Adams led the American Revolution before his presidency, achievingdependence from Great Britain. He was dedicated to the right to counsel and the presumption of innocence and successfully defended British soldiers against murder charges in the Boston Massacre.
Adams defended the British officer Thomas Preston and his soldiers in two separate trials. Can you talk about the balancing act Adams undertook to defend all his clients without alienating his fellow Bostonians, many of whom fervently supported the broader patriot cause?
John Adams — Defense Attorney for British Soldiers? Why a Founding Father represented British soldiers during the Boston Massacre Trials aptain Thomas Preston and eight British soldiers were on trial for murder. They would need an excellent attorney to represent them with a jury full of anti-British colonists.
Witnesses recalled how the mob had repeatedly called for the British soldiers to be killed. Particularly effective testimony for the defense came from Dr. John Jeffries, who had tended to one of the colonists killed on the night of March 5, 1770.
One historian, Hiller B. Zobel, has suggested that Adams agreed to defend the soldiers in exchange for a legislative seat. (Three months after the trial, he was Boston's first choice for the position.)
The Boston Massacre, in which British redcoats killed five American civilians. Adams defended the British officer Thomas Preston and his soldiers in two separate trials.
President John AdamsEight soldiers, one officer, and four civilians were arrested and charged with murder, and they were defended by future U.S. President John Adams.
Without hesitation Adams agreed to defend the soldiers and their captain. Above all, John Adams believed in upholding the law, and defending the innocent. Adams was convinced that the soldiers were wrongly accused, and had fired into the crowd in self-defense.
Adams Reacts to the Boston Tea Party When he returned the very next morning, he was shocked that the Sons of Liberty undertook such a foolhardy course, but was nonetheless pleasantly surprised.
In the following trial of Preston's men in November 1770, Adams pleaded that the soldiers had acted in self-defence and asked the jury to consider themselves in the shoes of the soldiers and whether any reasonable man would not have concluded that they were in danger of their lives when surrounded by a hostile crowd ...
Adams was a Massachusetts delegate to the Continental Congress and became a leader of the revolution. He assisted Jefferson in drafting the Declaration of Independence in 1776. As a diplomat in Europe, he helped negotiate a peace treaty with Great Britain and secured vital governmental loans.
In the 1780s, Adams served as a diplomat in Europe and helped negotiate the Treaty of Paris (1783), which officially ended the American Revolutionary War (1775-83). From 1789 to 1797, Adams was America's first vice president. He then served a term as the nation's second president.
Thomas Preston ( c. 1722—c. 1798) was a British officer, a captain who served in Boston in the Province of Massachusetts Bay. He commanded troops in the Boston Massacre in 1770 and was tried for murder, but he was acquitted.
John Adams was born on October 30, 1735, to his father, John Adams Sr., and his mother, Susanna Boylston, and had two younger brothers, Peter and Elihu.
The Boston Massacre was a conflict in Boston on March 5, 1770. British soldiers shot and killed many people, perceiving them as a mob, and leading patriots including Paul Revere and Samuel Adams heavily publicized the event.
Following the Boston Massacre, Captain Thomas Preston, eight British soldiers, and five British civilians were charged for murder. They were exposed to the possibility of execution and could not find a defense team as they would have to defend them in the anti-British city of Boston.
These days, criminal defense lawyers regularly take John Adams’s defense of the British soldiers to to represent specific clients. He did not blame the city for initiating the riot and focused on facts.
It is generally unsatisfying to get a mixed verdict in a case involving so much passion and emotion. However, these cases serve as a compelling example, and the Boston Massacre trial was among these trials.
He was carried along to King Street, where a file of redcoats was formed up at a distance from some blood-stained ice. Nearby two townspeople lay dead; three were mortally wounded. Adams, who had been spending a convivial evening in the South End with members of his club, now thought of home.
Six were acquitted, and two were found guilty of manslaughter. (Their punishment was to be branded on the right thumb by the Boston sheriff.) More than this, however, the speech illuminated the core of Adams’s political thought, especially his view of the human material of which politics is made.
Adams had a week or ten days in which to prepare for the second and final massacre, Rex v. Wemms et al. That the wheels of justice did not turn without lubrication in those days is obvious from the itemized expenses for which Adams later sought reimbursement from the British army.
Yet on June 6, when an election was held in Boston to fill a newly vacant position on the General Court, Adams received 418 out of 536 votes cast. As was customary, the candidate did nothing on his own behalf.
In the opinion of the Boston mob, the best resolution of the cases of Preston and his men, short of immediate hangings, was an instant trial, conducted while the town was still on the boil. But Hutchinson deftly deflected this hope, and the proceedings were postponed until the autumn.
