Legal epistemology examines when and why evidence has a probative value; that is, it investigates how evidence makes a litigated claim more likely. It illuminates what reasons—moral, political, economic, practical, epistemic—justify excluding probative evidence. It questions whether particular kinds of evidence are apt to mislead factfinders.
Full Answer
Legal epistemology is deeply interdisciplinary. In addition to law and philosophy, it involves research in psychology, forensic science, sociology, anthropology, criminology, history, theology, politics, economics (particularly behavioral economics), artificial intelligence, computing, and statistics.
Legal ethics is a term used to describe a code of conduct governing proper professional behavior, which establishes the nature of obligations owed to individuals and to society. In order to maintain a license to practice law, attorneys agree to uphold the Rules of Professional Conduct, adopted by the American Bar Association (ABA) in 1983.
What Are Attorney Ethics? Attorney ethics describe a set of state codes and rules the regulates the conduct of lawyers. These codes ensure lawyers follow the law, pursue justice, and zealously advocate their client’s best interests.
Lawyers, in turn, are guardians of that law. Therefore, their code ethics is unquestionably strict. Below are three areas of a lawyer’s professional responsibility: Client-Lawyer Relationship. As the American Bar Association states so emphatically, trust “is the hallmark of the client-lawyer relationship.”
Legal epistemology examines when and why evidence has a probative value; that is, it investigates how evidence makes a litigated claim more likely. It illuminates what reasons—moral, political, economic, practical, epistemic—justify excluding probative evidence.
Epistemology is the theory of knowledge. It is concerned with the mind's relation to reality.
First, the study of philosophy provides students with training in analytic thinking and logical argumentation, both of which are essential to success in law school and in the practice of law.
They are Natural, Positive, Marxist, and Realist Law theories. You may deal other theories in detail in your course on jurisprudence.
Epistemology is the study of knowledge, asking questions such as: “what is knowledge?” and “how do we know something?” For human geographers, an appreciation of epistemology is important in order to critically assess the reliability of knowledge developed in the discipline, but also in understanding how knowledge plays ...
Epistemology and ethics are both concerned with evaluations: ethics with evaluations of conduct, epistemology with evaluations of beliefs and other cognitive acts. Of considerable interest to philosophers are the ways in which the two kinds of evaluations relate to one another.
Philosophy is of great service to law; it not only helps in analysis but equally in organization of thought and building of systems. There is reasoning in law known as 'legal reasoning' the branches of philosophy known as logic and epistemology aid legal science in this area.
Philosophy Helps You Develop the Right Skills for Law School In the list, you can find “Philosophy,” but there are less-than-subtle clues that point to the philosophy major as the perfect fit for aspiring lawyers.
There can be little doubt that the philosophy major provides the best preparation for an education and career in the law. First, philosophy consistently ranks first among pre-law majors in average LSAT score, surely the most important criterion for admission to law schools.
Scholarship on law and popular culture can be classified into three general approaches: (1) semiotic; (2) transmission; and (3) institutional.
There are roughly three categories into which the topics of legal philosophy fall: analytic jurisprudence, normative jurisprudence, and critical theories of law.
IMPERATIVE OR AUSTIN'S THEORY OF LAW: Austin says that law is a command which obliges a person or persons to a course of conduct. It is laid down by a political sovereign and enforceable by a sanction.
Legal ethics is a term used to describe a code of conduct governing proper professional behavior, which establishes the nature of obligations owed to individuals and to society.
Consider meeting with an attorney specializing in legal ethics and professional responsibility if you have any questions or concerns.
If your attorney has violated any of these rules, or you have reason to believe your attorney has not acted in a professional manner, you should consider filing a complaint with the corresponding state bar association. For more serious violations, particularly when poor counsel results in an unfavorable outcome for your case, you might consider filing a legal malpractice lawsuit.
Malpractice: Although these claims are very difficult to prove, lawyers may be sued if no reasonable attorney would have made the same errors (and those errors caused injury).
Solicitation: Attorneys may not be misleading, fraudulent, or deceptive in their advertising (for instance, lawyers may not use statistics or client testimonials, and must refrain from guaranteeing specific outcomes for cases).
The ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 was created in 2009 to address technology and global practice changes facing U.S. lawyers. Find out more.
