Brett J. Talley, President Trumpâs nominee to be a federal judge in Alabama, has never tried a case, was unanimously rated ânot qualifiedâ by the American Bar Assn
The American Bar Association, founded August 21, 1878, is a voluntary bar association of lawyers and law students, which is not specific to any jurisdiction in the United States. The ABA's most important stated activities are the setting of academic standards for law schools, and the forâŚ
Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton is an American politician, diplomat, lawyer, writer, and public speaker. She was first lady of the United States from 1993 to 2001, a United States senator from New York from 2001 to 2009, and the 67th United States secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. ClinâŚ
Full Answer
As brought up in this question, there appears to be a growing group of headlines tonight focusing on the fact that someone who has never tried a case is being nominated for federal judge.
Instead, most U.S. lawyers would "read law" as an apprentice to an experienced attorney. Also, many federal judges and members of Congress in the early period didn't serve for long because other positions were more prestigious when the federal government was comparatively unimportant.
If the cost of the expected depositions exceeds the expected return on the case, an attorney most likely will not accept the case. If a lawyer doesnât take your case, you can get a second opinion from another lawyer who has taken cases similar to yours. But be cautious in this approach because of the next reason why a lawyer may not take your case:
It is exceedingly rare, if it has ever happened, for a lawyer with less than three years of experience whose only courtroom experience is serving as third chair lawyer in a hearing to be appointed as a U.S. District Court judge.
In total, of the 114 justices appointed to the Court, 49 have had law degrees, an additional 18 attended some law school but did not receive a degree, and 47 received their legal education without any law school attendance. Currently serving justices are listed in bold below.
James F. ByrnesThe last Justice to be appointed who did not attend any law school was James F. Byrnes (1941-1942). He did not graduate from high school and taught himself law, passing the bar at the age of 23.
Earl Warren and William O. Douglas had no prior judicial service at all.
ATLANTA â ATLANTA â Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett has a law degree from Notre Dame, but she doesn't need it to qualify for a seat on the high court. In fact, according to the U.S. Constitution, Supreme Court Justices don't need a college degree at all.
The last justice without a law degree was Stanley Reed, who served on the Court from 1938 to 1957. Although he never finished his formal legal studies, Reed did gain admission to the bar and was a practicing lawyer.
Among the 60 justices who were appointed in the 20th and 21st centuries, 40 received law degrees from law schools that are ranked among the top 25 â including ties â in the U.S. News 2023 Best Law Schools rankings.
There's no way to bacome a judge without getting your degree in Law. Moreover, there's a requirement of experience in any case if you want to become a judge. If you have already done your graduation, now you are eligible for L.L.B. course which will be of three years duration.
nineAltogether, nine, or slightly more than half, of the 17 men who have held the position of Chief Justice were appointed without prior judicial experience. Moreover, of the eight who had previously been judges, several had very limited judicial experience.
Is Amy Coney Barrett the youngest justice on the Supreme Court? Yes, she is the youngest justice serving on the court. Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, who is four years older, is the second youngest.
eight justicesFour of the eight justices appointed so far in the 21st century earned law degrees from Harvard, and another three graduated from Yale Law School.
Chief Justice John Roberts, Justices Anthony Kennedy, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan and Neil Gorsuch, and retired Justice David Souter, all graduates of Harvard Law School, attended the law school's bicentennial summit on October 26, 2017.
Supreme Court justices serve for life, unless they resign or are impeached and removed from office. The reason for their lifetime tenure is to enable them to make decisions free from any pressure by the executive or legislative branches of government.
In 2006, the ABA committee, which is responsible for evaluating federal judicial candidates, wrote that Kavanaugh âenjoys a solid reputation for integrity, intellectual capacity, and writing and analytical abilityâ and a majority of the committeeâs 15 members rated him âqualified,â with a minority rating him âwell qualifiedâ and none of them deeming him ânot qualified.â
When he was asked to name his 10 most significant cases, Mr. Kavanaugh could only cite five cases for which he actually appeared in court, and only two cases in which he was lead counsel. He even cited two cases for which he merely wrote a friend-of-the-court brief for someone who was not a party to the lawsuit.
Twelve years later, on 30 August 2018, the ABA committeeâs 15 members voted unanimously to give Kavanaugh a rating of âwell qualifiedâ for the position of U.S. Supreme Court justice, concluding: âJudge Kavanaugh meets the highest standards of integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament.â
A few days earlier, the U.S. Senate had voted 57-36 to confirm Kavanaugh to the position, with 53 Republicans and four Democrats supporting his nomination, 35 Democrats and one Independent opposing it, and seven senators not voting.
