what if a criminal defense lawyer does not like a judge who will sit on his case

Why won’t my criminal defense attorney talk to me about my case?

Most (but not all) criminal defense attorneys want their clients to tell them everything—the good, the bad, and the ugly—because an attorney cannot defend against what he or she does not know. Some attorneys, however, do not want to talk to their clients about the case because they do not want to be limited in pursuing a defense.

Can a defense lawyer lie to a judge at trial?

However, the defense lawyer may not lie to the judge or jury by specifically stating that the defendant did not do something the lawyer knows the defendant did do. Rather the lawyer’s trial tactics and arguments focus on the government’s failure to prove all the elements of the crime.

Can a defense attorney represent the innocent in a criminal case?

Yes. Defense attorneys are ethically bound to zealously represent all clients, the guilty as well as the innocent.

Do I need a lawyer for my criminal defense attorney?

What is clear is that being represented by a lawyer is almost always the best option. Nevertheless, some criminal defendants represent themselves. The decision of whether a defendant can self-represent is ultimately made by the judge, not the defendant.

What is it called when a lawyer doesn't do his job?

Legal malpractice is a type of negligence in which a lawyer does harm to his or her client. Typically, this concerns lawyers acting in their own interests, lawyers breaching their contract with the client, and, one of the most common cases of legal malpractice, is when lawyers fail to act on time for clients.

Do defense lawyers distort the truth?

While it is true that defense lawyers occasionally distort the truth, it is also true that prosecutors are equally guilty of sometimes misrepresenting the truth to win a case. Most defense and prosecutorial misconduct is an unfortunate byproduct of the adversarial process.

Do defense attorneys lie?

There are standards in place to keep lawyers honest: they cannot lie if they do know information pertaining to their client's legal guilt, and they also cannot offer evidence they know is false. But attorney-client privilege does protect communication between attorneys and clients.

What is exculpatory evidence?

Evidence, such as a statement, tending to excuse, justify, or absolve the alleged fault or guilt of a defendant.

What happens if a lawyer lies to a judge?

If a lawyer lies to the Judge about something that is within his own knowledge -- such as something the lawyer did or didn't do during the lawsuit, then he can be suspended or disbarred. However, it's important to distinguish what you mean by a "lawyer lying" from examples when a lawyer is not really lying.

Do lawyers lie to their clients?

In California, the Rules of Professional Conduct govern a lawyer's ethical duties. The law prohibits lawyers from engaging in dishonesty.

How do you spot a liar in court?

First of all, liars have difficulty maintaining eye contact with the person asking the questions. If the witness looks up at the ceiling while thinking of an answer, or looks down at the floor, they are liying every time. When a witness covers his mouth with his hand, he is about to lie.

What happens if a lawyer loses a case?

If the attorney loses the case, the client is still responsible for legal fees as stipulated in the original retainer contract. Some attorneys may agree to withhold billing until the end of a case, but they will still expect payment regardless of how the case ends.

What if a lawyer knows client is guilty?

If a lawyer knows their client is guilty, it really shouldn't change anything. They will act in the interest of society as well (to a certain extent): Ensure the client has adequate legal representation in court, and is subject to a fair trial.

What is the Brady Rule?

The Brady rule, named after Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), requires prosecutors to disclose materially exculpatory evidence in the government's possession to the defense.

What kind of evidence tends to prove a defendant's innocence?

Exculpatory evidence is evidence favorable to the defendant in a criminal trial that exonerates or tends to exonerate the defendant of guilt.

What is the Giglio rule?

In the 1963 Brady v. Maryland case, the Supreme Court held that prosecutors must disclose any exculpatory evidence to the accused material to his guilt or punishment. Subsequently, in the 1972 Giglio v.

What to do if you question a ruling in court?

If you question a ruling against you within court, you may ask the court's permission to brief any issue before a ruling is handed down.

How will the error affect the case outcome?

How will the error affect the case's outcome? If a ruling is in doubt, it's best to err on the side of caution: assume every ruling will have an impact on every aspect of the case, from discovery boundaries to use of expert witnesses or the manner in which evidence will be presented at trial.

What is permission to appeal?

(1) To request permission to appeal when an appeal is within the court of appeals' discretion, a party must file a petition for permission to appeal. The petition must be filed with the circuit clerk with proof of service on all other parties to the district-court action.

How many pages are required for a court order?

Except by the court's permission, a paper must not exceed 20 pages, exclusive of the disclosure statement, the proof of service, and the accompanying documents required by Rule 5 (b) (1) (E).

Can a judge's misunderstanding be remedied?

Unfortunately, there are times when a judge's misunderstanding or misapplication of the law is material but the issue cannot be remedied via a later appeal. In these circumstances, the rules provide for an interlocutory appeal. Interlocutory appeal is a tool that circumvents waiting for the final decision of the district court, ...

What happens if a judge is biased?

