the procurator lawyer cross examinations who

What is the plaintiff's attorney's role in cross examination?

Once the plaintiff's attorney has called all of the plaintiff's witnesses, the defendant's attorney begins calling witnesses. The same procedure is followed as in the plaintiff's presentation of witnesses. The defendant's attorney conducts direct examination of the witnesses, and the plaintiff's attorney will conduct cross-examinations.

What is a cross examination in law?

Cross-Examination After the plaintiff's attorney completes the direct examination, the defendant's attorney gets to cross-examine the witness. Cross-examination is a fundamental right in the American system of justice. Generally, cross-examination is limited to matters covered during the direct examination.

Can a witness be cross examined without asking a question?

But, often, cross-examination will add nothing to your case. If cross-examination of a witness does not help your case, then let the witness go without asking a question. Asking a few harmless questions of a witness only suggests to the jury you believe the witness is worth questioning.

Can opposing counsel object to questions asked on cross-examinations?

Opposing counsel may object to certain questions asked on cross-examination if the questions violate the state's laws on evidence or if they relate to matters not discussed during direct examination.

Who performs the cross-examination?

When the lawyer for the plaintiff or the government has finished questioning a witness, the lawyer for the defendant may then cross-examine the witness. Cross-examination is generally limited to questioning only on matters that were raised during direct examination.

Who cross examined the witness?

In civil and criminal cases, the judge has the power to summon witnesses as court witnesses and examine them. They can be cross-examined by both the parties as provided in Section 165, Evidence Act. Such cross-examination is not restricted to the points on which he has been examined by the court.

How do prosecutors cross-examine?

In order to succeed at cross-examination, a prosecutor must understand the goals of each party in a criminal trial. This allows a prosecutor not only to block the defense tactics, but also to use skillful questioning of defense witnesses to illicit responses favorable to the State.

Who cross-examine the witness first?

If you are a witness for the defense, or the rare defendant who testifies on his one behalf, you will be subject to cross-examination by the prosecutor. Each party to a criminal trial has the chance to call witnesses on his behalf. The party who calls the witness to testify goes first and asks the witness questions.

Who conducts cross-examination when the defendant is presenting its case?

Presenting the case The plaintiff's lawyer introduces the evidence supporting his/her case, and puts witnesses on the stand, and conducts a direct examination. The defendant has the opportunity to cross-examine the plaintiff's witnesses.

What is cross-examine in court?

During a cross-examination, the opposing party questions the witness. Generally, a witness is initially questioned by the party that called them to the stand on direct examination. Afterwards, the opposing party has the opportunity to question the witness on cross-examination, often using targeted or leading questions.

What does a cross examiner do?

Cross-examiners attempt to get the witness to say something helpful to their side, or to cast doubt on the witness's testimony by eliciting something that reduces the witness's credibility -- for example, that the witness's eyesight is so poor that she may not have seen an event clearly.

Can the prosecution cross-examine the defendant?

A prosecutor may cross-examine a defendant about defendant's pre-arrest silence, because the use of pre-arrest silence to impeach does not violate the Fifth Amendment or due process rights.

What is cross-examination by defense?

Cross-examination is an opportunity for the defense attorney to question the prosecution's witnesses during a trial. Cross-examination is an effective way for the defense to present evidence by using government witnesses.

What is the order of examination of witness in court?

The order of examination is laid down under section 138 which states that: Witnesses shall be first examined-in-chief, then (if the adverse party so desires) cross-examined, and finally (if the party calling him so desires) re-examined.

How do you cross-examine someone?

Five Steps to an Effective Cross-ExaminationEstablish Your Goals for Each Witness. ... Structure Your Questions to Box Witnesses In. ... Strategically Use Constructive & Deconstructive Cross-Examination. ... Know Witnesses' Prior Testimony Inside & Out. ... Keep Your Cool with Uncooperative Witnesses.

How do you cross-examination in criminal cases?

