Redirect and recross examination. After the cross-examination, the prosecutor may ask the witness more questions, usually to clarify parts of the testimony or address issues that came up during the cross. Then, the defense attorney also has another chance at further questioning, usually to discuss new subjects discussed during the redirect.
Got a dispute? A divorce? A potentially lucrative deal? Read these insider tips before you think about calling a lawyer. When should you hire a lawyer? When disputes arise, a person’s first inclination is often to call a lawyer, attorney Randolph Rice tells Reader’s Digest.
So when dealing with attorneys, don’t just look for honesty—be honest. “If you want to improve your chances of securing the best lawyer to take your case, you need to prepare before you meet them,” advises attorney Stephen Babcock. “Get your story, facts, and proof together well before your first meeting.”
Generally, though, redirect is designed for clarification of the witness's testimony on cross or to address any subject matter discussed on cross that wasn't mentioned on direct. In turn, recross presents an opportunity for the other lawyer to address the subject matter discussed in redirect, particularly anything that's new.
Redirect is the examination of your own witness after he has been cross-examined by your adversary. While trial lawyers often painstakingly prepare for direct and cross-examination, far too little attention has been given to this crucial phase of trial.
Redirect examination, in the United States, is the questioning of a witness who has already provided testimony under oath in response to direct examination as well as cross examination by the opponent.
A redirect examination takes place during a trial after the cross examination of a witness has been completed. During a redirect, the lawyer who called the witness has an opportunity to clarify the testimony of the witness, in an attempt to minimize potential damage and explain the testimony.
After cross-examination, the plaintiff's lawyer may again question the witness (this is called REDIRECT), and this may be followed by recross examination. This process of examining and cross-examining witnesses and receiving exhibits continues until the plaintiff's evidence is before the jury.
When the lawyer for the plaintiff or the government has finished questioning a witness, the lawyer for the defendant may then cross-examine the witness. Cross-examination is generally limited to questioning only on matters that were raised during direct examination.
As indicated by the term, a leading question is one that leads a witness to an answer, by either suggesting the answer or by substituting the words of the questioning attorney for those of the witness.
Don't lead on redirect. Some leading is necessary and desirable, to direct the witness to particular issues raised on cross-examination. Otherwise, it is improper. Don't do it.
Definition. Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of whatever it asserts.
Leading questions shall not be used on the direct or redirect examination of a witness, except that the court may permit leading questions, in its discretion, in circumstances such as, but not limited to, the following: (1) when a party calls a hostile witness or a witness identified with an adverse party, (2) when a ...
If a lawyer knows their client is guilty, it really shouldn't change anything. They will act in the interest of society as well (to a certain extent): Ensure the client has adequate legal representation in court, and is subject to a fair trial.
When is a Directed Verdict Used? A directed verdict is only proper in situations where a reasonable jury could not find for the opposing party. The defendant can move for a directed verdict after the plaintiff rests her case. If the judge grants this motion, the case is over and the defendant wins.
A motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict is often filed together with a motion for a new trial by the losing party in response to the jury's verdict. A judge's decision to grant or deny a motion for JNOV is often reviewable on appeal.