Jul 20, 2020 · Roy Den Hollander had openly seethed against the judge, Esther Salas. After the shooting at her home, he was found dead in an apparent suicide. Give this article 196 From left: Roy Den Hollander...
Aug 03, 2020 · Roy Den Hollander, 72, a lawyer and self-described anti-feminist, went to the judge’s North Brunswick home on 19 July, and shot her son Daniel Anderl, 20, and husband Mark Anderl, 63, when they...
Jul 21, 2020 · Roy Den Hollander, an attorney known for bringing lawsuits over perceived infringements of men’s rights, was found dead in the Catskills area of New York on Monday, a day after Daniel Anderl, the...
Jul 20, 2020 · Federal Judge Esther Salas’ husband Mark Anderl, a 63-year-old criminal defense lawyer and former prosecutor, and her 20-year-old son, Daniel, were allegedly shot by Roy Den Hollander (pictured), a...
Hours after the shooting in New Jersey, the police found Mr. Den Hollander’s body off a road in upstate New York with a single gunshot to the head. Mr. Den Hollander was a self-described “anti-feminist” with a record of virulently misogynistic and hateful writing.
Her husband, Mark Anderl, who was shot three times, remains hospitalized. “Two weeks ago, my life as I knew it changed in an instant, and my family will never be ...
Mr. Den Hollander also had a photo of New York State’s chief judge, Janet M. DiFiore, in his car, according to her spokesman, Lucian Chalfen. A former federal judge in Manhattan, Shira A. Scheindlin, agreed that access to judges’ home addresses and phone numbers too often puts them and their families at risk.
Den Hollander's body was discovered in a car by a municipal employee in the town of Rockland, New York. He died of an apparently self-inflicted gunshot wound, the sources said. New York State Police were on scene and the FBI was called. A FedEx package addressed to Judge Salas was discovered in the car, sources said.
Salas had received threats in the past, sources said. Authorities are investigating whether there is any connection between those prior threats and the shooting, or whether it possibly involved the husband's work as a criminal defense attorney.
In a frightening twist, the FBI Monday contacted New York State’s chief judge, Janet DiFiore, to notify her that Den Hollander had her name and photo in his car, her spokesman, Lucian Chalfen, confirmed. The agents didn’t indicate whether Hollander meant to target her too, Chalfen said.
He has previously worked at New York Newsday, Newsday, and the Village Voice. He authored a book on a police officer who became a whistleblower in Brooklyn called "The NYPD Tapes."
If a judge is biased or prejudiced for or against a party or attorney, he cannot be fair and impartial in deciding the case. A party or attorney who believes such bias or prejudice exists must prove it with admissible evidence, and cannot base this belief on mere suspicion.
Even a judge who is not serving as the finder of fact (i.e., when the case is to be decided by a jury) cannot be fair and impartial if he or she has personal knowledge of disputed facts, because the judge's evidentiary rulings (in pleadings and motions made by the parties) may be influenced by that knowledge.
In large cities, public defenders are often leaders in the defense community, with significant experience and ability. Court-appointed private attorneys who are under contract to provide services are also likely to have extensive experience.
Updated: Dec 15th, 2020. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to the assistance of legal counsel in all felony cases. If a person does not have the financial means to hire an attorney, courts will appoint a lawyer free of charge in all cases, including misdemeanors, that have the possibility of incarceration.
Although any one lawyer might be better than another, the general assumption that private attorneys are better than public defenders is not true. Consider the following: Most public defenders are committed to the cause of justice and want to help you get the best result possible.
If you are dissatisfied with your lawyer, your first step should be to raise your concerns in a conversation. If the problem persists and your lawyer is a public defender, you may contact the lawyer’s supervisor. In rare cases, the supervisor may assign a different public defender. This would be done without court intervention.
You might feel that your counsel should have made certain legal motions, like a request to exclude certain evidence (such as statements made to arresting officers or items seized during a search ). This argument is usually a long shot. Judges are reluctant to second-guess the legitimate legal strategies of counsel and are unlikely to replace attorneys if they can articulate a reasonable basis for choosing not to make the legal motions you seek.
At a hearing in which you ask for a new lawyer, the courtroom is typically closed to all but the judge, the defendant, and the appointed lawyer, and the record of the proceeding will be sealed. This means that neither the prosecutor nor the public will have access to a transcript of the proceeding. The defendant presents his grievance, the defendant’s lawyer responds, and the judge normally asks questions to clarify the dispute. The judge will attempt to resolve the disagreement without having to appoint a new lawyer.
If you're claiming your public defender is failing to communicate with you, you'll need detailed support showing a lack of communication over a substantial period. Bring documentation such as records of unreturned phone calls, canceled meetings, or missed jail or prison visits.