Conduct during cross-examination Maintain good eye contact. Always avoid a fight with a witness. If a witness incites you, stick to the backup questions. Listen to the witness carefully and always look for any inconsistencies in their statements.

What is cross examination?

Cross-examination is the legal process of interrogating a witness that has been called to testify by the opposing party in a legal proceeding. When a party calls a witness to testify in court, he must follow certain rules in questioning the witness. This is called “direct examination.”. Once this questioning is finished, ...

What happens after a witness is cross-examined?

After a witness has been directly examined and cross-examined, both attorneys are given an opportunity for redirect examination and recross examination of the witness. This is often done to clarify testimony given, or address any subject brought up during, prior questioning.

How can a witness be discredited?

A witness’ testimony may be discredited through discrediting cross-examination by showing any of the following: The witness is unable to understand the obligation to tell the truth in court. The witness has some problem of perception. The witness is unable to effectively communicate his testimony. The witness has a faulty memory.

What is supportive cross examination?

Supportive cross-examination involves asking questions in an attempt to have the witness provide information that supports the cross-examiner’s case. This type of questioning is not intended to attack the witness, or to discredit his testimony, but to obtain information that fills in the gaps in his testimony under direct examination, or to obtain some type of admission. During supportive cross-examination, the attorney is attempting to show the judge or jury that the opposing party’s own witness lends credibility to the case.

What is the purpose of discrediting cross-examination?

Discrediting cross-examination attempts to bring doubt on the witness’ testimony of facts. This may be done by showing that the witness’ testimony does not make fit in with what other witnesses and evidence say, or that it does not make common sense.

What is the purpose of cross-examination questions?

The main goal of cross-examination questions is often to undermine the credibility of the witness, or to get him to testify to additional information that furthers the cross-examiner’s case. This may be done by showing that the witness is somehow prejudiced in his understanding or testimony, or that he has a stake in the outcome of the proceedings.

What is an expert witness?

Expert Witness – A witness possessing training, education, skill, or experience in a specific subject, that is beyond that of the average person, who is allowed to give an opinion at trial.

Who conducts cross examinations?

The defendant's attorney conducts direct examination of the witnesses, and the plaintiff's attorney will conduct cross-examinations.

What does cross examination mean in court?

During cross-examination, the attorney tries to undermine or impeach the witness's credibility by showing that the witness is not reliable or that the witness may have misstated something or even lied during the direct examina tion. For example, if the witness said one thing in an accident report or during a deposition and then testified differently at trial, the defendant's attorney can refer to the previous statements and show inconsistencies in the story.

What can a lawyer ask a witness to testify about?

During direct exams, attorneys can ask witnesses to identify demonstrative evidence, such as documents and photographs and/or to explain what they saw, heard, or did in relation to the case at hand. For example, a plaintiff's attorney in a car accident personal injury lawsuit may call a bystander to testify as to what he or she saw just before, during, and/or after the accident, including what the weather was like, what happened during the accident, and any other details the witness remembers from the day.

What happens after a witness is cross-examined?

After this, the opposing attorney can conduct a final recross examination of the witness, which is limited to the subjects brought up during the redirect.

What is the purpose of a direct examination?

The purpose of a direct examination is to get the witness to testify about facts that support the plaintiff's case. Generally, a witness can't give an opinion or draw conclusions from the evidence unless that person has been qualified as an ...

How to undermine a witness's credibility?

Another way to undermine the witness's credibility is to show that the witness has a stake in the outcome of the case, which might influence the testimony.

What happens when a defendant calls witnesses?

The same procedure is followed as in the plaintiff's presentation of witnesses. The defendant's attorney conducts direct examination of the witnesses, and the plaintiff's attorney will conduct cross-examinations.

What is cross examination in court?

Cross-Examination. When the lawyer for the plaintiff or the government has finished questioning a witness, the lawyer for the defendant may then cross-examine the witness. Cross-examination is generally limited to questioning only on matters that were raised during direct examination.

What happens when a lawyer calls an adverse witness?

