If you believe your Constitutional rights were violated or a police officer is guilty of misconduct, contact a criminal defense attorney. Arguing with a police officer or resisting arrest can give an officer probable cause for the arrest. Police are permitted to pat you down to ensure that you are not carrying a dangerous weapon.
Full Answer
The officer can serve time in prison, pay fines, and be on probation. However, general crimes are not the only things that a cop can do that would be illegal. Some of the actions that police officers take during the course of their jobs may be considered illegal if those actions violate your civil rights.
Defense attorneys will commonly ask an officer if he/she received training in the academy (or otherwise) on how to sound believable on the stand. The purpose is to suggest the officer is practiced at deceiving and appears credible because of special training in how to act, not because she’s testifying truthfully.
You have the right to defend yourself against physical attacks, but resisting arrest is a crime, so if a police officer threatens or bullies you, the place to defend yourself is in the courtroom, not with your fists. What do you do if a police officer threatens violence against you? Can you fight back?
Avoid attorneys who work in many different areas of the law. (Click here for a list of attorneys who specialize in handling cases of police misconduct.) Police misconduct cases are challenging, and lawyers meet a lot of difficult people. Distinguish yourself by being calm and well-organized.
If a police officer acts in an unethical manner, or if they break constitutional laws by violating citizen’s rights, a complaint should be filed against them. If a citizen believes that a complaint against an officer is justified, they can file a complaint with the department, or the United States Department of Justice.
Beatings, shootings, bullying and bribery activities are caught on video with the quickly available cellular phone, leaving citizens to wonder who they should be protecting themselves from.
If a citizen has been victimized by a law enforcement officer, filing a formal complaint is the first line of action against unconstitutional or unethical conduct as it becomes part of the permanent personnel file of the officer in question.
Police officers cannot access or review formal complaints that have been made against them, but if they hire attorneys to represent them, they can find out what negative information may be part of their personnel record.
Defense attorneys want to put you on trial so the jury will be distracted from who is actually on trial. They don’t want to spend time on the evidence. The evidence proves their clients are guilty. On days you are scheduled for court, put a Q-tip in your pocket.
There are rules that limit what a defense attorney can do – they can’t fals ify evidence or counsel a witness to lie, for example – but, they have no obligation to present the truth and I continuously see officers shocked when they learn this firsthand in court. Don’t blame defense attorneys.
Putting Everyone on Trial Except the Defendant. Defense attorneys will attack an officer’s credibility more often and harder than other prosecution witnesses just because you’re an officer. They know if they can raise a doubt about your credibility, it may cause a judge or jury to doubt the credibility of the entire case (remember Mark Fuhrman ?). ...
Your big power play is to understand defense attorneys can’t make you feel defensive – unless you let them. (Photo/Pixabay) “Defense counsel has no obligation to present the truth. If he can confuse a witness, even a truthful one, or make him appear unsure or indecisive, that will be his normal course.”.
What to Do If The Police Violate Your Rights 1 The first step is to file a complaint with the police department or the internal affairs division of the police department where the officer is employed. It is generally a requirement that a person exhaust all administrative remedies before bringing a lawsuit; that means seeking a remedy from the agencies involved before turning to the courts; 2 After reporting to the police department, the next step is to report the misconduct to the U.S. Department of Justice or the office of the U.S. Attorney; 3 After the violations have been reported to the police department or the U.S. Attorney’s office, a person may then proceed to filing a lawsuit in court against the police department and/or their officers.
If a police officer violates a person’s rights under the Constitution or federal law, the person can file a civil lawsuit seeking damages in court. However, there are many requirements that must be met before a claim of this type can be successful.
The types of damages that one can recover in a police misconduct lawsuit include the following: Exemplary Damages: These are awarded where the police conduct amounted to an oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional action; exemplary damages are intended to serve as a deterrent to future wrongdoing.
Attorney’s office, a person may then proceed to filing a lawsuit in court against the police department and/or their officers .
If the police abuse their power, they can face both civil liability and criminal penalties. One kind of police misconduct occurs when an officer violates a person’s constitutional rights.
Police officers can commit misconduct when they fail to follow proper procedures as designated by the police department for which they work. They might abuse citizens in the course of performing their duties physically or verbally and emotionally. They may use excessive force or ask for bribes.
Civil Police Misconduct. A federal law makes it illegal for anyone acting under the authority of the law of any state to deprive a person of their rights under the U.S. Constitution or federal law.
