The Golden Rule is the general principle that a solicitor making a will on behalf of a client, who suspects that their client might not have testamentary capacity, should ensure that a medical professional conducts an examination of the testator before they make their will.
Full Answer
Attorneys representing a client with diminished capacity should constantly evaluate whether the client is capable of acting in his or her own interest, and adjust representation accordingly. We are in a position to help people who trust us and seek us out for advice regardless of a particular client’s mental or physical state.
Rule 1.14, a version of which has been adopted in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, states, “the lawyer shall, as far as reasonably possible, maintain a normal client-lawyer relationship with the client.” That, of course, may be easier said than done.
Lack of testamentary capacity often arises in cases where the testator suffered from dementia or Alzheimer’s disease. If the testator was sound of mind, but was under the influence of another person when the will was written, a claim for undue influence might be a more appropriate ground upon which to challenge the validity of a will.
If an attorney remains uncertain about a client’s mental state after a preliminary assessment, then the attorney may need to consult the help of a mental health professional. If an attorney does not discover a mental illness until after representation commences, the attorney should take steps to ensure the client’s interests have been preserved.
Testamentary capacity is perhaps the easiest to determine. It is simply a matter of does the client know who the natural objects of their bounty, the extent of their property, and the understanding that the will states how their property will be disposed of upon their death.
For example, raising the question of diminished capacity could, in some circumstances, lead to proceedings for involuntary commitment. Information relating to the representation is protected by Rule 1.6. Therefore, unless authorized to do so, the lawyer may not disclose such information.
However, there are three different types of capacity: legal capacity, mental capacity and physical capacity.
The law generally presumes that adults have capacity unless they have been adjudicated as incapacitated, for example, through guardianship or conservatorship. The definition of “diminished capacity” varies, depending on the transaction or nature of the decision.
Section 126 of the Act prohibits an attorney from disclosing attorney-client communications, without the express consent of the client. Therefore, the client may release the attorney from his or her obligation to maintain secrecy. However, in the absence of express consent, the attorney has a duty to maintain secrecy.
(a) A lawyer shall not reveal information protected from disclosure by Business and Professions Code section 6068, subdivision (e)(1) unless the client gives informed consent,* or the disclosure is permitted by paragraph (b) of this rule.
If proceedings are being contemplated, or if you are concerned your client has lost capacity during proceedings, you can apply to the court for a determination of whether the client lacks capacity to conduct the proceedings. The court may then order an assessment.
To decide whether you lack capacity, they then need to ask whether you are unable to make the decision because of a short-term or long-term condition, such as: an illness. the effects of medication. being unconscious.
If the person can't make a decision because they lack mental capacity, someone else might have to make the decision for them. This could be: a health and social care professional. someone legally appointed to make decisions about treatment, care and where they live, like a Power of Attorney.
The test for testamentary capacity in Banks v Goodfellow (1870), is that the testator: Must appreciate the nature and consequences of making a Will; Must understand the extent of his or her property; Should consider any moral claims to their estate; and.
Answering Your Questions about Assessing Mental CapacityWhen should we do it? Why? And How? And who should do it?Why should capacity sometimes be assessed?What is mental capacity?When should someone's capacity be assessed?How should we assess someone's capacity?Who should assess capacity?
When should capacity be assessed? You may need to assess capacity where a person is unable to make a particular decision at a particular time because their mind or brain is affected by illness of disability. Lack of capacity may not be a permanent condition.
Testamentary capacity is the mental ability of a person to make or alter a will. To execute a valid will in Illinois, testators must be at least 18 years old and of sound mind and memory.
A diagnosis of cognitive impairment does not automatically affect the presumption of a person’s testamentary capacity. Some cognitive disorders and learning impairments, such as autism, present early in life while others, like dementia, may not develop until much later.
The burden of proving a testator lacked the necessary mental ability at the time of a will’s execution lies with the person challenging the document’s validity.
Simply fill out the our online form, and one of our attorneys or staff members will contact you to schedule your appointment.
Testamentary capacity is a lower threshold of capacity than the kind of capacity needed to enter into a contract.
Nature and Extent: The second factor is whether the testator “understands the nature and extent of his or her property.”.
Understanding Effect: The fourth factor is whether the testator “understands that, by executing the instrument, he or she is giving property to persons in the manner specified in the instrument.”.
Nature Objects: The third factor is whether the testator “knows the people who are the natural objects of his or her bounty.”. This means that the testator must know who would inherit his or her estate if there was no will.
Missouri courts weigh four factors to determine if a person is of sound mind when he or she executed his or her will. Ordinary Affairs: The first factor is whether the testator “understands the ordinary affairs of life.”. This first factor is vague and has not been clarified by court decisions.
That is because Wills require that the testator (the person making the will) have a certain type of capacity, called “testament ary capacity”. If the testator is lacking testamentary capacity at the time he or she made a will, that will would be invalid.
