in robinson v audi why did the plaintiff's lawyer not go after the locks

Was Robinson’s conviction wrongful based on his status as a drug addict?

The weight of the evidence showing that Robinson was a drug addict simultaneously shows that he used drugs often. As a result, the defendant’s conviction was not wrongfully based on his status as an addict. The conviction was instead based on the defendant’s regular use of drug, which occurred before his arrest.

What did the jury decide in the Robinson case?

The trial judge instructed the jury that Robinson could be convicted regardless of whether or not he was in possession of drugs. After Robinson was convicted, he appealed, claiming that the state statute violated both the Eighth and 14th Amendment.

What was the case of Robinson v California?

Case summary for Robinson v. California: Robinson was a drug addict who was convicted under a California state statute which criminalized being addicted to drugs. The trial judge instructed the jury that Robinson could be convicted regardless of whether or not he was in possession of drugs.

Why was the Robinson case unconstitutional?

The Court held that the statute, which could punish a person based solely on drug addiction, was unconstitutional under the Eighth and 14th Amendment because it punished people based on their sickness as opposed to a criminal act. ...

What was the Supreme Court case in Robinson v. California?

California: Robinson was a drug addict who was convicted under a California state statute which criminalized being addicted to drugs. The trial judge instructed the jury that Robinson could be convicted regardless of whether or not he was in possession of drugs.