what happens when a lawyer has 2 opossing clients

Can a lawyer talk to another lawyer about a client?

Under most circumstances, the law firm has two options: (1) get both parties to waive the conflict of interest, or (2) withdraw from representing either party to the case. In WA, this is found in RPC 1.7: RPC RULE 1.7. CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CURRENT CLIENTS (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a

Is it legal for two attorneys to represent opposing parties?

Dec 07, 2018 · The lawyer isn't representing two clients against each other in the same lawsuit; and Each affected client provides informed consent in writing. Basically, exceptions can occur on a case-by-case basis and will depend on whether the lawyer legitimately believes that they can provide the best representation possible to their client (s).

Will opposing counsel reply to a letter sent to attorney?

Feb 09, 2013 · There is something called a "chinese wall" which can be used to keep the 2 sides from communicating with the other and find out what is going on. Generally speaking the firm should decline the representation and should definitely have both clients sign waivers of the conflict. Report Abuse. Report Abuse.

Can an attorney answer my questions about the law?

If the firm was not careful to avoid discussing the case with both parties, it could be forced out of representing either. 6 level 1 · 8 yr. ago Conflict of interest. Depends on state ethics rules. Usually depends on the kind of case, be it civil or criminal. That will be 300 dollars 9 level 2 Op · 8 yr. ago

Can a law firm represent two opposing clients?

The California Rules generally permit a lawyer to represent multiple clients with conflicting interests so long as all the clients have provided their informed written consent.May 1, 2020

Can two people be represented by the same law firm?

Thus, a lawyer related to another lawyer, e.g., as parent, child, sibling or spouse, ordinarily may not represent a client in a matter where that lawyer is representing another party, unless each client gives informed consent.

What does it mean when a lawyer has a conflict of interest?

A conflict of interest is defined as a conflict between professional duties and private interests, or when there is a conflict between the duty to one client and another.May 20, 2019

Do opposing lawyers talk to each other?

(A) While representing a client, a member shall not communicate directly or indirectly about the subject of the representation with a party the member knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the member has the consent of the other lawyer.

Can different attorneys from the same firm represent opposing parties?

It is feasible (albeit far from ideal) with the informed consent of the clients for two lawyers in the same firm to represent parties opposed in interest. Joint retainer agreements will typically spell out that in the event of a conflict, the law firm may decline to continue to represent one or all of the clients.

What is a conflict waiver?

Conflict waivers serve as a memorialization or proof that a client has given informed consent for a lawyer to handle a legal matter despite a “disqualifying conflict of interest.”

What are some examples of conflicts of interest?

Some types of conflicts of interest include:Nepotism. ... Self-dealing. ... Gift issuance. ... Insider trading. ... Review the employee handbook. ... Attend business ethics training. ... Report conflicts of interest. ... Disclose.Apr 1, 2021

What are the two conflicts involving representation of clients?

The recommended approach tracks the ABA Model Rule, which generally describes two kinds of conflict situations relating to current clients: (1) those involving direct adversity, (MR 1.7(a)(1)), and (2) those involving a significant risk that a lawyer's representation of current clients will be materially limited by the ...

How do you prove conflict of interest?

A conflict of interest exists if the circumstances are reasonably believed (on the basis of past experience and objective evidence) to create a risk that a decision may be unduly influenced by other, secondary interests, and not on whether a particular individual is actually influenced by a secondary interest.

Do lawyers get along with each other?

In most counties and especially in the area of family law, the lawyers know each other well because they practice in front of the Judges and among themselves so often. So, it is possible they will know each other well – sometimes being friends and sometimes being the opposite.Apr 11, 2016

What is the most common complaint against lawyers?

Perhaps the most common kinds of complaints against lawyers involve delay or neglect. This doesn't mean that occasionally you've had to wait for a phone call to be returned. It means there has been a pattern of the lawyer's failing to respond or to take action over a period of months.

Is it normal to not hear from your lawyer?

Throughout the process of getting your financial settlement after becoming injured, there may be periods of time that you do not hear from your attorney. Although this can be unnerving, it is a normal part of the legal process.Oct 25, 2018

What are the duties of a lawyer?

In the legal field, however, one of the legal duties every lawyer must observe is to avoid conflicts of interest when it comes to their clients. In fact, if a lawyer represents a client knowing that there's a conflict of interest, they can be disciplined by the state bar and sued by the client for legal malpractice.

What are the conflicts of interest in a lawyer?

There are a variety of conflicts of interest that can prevent a lawyer from taking on a particular case. The conflict may occur between the prospective client and one of the attorney's current or former clients. There can also be concerns if a client's interests are in conflict with the lawyer's professional or personal relationships.

