti-feminism
• Fathers' rights movement by country
• Honey badger (men's rights)
• Masculism
• Men's rights movement in India
• Arndt, Bettina (2019). #MenToo. Wilkinson. ISBN 978-1-925642-65-0.
• Baumeister, R.F. (2010). Is There Anything Good About Men?: How Cultures Flourish by Exploiting Men. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-537410-0.
• Coston, Bethany M.; Kimmel, Michael (2013). "White Men as the New Victims: Reverse Discrimination Cases and the Men's Rights Movement". Nevada Law Journal. 13 (2): 368–385.