What leads to Uber cars getting into crashes in Boston? Oftentimes, it is the same factors that can cause any other type of traffic accident, such as weather, heavy traffic, and (mos t significantly) motorist error.
In many Uber cases, our first order of business is to investigate what happened to our clients. We often have two goals in mind: to figure out who should pay compensation to our clients for causing their injuries, and to determine how much money our clients deserve to receive. By carefully analyzing the facts of a Boston Uber crash and the harm it inflicted on our client (sometimes with the help of forensic, financial, and medical experts), we can plan a legal strategy designed to obtain the maximum compensation available to our client under Massachusetts law.
At Rawson Merrigan & Litner, LLP, our Boston accident lawyers have extensive experience handling complex vehicle accident claims, and we understand how the no-fault system interferes with Uber and Lyft accident cases.
Uber and Lyft accidents are going to be complex, and injury victims should not try to handle these cases without an attorney. A Boston Uber or Lyft accident lawyer will use their resources to stand up to aggressive insurance carriers and rideshare companies. They can:
Uber and Lyft drivers are just like anybody else on the roadway. These are regular drivers with a standard license using their own vehicles to chauffeur people from place to place. They can, and do, make mistakes behind the wheel.
If you or somebody you care about has been injured in an accident involving an Uber or Lyft vehicle in the Boston area, turn to the team at Rawson Merrigan & Litner, LLP as soon as possible. We have experience investigating complex vehicle accident cases, particularly those that involve multiple parties.
Mass. 2014) (close to $1 million jury verdict in favor of skycap who was terminated in retaliation for bringing wage complaint about policy affecting skycaps’ tips)
233 (2001) (Supreme Judicial Court decided that Massachusetts law would diverge from federal law in prohibiting discrimination against individuals with correctable disabilities, resulting in hiring of hearing-impaired police officer candidate and jury verdict of nearly $1 million)
Mass. 2008) (jury verdict in favor of skycaps, finding that airline violated state tips law and interfered with skycaps’ relationship with passengers by charging $2 per bag and not allowing skycaps to keep the proceeds of the charge; verdict led to airline dropping charge nationwide) (damages award reversed on federal preemption grounds)
Villon v. Marriott, Hawaii Supreme Court No. 11-747 (2013) (waitstaff could sue to recover service charges retained by employers under state service charge statute, leading to resolution of multiple cases and payments to thousands of Hawaii service employees)
She is currently representing workers in a number of cases against “gig economy” companies that save on labor costs by misclassifying employees as independent contractors. She represents employees nationally, at the trial court and appellate levels, including six landmark victories at the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Some of her most notable cases include victories against Starbucks, FedEx, and American Airlines. The Boston Globe has profiled her work twice as a “legal champion” fighting for the rights of low wage workers , and she has also been profiled in such publications as the Wall Street Journal, Mother Jones, and the LA Times.
Shannon Liss-Riordan is widely recognized as one of the nation’s top plaintiffs’ class action employment lawyers. She has reshaped industries through her pioneering successes representing tipped workers, employees misclassified as independent contractors, and low wage workers who have been denied overtime, minimum wage, and other wage protections.
In 2019, Ms. Liss-Riordan ran for the U.S. Senate in the Democratic primary for Massachusetts, a campaign for which she received a number of labor endorsements.