If a judge is biased or prejudiced for or against a party or attorney, he cannot be fair and impartial in deciding the case. A party or attorney who believes such bias or prejudice exists must prove it with admissible evidence, and cannot base this belief on mere suspicion.

What is a judge's relationship with a party?

Judge's Relationship to a Party or Attorney. A judge's fairness and impartiality may be compromised when he or she has had a business or professional relationship with a party or attorney. In cases where the judge was a party's business partner or attorney, as well as in cases where the judge was a member of a law firm representing a party, ...

What is the principle of the American judiciary?

One of the key principles of the American judicial system is that the judge who presides over a case must be fair and impartial. In the vast majority of cases, the issue of the judge's fairness and impartiality never comes up. There are instances, however, when one of the parties in a civil case has reason to believe that ...

Can a judge be impartial?

Even a judge who is not serving as the finder of fact (i.e., when the case is to be decided by a jury) cannot be fair and impartial if he or she has personal knowledge of disputed facts, because the judge's evidentiary rulings (in pleadings and motions made by the parties) may be influenced by that knowledge.

Can a judge recuse himself?

In those situations, the judge will either recuse himself or the litigant will move to have the judge disqualified from presiding over the case. Let's look at some of the circumstances that may lead to a judge's recusal or disqualification.

What does a defense lawyer do?

Defense counsel also provide more personal services by giving the defendant a reality check as to the possible outcomes and by helping the defendant to deal with the frustrations and fears resulting from being thrown into the criminal justice system. And of course, if no plea deal can be made, the defense lawyer represents the defendant at trial.

What is a defense attorney?

Within the complex criminal justice system, a defense attorney serves as the defendant's guide, protector, and confidant. (At least that's how it's supposed to be.) Defense attorneys are usually grouped in two camps: court-appointed attorneys paid by the government and private attorneys paid by the defendant. ...

What is a court appointed attorney?

These court-appointed attorneys are either public defenders who are on government salary, or they are so-called "panel attorneys," local attorneys chosen from a panel. A small fraction of criminal defendants (approximately two percent) represent themselves and are referred to as "pro se" or "pro per" defendants.

Is a private attorney a defender?

Many private attorneys are former prosecutors or public defenders. Based on studies that evaluate the outcomes of having a private versus court-appointed attorney, data seems to indicate that the results for defendants are often the same.

Who determines the competency of a defendant?

The judge is required to determine the defendant's competency. That's because a defendant who cannot provide a competent defense cannot get a fair shake, even if the defendant is adamant about not accepting the services of a court-appointed attorney.

Can a defendant represent themselves?

What is clear is that being represented by a lawyer is almost always the best option. Nevertheless, some criminal defendants represent themselves. The decision of whether a defendant can self-represent is ultimately made by the judge, not the defendant. The judge is required to determine the defendant's competency. That's because a defendant who cannot provide a competent defense cannot get a fair shake, even if the defendant is adamant about not accepting the services of a court-appointed attorney. When determining whether a defendant can go pro se, a judge will consider factors such as:

Why do criminal defense attorneys not want to talk to their clients?

Some attorneys, however, do not want to talk to their clients about the case because they do not want to be limited in pursuing a defense. ...

Why is a defense attorney not a lesser representation?

A defense attorney will not offer lesser representation simply because he or she believes the client has committed a crime. The attorney's concern is whether there is sufficient evidence to prove that you committed the crime. It is not the role of the criminal defense attorney to decide if the client is innocent or guilty.

Why do attorneys assume that their clients are guilty?

Some attorneys say that they just assume that all their clients are guilty because it helps them critically evaluate the case and decide how to present the best defense. If they allow themselves to believe that their client is innocent, they might miss out on a more compelling argument.

What is the ethical standard for the American justice system?

That is a high standard, but our legal system is founded on the principle that it is better to let a guilty person go free than to wrongly convict an innocent person.

What is the focus of a criminal trial?

The focus of a criminal trial is whether the prosecutor can prove that you committed the charged crime. Your defense attorney's job is to fight for you, protect your constitutional rights, and try to show that the prosecutor's proof is lacking—no matter what your attorney's personal view of the facts may be.

What to do if you are charged with a crime?

If you are charged with or accused of committing a crime, talk to a lawyer. Your lawyer is there to fight for you.

Can an attorney argue that you did not commit a crime?

You admit to your attorney that you were smoking a joint with a group of friends. Your attorney cannot argue that you did not commit the crime. But, the attorney can argue that the prosecutor has not proved that you committed the crime.

Why do defense attorneys use peremptories?

Convinced that the juror would not be fair , the defense attorney uses one of his peremptories to excuse her. Another theory for the use of peremptories is that by letting each side dispense with the most unacceptable members of the jury, it results in a more middle-of-the road jury, one not subject to extreme views.

Why do lawyers not use peremptory?

