Florida caps on punitive damage amounts Florida has a mandatory limit to punitive damages. If you’re awarded punitive damages, the amount can be up to 3 times the amount of the compensatory damages, or $500,000 — whichever is greater.
This compensation is known as “damages” in personal injury law, and in the state of Florida, two types of damages can be awarded to plaintiffs in personal injury cases: “compensatory” damages and “punitive” damages (sometimes called “exemplary” damages).
However, a number of exceptions can apply under Florida law in both medical malpractice cases and all other types of personal injury cases, and judges in Florida are allowed to ignore damage caps when a specific case genuinely merits a larger punitive damage award.
For the year recorded, punitive damages were awarded in just 5% of the trials where plaintiffs prevailed. 13% of cases where punitive damages were awarded had damages of $1 million or more, and the median punitive damage amount was $64,000. It seems that courts are awarding punitive damages less and less frequently.
Compensatory damages are the most common type of reward given to the injured party and are designed to recover what the plaintiff has lost as a result of the injury. Plaintiffs are awarded these damages to help them return to emotional and financial state they were in prior to the injury.
(1) In any civil action, no claim for punitive damages shall be permitted unless there is a reasonable showing by evidence in the record or proffered by the claimant which would provide a reasonable basis for recovery of such damages.
Individuals can also be ordered to pay punitive damages that injure someone else due to negligent behavior. Examples of this would be drunk driving or distracted driving. In both cases, the defendant would have made a conscious decision to engage in behavior that could easily harm another person.
“The elements of negligent misrepresentation are (1) the defendant made a false representation as to a past or existing material fact; (2) the defendant made the representation without reasonable ground for believing it to be true; (3) in making the representation, the defendant intended to deceive the plaintiff; (4) ...
Punitive Damage Caps in Florida The Florida punitive damages statute allows an award of up to three times the amount of compensatory damages, or $500,000, whichever amount is higher. So, if you were awarded $1 million in compensatory damages, you could not be awarded more than $3 million in punitive damages.
There need only be sufficient evidence presented that there is factual support for a punitive damages claim. It is not necessary to show actual malice or intent to cause the particular injuries sustained. It is enough if a Plaintiff can show or infer that the Defendant acted with malice, or improper intent.
Types of DamagesCOMPENSATORY. Compensatory damages are generally the most identifiable and concrete type of damages. ... GENERAL. General damages are sought in conjunction with compensatory damages. ... PUNITIVE. Punitive damages are meant to punish a Defendant for particularly egregious conduct.
There are two types of compensatory damages—general and actual. Actual damages are intended to provide funds to only replace what was lost. General compensatory damages awarded are more complex, as these compensatory damages do not represent a monetary expenditure.
Compensatory damages are calculated by adding up all of your economic and non-economic damages and losses. However, when calculating a proper settlement amount, courts consider a variety of factors, including the injured party's negligence.
The remedies for misrepresentation are rescission and/or damages. For fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation, the claimant may claim rescission and damages.
If a misrepresentation is fraudulent or negligent, the claimant may claim both rescission and damages under s2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 (the Act). If a misrepresentation is negligent or innocent, the court has the discretion to award rescission or damages in lieu of rescission under s2(2) of the Act.
If the misrepresentation is identified, the contract can be declared void and depending on the situation, the unfavourably impacted party may seek damages. In such a contract dispute, the party who made the misrepresentation becomes the defendant and the aggrieved party is the plaintiff.
Punitive damages are provided for in Florida Statute § 768.72, which states “ [a] defendant may be held liable for punitive damages only if the trier of fact, based on clear and convincing evidence, finds that the defendant was personally guilty of intentional misconduct or gross negligence.” Fla. Stat. § 768.72 (2).
In Florida, punitive damages cannot be requested in an initial complaint.
As noted, under Fla. Stat. § 768.72, “a plaintiff is required to obtain leave from the trial court to amend the complaint before punitive damages may be asserted and is further required to make an evidentiary showing that would provide a reasonable basis for recovery of such damages.” Espirito Santo Bank v. Rego, 990 So. 2d 1088 (Fla.
In Tilton v. Wrobel, 198 So. 3d 909, 911 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), the Fourth District held that the trial court erred in granting leave to amend to seek punitive damages on a claim of defamation per se. The trial court committed to errors. Id.
“Gross negligence” is defined as extremely reckless or careless behavior that constitutes indifference to life, safety, and the rights of others.
Under Florida law, “intentional misconduct” means that a defendant knew that his or her behavior was wrong ...
Loss of consortium: Compensatory damages may be awarded for loss of consortium in wrongful death cases as well as cases where a severe injury has damaged a couple’s ability to enjoy intimacy.
However, in personal injury cases where a defendant’s intentional misconduct was motivated purely by the opportunity for financial gain, even when that conduct was likely to result in injury, the court can award punitive damages up to the amount of $2 million or four times the amount of the compensatory damages, whichever is greater.
When an injury is long-term or permanent, compensatory damages can include reimbursement for lost earning capacity in the future. Property damage: Compensatory damages cover the cost of any property that was damaged or destroyed as a result of the accident.