When President George W. Bush nominated him to the DC Circuit in 2003, Brett Kavanaugh had never tried a case in court and was promoted from a law clerk to a judgeship.
In late 2000, Kavanaugh joined the legal team of then-Texas governor George W. Bush as the contested results of the presidential election in Florida went before the U.S. Supreme Court.
In June 2006, Kavanaugh was sworn in as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, commonly known as the âDC Circuit.â In welcoming him into the role, then-President George W. Bush said:
Trump and McConnell have succeeded in pushing judicial nominees through the Senate because the Republicans have voted in lockstep since taking control of the chamber in 2014.
By November 2009, Obama had made 27 judicial nominations, including Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Trump has nominated 59 people to the federal courts, including Justice Gorsuch. Thatâs also a contrast with Trumpâs pace in filling executive branch jobs, where he has lagged far behind the pace of previous administrations.
Civil rights groups and liberal advocates see the matter differently. They denounced Thursdayâs vote, calling it âlaughableâ that none of the committee Republicans objected to confirming a lawyer with as little experience as Talley to preside over federal trials.
Talley does have some other qualifications, some traditional, others less so. He grew up in Alabama and earned degrees from the University of Alabama and Harvard Law School. He clerked for two federal judges and worked as a speech writer on the presidential campaign of Mitt Romney.
âThe judge story is an untold story. Nobody wants to talk about it,â Trump said last month, standing alongside Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) in the White House Rose Garden. âBut when you think of it, Mitch and I were saying, that has consequences 40 years out, depending on the age of the judge â but 40 years out.â
Last month, when the Judiciary Committee held a hearing on several other nominations, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) asked Talley about his fervent advocacy of gun rights. In a blog post titled âA Call to Arms,â he wrote that âthe President and his democratic allies in Congress are about to launch the greatest attack on our constitutional freedoms in our lifetime,â referring to Obamaâs proposal for background checks and limits on rapid-fire weapons following the 2012 shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.
Trump filled the seat this year with Justice Neil M. Gorsuch.
What makes Montanaâs situation even more troubling is that its usage of non-lawyer judges is not a vestige of an earlier era, but a recent attempt to save money. From at least 1895 until the 21st century, Montana guaranteed defendants tried before non-lawyer judges to a new trial before a lawyer-judge. Then, in 2003, state lawmakers tweaked the stateâs rules to allow counties to exclude themselves from that right by designating their justice courts as courts of record. A state senator told his colleagues while introducing the bill would âprovide cost savings to the people of Montana at every level.â
Supreme Court to take up the issue in Davis v. Montana. The case revolved around two defendants , Kelly Davis and Shane Sherman, who were separately arrested and charged with driving under the influence. Each of them unsuccessfully moved for dismissal at trial, arguing the proceedings violated the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments by denying them access to a trial by a lawyer-judge. Davis received a 30-day jail sentence; Sherman was sentenced to serve ten days behind bars. The Montana Supreme Court upheld the convictions last May and the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case in January, leaving the underlying constitutional question unresolved.
Twenty-eight states require all judges presiding over misdemeanor cases to be lawyers, including large states like California and Florida. In 14 of the remaining 22 states, a defendant who receives a jail sentence from a non-lawyer judge has the right to seek a new trial before a lawyer-judge. But Montana and seven other statesâArizona, Colorado, ...
How about one of stateâs justices of the peace, with the power to send defendants to jail for up to six months? Youâre in luckâonly a four-day certification course is necessary.
But Montana and seven other statesâArizona, Colorado, Nevada, New York, Texas, South Carolina, and Wyoming âallow non-lawyer judges to hand down jail sentences for misdemeanors without the right to a new trial before a lawyer-judge. Some states, like Montana, only allow the practice in rural or sparsely populated counties, ...
âAt Runnymede in 1215, King John pledged to his barons that he would ânot make any justices, constables, sheriffs, or bailiffs, excepting of such as know the laws of the land ,ââ Stewart concluded. âToday, more than 750 years later, the Court leaves that promise unkept.â
Russell, a challenge to Kentuckyâs then-two-tiered judicial system in which only cities with more than 100,000 residents had to use lawyer-judges in their municipal courts. Lonnie North, the defendant, challenged the jail sentence he received from Judge C.B. Russell, a coal miner with no legal education. Chief Justice Warren Burger led a 6-2 majority to uphold the arrangement in a dry, rote opinion, citing Northâs procedural ability to seek a new trial before a lawyer-judge.
The current Chief Justice, John Roberts, served for only two years and three months as a federal judge before his elevation to the Supreme Court in 2005. While prior judicial experience appears to have become a prerequisite for a Supreme Court appointment in our own time, historically, there clearly was no such requirement.
