lawyer hired to defend john t scopes who was arrested for teaching evolution quizlet

by Prof. Freida Witting II 5 min read

Clarence Darrow

Which famous lawyer defended John Scopes?

Scopes was unsure whether he had ever actually taught evolution, but he incriminated himself purposely so the case could have a defendant. The ACLU hired the famous lawyer Clarence Darrow to defend Scopes, while William Jennings Bryan, three-time presidential candidate and former secretary of state, volunteered to argue for the prosecution.

What was the Scopes Trial?

Jan 01, 2015 · Clarence Darrow was the famous top criminal lawyer who defended John Scopes. John Scopes was the teacher who taught evolution in a Tennessee high school.

Who taught evolution in a Tennessee High School?

Jan 11, 2017 · Which famous lawyer defended John Scopes, who was arrested for teaching evolution in a Tennessee high school? A. William Jennings Bryan B. Mitchell Palmer C. William Howard Taft D. Clarence Darrow

Who were the opposing attorneys in the Civil War trial?

At the "Scopes Monkey Trial," famous defense lawyer Clarence Darrow volunteered to defend science teacher John Scopes, who was arrested for teaching evolution. The Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution was proposed in 1923 and approved by Congress in ____, but never ratified by the requisite three-quarters of the states.

Who was John T Scopes?

John T Scopes. High school teacher who was prosecuted in 1925 for violating a Tennessee law outlawing the teaching of evolution in public schools and colleges; he was ultimately convicted but his $100 fine was overturned by the state supreme court on a legal technicality. The Scopes Trial.

What did Karl Marx say about capitalism?

Karl Marx stated there was a struggle between capitalists and the common worker and encouraged the workers to seize control of all industry and create a classless society of equal distribution. This was a contradiction of the economic system of capitalism that is based on competition and hands off government attitude.

What is the Dawes Plan?

Dawes Plan. A plan to revive the German economy, the United States loans Germany money which then can pay reparations to England and France, who can then pay back their loans from the U.S. This circular flow of money was a success. Installment Plan.

Who was the first person to fly across the Atlantic Ocean?

United States aviator who in 1927 made the first solo nonstop flight across the Atlantic Ocean (1902-1974) Teapot Dome Scandal. Secretary of the Interior (Albert Fall) leased government land in California and at Teapot Dome, Wyoming to 2 oil executives- Fall became the first Cabinet official to be sent to prison.

Who was the first Republican president?

Harding was the first Republican president elected to office in over twenty years. He was an easy going politician that made everyone happy and was easily elected to office running under the slogan "Return to Normalcy.". He was not qualified for the presidency and left many responsibilities to his cabinet which consisted ...

Who was the judge in the Scopes trial?

Judge (s) sitting. John Tate Raulston. The Scopes Trial, formally known as The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes and commonly referred to as the Scopes Monkey Trial, was an American legal case in July 1925 in which a high school teacher, John T. Scopes, was accused of violating Tennessee 's Butler Act, which had made it unlawful ...

What was the Scopes trial?

John Thomas Scopes and commonly referred to as the Scopes Monkey Trial, was an American legal case in July 1925 in which a high school teacher, John T. Scopes, was accused of violating Tennessee 's Butler Act, which had made it unlawful to teach human evolution in any ...

How much was Scopes fined?

Scopes was found guilty and fined $100 (equivalent to $1,500 in 2020), but the verdict was overturned on a technicality. The trial served its purpose of drawing intense national publicity, as national reporters flocked to Dayton to cover the big-name lawyers who had agreed to represent each side.

Who was the witness in the trial of William Jennings Bryan?

On the seventh day of the trial, Clarence Darrow took the unorthodox step of calling William Jennings Bryan, counsel for the prosecution, to the stand as a witness in an effort to demonstrate that belief in the historicity of the Bible and its many accounts of miracles was unreasonable.

What was the Dayton trial?

The trial escalated the political and legal conflict in which strict creationists and scientists struggled over the teaching of evolution in Arizona and California science classes. Before the Dayton trial only the South Carolina, Oklahoma, and Kentucky legislatures had dealt with anti-evolution laws or riders to educational appropriations bills.

How did the Scopes trial affect science?

Though often portrayed as influencing public opinion against fundamentalism , the victory was not complete. Though the ACLU had taken on the trial as a cause, in the wake of Scopes' conviction they were unable to find more volunteers to take on the Butler law and, by 1932, had given up. The anti-evolutionary legislation was not challenged again until 1965, and in the meantime, William Jennings Bryan's cause was taken up by a number of organizations, including the Bryan Bible League and the Defenders of the Christian Faith.

Why did the ACLU oppose the Butler Act?

The ACLU had originally intended to oppose the Butler Act on the grounds that it violated the teacher's individual rights and academic freedom , and was therefore unconstitutional. Principally because of Clarence Darrow, this strategy changed as the trial progressed. The earliest argument proposed by the defense once the trial had begun was that there was actually no conflict between evolution and the creation account in the Bible; later, this viewpoint would be called theistic evolution. In support of this claim, they brought in eight experts on evolution. But other than Dr. Maynard Metcalf, a zoologist from Johns Hopkins University, the judge would not allow these experts to testify in person. Instead, they were allowed to submit written statements so their evidence could be used at the appeal. In response to this decision, Darrow made a sarcastic comment to Judge Raulston (as he often did throughout the trial) on how he had been agreeable only on the prosecution's suggestions. Darrow apologized the next day, keeping himself from being found in contempt of court.