Testator’s treating physician, who saw him regularly during the entire time he was in the sanitarium, characterized him as senile, confused and disoriented and stated that testator’s awareness was limited to the presence of other individuals and his immediate physical urges.
Testator entered a sanitarium in Nov. 1958 diagnosed with, among other things, chronic brain syndrome and structural brain damage that would affect his behavior, personality, intelligence and coordination.
Testimony of 3 doctors, including testatrix’s personal physician, that testatrix suffered from chronic brain syndrome caused by senile dementia and thereby lacked testamentary capacity, as well as unspecified evidence as to testatrix’s forgetfulness, erratic behavior and possible delusions was overcome by:
Testatrix, 89 years old, was admitted to the hospital on February 20, 1964 with a panoply serious, chronic and terminal illnesses and diseases. Testatrix executed a codicil to her will, executed in 1958, on February 28, 1964 and died on March 3, 1964.
Proof of Testamentary Incapacity - What Does It Take to Show Someone Is Incapable of Creating a Will. Just as when one enters into a contract, one cannot create a Will unless one has the mental capacity to do so. Normally, someone challenging a Will must demonstrate that the person lacked that capacity or that the person was subject ...
All things being equal, if the Court is doubtful as to whether a person is incompetent, the court will normally uphold the will. Yet will contests are common and the subsequent turmoil and heartbreak within families is a typical scene in the courts.
Testator, age 83, executed a new will in March, 1959, leaving his entire estate to his male nurse, revoking an earlier will which left his estate evenly divided to his nieces and nephew. The court found the following evidence of incapacity to be “serious and exceedingly substantial”.
Clients (or more commonly, client’s children) usually assume that the family doctor determines whether someone has capacity to sign documents or not. In practice, it is the attorney who ultimately makes that decision. That is not to say that medical records are not helpful or that the doctor should not ever be consulted, ...
In order to execute a durable power of attorney, a client has to have contractual capacity. Contractual capacity means that the person has the ability to understand the nature and effect of the act and the business being transacted. If the durable power of attorney contains gifting powers or if the document being executed by ...
Most doctors do not understand what constitutes contractual capacity or testamentary capacity. I have found that most doctors do not want to weigh in on capacity in the first place and sometimes make a mess of it when they do.
An evaluation by someone trained to determine whether a criminal defendant can stand trial is probably not going to be helpful (something I learned by way of a court ordered multi-disciplinary evaluation in a hotly contested guardianship case).
If you ask a client with diminished capacity if they understand what a durable power of attorney is they will almost certainly say “yes ”.
If the client cannot act in his or her own interest, then an attorney “may take reasonably necessary protective action, including consulting with individuals or entities that have the ability to take action to protect the client and, in appropriate cases, seeking the appointment of guardian ad litem, conservator or guardian.”
Once an attorney determines whether a client has a mental illness and takes the proper legal precautions, the attorney should also consider his or her behavior toward the client as the representation continues. For any client, effective representation goes far beyond the bare minimum legal and ethical requirements.
For lawyers in this position, they need to know ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.14, which addresses client-lawyer relationships where the client suffers from a mental illness or diminished capacity. Rule 1.14, a version of which has been adopted in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, states, “the lawyer shall, as far as reasonably possible, maintain a normal client-lawyer relationship with the client.”
A lawyer is not to seek a guardian for a client because the client displays bad judgment, makes imprudent choices, or disagrees with the attorney’s assessment of his or her best interest.
The ethics rules adopted in most states provide that a lawyer may seek a guardian for a client under a disability, “or take other protective action with respect to a client, only when the lawyer reasonably believes that the client cannot adequately act in the client’s own interest.”. Model Rule 1.14 (b).
Attorneys should be aware of mental health symptoms to spot a mental illness when representation commences. This, again, may be easier said than done. After all, most attorneys are not trained in mental health assessment. And the younger or less experienced the attorney, the more difficult it can be for the attorney to determine if their client is suffering from a mental illness that affects their capacity to such a degree that the client is unable to understand the lawyer’s advice or make informed decisions.
Testamentary capacity is an elusive concept because it differs from the capacity needed in other areas of the law, such as the capacity necessary to enter into a contract. For example, someone in the early stages of Alzheimer’s might be found to lack the mental capacity needed to enter into a contract yet still have the capacity necessary to execute a Will. As a general rule, Connecticut courts have found a Testator to have testamentary capacity if the Testator: 1 Understand the type and extent of his/her property 2 Knows who his/her heirs are 3 Understands what it means to make a Will
A Testator suffering from early stage dementia, for example, might have periods when he/she lacks capacity but also have periods of clarity when the capacity to execute a Will exists. As long as the Will was executed during a period of clarity, the court may uphold the Will’s validity.
As a general rule, Connecticut courts have found a Testator to have testamentary capacity if the Testator : Understand the type and extent of his/her property. Knows who his/her heirs are. Understands what it means to make a Will. The Testator must also understand and appreciate the relationship between these factors.