Although lawyers don’t have to give a reason for using a peremptory, they may not use them in order to rid the jury of people of a certain race, religion, gender, or other protected status. If a pattern begins to emerge—the prosecutor excuses every Black juror but no White members—the judge will intervene.

What is the crowd of people who show up at the courthouse with jury summons in hand called?

The crowd of people who show up at the courthouse with jury summons in hand are known as “venirepersons, ” which means that they are potential jurors (the group is called “the venire").

Why are Venirepersons excused?

Venirepersons will be excused if they indicate that they will not convict in view of the sentence that might result. Such sentiments surface in drug use cases, for example, where some people feel quite strongly that personal use of illegal drugs should result in treatment, not incarceration.

What are personal experiences that might affect the person's ability to judge the case?

Personal experiences that might affect the person’s ability to judge the case. While a venireperson’s experience with the subject matter of the case might make that person an informed juror, it might also make him a biased one. For instance, someone who has himself been the victim of a similar crime might be prone to project his trauma onto ...

Why are notorious trials moved away from the city?

This is one reason why notorious trials are moved away from the city in which the crime allegedly occurred, in hopes that people living elsewhere may not have been exposed to such fare.

Do criminal defendants have to answer jury summons?

Criminal defendants are entitled to a jury of their peers. Those jurors are practically drafted, called as a result of having registered to vote or after obtaining a drivers’ license. Failing to answer or lying on a jury summons is a crime, and "getting out of jury duty" is no easy task. Yet all courts provide for the questioning ...

Why should a defendant tell their defense attorney the truth?

If, for example, a defendant is charged with armed robbery, and the defendant tells his attorney that , yes, he did rob the store, but not with any weapon, this could reduce the charge to simple robbery, a much less serious crime in terms of potential jail time.

How to defend a case against a defendant?

In many situations, defense attorneys will: 1 Use mock-interviews in order to get defendants to commit the defense theory to memory, 2 Bring defendants to important crime scenes in order to stimulate memories, and 3 Get defendants to write down the version of events as seen from their own point of view.

What is a criminal defense strategy?

A criminal defense strategy for your criminal prosecution will emerge as your criminal defense attorney finds out more about what the prosecutor plans to do in your case. If a prosecutor lays out a story that has the defendant at the scene of the crime, the defense attorney will probably ask questions that may lay out a different story showing ...

Why do defense attorneys use mock interviews?

In many situations, defense attorneys will: Use mock-interviews in order to get defendants to commit the defense theory to memory, Bring defendants to important crime scenes in order to stimulate memories , and. Get defendants to write down the version of events as seen from their own point of view.

What happens after a criminal tells their story to their lawyer?

After the criminal defendant tells their story to their criminal defense attorney, they will probably collaborate to come up with a strategy that will work best. Coming up with a defense strategy isn't as simple as telling the truth in a way that shows the defendant's innocence or lessened legal culpability.

Can two defendants come up with the same story?

It's almost impossible for two defendants to come up with the exact same version of the events that took place during the crime. Generally speaking, a defendant's story will fall into one of three categories:

Can a prosecutor and a defense attorney come up with the same facts?

A prosecutor and a defense attorney can both use the same foundation of factual events and come up with two completely different stories. Think of this in the way that you would think of a map of the United States. In one map, you have the states depicted in their geographic areas with the state borders in dark lines.

Why is the defendant lying?

Just because the defendant says he did it doesn’t make it so. The defendant may be lying to take the rap for someone he wants to protect, or may be guilty, but guilty of a different and lesser crime than the one being prosecuted by the district attorney.

What does it mean to be a guilty client?

Defendant a guilty client may mean committing professional suicide. Criminal defense attorneys may vigorously defend guilty clients, but as a couple of examples make clear, they risk committing professional suicide by doing so.

Who was the British barrister who defended Courvoisier?

Way back in 1840, Charles Phillips, one of the finest British barristers of his era, defended Benjamin Courvoisier against a charge that Courvoisier brutally murdered his employer, wealthy man-about-town Lord Russell. Courvoisier privately confessed to Phillips that he was guilty.

Do defense lawyers ask if they committed a crime?

For these reasons, among others, many defense lawyers never ask their clients if they committed the crime. Instead, the lawyer uses the facts to put on the best defense possible and leaves the question of guilt to the judge or jury.

Who said "I'd give the Devil the benefit of law for mine own safety's sake"?

Perhaps no one has ever put the duty as eloquently as Henry VIII’s soon-to-be-beheaded ex-Chancellor Sir Thomas More, who, before going to the scaffold, insisted, “I’d give the devil the benefit of law, for mine own safety’s sake.”.

Did Feldman know that Westerfield was guilty?

Feldman knew privately that Westerfield was guilty. Nevertheless, at trial Feldman aggressively attacked Danielle’s parents. He offered evidence that they frequently invited strangers into their home for sex orgies, and suggested that one of the strangers could have been the killer.