lawyer: what is fruit of the poisonous tree?

The “fruit of the poisonous tree” legal doctrine means that evidence found as a result of an illegal search, seizure or arrest cannot be used against you. For example, imagine that you are driving along the road and law enforcement stops you without a good reason to do so.

Full Answer

What is the fruit of the poisonous tree in criminal law?

May 18, 2020 · The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine extends the exclusionary rule by excluding any evidence exposed through other evidence attained by an illegal search, seizure, or arrest. The initial evidence obtained through a constitutional violation is the "poisonous tree." A "fruit" of that poisonous tree involves other evidence that was later discovered because of the …

Where did the term fruit of the poisonous tree come from?

Fruit of the Poisonous Tree. The principle that prohibits the use of secondary evidence in trial that was culled directly from primary evidence derived from an illegal Search and Seizure. The "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine is an offspring of the Exclusionary Rule. The exclusionary rule mandates that evidence obtained from an illegal arrest, unreasonable search, or coercive …

How do you determine if evidence is fruit of a poisonous tree?

Why is the fruit of the poisonous doctrine important?

What does the fruit of a poisonous tree phrase mean?

What does fruit of the poisonous tree mean in search and seizure law?

Is the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine a good rule?

What is the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine What was the decision in the case of Silverthorne Lumber Co v United States in relation to this doctrine?

Can illegally obtained emails be used in court?

Does fruit of the poisonous tree apply to civil cases?

What are three exceptions to the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine?

What is the difference between the exclusionary rule and fruit of the poisonous tree?

What is the fruit of the poisonous tree?

The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine. The “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine is an evidentiary rule that , together with the exclusionary rule, gives the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution its teeth. The exclusionary rule bars illegally obtained evidence from being used in trials.

Is evidence from police conduct inadmissible?

Any evidence that comes from illegal police conduct is likely inadmissible. But proving this in court will be hard, as proving it is “the fruit of the poisonous tree” is complex. An experienced criminal defense attorney will be able to present the best defense to dismiss illegally obtained evidence, which could lead to a dismissal of all charges.

What to do if you are arrested?

If you are arrested or learn you are under investigation, the first thing you should do is contact an experienced criminal defense attorney.

What is the exclusionary rule?

The exclusionary rule allows the courts to exclude evidence at trial if it was obtained in violation of the Constitution. It usually involves Fourth and Fifth Amendment violations. The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine extends the exclusionary rule by excluding any evidence exposed through other evidence attained by an illegal search, seizure, ...

What is the fruit of the poisonous tree?

Fruit of the Poisonous Tree. The principle that prohibits the use of secondary evidence in trial that was culled directly from primary evidence derived from an illegal Search and Seizure. The "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine is an offspring of the Exclusionary Rule. The exclusionary rule mandates that evidence obtained from an illegal arrest, ...

What is the theory of tree evidence?

The theory is that the tree (original illegal evidence) is poisoned and thus taints what grows from it. For example, as part of a coerced admission made without giving a prime suspect the so-called "Miranda warnings" (statement of rights, including the right to remain silent), the suspect tells the police the location of stolen property. Since the admission cannot be introduced as evidence in trial, neither can the stolen property. (See: Miranda warning)

What is the exclusionary rule?

The exclusionary rule mandates that evidence obtained from an illegal arrest, unreasonable search, or coercive interrogation must be excluded from trial. Under the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, evidence is also excluded from trial if it was gained through evidence uncovered in an illegal arrest, unreasonable search, ...

What is the fruit of the poisonous tree?

Fruit of the poisonous tree includes evidence gathered from just about any kind of police conduct that violates a defendant's constitutional rights. Take an illegal wiretap, for example. Suppose the police begin to listen in on and record the statements of suspected drug dealers without first getting a warrant.

Is evidence admissible even though police came by it illegally?

There are exceptions to the fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree doctrine, meaning that some evidence may be admissible even though police came by it illegally. Courts use the terms "inevitable discovery" and "attenuated taint" to describe situations in which the government finds evidence illegally, but could have found it lawfully. In those instances, the evidence may be admissible. (For another way to get illegally obtained evidence into court, see Is illegally seized evidence admissible to attack a defendant's credibility?)