The following chart summarizes the prior judicial experiences, or lack thereof, of the 17 Chief Justices.
In response to my earlier post about Chief Justices of the United States Supreme Court who were also the Courtâs senior justice in terms of years of service, Nick Zales posed the question as to whether the late William Rehnquist was the only Chief Justice to have had no prior judicial experience before becoming a member of the Supreme Court. (While Rehnquist had served for 13 years as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court before being elevated to the Chief position, that was his only prior judicial experience.)
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, in addition to a four-year stint as President of the United States. Charles Evans Hughes (1930-1941) â no prior judicial experience before his appointment to the Supreme Court in 1910. Resigned to run for President ...
Fred Vinson (1946-1953) â served on the United States Circuit Court for the District of Columbia.
John Roberts (2005- ) â served on the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Oliver Ellsworth (1796-1800) â member of the Connecticut Superior Court.
To help him fill the bench with religious conservatives, he turned to the Federalist Society , a conservative legal organization established in 1982 that over the years has been funded with millions of dollars in dark money donations in an effort to stack the federal courts with conservative and libertarian judges for decades to come.
But by the time Trump picked him to replace Kennedy, he had spent 12 years on the appellate court and written hundreds of opinions. Trumpâs other appointee, Justice Neil Gorsuch, had been an appellate court judge for 11 years before Trump nominated him to fill the seat vacated by the late Justice Antonin Scalia.
During her confirmation hearing, Pitlyk explained that she had never taken a deposition or tried a case because she had arranged her schedule to spend more time with her four children. During her Senate testimony she described herself as âvery fortunateâ for having had the opportunity to work âat small firms with very accommodating and flexible colleagues who want the best for me and for my family in addition to the best for our clients. I have had the luxury of getting to be as protected as possible and as supported as possible by my colleagues.â
Kagan later spent four years working in the Clinton White House, first as associate White House counsel and later at the domestic policy counsel. Clinton nominated her to a seat on the DC Circuit in 1999, but the GOP-led Senate never acted on the nomination. When Obama tapped her for the Supreme Court, critics complained that Kagan, like Barrett, had never tried a case. But unlike Barrett, Kagan had no trouble satisfying the Judiciary Committeeâs questions about the most notable 10 cases sheâd worked on in private practice at the Washington, DC, law firm Williams & Connolly before she went into academia. At the time of her nomination, she was the solicitor general, the first woman to hold the post, where she argued frequently before the Supreme Court, wrote briefs, and oversaw the work of nearly two dozen lawyers before the high court.
Chief Justice John Roberts rustled up 75,000 pages of records for his 2005 confirmation hearingâjust from his time serving in Republican administrations. The Senate reviewed about 170,000 pages of records before confirming Justice Elena Kagan and 180,000 for Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Barrett first joined the Federalist Society in 2005 and then again in 2014, after which she set off on an extensive speaking tour sponsored by the conservative legal outfitâa tour that bears all the hallmarks of a political campaign, only one targeted at the unelected post of Supreme Court justice.
Clearly, one likely reason Barrettâs resume is so thin is precisely because she has seven children. Consider this: If she took all the paid family leave available to her while she was a full-time professor, she would have spent nearly two of the 15 years she worked at Notre Dame on leave.
Additionally, the cost of developing the testimony to prove up your case has to be factored into the analysis of the attorney. If the cost of the expected depositions exceeds the expected return on the case, an attorney most likely will not accept the case. If a lawyer doesnât take your case, you can get a second opinion from another lawyer who has ...
If your case has been repeatedly âreleasedâ or âdroppedâ from another law firm, subsequent attorneys will think twice about taking your case from either a liability perspective or an unreasonable expectation perspective.
The Statute of Limitations has expired. A statute of limitations is a law which sets the maximum time you have to initiate legal proceedings from the date of an alleged offense, whether civil or criminal.
For example, in some states, the statute of limitations on personal injury claims is two years, so that means you have two years to sue for a personal injury case.
Lawyers have an interest to protect their own reputations since a strong reputation will draw in more clients, just as a weak reputation will do exactly the opposite. In personal injury cases, how badly youâre injured is an important factor in a case.
7. They donât like you. A lawyer is never obligated to take your case. Taking on a new client means starting a new working relationship â and relationships are a two-way street. If youâre perceived to be difficult to work with, obnoxious, or abrasive, then they may choose to pass on your case.
Often times, many cases are turned down because the potential client appears to be shopping around for a lawyer based upon the feedback they receive on the potential value of the case.