The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) applies to all trade in services, including legal services. In August 2006, ABA House of Delegates voted to adopt Report and Recommendation 105 submitted by the Standing Committee on Professional Discipline regarding General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) disciplines on domestic regulation. The policies: (1) support the efforts of the U.S. Trade Representative to encourage the development of transparency disciplines on domestic regulation in response to Article VI (4) of the GATS requiring the development of "any necessary disciplines" to be applicable to service providers; and (2) support the U.S. Trade Representative's participation in the development of additional disciplines on domestic regulation that are: (a) "necessary" within the meaning of Article VI (4) of the GATS; and (b) do not unreasonably impinge on the regulatory authority of the states' highest courts of appellate jurisdiction over the legal profession in the United States.
To protect the reputation and livelihood of practitioners. Often that involves protecting lawyers from regulatory overreach. In my experience, regulators sometimes seem to have little conception of how devastating to a lawyer even an allegation, let alone a finding, of professional misconduct can be.
There was an optional seminar in Legal Ethics. I did not take it and I do not know anyone who did.
MacKenzie Barristers is a boutique litigation practice concentrating on civil appeals and issues of professional responsibility and liability. They are frequently retained by other lawyers for advice or representation on legal ethics issues and professional responsibility disputes; to act as independent counsel for a third party or affected person in continuing litigation; or to collaborate or act as counsel on a motion or an appeal.
If you are thoroughly prepared, the stress of worrying that you have not done everything you can to advance your client’s interests is removed, or at least minimised. If you deal with opposing counsel with courtesy and respect, you will not aggravate the stress resulting from the parties’ conflict by piling on the stress of conflict with the lawyer on the other side. From the vantage point of the court, civility is also good advocacy. A sense of humour does not hurt either.
Now we also have endless case conferences, status hearings, pre-trial conferences and mediations, all designed to promote settlement and prevent cases going to trial. For cases that should be tried, the added steps simply add time and expense. The advent of email has resulted in an exponential increase in the number of documents that must be produced, and a corresponding increase in cost. Access to justice has suffered. So have the opportunities for advocacy for young lawyers.
You should avoid receiving confidential information from a potential client until you check conflicts.
No other profession devotes anything like the amount of attention to ethics that we do.
When the lawyer was later sued by his by-then former client, one of his defenses was that the requirements of Rule 1.8 did not apply to him because he was in-house counsel. This was soundly rejected by the court:
It reminds all lawyers that the definition of "Firm" in Rule 1.0 includes "the legal department of a corporation or other organization." As such, when one in-house lawyer is disqualified, the disqualification can be imputed to the entire in-house department.
1. The Ethical Rules Still Apply to You. In writing and speaking on ethical issues for in-house counsel for over 15 years, I've encountered numerous in-house lawyers who believe that for some reason the ethical rules don't apply to them. To be blunt, they are wrong. In addition to the fact that the rules as written never suggest ...
Analytically, there is no difference between an outside counsel going in on a business venture with a client and an in-house counsel being offered stock or stock options in the client. In both instances, the lawyer is engaging in a business transaction with the client, and so the requirements of Rule 1.8 must be followed.
This is dangerous. Practicing law without a license is a crime, an ethical violation where you are licensed, can get your colleagues in ethical trouble (as they are prohibi ted from assisting in the unauthorized practice of law by the Rules), and may impact your client's attorney-client privilege. The good news is many states have "single-client" rules that allow in-house counsel to register in the state where they office but keep up their licenses in another state.
9. Acting in a Capacity other than Lawyer does not Excuse you from the Rules. Many in-house counsel also have another job (Vice-President, Secretary, etc.). Most courts addressing these "dual capacities" have held the legal ethical rules still apply even when the lawyer is acting in his "other" capacity.
Rule 1.13 provides that the client is the organization itself-not the officers, management, or even the board of directors. Many times executives or owners at companies treat in-house counsel as their own personal counsel, and this can lead to the conflicts described above (among other bad things).
If a lawyer knows that another lawyer or judge has breached their state’s rules of professional conduct, they are obligated to “inform the appropriate authorities” ( Nebraska Judicial Branch ).
When talking to a person who does not have legal representation, a lawyer is obligated to make it clear that they are acting in the interests of their client and not as a disinterested third party ( Colorado Bar ).
