Short answer is Yes. However, it is almost always inadvisable to do so. Two people can waive any and all conflicts and, thus, retain one lawyer to represent them. They also have the right to negotiate any fee they want. My experience still suggests strongly that each person should have his/her own attorney, particularly in major felony cases.
# Everything is possible (Lawyers from same legal firm can argue for both the parties) but people do not want. # So whatever people want becomes a practice in any field. Can you consult with another attorney if you already have an attorney? Yes, especially if your current attorney always has alcohol on his breath. Can I hire two attorneys?
If you have been wondering, when can a divorcing couple use the same lawyer?, well usually, one divorce attorney cannot work with both clients. However there is an exception to the rule. Joint representation is permitted when:
In the American system, it is fairly common for a client to hire multiple firms to handle the same case, and there is nothing impermissible about this practice. When a client has multiple, distinct cases, hiring two or more firms is not just permitted, but may be the smartest thing to do or even required.
If attorneys have multiple clients in the same matter, they must disclose the existence of any current or potential conflicts, and where possible and proper, obtain waivers of such conflicts in compliance with the applicable rules of professional responsibility.
You can sue more than one defendant for the same incident or contract. But each defendant must have some actual interest in the subject of your case and must be (at least arguably) responsible somehow for your injury.
Thus, a lawyer related to another lawyer, e.g., as parent, child, sibling or spouse, ordinarily may not represent a client in a matter where that lawyer is representing another party, unless each client gives informed consent.
The California Rules generally permit a lawyer to represent multiple clients with conflicting interests so long as all the clients have provided their informed written consent.
It may be possible for you to sue for emotional distress, depending on your situation. The main factor that will mean you can make a claim is whether someone's negligence caused the harm you first suffered. This could be because you were hurt in an accident that was someone else's fault.
The court may order the sale of assets to pay a judgment against them. Their wages may also be garnished until the judgment is paid. It can be difficult to enforce these methods though, and they are often time-consuming.
Ultimately, it isn't uncommon for attorneys in the community to have a friendly relationship. Don't be afraid if you even see the attorneys partake in some light banter back and forth.
At present, only solicitors and barristers can represent other people in court. This means that, without leave of the court, you cannot speak for a friend in court, except as a character witness. However, as it can make their job easier, many magistrates and judges will grant such 'leave'.
A difference between the laws of two or more jurisdictions with some connection to a case, such that the outcome depends on which jurisdiction's law will be used to resolve each issue in dispute. The conflicting legal rules may come from U.S. federal law, the laws of U.S. states, or the laws of other countries.
Under the Act, a public official has a disqualifying conflict of interest in a governmental decision if it is foreseeable that the decision will have a financial impact on his or her personal finances or other financial interests.
There are two different sets of circumstances which may constitute a concurrent conflict of interest. One is when the representation of one client would be directly adverse to the other client. [4] This occurs when the interests of one client requires the lawyer to act against the interest of his other client.
A conflict of interest exists if a legislator has any interest or engages in any business, transaction, or professional activity, or incurs any obligation, which is in substantial conflict with the proper discharge of his or her duties in the public interest.
Short answer is Yes. However, it is almost always inadvisable to do so. Two people can waive any and all conflicts and, thus, retain one lawyer to represent them. They also have the right to negotiate any fee they want. My experience still suggests strongly that each person should have his/her own attorney, particularly in major felony cases.#N#More
So long as there is no potential conflict of interest involved, an attorney can represent two different parties in either a criminal or civil case. As for the fee issue, that is something you need to work out with the criminal defense attorney.#N#More
In fact, most won’t and the court won’t want them to because that would create a new conflict of interest.
Even if your divorce is uncontested, meaning you and your spouse agree on all the important terms and conditions, you are still both technically on opposing sides of the courtroom.
You cannot go into court both sharing one attorney, but what if you don’t rely on the courtroom to settle your disagreements? If you decide to use mediation and come up with a divorce agreement in a conference room instead of a courtroom, you are looking at an entirely different legal situation than before. During mediation, you can use one attorney, but that lawyer isn’t representing you or your ex-spouse. Instead, the family lawyer overseeing your mediation acts as a neutral party that helps each but fights for neither.
Attorney Bettina Yanez is a recognized top Orange County Divorce & Family Law Attorney.
The right legal team is vital to the success of your case. Contact us today to schedule a FREE CONSULTATION with one of our Family Law Attorneys by calling (714) 971-8000 or by completing the form below. We'll respond to your inquiry promptly!
Mrs. Yanez is a very professional attorney. She is very versed in local and international law. She does a great job of letting you know your options and the best course of action to accomplish what needs to be done for whatever your situation is.
So in the end, the reason attorneys recommend settling, is because it is more likely to final, to end stress, stop burning time and cash that could go to more productive things in the client’s life.
First of all, if an attorney promises a particular outcome, find another attorney. There are typically too many other people involved, each having his/her own opinion of a matter, for one person to guarantee an outcome. (And the rare attorney that always wins is smart enough to never make such a promise.)
Honesty is important: it is common to have conversations with the client in which you discuss weaknesses in the case and what may realistically be achieved , and so long as you as a lawyer are honest about expectations, there's nothing wrong with taking a non-frivolous case you believe to be an uphill battle.
In criminal cases, while it’s not technically disallowed for a lawyer to represent two clients at the same time in a criminal case, potential conflict of interest is asking for a lot of trouble.
It is generally not more profitable to the attorney to settle out of court, in fact it is often less profitable. However, most attorneys actually put their client’s welfare ahead of pure profit. To understand why that is a good idea using game theory, you need to distinguish finite vs. infinite games.
A lawyer can still provide outstanding representation by achieving a result that is better than the client has any objective right to expect, even if that result isn't total victory. For example, in a case where a client has $20 million in legitimate exp. Continue Reading. No.
Two POAs on One Person. Can one person legally have two different POAs in effect giving two different people the power of attorney? The answer is yes. You can have two POAs in effect giving the power of attorney to two different people.
For example, you could have one POA that covers financial matters and another that covers contractual negotiations. If you have agents who are strong in those areas, then separate POAs might actually be a good idea. Instead of revoking a POA, you may want to look into amending your POAs to work to your benefit.
If power of attorney co-agents disagree on a financial decision and the principal is mentally competent and not physically incapacitated, then the principal’s decision supersedes the representatives. The principal also has the authority to revoke an agent’s authority.
The principal is the individual who appoints a power of attorney. Another way to think of the principal is as the person a power of attorney is making the decisions for. A competent principal is still coherent and mentally able to make his or her own decisions. If power of attorney co-agents disagree on a financial decision and ...
The simplest option is to not give two people power of attorney. Or, if you must appoint two people, name one as the primary representative and the other as the secondary representative in case the primary becomes incapacitated. If you’re still concerned about the decisions of the primary representative, then you probably need to take another look ...
Naturally, it may seem like a good idea to spread that authority to more than one person. You decide to name your two daughters as co-agents for power of attorney; they can share the burden.
If two people are named as co-agents on a durable power of attorney and they are faced with a financial or health care decision that they can’t agree on, then the co-agents can petition the court to decide. In most case, this will be the probate court. The court will attempt to discern the principal’s wishes through any estate planning documents ...