lawyer who represented plaintiff in leonard v pepsico

by Granville Orn 6 min read

Who was the plaintiff in the PepsiCo V Leonard Case?

Pepsico. Leonard v. Pepsico. Brief Fact Summary. PepsiCo (Defendant), advertised Pepsi related paraphernalia, which one could obtain by getting “Pepsi points” by drinking Pepsi. The commercial featured a youth arriving at school in a Harrier Jet and said the Harrier Jet was 7,000,000 Pepsi points. Plaintiff tried to obtain the Harrier Jet ...

Did plaintiff actually see the Pepsi commercial in Florida?

Mar 21, 2000 · When the teenager is shown in the jet, the ad prices it as 7 million points. Plaintiff-appellant John D.R. Leonard alleges that the ad was an offer, that he accepted the offer by tendering the equivalent of 7 million points, and that Pepsico has …

How much did plaintiff pay for the Pepsi lawsuit?

John D.R. LEONARD v. PEPSICO, INC. (August 5, 1999) 88 F. Supp 2d 116 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) OPINION & ORDER WOOD, J. Plaintiff brought this action seeking, among other things, specific performance of an alleged offer of a Harrier Jet, featured in a television advertisement for defendant's "Pepsi Stuff" promotion. Defendant has

Can a judge decide whether a Pepsi advertisement is an offer?

Jul 14, 2021 · Between July and August of 1996, two lawsuits were brought forth: one by PepsiCo, the “declaratory judgment action” and the other by Leonard, the “Florida action.”. The Florida suit was transferred by US District Court Judge James Lawrence King for a lack of meaningful relationship to the controversy. Upon this transfer, the plaintiff ...

Who was involved in the Pepsi Points case?

John Leonard
3d 88 (2d Cir. 2000), more widely known as the Pepsi Points Case, is a contracts case tried in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in 1999, in which the plaintiff, John Leonard, sued PepsiCo, Inc.
...
Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc.
Judge(s) sittingKimba Wood
9 more rows

What happened in Leonard vs Pepsico?

A television commercial depicting a military jet is not an offer of goods; any objective person cannot reasonably conclude that a television commercial was an actual offer of a military jet of which consumers could accept; a television commercial that was an alleged contract did not satisfy the New York statute of ...

Does Pepsi Stuff include a Harrier jet?

The item that you have requested is not part of the Pepsi Stuff collection. It is not included in the catalogue or on the order form, and only catalogue merchandise can be redeemed under this program. The Harrier jet in the Pepsi commercial is fanciful and is simply included to create a humorous and entertaining ad.

Did the guy who sues Pepsi for Harrier Jet?

Public sentiment was decidedly in favor of Leonard getting his Harrier jet, but the Southern District of New York would be the decider in the end. It ruled in favor of Pepsi. “No objective person could reasonably have concluded that the commercial actually offered consumers a Harrier Jet,” the court said.

Was there a binding contract between Leonard and PepsiCo?

Leonard v. PepsiCo, Inc. is a famous example of an invalid contract. In 1995, John Leonard under the influence of a Pepsi commercial tried to enforce an alleged offer to obtain a Harrier jet for 7 million company's points (Contract Law, n.d.; Lexisondemand, 2009).Nov 20, 2020

Did Leonard get the Harrier jet?

Then Leonard hit the phones and convinced five well off investors to give him the $700,000. "He sent Pepsi 15 labels and a check and waited for his jet," reported John Blackstone. The jet, though, never came. Pepsi's response: the ad was just a joke.Jan 29, 2015

How much was a Harrier jet worth in 1996?

$33.8 million
The real price of a Harrier in 1996 was $33.8 million and used 11.4 gallons of fuel per minute. Leonard included $10 for shipping and handling, as per the contest rules. PepsiCo.Apr 2, 2018

How much is a PepCoin worth?

approximately 37 cents
According to the PepCoin FAQ, each scanned snack combination is worth approximately 37 cents, which it says is 10 percent of the average combined retail price of the two items. If you do the math, that means it takes six drinks and six bags of chips to hit that $2 threshold.Sep 13, 2019

What is the Harrier jet in the Pepsico ad?

Pepsico characterizes the use of the Harrier jet in the ad as a hyperbolic joke (“zany humor”), cites the ad's reference to offering details contained in the promotional catalog (which contains no Harrier fighter plane), and argues that no objective person would construe the ad as an offer for the Harrier jet.

What is the name of the aircraft in the Pepsi commercial?

A television commercial aired by Pepsico depicted a teenager gloating over various items of merchandise earned by Pepsi points, and culminated in the teenager arriving at high school in a Harrier Jet , a fighter aircraft of the United States Marine Corps.

Who is Charles Ossola?

Charles Ossola, New York, N.Y. (Arnold & Porter, Washington D.C., and Arent, Fox, Kitner, Plotkin & Kahn, New York, N.Y. on the brief) for Defendant-Appellee. In 1995, defendant-appellee Pepsico, Inc. conducted a promotion in which it offered merchandise in exchange for “points” earned by purchasing Pepsi Cola.

What was the name of the Pepsi case?

Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc., 88 F. Supp. 2d 116, ( S.D.N.Y. 1999), aff'd 210 F. 3d 88 ( 2d Cir. 2000), more widely known as the Pepsi Points Case, is a contracts case tried in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in 1999, in which the plaintiff, John Leonard, sued PepsiCo, Inc. in an effort to enforce an " offer " to redeem 7,000,000 Pepsi Points for an AV-8 Harrier II jump jet (valued at $33.8 million at the time) which PepsiCo had shown in a portion of a televised commercial that PepsiCo argued was intended to be humorous.

How many Pepsi points did the plaintiff get?

The plaintiff did not collect 7,000,000 Pepsi Points through the purchase of Pepsi products, but instead sent a certified check for $700,008.50 as permitted by the contest rules. Leonard had 15 existing points, paid $0.10 a point for the remaining 6,999,985 points, and a $10 shipping and handling fee.

Where was the case of the Pepsi case brought?

The case was originally brought in Florida, but eventually heard in New York. The defendant, Pepsi, moved for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Among other claims made, Leonard claimed that a federal judge was incapable of deciding on the matter, and that instead the decision had to be made by a jury consisting ...

Did Pepsi ever cashed the check?

Since Pepsi never cashed the check, a case for fraud held no water; additionally, while the ad was alleged to have been a breach of contract, the ad was deemed to be humorous and did not legally constitute an offer under the Restatement (Second) of Contracts. Pepsi continued to air the commercial, but it updated the cost of the Harrier Jet to 700 million Pepsi Points and added a clarifying "Just Kidding" disclaimer. The White House stated that the Harrier Jet would not be sold to civilians without "demilitarization", which, in the case of the Harrier, would have included stripping it of its ability to land and take off vertically.

What is the Harrier jet in the Pepsico ad?

Pepsico characterizes the use of the Harrier jet in the ad as a hyperbolic joke ("zany humor"), cites the ad's reference to offering details contained in the promotional catalog (which contains no Harrier fighter plane), and argues that no objective person would construe the ad as an offer for the Harrier jet.

What is the name of the aircraft in the Pepsi commercial?

A television commercial aired by Pepsico depicted a teenager gloating over various items of merchandise earned by Pepsi points, and culminated in the teenager arriving at high school in a Harrier Jet , a fighter aircraft of the United States Marine Corps.