Full Answer
If they do not, they may be found to be negligent and a patient may be able to prove that medical malpractice occurred. Malpractice requires proving that a breach in duty occurred in the form of a failure to follow up and that it caused significant patient harm.
American Medical News reports that “Medical liability experts say missed appointments and failures to follow up pose some of the greatest legal risks for physicians.” And these problems are increasing with more hand-offs and more people being involved with the “team” taking care of the patient.
So he looked for a malpractice attorney who would help him file a case against the hospital. That’s when he ran into a problem faced by many who are harmed in a medical setting: Attorneys refuse their cases, not because the harm didn’t happen but because the potential economic damages are too low.
Proving malpractice means proving that a duty to provide care was breached and caused the patient damage. Inadequate follow up measures not only apply, but are increasingly common as reasons that patients file lawsuits. As care has become more ambulatory, follow up care has become more complicated, difficult, an often inadequate.
If a physician failed to correctly diagnose a medical condition that affected you or a family member, talk to us. At the Jacob Fuchsberg Law Firm, our attorneys have been handling medical malpractice claims for decades. We can assist you if your circumstances involve:
While feelings of dizziness and nausea are often associated with the flu, they may also be signs of an imminent heart attack—and we trust our doctors to know the difference.
In the unfortunate event, you were misdiagnosed, there are many steps you can take to help get the treatment you need, including:
Our misdiagnosis attorneys handle failure to diagnose and incorrect diagnosis cases in New York City and all of New York State, Connecticut, and New Jersey. Contact us to schedule your free consultation to discuss your concerns by calling 212.869.3500. We charge no fees until we recover compensation for your family.
Failure to make sure that appropriate follow-up was done and failure to contact patients about missed appointments are among the most frequent deficiencies cited as big legal risks for physicians.
Skeptical Scalpel is a recently retired surgeon and was a surgical department chairman and residency program director for many years. He is board-certified in general surgery and a surgical sub-specialty and has re-certified in both several times. For the last three years, he has been blogging at SkepticalScalpel.blogspot.com and tweeting as @SkepticScalpel. His blog averages over 1000 page views per day, and he has over 6700 followers on Twitter.
Patients frequently miss appointments and tests that their doctors schedule. No-show rates range from 5 to 55 percent. In some instances, like when a patient skips a cardiac stress test, for example, then has a heart attack, the hospital might classify what occurred as a “systems error.”.
Certain patients surely require special attention: non-English speakers, persons with dementia or other neurological conditions and those with social problems that interfere with their ability to show up. Doctors’ offices should anticipate these types of issues and work with patients to improve compliance.
When Failure to Follow Up is Negligent. There are situations in which a failure to follow up with a patient is not the fault of the doctor. The patient has a role to play in this too and a responsibility to make appointments and take a physician’s advice.
This can be especially serious when the patient’s condition is cancer. Not getting adequate follow up care often means not getting needed or recommended treatments. The ultimate consequences of all of the possible ways in which after care can fail or be inadequate varies by individual.
Malpractice requires proving that a breach in duty occurred in the form of a failure to follow up and that it caused significant patient harm.
There are many examples that constitute a failure to follow up, whether they are proven to be medical malpractice or not. From communication issues to failure to comply on the part of the patient, or even complete failure to contact a patient on the part of the doctor, there are many ways in which after care can be delayed or incomplete:
Cancer is often the most serious consequence of medical negligence because any delay in diagnosis and treatment can lead to progression to a terminal illness. This was the case when a man was treated for a case of anemia. The cause of the anemia could not be found and eventually the man died of colon cancer.
Physicians, medical offices, and other medical professionals and settings have a responsibility to do more than simply care for a patient once. They have a responsibility to follow up and provide after care. When this doesn’t happen, or there are failures in the follow up leading to inadequate care, the patient may suffer a range ...
In either case the resulting harm may range from additional or worse mild symptoms to severe symptoms and progression of disease, and even death. This can be especially serious when the patient’s condition is cancer.
Medical malpractice law is a fascinating area of law. It is technical. It is highly specialized and requires a great deal of knowledge of medicine as well as a high degree of trial skill. In this lecture, which was designed to teach lawyers who practice in other areas of law, what they need to know about medical malpractice law in New York. Lawyers across the country
Likewise, if a doctor did not treat you properly, but you did not suffer any injury as a result of that wrongdoing, then you have no business bringing a lawsuit seeking compensation.
Doctors and hospital officials who subscribe to this philosophy, such as those at the University of Michigan Health System, the University of Illinois at Chicago Medical Center and Stanford University Medical Center say they tell patients when something went wrong and offer an apology and sometimes even compensation.
That’s when he ran into a problem faced by many who are harmed in a medical setting: Attorneys refuse their cases, not because the harm didn’t happen but because the potential economic damages are too low.
More than 450 attorneys were surveyed for the Emory study, “ Uncovering the Silent Victims of the American Medical Liability System ,” which found that three out of four medical malpractice attorneys reject more than 90 percent of the cases they screen. The study found:
“ I turn down clearly meritorious cases all the time because I think they’re just not worth enough money ,” said an attorney from Pennsylvania, which the study said did not have caps on damages.
If you spend $50,000 and only get $50,000, the lawyer gets nothing and the patient gets nothing, ” he said. “Nobody wants to do that.”
But lawyers may have to invest $50,000 or more to pursue a case, and they usually only get paid if they win or settle.
Most cases settle, Malone said, but not usually until the last minute, years into the process. So he has to prepare the patient and himself for a long haul.