Do attorneys have to do conflict checks?

While an attorney may be able to easily identify a conflict, sometimes they're not always easy to spot. Because of this, it's the attorney's responsibility to perform regular conflict checks when taking on a new client.

Can an attorney answer questions about conflicts of interest?

An attorney can not only answer any questions you may have about the scope of an attorney's obligations to their client, they can also answer other questions you may have about the law.

Can a law firm represent a client?

It's also important to note that a law firm may be able to represent a client even though a single attorney had a conflict of interest, if a "firewall" can be successfully put around the attorney with the conflict. This essentially means that the matter would not be discussed with or around the attorney with the conflict, ...

Can a conflict of interest occur at the law firm level?

It's also possible for there to be an issue if the potential client's interests are at odds with the attorney's own interests. A conflict of interest can also occur at the law firm level. For example, even if an attorney working at a law firm didn't personally work on a particular matter (because someone else at the firm handled it), ...

Is representation illegal in a lawsuit?

The lawyer believes they can provide " competent and diligent " representation to all affected clients; The representation isn't illegal in any way; The lawyer isn't representing two clients against each other in the same lawsuit; and. Each affected client provides informed consent in writing.

Is it ethical to represent opposing parties in the same firm?

The question is not one of legality, but ethics. It is not ethical for two attorneys in the same firm to represent opposing parties without the written consent of both parties to waive the obvious conflict of interest. I would suggest you find yourself another attorney.

Is a slam dunk conflict of interest a bad idea?

This is a slam dunk conflict of interest. There are some ways to deal with the conflict, but both clients must agree after being fully aware of the conflict and the lawyers must agree not to look at each others files. It is a very bad idea for the lawyers to do so. You have remedies and should consult an independent lawyer.

Can you talk to opposing counsel?

There is no rule against your talking to the opposing party, or to the opposing party's attorney. There is a rule, however, that applies to attorneys only, that would prevent opposing counsel from responding to your communication, unless he had permission from your attorney... 2 found this answer helpful.

Is it a good idea to speak to an Opp counsel?

In general, it is not a good idea to directly communicate with Opp counsel. First, opp counsel should not respond; second, it sends a message that you are bypassing your atty, which may undermine his work in the case; third, it may be an insult to your atty. 2 found this answer helpful. found this helpful.

Can opposing counsel reply to you?

Opposing counsel will probably not reply to you, but will most likely forward your communication to your attorney. I would recommend that you speak to your attorney in person, and insist that he or she draft the letter to opposing counsel that you are contemplating sending. More. 0 found this answer helpful.

What is the best practice for an attorney?

The better practice for attorneys is to cite cases that seem to be adverse and then distinguish them. It is far better to do that than to raise the court’s ire or suspicion that the lawyer is being less than candid. The key is that attorneys need to realize their different roles when considering candor toward courts.

Why don't lawyers cite cases?

However, courts look suspiciously at lawyers who claim that they didn’t cite a case because it is merely tangentially adverse. A federal district court in Maryland referred to this position as a “bold and risky gambit” in Prince George’s County v. Massey (1996), a case in Maryland federal district court.

What is the current rule to cite directly adverse legal authority?

The current rule to cite directly adverse legal authority is directly tied to the duties of competence and diligence found in Rules 1.1 and 1.3, respectively. “It is a matter of competence to be aware of adverse legal authority,” Jacobowitz notes. “It also is a fundamental requirement in the duty of diligence to be knowledgeable ...

Why is disclosure of adverse authority important?

The duty to disclose adverse authority is considered an important one to help judges decide on cases based on precedent —serving the principle of stare decisis.”. The rule is part of the profession’s commitment that attorneys must follow the duty of candor to help the system find the truth.

What is the role of lawyers in the legal system?

Lawyers are often viewed primarily as advocates unilaterally pursuing their client’s positions in court, but they are also officers of the court. “As an officer of the court, the attorney has the duty of candor,” says Susan Saab Fortney, ...

Do lawyers have a duty to disclose adverse legal authority?

Lawyers have a duty to disclose adverse legal authority even if it hurts their case. An attorney researches a legal question and finds a controlling case that is adverse to her client’s position. Surprisingly, the opposing counsel neglects to cite the case to the court in her pleadings. What is the attorney to do?

Does the rule prohibit citing directly adverse legal authority?

Interpreting the Rule. The rule prohibits attorneys from “knowingly” failing to cite directly adverse legal authority. Ostensibly, the rule would not apply to lawyers who fail to find the applicable case law because they are negligent. That raises the question as to whether the rule goes far enough. Should it also apply to lawyers who didn’t ...