When talking about a code of ethics within a business, the Houston Chronicle says that, “a well-written code of ethics should give guidance to employees on how to deal with certain ethical situations.” It can be as short as ten simple rules (like Kraft’s code of ethics), or it can be elaborated by a 16-page document (like Verizon Wireless).
Below are three areas of a lawyer’s professional responsibility: Client-Lawyer Relationship. As the American Bar Association states so emphatically, trust “is the hallmark of the client-lawyer relationship.”. Here are some of the rules that solidify this: A lawyer cannot reveal information given to them by the client ( American Bar Association ). ...
A lawyer is required to give their honest opinion about the likely consequences of a client’s actions ( Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct ). A lawyer is forbidden from sharing information about the client, including any wrongdoing they have committed, with a few exceptions ( State Bar of Georgia ).
Transactions with Persons Other Than Clients. Not only do clients have certain rights, but lawyers are also obligated to protect the rights of those who are not their clients:
A lawyer cannot reveal information given to them by the client ( American Bar Association ). A client has a right to their lawyer’s “undivided loyalty uncompromised by conflicts of interest” ( New York State ). While a lawyer offers advice and expertise, the client has the last say on the goals of their case ( Ohio Supreme Court – PDF).
Attorney ethics describe a set of state codes and rules the regulates the conduct of lawyers. These codes ensure lawyers follow the law, pursue justice, and zealously advocate their client’s best interests.
Model Rules of Professional Responsibility. Every state is responsible for drafting their own set of codes of professional responsibility governing attorney ethics. The American Bar Association developed the Model Rules of Professional Responsibility to act a guideline for ethical conduct and help resolve moral and ethical dilemmas.
If the lawyer is unresponsive or not willing to discuss the matter, then that person may wish to file a complaint with your attorney’s State Bar Association.
If a lawyer is not competent to handle a legal matter, that lawyer is generally required to become competent, either by consulting with another lawyer or conducting adequate research. Furthermore, a lawyer should not handle a legal matter without adequate preparation under the circumstances.
A lawyer cannot assist his client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal or fraudulent.
In limited some instances, a lawyer can reveal confidences if such confidence is a client’s intent is a crime that may cause death or serious injury. A lawyer should exercise independent professional judgment on behalf of a client. A lawyer cannot accept employment from a client when there is a conflict of interest.
Finally, a lawyer is not allowed to neglect a case that has been entrusted to him. A lawyer should represent a client zealously within the bounds of the law. However, in cases where a client’s conduct could arguably be illegal, a lawyer may refuse aid or participate in such conduct.
Lawyers often run into ethical dilemmas when trying to figure out the best way to represent their clients. For instance, a lawyer may represent a client whose guilt is known to them. However, the lawyer is still prohibited from inducing the client to perjure him or herself on the witness stand. For this reason, law firm managers must strike a balance between ethical considerations and advocacy of their clients. There is always the option to withdraw from a case if maintaining such a balance becomes impossible.
They may be encouraged to do anything they can to win a case, regardless of ethical implications. As a result, lawyers need to be especially vigilant with the rules of professional responsibility to avoid ethics rules violations.
A conflict could also occur if two lawyers in the same firm represented clients with opposing interests. Indeed, even if one lawyer at a firm has no direct conflict of interest, the fact that another lawyer does may preclude representation. Nowadays, many large law firms employ conflict-checking software to avoid representing a client who may pose a conflict of interest.
Lawyers must be willing to refuse client requests, especially if such requests are unethical. In these instances, it’s always best to steer the client away from such a course of action. It also helps to clarify what can befall the client if the attorney were to accede to his or her request. A lawyer should not fall prey to going along with a client’s wish just because he or she may lose the client.
Lawyers simply cannot represent clients when they have a conflict of interest. For instance, if an attorney represented someone already, he or she would not be in position to sue that person later if their earlier representation gave the lawyer information that amounted to an unfair advantage or even the appearance of one.
Unfortunately, ethics rules do not cover every kind of ethical dilemma that can arise in the practice of law. Moreover, rules violations do not always result in disciplinary action. So, what can lawyers do to ensure that they don’t run afoul of the laws that govern their profession?