If you’ve read my other article on the cost of a divorce, you’ll get a sense for how expensive a divorce and divorce lawyer can be. So, if you’re going to pony up all that dough, it should make sense from a financial, or at least, a life perspective before parting with your hard-earned cash (or someone else’s if you’re borrowing it).
Nov 25, 2013 · It may depend on what you mean by my ex. If it is ex girlfriend, and the stuff is yours, you could possibly get her for breach of trust, larceny, or malicious…
Sep 24, 2012 · If you are particularly fortunate, you will never need an attorney. On the other hand, if you, like an ever-growing number of people, require the services of an attorney, the following may be invaluabl
Suing someone, or responding to someone’s lawsuit against you? An attorney who specializes in civil litigation will be your best legal option. You may also find that different attorneys will specialize in different litigation areas as well. For example, a corporate litigation lawyer should have the expertise to help you with commercial litigation issues.
Employment Lawyer. Whether you’re a company that’s having a problem with an employee, or an individual who’s having problems with the company you work for, an employment lawyer can generally provide advice about legal issues which arise from an employment contract or within an employment relationship.
The Social Security Disability system can be a particularly complex system in which to navigate. An attorney who specializes in Social Security Disability issues can help you with any step in the Social Security Disability process, including assisting you with eligibility issues, launching an appeal of a decision to deny you benefits and dealing with the reduction or termination of your benefits.
A corporate lawyer will be able to help you with issues related to the formation of your corporation, general corporate governance issues and corporate compliance issues.
The estate planning lawyer specializes in wills and trusts, and can help you to draw up a will to pass on your assets. Among other estate planning legal services, this type of lawyer can help you set up a trust which will help take care of your children’s financial needs.
If you’ve been injured while on the job, or have had to face the death of a loved one as a result of a workplace accident or occupational disease, a lawyer who specializes in workers compensation law can help you navigate the issues you face, such as the extent of the employer’s fault and the amount of benefits to which you are entitled.
Also known as an IP attorney, an intellectual property lawyer can advise you with regard to issues relating to intellectual property, such as copyrights, trademarks, patents, industrial design and trade secrets.
Regardless of what your Ex would do you choose to treat them as if the roles were reversed. You do not leave them with as little as possible even if they would do that to you.
You could also get a friend or relative to pick them up, (if you have more stuff) or ask the police to come with you, in which case they will go to the door, ask him to allow you to pick up your belongings and stay around to make sure you leave without incident.
Kiss your stuff goodbye and count your blessings that he's not stalking you. Stay away from him, cut off all contact, call it a loss and move on.
Ask him or her to give them back. If he or she is still refusing you can make a complain to the police. Actually there is no legal relationship between a girl friend and boy friend unless both have a child together or promise of marriage.
If you lived together, what the lease said may matter. If you were both on the lease, then you are equal partners with a contract to the landlord.
What was your relationship? If there was no child, no common law relationship, and no marriage or proposal, then you were roommates, nothing more. And that’s assuming you lived together.
Short answer? Possession is 9/10th s of the law.
Moving out does not relieve you of all duties toward the property. Occupation or possession of real property is only one branch in the bundle of sticks of ownership (or leasehold, if you rent). Whether you or your former romantic partner moves out of your previously shared residence—and if so, when—is completely up to you.
A judge will not punish you if you are the one who moves out. Being the first to leave the home will not affect your parental rights, property-ownership rights, or anything else related to the divorce. Sure, you might be ordered to provide child support and possibly spousal maintenance, at least temporarily while the case is actively pending in court. But this would be true no matter who is living in the residence or if neither of you is doing so anymore.
If an order of protection is in place, and you are truly afraid for the life or safety of yourself and/or other loved ones in the home, you may be able to change the locks temporarily. Then you would need to change them back or give the other party a key once the danger has subsided.
In Arizona, the answer is no. Moving out of the marital residence or home you have shared with your romantic partner does not break any law, criminal or otherwise. Also, it cannot be used against you in family court. Arizona is a no-fault divorce state.