What happens if you beat a statement out of a defendant?

If officers beat a statement out of a defendant, both the statement and evidence it leads to are inadmissible. But if the defendant gives a statement voluntarily, albeit without the requisite Miranda warning, evidence the police locate because of that statement can come in at trial. It doesn't matter that the statement itself is inadmissible—the poisoned fruit is nevertheless edible. (For more on Miranda and its exceptions, see When Police Violate the Miranda Rule and Exceptions to the Miranda Rule .)

What is the fruit of the poisonous tree?

The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine prevents the prosecution from admitting certain evidence into a criminal case after it has been tainted by a primary illegality. This doctrine is meant to remove illegally-acquired evidence from negatively impacting a criminal defendant.

What is the doctrine of deterrence?

The doctrine was designed to deter police misconduct that is reckless, deliberate or grossly negligent. However, it can also be used to correct widespread systemic negligence. The doctrine may not prevent all types of evidence from being admitted if it would only cause marginal deterrence.

What is the exclusionary rule in criminal law?

The exclusionary rule requires that evidence that is illegally obtained should be excluded from admission in a criminal trial. The fruit of the poisonous tree takes the assessment one step further by excluding evidence that stemmed from the primary illegality, the poisonous tree.

Why is a confession inadmissible?

Similarly, if law enforcement coerced a confession in which the criminal defendant said where a weapon used in a crime was located and law enforcement obtained a search warrant based on this confession, the weapon would be inadmissible because it would be the fruit of the poisonous tree. Likewise, the confession would also not be admissible.

What is independent source doctrine?

Independent Source Doctrine. Even if evidence was originally discovered by an unlawful search, the evidence can still be admitted in some cases. This can occur when the same evidence is obtained in an independent manner that was not tainted by the primary illegality. The court assesses whether the evidence that is at stake was discovered by ...

Can evidence be admitted in a search?

Even if evidence was originally discovered by an unlawful search, the evidence can still be admitted in some cases. This can occur when the same evidence is obtained in an independent manner that was not tainted by the primary illegality. The court assesses whether the evidence that is at stake was discovered by exploitation ...

What is the exclusionary rule?

The exclusionary rule requires that evidence that is illegally obtained should be excluded from admission in a criminal trial. The fruit of the poisonous tree takes the assessment one step further by excluding evidence that stemmed from the primary illegality, the poisonous tree. For example, if there is an illegal interrogation ...

What is the fruit of the poisonous tree?

The “fruit of the poisonous tree” refers to all evidence that stems from original evidence that was illegally obtained.

What is the doctrine of deterring police misconduct?

Although the doctrine was established to deter police mis conduct that is deliberate, reckless, or grossly negligent, it may not prevent all types of evidence from getting admitted in a criminal case if it only causes marginal deterrence.

What is independent source?

Independent Sources. The court assesses whether the evidence in question was discovered by illegal means by independent legal sources. Evidence that is acquired through independent legal sources is not prohibited by the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.

What is the fruit of the poisonous tree?

The “fruit of the poisonous tree” is a doctrine that is very similar to the exclusionary rule. Under the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine evidence obtained from illegal arrest, search or seizure is not admissible in the court of law. [ 1] . Such evidence is excluded by the courts at the time of trial and the State is prevented from using ...

Which amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures?

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is the part of Bill of Rights which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” It is in the light of this that we should examine the cases with respect to the fruit of the poison tree doctrine. The rule was first hinted in the case Boyd v. U.S. [ 3]

Why is evidence inadmissible?

The meaning of this metaphor is that, evidence (fruit) is inadmissible if it has been obtained as a result of illegal search, arrest and coercive interrogation (i.e. the source of the evidence is poisonous). It is so because it is a violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule?

The court then went on to say that the purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter the law officers from obtaining evidence illegally and to compel respect for the constitutional guarantee and “if the criminal is to go free, then it must be the law that sets him free”.