The inference to be drawn from the Preston verdict was that they had fired without a lawful order. To the Whigs, they were murderers. For the student of John Adams’s life and thought, the most important feature of the second massacre trial was the presence in the courtroom of a shorthand writer.
Extreme patriots regarded the absence of a lynching of Preston and his men as proof of the impartiality of Boston justice. John Adams, possessing strong patriotic views by refusing to express them on any terms but his own, sometimes was suspected of a lack of Whiggish zeal.
After a soldier was knocked down, someone fired into the crowd, confused, and killed the first colonist in the Revolutionary War — Crispus Attucks. Panic ensued, and soldiers fired into the crowd of colonists. After the skirmish ended, five of the colonists had been killed.
The impact on today’s legal system. The Boston Massacre trials served as a landmark case for the new justice system in the colonies. This trial was the first time that a jury was sequestered, which is now typical practice in high profile cases. The standard of reasonable doubt was also introduced during this trial.
Boston was a major port for trade as well as a hotbed for Patriot activity and organization. Britain stationed a large garrison of troops in the city with the aim of controlling unruly colonists who were resisting customs officials. On March 5, 1770, a crowd gathered outside the Customs House that was being guarded by the British.
Adams and the defense argued that the crowd was endangering the soldiers’ lives and they acted in self-defense. He called witnesses that described how the crowd verbally threatened the soldiers and threw objects at them. Witnesses recalled how the mob had repeatedly called for the British soldiers to be killed.
After deliberating for three hours, the jury found all eight soldiers not guilty of murder. Two of the men were found guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter and their penalty was reduced to branding on the thumb. The other six soldiers were completely cleared of all charges.
Before the trial, Loyalists and Patriots engaged in a propaganda war. Patriot cartoons and articles painted the riot as an all-out attack by aggressive British soldiers. Paul Revere even published a cartoon which he named The Bloody Massacre, leading the riot to be known as the Boston Massacre.
Britain felt that the colonies had only flourished because of the protection and support from their home country. In response to bids for more autonomy, Parliament began passing laws to control trade, stop smuggling, and raise more revenue from the colonies.
However, one of the patriots so essential to the revolution, John Adams, chose to defend the British soldiers in court.
He clearly knew that taking on this case was dangerous. An angry mob could threaten his family, and should his reputation be tarnished, his ambitions and economic future would be endangered.
In 1768, British troops arrived in Massachusetts to enforce the hated, tax-heavy Townshend Acts. Over the ensuing months, tensions between the colonists and their mother country’s soldiers boiled over, culminating in what became known as the Boston Massacre.
The British soldiers, facing the prospect of the death penalty, had trouble finding defense counsel. No colonist, it seemed, wanted to take on this unpopular case, as doing so might affect his reputation and economic future. However, as British subjects, the soldiers had the right to competent defense lawyers, and the people ...
Results of the Trials. Preston’s trial took place between Oct. 24 and Oct. 30, 1770 . Adams argued that Preston had not given the order to fire, and that Preston's soldiers were provoked by the crowd.
However, one of the patriots so essential to the revolution, John Adams, chose to defend the British soldiers in court.
Here, Adams argued that they acted in self-defense. The jury in that case acquitted six, but found two guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter. Finally, in December the four civilians went to trial, and all were acquitted.
Crispus Attucks. Captain Preston and a detachment of seven or eight soldiers were surrounded by Boston citizens who were angry and taunting the men. Attempts to calm the gathered citizens were useless. At this point, something happened that caused a soldier to fire their musket into the crowd.
John Adams believed that the rule of law should be paramount and that the British soldiers involved in the Boston Massacre deserved a fair trial.
On March 5, 1770, a small gathering of colonists in Boston were tormenting British soldiers. Unlike normal, the taunting on this day led to an escalation of hostilities. There was a sentry standing in front of the Custom House who talked back to the colonists. More colonists then arrived on the scene. In fact, the church bells began ringing which ...
The verdict's effect was huge as the leaders of the rebellion used it as further proof of Great Britain's tyranny. Paul Revere created his famous engraving of the event that he titled, "The Bloody Massacre perpetrated in King Street." The Boston Massacre is often pointed to as an event that presaged the Revolutionary War. The event soon became a rallying cry for the Patriots.
Soldiers including Captain Prescott claimed the crowd had heavy clubs, sticks, and fireballs. Prescott said that the soldier who shot first was hit by a stick. Just like with any confusing public event, a number of disparate accounts were given about the actual chain of events.
However, in the meantime, the Sons of Liberty had started a major propaganda effort against the British. The six-day trial, quite long for its time, was held in late October.