Jul 30, 2019 · ABRAHAM LINCOLN SAID: A man who represents himself, has a fool for a client. In 2002 “The Cincinnati Enquirer” of Ohio printed an elaborate instance with an attribution to Lincoln: [10] 2002 August 26, The Cincinnati Enquirer, Defend: More face court alone (Continuation title), Start Page A1, Quote Page A10, Column 1, Cincinnati, Ohio. (Newspapers_com)
Sep 08, 2011 · Next, when a “personally vested" emotional state is combined with all the complexities and nuances that every single legal matter involves, the answer becomes obvious: “He [and even a lawyer] who represents himself [TRULY] has a fool of a client! WHY EVERY PERSON SHOULD ALWAYS HIRE A LAWYER IN ALMOST EVERY CASE
an attorney who represents himself has a fool for a client Choosing to represent yourself in court rather than hiring a lawyer is usually very unwise. A: "I'm licensed and all, so I'm just going to represent myself.
an attorney who represents himself has a fool for a client (redirected from attorney who represents himself has a fool for a client ) Choosing to represent yourself in court rather than hiring a lawyer is usually very unwise.
ABRAHAM LINCOLN SAID: A man who represents himself, has a fool for a client.
Abraham Lincoln reportedly employed the following adage. Here are two versions: If you are your own lawyer you have a fool for a client. He who represents himself has a fool for a client.
It is an old law adage, copied from the Italian proverb of Che s’insegna, &c. that the man who is his own lawyer has a fool for his client. If he undertakes, of choice, to become so in making his will, he seems to us to verify the proverb in the most obvious and striking instance. For the ill consequences of his ignorance fall upon those whom he loves best, and wishes to benefit most.
Before you act, it’s Prudence soberly to consider; for after Action you cannot recede without dishonour: Take the Advice of some Prudent Friend; for he who will be his own Counsellour, shall be sure to have a Fool for his Client.
Benjamin Franklin (Fredd Wayne): No, that might be unwise, Sir. The man who defends himself in court has a fool for a lawyer and a jackass for a client.
Whoever, he stole it from me. In 1976 the famous statesman, lawyer, and quotation magnet Abraham Lincoln received credit for the saying in a Spokane, Washington newspaper. Lincoln died in 1865, so this attribution is very late, and it is not substantive: 9.
A counselor is a person who gives counsel, i.e., an adviser. Alternatively, a counsellor is an attorney, especially one who pleads cases in court. The context suggests to QI that the first interpretation is the most likely.
However, in the event that some further action is necessary, then the smartest decision a person can make is to allow an experienced trained professional to assist them in the resolution of the matter ; especially when the entire “weight" of the legal system is brought into play.
In many cases, because of the issues and often the “twists", or even simply because the extent of the damages and the possible exposure of the insurance company, the filing of a lawsuit will be required! In fact, statistics show that if a case potentially involves a settlement in excess of $100,000.00; that litigation will more likely than not be required! Simply, because any case with that amount of exposure will cause ALL parties (including the insurance company) to exercise as much “due diligence" as possible to determine whether the claim has merit.
All professionals, including but not limited to attorneys, physicians, accountants, dentists, but also “specialists" of all areas - all have one key factor in common: Years of education and Training! Training and education that if used in an “objective" and “meaningful" way, can and often does make the difference between winning and losing, and in extreme cases – “financial" demise, and loss of “freedom and liberty".
Next, when a “personally vested" emotional state is combined with all the complexities and nuances that every single legal matter involves, the answer becomes obvious: “He [and even a lawyer] who represents himself [TRULY] has a fool of a client!
President Lincoln was also an attorney, and yet – he felt compelled to make that statement? Why? Speaking from the perspective of an attorney that has been practicing law for over 20 years, the answer to me is actually as much “psychological" as it is “practical". In fact, as much of my practice consists of representing attorneys and other professionals in criminal matters, civil litigation, bankruptcy proceedings, and sales of structured settlements, and annuities, I have had the “unique" opportunity to see first-hand – just how true that statement actually is!