Most personal injury cases do not allow for punitive damages because in most personal injury cases, the defendant’s conduct is not found to be either grossly negligent or intentional. In those rare instances where there is a finding of gross negligence or intentional misconduct, Florida caps the amount of punitive damages that can be awarded.
Although compensation is not the purpose of punitive damages, the plaintiff receives any punitive damages awarded. Some states do not recognize or award punitive damages. For example, punitive damages are unavailable under any circumstances in Louisiana, Nebraska, Puerto Rico, and the state of Washington.
The least straight-forward types of damages are those caused by a partial taking. Damages that may be available as the result of a partial taking include, in addition to damages for the property taken itself, severance damages and business damages.
& #x201c;The power of eminent domain is an inherent feature of the sovereign authority of the state.” 1 ( In other words, the fleas go with the dog.) The Florida Constitution limits this power by requiring that full compensation be paid to an owner for property taken, 2 a nd our court system seeks to achieve full compensation with the remedy of damages. In evaluating the merits of a damages claim in an eminent domain proceeding, counsel should recognize the types of damages that are available. This article will briefly review the three categories of compensation in eminent domain and then focus on a single category: the damages that may be available when less than the entire property is sought to be appropriated.
The three categories include damages for the value of the property appropriated, damages resulting from a partial taking, and damages resulting from the relocation of a mobile home.
Punitive damages, also known as exemplary damages, are one of the types of money damages that a plaintiff can recover in a lawsuit. If punitive damages are awarded, they are generally designed to punish the defendant for untoward conduct and/or serve as a deterrent to others who might contemplate ...
Generally, punitive damages cannot exceed the greater of: three times the amount of compensatory damages, or. the sum of $500,000.
“Gross negligence” is conduct that is so reckless, or so “wanting in care”, ...
Whether the claim will ultimately be successful is another matter. Under Florida law, punitive damages can be awarded if there is clear and convincing evidence to support a finding by the trier of fact that the defendant was guilty of either “intentional misconduct” or “gross negligence.”.
Because the owner is generally limited to the lesser of the restoration cost or the diminution in value, one issue which occasionally arises at trial is whether the owner has the burden to introduce both figures in order to establish which one is the lowest.
Damaged property sometimes carries a “stigma” associated with the event that caused the damage even after repairs have been made , especially in cases involving numerous construction defects, mold damage, or termite infestation.
Structural damages often involve removal of debris before rebuilding can begin. If the costs of debris removal is included within the overall rebuilding cost and if that total cost is less than the diminution in value, it follows that the cost is recoverable.
The drudgery of itemizing the damages is difficult enough. The battle over entitlement to economic damages is no less daunting. Once entitlement is established, the weary litigant may have little time or energy left to fully analyze the proper legal standards for recovering those damages.
The trial court, however, subtracted the stigma damages, limiting the award to the reparation costs. On appeal, the appellate court affirmed the reduction, noting that stigma damages are not to be added to the cost to repair, though such damages may be recoverable as an element of the diminution in value.
The attorney owed you a duty of service. By negligence or misconduct, the attorney made a breach in their duty. This breach caused you to suffer financial harm. You experienced financial loss due to the breach.
A legitimate legal malpractice suit will involve either misconduct or negligence on the part of the original attorney. To win your case, your new attorney must be able to prove that four elements are true: The attorney owed you a duty of service. By negligence or misconduct, the attorney made a breach in their duty.
When she sat down, her dress wafted into an open candle, one of many that had been placed on the floor for “atmosphere.” The open candle ignited the dress, causing massive third-degree burns over 30% of the unfortunate teen’s body.
A two-year old toddler, the youngest of 5 children, tragically lost her life when she fell into the pool at her family’s rented home. The home was delivered to the family by its absentee owners without any of the pool safety features required by Florida law pursuant Florida’s “Residential Swimming Pool Safety Act” (Florida Statutes Section 515 et.seq.). The out-of-state landlords’ insurers paid their full policy limits and the uninsured management company paid $40,000. The claim is still pending against the bank that sold the non-compliant home to the absentee landlords out of foreclosure and a local pool company that serviced the pool prior to the victim’s family moving in.
Examples of failure to perform duties include ignoring the case, not filing the case in court, unauthorized settlements, violation of client privilege, or mishandling of retainer funds. A viable case will have specific and reliable evidence to back up the charges.
To win your case, your new attorney must be able to prove that four elements are true: 1 The attorney owed you a duty of service. 2 By negligence or misconduct, the attorney made a breach in their duty. 3 This breach caused you to suffer financial harm. 4 You experienced financial loss due to the breach.
Andrew Winston is a partner at the personal injury law firm of Winston Law . For over 20 years, he has successfully represented countless people in all kinds of personal injury cases, with a particular focus on child injury, legal malpractice, and premises liability. He has been recognized for excellence in the representation of injured clients by admission to the Million Dollar Advocates Forum, is AV Preeminent Rated by the Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory, enjoys a 10.0 rating by AVVO as a Top Personal Injury Attorney, has been selected as a Florida “SuperLawyer” from 2011-2017 – an honor reserved for the top 5% of lawyers in the state – and was voted to Florida Trend’s ”Legal Elite” and as one of the Top 100 Lawyers in Florida and one of the Top 100 Lawyers in the Miami area for 2015, 2016, and 2017.