If a police officer antagonizes you, the most important thing is to get out of the situation alive. If you get charged with resisting arrest or with any other offense, at least you will be alive to fight the charges. A criminal defense lawyer can help you clear your name if you have been unjustly arrested.
If the officer is tried for using excessive violence (many instances of police brutality have not resulted in criminal charges), he or she usually argues that the defendant was resisting arrest, and then the officer gets acquitted.
In most violent crime cases, everything from simple assault to murder, the jury must find the defendant not guilty if the defendant can convince them that he or she acted in self-defense. For the self-defense argument to work, you must establish the following facts: 1 The victim was physically attacking you, attempting to attack you physically, or making credible threats of violence against you. 2 Your fear that you were in imminent danger was credible. (If you are twice the victim’s size and the victim did not have a weapon, you will have a hard time proving reasonable fear.) 3 You used a reasonable level of force, only enough to deescalate the situation so you could avoid serious injury.
In most violent crime cases, everything from simple assault to murder, the jury must find the defendant not guilty if the defend ant can convince them that he or she acted in self-defense. For the self-defense argument to work, you must establish the following facts:
Even if you are arrested unjustly, the important thing is to stay alive; there will always be a chance to fight the charges. When it is your word against the officer’s about who attacked whom, contact an Atlanta obstruction of justice defense lawyer.
Does the right to self-defense apply when the aggressor is a law-enforcement officer? The short answer is that, from a legal perspective, you should never use physical violence against a police officer, even if the officer is threatening or antagonizing you. Even if you are arrested unjustly, the important thing is to stay alive;
You have the right to defend yourself if you are being attacked, even if the person attacking you is a police officer. Despite this, resisting arrest is a crime, and police officers are allowed to use force against defendants who resist arrest.
This belief was expressed in State v. Holeman, 103 Wn.2d 426, 430, 693 P.2d 89, 92 (1985). In that decision – the basis for the Court’s modern understanding of the law – the Court wrote:
Popular wisdom among defense attorneys today is that a defendant thus cannot raise self-defense against a police officer, regardless of whether they were unlawfully arrested or whether they were assaulted by a police officer in the process…. unless they first actually die or are severely maimed by the police officer’s use of excessive force.
Hiring a criminal defense lawyer to represent you after you have been charged with a crime is one of the biggest decisions anyone might need to make.
The reason the Law Office of Chris Van Vechten offers free case evaluations is exactly because there isn’t a hard and fast rule about when someone should hire a criminal defense lawyer.
The types of law enforcement misconduct covered by these laws include excessive force, sexual assault, intentional false arrests, theft, or the intentional fabrication of evidence resulting in a loss of liberty to another. Enforcement of these provisions does not require that any racial, religious, or other discriminatory motive existed.
In a criminal case, DOJ brings a case against the accused person; in a civil case, DOJ brings the case (either through litigation or an administrative investigation) against a governmental authority or law enforcement agency.
This document outlines the laws enforced by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) that address police misconduct and explains how you can file a complaint with DOJ if you believe that your rights have been violated. Federal laws that address police misconduct include both criminal and civil statutes.
It is a crime for one or more persons acting under color of law willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive another person of any right protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242). "Under color of law" means that the person doing the act is using power given to him or her by a governmental agency (local, State, or Federal). A law enforcement officer acts "under color of law" even if he or she is exceeding his or her rightful power. The types of law enforcement misconduct covered by these laws include excessive force, sexual assault, intentional false arrests, theft, or the intentional fabrication of evidence resulting in a loss of liberty to another. Enforcement of these provisions does not require that any racial, religious, or other discriminatory motive existed. What remedies are available under these laws? These are criminal statutes. Violations of these laws are punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. There is no private right of action under these statutes; in other words, these are not the legal provisions under which you would file a lawsuit on your own.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the "OJP Program Statute". Together, these laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, and religion by State and local law enforcement agencies that receive financial assistance from DOJ. (42 U.S.C. § 2000d, et seq. and 34 U.S.C. § 10228).
In a criminal case, the evidence must establish proof "beyond a reasonable doubt," while in civil cases the proof need only satisfy the lower standard of a "preponderance of the evidence.". Finally, in criminal cases, DOJ seeks to punish a wrongdoer for past misconduct through imprisonment or other sanction. In civil cases, DOJ seeks ...
There is no private right of action under this law; only DOJ may file suit for violations of the Police Misconduct Provision.