A. Because personal injury claims are generally handled on a “contingency basis"; the ONLY attorney fees charged will come from the FINAL settlement of the claim. Although, “costs" on occasion may be required (particularly if litigation is necessary); most experienced attorneys will ALSO ADVANCE those costs on your behalf at no interest as well.
When you took your first bar review prep course you probably heard the adage, “The man who represents himself has a fool for a client.” The internet tries to attribute the quote, like many other profundities, to Abraham Lincoln, but some sources credit it years earlier to English clergyman Henry Kett. Regardless who said it or who said it first, the wisdom of the adage are at least two. First, an individual, even if he or she is a trained lawyer, may not have the expertise in the particular area of law at issue, even though many of us think we are smart enough to figure anything out. (We lawyers are sometimes too smart for our own good.) More precarious is that someone who represents him or herself is likely to lack the ability to see both sides of a case. As lawyers, we all know how difficult it is to convince a head strong client from doing something stupid.
More precarious is that someone who represents him or herself is likely to lack the ability to see both sides of a case. As lawyers, we all know how difficult it is to convince a head strong client from doing something stupid. Of course, many people can’t afford to hire a lawyer – but that’s a different thing.
Mark Peterson, the disgraced and convicted Contra Costa County District Attorney, found out the hard way. Just last month, Peterson pled no contest to a single count of felony perjury and resigned from office. Peterson didn’t represent himself in his own criminal case. But he did represent himself in what seven years earlier he probably considered ...
Mark Morodomi is Senior Counsel, Governance in the UCOP’s Office of General Counsel .
But he did represent himself in what seven years earlier he probably considered a crumb of a matter: he acted as his own political campaign’s treasurer. Peterson was no novice politician. He had been a Concord City Councilman before he ran for district attorney in 2010.
In the G. K. Chesterton story "The Ecstatic Thief", the eponymous thief defends himself successfully.
The Law of Innocence: Defense attorney Mickey Haller represents himself after he is accused of murder. Mickey says "Maybe I did have a fool for a client" but still feels like he has to handle his own defense. He does at least get his law partner Jennifer Aronson, and later his ex-wife Maggie McPherson, to sit alongside him.
But their decision to defend themselves backfires as Chanel's "strategy" involves simply yelling at people and demanding to be set free. Even then, it looks like they'll be acquitted...until Chanel stands up in court to bad mouth every member of the jury who then turns in a guilty verdict. If the Chanels had just bothered to get a half-decent lawyer, they would have gotten out scot-free.
In issue 38 of the 2016 Green Arrow run, Ollie decides to represent himself in court . While this is met with shock (and his lawyer rubbing her temples), the defense itself goes pretty smoothly thanks to the Justice League stepping in.
He manages to get himself acquitted despite a signed confession, a murder weapon, and motive. The way he was able to do this was that the investigating detective was sleeping with the victim (the killer's wife) making the confession suspect when the detective's testimony of it was undermined, and the murder weapon had never been fired (he had switched it with the detective's weapon as they were identical models). As for motive, without evidence it's useless. This was helped by the fact that the prosecutor had his foot out the door as he was about to get a job at a prestigious law firm and wasn't taking the case very seriously due to the mountain of evidence. Crawford also purposely used an Obfuscating Stupidity angle to appear like an easy win to the haughty and uninterested public prosecutor. When the prosecutor then finds a way to try Crawford for murder, Crawford hires a defense team of 4+ lawyers. He no longer has the tricks available that got him acquitted the first time. Both times rely on Hollywood Law .
The prosecution objects because he's not even sane enough to confirm his own identity. It turns out to be a part of a ploy to steal the evidence and escape the court.
Robert Kearns defends himself in Flash of Genius in his 1980 lawsuit against Ford, which ends with $10.1 million in damages after his attorney Gregory Lawson (Alan Alda) withdraws from the suit. He then sues Chrysler in 1992, receiving $18.7 million. In Real Life, he was represented by Gregory Lawson in the suit against Ford but did represent himself against Chrysler. It's possible this was changed to have a scene where he examines himself on the witness stand in homage to the King of the Hill episode below.