If your boss starts pressuring you, or even jokes about making sure you vote for the right candidate, don't start screaming that he or she is violating your rights and freedoms. Ignore what the boss says and vote for the person you think will be best for the job.
Sidney Powell, attorney for President Donald Trump, conducts a news conference at the Republican National Committee on lawsuits regarding the outcome of the 2020 presidential election on Thursday, November 19, 2020.
Every attorney, including the organized bar and disciplinary authorities, should disavow lawyers who trample the truth and undermine democracy through their false statements,” Bellows said.
Even the most zealous advocate for a client should not violate ethical or legal obligations merely to advance a client’s interests. Every individual has the right to hire the lawyer of his preference and choosing, subject to financial and ethical limitations.
In the court filing made public Monday night, Powell’s lawyers argued that Dominion’s defamation suit should be dropped because her claims were merely constitutionally protected expressions of political opinion, rather than declarations of fact. “Determining whether a statement is protected involves a two-step inquiry,” Powell’s lawyers wrote in ...
Trump was impeached in the House for inciting an insurrection, but was acquitted in the Senate. Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Ala., who spoke at the pre-riot rally in Washington, on Monday repeated false election theft claims as he launched his campaign for the Senate.
The invasion resulted in five deaths. More than 300 people have been charged in the Capitol riot.
Lawyers for pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell said that “no reasonable person” would believe that her false claims and conspiracy theories about the 2020 election were “truly statements of fact.”.
Sidney Powell, attorney for President Donald Trump, conducts a news conference at the Republican National Committee on lawsuits regarding the outcome of the 2020 presidential election on Thursday, November 19, 2020. Lawyers for pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell said that “no reasonable person” would believe that her false claims ...
of Eur. (communications by client to lawyer who is "bound to his client by a relationship of employment" not covered by privilege otherwise recognized in European Commission proceedings.) However, because the client is a corporation, and because of the dual roles of the in-house lawyer as both counsel to and employee of the corporation, ...
In-house counsel should also document the rationale for a memorandum's distribution in order to deflect a waiver argument; in other words, the writing should make clear why each recipient needed to get the memorandum. There are also a number of "don'ts" which in-house counsel should consider.
Specifically, counsel was asked to disclose the recommendations made to his employer during the negotiations about certain contractual provisions . It came as a surprise to many litigators that the company's assertion of the privilege relating to these conversations was rejected.
When writing a memorandum to an employee, a legend should be included such as "REQUEST FOR FACTS SO THAT LEGAL ADVICE CAN BE GIVEN.". When an employee sends a memorandum to in-house counsel, it could be helpful for the memorandum to contain prominent language such as "FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING LEGAL ADVICE.".
One situation involves former employees and whether communications had with them while employed can be protected by the attorney-client privilege because, at the time of their employment, they were either control group members or were involved in the subject matter which evolved into litigation.
The reality seems to be that while courts and practicing lawyers generally presume the existence of the privilege for outside counsel, the privilege is often challenged and must be proved when inside counsel is involved. It is a well-established principle in the United States that a corporation possesses an attorney-client privilege and ...
The collection agency was authorized to hire a law firm to file suit, if necessary, and in-house counsel's communications to the agency were passed on to the law firm eventually retained. When the defendant in the suit sought discovery of these communications and the privilege was asserted, the claim was rejected.
Rule 3.1 of the American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct—upon which most state bars rely at least in part—stipulates that a lawyer shall not bring an action unless a basis exists in law and fact for doing so.
Joanne Molinaro is a partner and trial lawyer in Chicago. Every year, incoming first-year law students are told a simple truth: You can sue anyone at any time for anything, anywhere. That does not mean you will win. And it does not mean doing so is always consistent with a lawyer’s ethical and professional obligations.
A state court judge thre w that lawsuit out after finding there was “no evidence” indicating the allegations were correct. Other allegations claim that individuals who are deceased or no longer living in the relevant state nonetheless voted in the 2020 election.
Attorney General William Barr called Trump’s conduct “inexcusable” and a “betrayal of his office” in a statement to the Associated Press Thursday, and members of Trump’s cabinet have reportedly considered invoking the 25th Amendment.
Though the case was shut down and has not had any activity since Nov. 18, Marcus asked the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to let him withdraw from the case. Marcus said he was withdrawing because “the client has used the lawyer’s services to perpetrate a crime and...insists on taking action that ...
Trump’s supporters violently forcing their way into the U.S. Capitol —and the president’s failure to adequately condemn their actions—has provoked widespread criticism from even Trump allies, with former White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney and a string of other officials resigning from the Trump administration.
The attorney cited a statute in Pennsylvania law that stipulates attorneys can withdraw from cases if the client uses a lawyer to “perpetrate a crime or fraud” or insists on taking “repugnant” action the lawyer disagrees with, as Marcus alleged.
Topline. Attorney Jerome Marcus, who represented the Trump campaign in a Pennsylvania post-election lawsuit, asked the federal court to let him withdraw from the case Thursday because the president had used the lawyer to “perpetrate a crime,” as Trump allies distance themselves from the president after his supporters violently stormed the U.S.