what ethical theory support lawyer

by Dr. Ashlynn Ullrich 3 min read

Full Answer

What are the ethical responsibilities of a lawyer?

General ethics, particularly social and political conceptions of justice, moral philosophy and promotion of substantive justice define lawyers' responsibilities.

What are the ethical approaches to the legal profession?

The following two sections consider the moral activist and ethics of care approaches - two approaches that apply more general ethics to the legal profession. The adversarial advocate is only one social role that could govern the ethics of lawyers. Another possibility is the 'responsible lawyer' approach.

What is the responsible lawyer theory?

This theory, referred to as the responsible lawyer theory, is supplemented or nuanced, as appropriate, by the theory of moral activism, pursuant to which the lawyer must contribute to changing the laws and the institutions so that the access to justice becomes easier and the law, considered in the most general sense, is improved.

What is the relationship between a lawyer and general ethics?

Relationship to General Ethics Responsible Lawyer (Officer of the court and trustee of the legal system) Relationship to Client and Law Lawyers' ethics governed by role as advocate in adversarial legal process and complex legal system: partisanship, loyalty and non- accountability.

image

What are ethics for lawyers?

Attorney ethics describe a set of state codes and rules the regulates the conduct of lawyers. These codes ensure lawyers follow the law, pursue justice, and zealously advocate their client's best interests.

What are the 4 ethical theories?

Four broad categories of ethical theory include deontology, utilitarianism, rights, and virtues.

What are the ethical models of legal profession?

It is the purpose of this article to present a picture of each of the three theoretical models—autonomy, socialist, and deontological—and to indicate how they differ from one another in their application to some aspects of attorney-client confidentiality, one of the most hotly debated topics of professional ethics.

Why is it important for lawyers to be ethical?

Importance of Legal Ethics Often, lawyers and other legal professionals are faced with conflicting interests from the clients they are working for and their personal interests. Legal ethics are important in helping the attorney to work through the balance of these interests and work to promote good faith.

What are the 3 main theories of ethics?

There are generally three philosophical approaches, or what may be considered the science, to ethical reasoning:utilitarian ethics.deontological ethics.virtue ethics.

Which ethics theory is best?

Utilitarianism holds that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number. It is the only moral framework that can be used to justify military force or war.

What is legal and ethical responsibilities?

Definition. Legal compliance refers to acting in accordance with the laws of a particular organization, company etc. while ethical responsibility is the choice to comply with the code of ethics of the particular organization, company etc.

Why is ethics important in the legal profession?

Ethics in any profession are important, and it is perhaps more important in the legal sector where lawyers are viewed with a level of suspicion. Thus, having an enforced code of ethics is crucial in ensuring the credibility of the practitioners and legal system altogether.

What is professional ethics?

Professional ethics encompasses a code governing the conduct of professionals engaged in the practice of law and those engaged in the legal sector in other ways. All of the professionals who work in the legal field to a certain degree have an essential duty to the court and towards justice.

What happens if a lawyer is not competent?

If a lawyer is not considered to be competent to handle a legal matter, that lawyer is generally required to become competent by adequate research. Also, a lawyer should not handle a legal case without the right amount of preparation.

Is the Code of Ethics binding?

Every state is responsible for drafting their own set of codes of ethics governing attorney professional responsibility. While this code is not binding , it does lay out guidelines for state bar associations or even attorneys who find unclear codes in their jurisdiction to make sense of their ethical choices.

Can an attorney use a client's confidence?

This means that the attorney can never use a client’s confidence to their personal advantage or personal gain of any kind. Usually, an attorney or legal professional can only divulge a client’s confidence with their consent and only after the lawyer gives full disclosure as to the consequences of that disclosure.

What happens if a lawyer is not competent?

If a lawyer is not competent to handle a legal matter, that lawyer is generally required to become competent, either by consulting with another lawyer or conducting adequate research. Furthermore, a lawyer should not handle a legal matter without adequate preparation under the circumstances.

What are the rules of professional responsibility?

Model Rules of Professional Responsibility. Every state is responsible for drafting their own set of codes of professional responsibility governing attorney ethics. The American Bar Association developed the Model Rules of Professional Responsibility to act a guideline for ethical conduct and help resolve moral and ethical dilemmas.

What is zealous representation?

Zealous Representation. A lawyer should represent a client zealously within the bounds of the law. However, in cases where a client’s conduct could arguably be illegal, a lawyer may refuse aid or participate in such conduct. Furthermore, a lawyer may not assert a position, file a suit, delay trial, or take actions on behalf of a client, ...

What to do if you suspect a lawyer is unresponsive?

If the lawyer is unresponsive or not willing to discuss the matter, then that person may wish to file a complaint with your attorney’s State Bar Association.

Can an attorney prove malpractice?

Proving that your attorney committed malpractice can be difficult. You have to know exactly what constitutes malpractice and show that your attorney actually committed malpractice. An experienced malpractice attorney can help you determine whether or not you’re a victim of attorney malpractice.

Can a lawyer use perjured testimony?

A lawyer cannot knowingly use perjured testimony or false evidence. A lawyer cannot knowingly assert false statements of law or fact. A lawyer cannot preserve or create evidence which the lawyer knows is false. A lawyer cannot assist his client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal or fraudulent.

Can a lawyer reveal confidence?

In limited some instances, a lawyer can reveal confidences if such confidence is a client’s intent is a crime that may cause death or serious injury. A lawyer should exercise independent professional judgment on behalf of a client. A lawyer cannot accept employment from a client when there is a conflict of interest.