When a lawyer calls an adverse or hostile witness (a witness whose relationship to the lawyer’s client is such that his testimony is likely to be prejudicial) on direct examination, the lawyer can ask leading questions as on cross-examination.

Why do prosecutor ask narrow questions?

They typically ask narrow questions intended to force the witness to provide certain information. Prosecutors use this tactic, too. Of course, defendants and their witnesses must testify truthfully at all times. But they must be careful to avoid going along with misleading information in a prosecutor's leading questions.

Does Carson agree with the cross-examination?

The question is leading but proper. The theory is that since Carson is likely to be hostile to the cross-examiner, he won't agree if the information is false. If Carson had two whiskeys—not three—within the half hour in question, he would simply answer, "No.". Talk to a Lawyer.

What is cross examination?

Cross-Examination. This is the process of questioning your opponent’s witnesses. The purpose of cross-examination is firstly to establish and advance you own and case and secondly to attack the other side’s case. Before you cross-examine a witness you need to consider whether the evidence they have provided in chief is harmful to your case.

When cross-examining a witness, do you need to be careful?

When cross-examining a witness you need to bear in mind that most of them are not lying. They are often trying to provide an account of the events as they saw them. You should therefore be careful if you decide to attack them as untruthful. It is best to focus upon the manner in which they saw the event.

What to consider before cross-examination?

Before you cross-examine a witness you need to consider whether the evidence they have provided in chief is harmful to your case. If you establish that their testimony has not been harmful then you need to conduct a constructive cross-examination showing that he/she is to be trusted.

Why is cross-examination important?

It is important that when cross-examining witnesses that the questioning is constructive to obtain support for your story and destructive questioning to challenge a version of the story which is not accepted by you. The cross-examination of witnesses needs to be structured and this can be achieved through appropriate planning.

How to strengthen your argument in cross examination?

Keep your cross-examination to four points which support your theory of the case. This will strengthen your argument. Make your strongest points at the beginning and end of your cross-examination as these are the points likely to remain in the mind of the listener.

Can you prepare every question like a script?

Look Before You Leap: Having to think on your feet is inevitable on cross, but you can't go in empty handed. Yes, you can prepare every single question like a script. However, to a degree, doing so puts you at a disadvantage to a degree when you do that.

Can an attorney testify?

Attorneys cannot testify , but when it comes to cross examination this is your best way to tell your client’s side of the story. You are in the Driver’s Seat Despite your Client Being a Backseat Driver: I don’t think this can be emphasized enough with my fellow young lawyers, but never forget that it is your case.

What to do when cross-examination is not productive?

Once you have started cross-examination, quickly assess how it is going. If you sense that the cross will not prove productive, move on to something else. It is better to leave the jurors wondering where you were going, than for them to know for certain that you were going nowhere.

What to do if you score a devastating blow on a witness's credibility?

If you are fortunate enough to score a devastating blow on the witness’s credibility, consider cutting short your cross-examination, even if you had other points to make with the witness.

Definition of Cross-Examination

What Is Cross-Examination

• During court proceedings, witnesses are called to the stand and questioned by the attorney who called them. After that attorney ends his questioning, the attorney for the opposing party is given the opportunity to ask questions of the same witness. This is known as “cross-examination,” serves the purpose of discrediting, or causing doubt about, the...

See more on legaldictionary.net

Types of Cross-Examination

Cross-Examination Questions

Challenging Credibility on Cross-Examination

The Art of Cross-Examination

Discrediting Testimony of Expert Witnesses on Cross Examination

Direct Examination

Cross-Examination

• After the plaintiff's attorney completes the direct examination, the defendant's attorney gets to cross-examine the witness. Cross-examination is a fundamental right in the American system of justice. Generally, cross-examination is limited to matters covered during the direct examination. The attorney may ask leading questions during cross-examina...

See more on lawyers.com

Challenging Witness's Credibility on Cross-Examination

Redirect and Recross Examination

Defense's Case