Technically, both parties have the right to access the property anytime if they are both named as the owners or lessees. So a better plan would be to hold off changing the locks until the moved-out party is notified and has given written consent.
A related question is whether a spouse or parent can have the locks changed on the residence so that the other party cannot get back in. This depends on whether both people are listed on the title or lease. It also depends on whether any protective orders are in place preventing the defendant from returning without law enforcement on standby while the person picks up some of his or her belongings.
“If you want to improve your chances of securing the best lawyer to take your case, you need to prepare before you meet them,” advises attorney Stephen Babcock. “Get your story, facts, and proof together well before your first meeting.” This not only ensures that you understand your own needs, but it helps a good lawyer to ascertain whether he or she can actually help you. “We want the best clients too. Proving you’re organized and reliable helps us.”
“ Winning cases can be lost because of a client who lies or exaggerates just as easily as because of a lawyer who tells the client what the client wants to hear instead of what is true.” So when dealing with attorneys, don’t just look for honesty—be honest.
In fact, a lawyer should try to stay out of court. “In my experience, a good lawyer always finds every opportunity to keep a case from being decided by a judge, and only relents on trying a case before the bench when all alternatives have been exhausted,” attorney, Jason Cruz says.
On reading a demand letter, the other person will often say, “this isn’t worth the trouble” and they quickly settle. But here’s a secret from Knight: You don’t need a lawyer to write a demand letter. You can do it yourself. Just make it look as formal as possible, and you may find your dispute goes away—no charge to you.
It’s not as hard as you might think, according to attorney Randall M. Kessler, author of Divorce: Protect Yourself, Your Kids and Your Future. “Shop around and trust your instincts,” he advises. “Does the lawyer listen to you? Do they explain things in a way you can understand? And are they willing to discuss fees and costs? The person you hire will need to be someone you trust and believe in, so be sure you feel very good about them from the start.”
In choosing your attorney and your plan of action in resolving a dispute, it’s important to consider that despite what you see on television, most cases never see the inside of a courtroom. Typically, they’re settled outside the courtroom because of the time and expense involved, according to attorney Darren Heitner, author of How to Play the Game: What Every Sports Attorney Needs to Know.
Heidi tells her lawyer that the drugs belonged to her , and that she bought them for the first time during a period of great stress in her life, just after she lost her job. Heidi authorizes her lawyer to reveal this information to the D.A., hoping to achieve a favorable plea bargain.
Example: Benny Wilson is charged with possession of stolen merchandise. The day after discussing the case with his lawyer, Benny discusses it with a neighbor. As long as Benny does not say something to his neighbor like, "Here's what I told my lawyer yesterday…," the attorney-client communications remain confidential.
Defendants who bring strangers (people who are not part of the attorney-client relationship) into a meeting risk losing the right to claim that the meeting was confidential. This means that the D.A. might be able to ask the stranger or even the defendant about what was said during the meeting.
The most basic principle underlying the lawyer-client relationship is that lawyer-client communications are privileged, or confidential. This means that lawyers cannot reveal clients' oral or written statements (nor lawyers' own statements to clients) to anyone, including prosecutors, employers, friends, or family members, ...
Heidi decides not to hire Lawless and, instead, retains Bill Mucho as her lawyer after she bails out. At trial, the prosecutor calls Lawless as a witness and asks him to reveal what Heidi told him in their jail conversation. Lawless cannot testify. Lawless spoke to Heidi in his capacity as an attorney, so their conversation is confidential even though Heidi decided to hire a different attorney.
Can they testify to what you said? Yes. Lawyer-client communications are confidential only if they are made in a context where it would be reasonable to expect that they would remain confidential. ( Katz v. U.S., 389 U.S. 347 (1967).) A defendant who talks to a lawyer in such a loud voice that others overhear what is said has no reasonable expectation of privacy and thus waives (gives up) the privilege. Similarly, people who talk about their cases on cell phones in public places risk losing confidentiality.
For perfectly understandable reasons, defendants sometimes want their parents, spouses, or friends to be present when they consult with their lawyers. Does that mean that the conversation won't be considered confidential?