What is responsible lawyer theory?

This theory, referred to as the responsible lawyer theory, is supplemented or nuanced, as appropriate, by the theory of moral activism, pursuant to which the lawyer must contribute to changing the laws and the institutions so that the access to justice becomes easier and the law , considered in the most general sense, is improved.

What is the amorality theory?

In order to provide solid ethical arguments to support the particularities that characterize the profession and counteract such harsh moral judgment, North American and Commonwealth lawyers have developed an amorality theory, referred to as the standard concept of legal ethics.

What is moral value?

Simply put, moral value exists only when the way in which you act in relation to others is equivalent to the way in which all others would act in relation to you. On the other hand, the teleological or consequentialist theory considers that the value of an action is given by its final purpose.

Is a lawyer a technician?

Under this theory, the lawyer is only a (legal) instrument of the client, a technician who provides assistance in order to obtain the intended results . The standard concept of legal ethics, as reflected in the principles above, focuses exclusively on the role of the lawyer as the representative of the client.

Who said "If you want to know the law and nothing else, you must look at it as a bad man

Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen. “If you want to know the law and nothing else, you must look at it as a bad man, who cares only for the material consequences which such knowledge enables him to predict, not as a good one, who finds his reasons for conduct, whether inside law or outside of it, in the vague sanctions of his conscience.”.

Is a lawyer's conduct a legal or ethical issue?

A lawyer’s conduct is determined exclusively by legal, not ethical grounds. More specifically, a lawyer’s professional obligations, as reflected in the statutory and deontological norms governing the profession, must be strictly followed, without any additional ethical analysis.

What are the four ethical theories?

There are four major ethical theories: deontology (or duty), utilitarianism, rights, and virtue. Each one of these theories looks at our ethical behavior in different ways. Deontology. The theory of deontology states that when we have to make ethical decisions, our first thoughts are on our duties and obligations.

What is the ethical theory of virtue?

The ethical theory of virtue states that we can judge a person’s decisions based on his or her character and morality. The way someone lives his or her life can explain any ethical decision according to this theory. For example, a person who lies and cheats to get ahead in life probably makes decisions based on advancing his or her own interests according to the virtue theory.

What is non consequential ethics?

Nonconsequential ethics is the other side of the coin to consequential ethics. It says that people base their decisions not on the result but on the values and beliefs that they hold deeply. In nonconsequential ethics , you’ll decide on a situation based on what you believe rather than what may happen. For example, you won’t lie in a situation if you believe that honesty is important.

What is the difference between utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism?

There are two sides to this theory. Act utilitarianism says you will make decisions based on helping others, while rule utilitarianism says you will act out of fairness. Those who don’t agree with this theory believe that nobody can predict outcomes, so we can’t know what the benefits of our actions will be.

What is the branch of philosophy that deals with morality and how it shapes behavior?

Follow Us: maia Pascual/Pixabay. Ethics is the branch of philosophy that deals with morality and how it shapes behavior. Different branches of the study of ethics look at where our views of morality come from and how they shape our everyday lives. There are four major ethical theories: deontology (or duty), utilitarianism, rights, and virtue.

Which theory of utilitarianism is the biggest factor?

The theory of utilitarianism falls into this category because the benefit of decisions is the biggest factor. The virtue theory can fit into consequential ethics because a person’s reputation can be based on the consequences of his or her decisions. Nonconsequential Ethics.

Which theory puts people in boxes based on their reputations at one point in time?

The virtue theory puts people in boxes based on their reputations at one point in time. Consequential Ethics. These four theories fall into one of two categories. The first one, consequential ethics, states that outcomes determine ethical decisions. Therefore, the result of a situation makes that decision OK.

What is the ethical of care approach?

In that sense, the ethics of care is as concerned with the ethics of the client as with the ethics of the lawyer, and sees them as being interdependent. However, the ethics of care approach can have quite a conservative impact.

What are the two approaches to legal responsibility?

However, the first and second - the adversarial advocate and responsible lawyering approaches - are the most dominant.

What is moral activism?

Moral activism, by contrast, requires that mainstream consequentialist and, to a lesser extent, deontological theories of ethics (and of justice in particular) should be applied to legal practice.

What is adversarial advocate?

The adversarial advocate is the predominant conception of what a lawyer's role and ethics ought to be in most common law countries including Australia. It is also the simplest, clearest and most absolute of the four approaches. It gives a reasonably clear answer of what to do in most situations: that is, a lawyer should advance their client's partisan interests with the maximum vigour permitted by law. This approach to legal ethics is often termed an 'amoral'one because it sees general moral theory as being irrelevant to lawyers' ethics.15 Rather the basis for lawyers' ethics is found in the social role that lawyers are supposed to play in the adversarial legal system.

How can lawyers improve justice?

Lawyers should take advantage of their position to improve justice in two ways: (1) Public interest lawyering and law reform activities to improve access to justice and change the law and legal institutions to make the law more substantively just (in the public interest).

What is the difference between ethics of care and moral activism?

The ethics of care, like moral activism, emphasises the integration of personal ethics with legal practice. While moral activism proposes that lawyers should act in a way calculated to best promote social and political justice, the ethics of care, by contrast, is more concerned with personal and relational ethics.

What is client counseling?

And client counseling, in turn, means discussing with the client the rightness or wrongness of her projects, and the possible impact of those projects on "the people" in the same matter-of-fact and (one hopes) unmoralistic manner that one discusses the financial aspects of a representation.

image