The money that you receive back from your deceased attorney can be used to retain the new attorney that you hire. If, for any reason, you are not able to contact someone for an accounting or to get a check back for the rest of your retainer, you should contact your local bar association as soon as possible.
Your right to get your money back will also depend on the type of arrangement you had with your lawyer: a contingency agreement or an hourly rate. A contingency fee agreement is a relationship where an attorney does not require any upfront legal fees.
Additionally, you have the right to seek legal action against your attorney for any unreturned fees. This might be an option if you are owed a large sum of money, but pursuing these claims likely requires you to obtain a new attorney to pursue your case. Seek legal counsel before filing a lawsuit against your attorney over unreturned fees.
Yes, you can get your money back. I agree with the two previous answers by other lawyers. In addition, you can file a grievance with the state bar. You can also file in small claims court. Not only was the lawyer obligated to provide the services as agreed, there is also an obligation to return phone calls...
Whenever a lawyer fails to perform the legal services that you paid him to render, you are entitled to full refund of your retainer. Your lawyer breached his contractual obigation to diigently and competently render legal services.
If you end up having to hire another attorney, you should ask the administrative person of your deceased attorney’s office to get you an accounting of how many hours your attorney has worked on your case. If you have money in a trust account, you should be able to reference that accounting and determine how much money you should be refunded. The money that you receive back from your deceased attorney can be used to retain the new attorney that you hire.
If your attorney has dies in the middle of your case and you are preparing for trial, there may be a delay in your trial date if you need to hire a new attorney. However, you should hire your new attorney as soon as possible so that there is not an unnecessary delay. When your attorney files for a substitution of attorney with the court, he or she will likely be able to secure more time to prepare for trial or any future hearings. The down side of this situation is that you are likely going to have to pay more because your new attorney will have to learn your case all over again.
Matt Pfau is an attorney and founding partner at the law firm Lawyers Plus . Matt has a background in business consulting, estate planning, business start-ups and bankruptcy and is licensed to practice in both Nevada and California. A partner in the firm Lawyers Plus, he can be reached at 702-912-4451 or matt@lawyers-plus.com.
If your lawyer is part of a firm of two or more attorneys, then it is probable that one of the other attorneys is at least slightly aware of your case. They may not know every element of what is happening with you case, but they will likely have a broad understanding of what your legal situation is.
In this scenario, when conflicts or vacations occur, each attorney would be able to cover each other’s cases. You might get lucky to find out that the other attorney has worked on your case and is very familiar with your particular circumstances. In this instance, you would just need to get in contact with the other attorney (s) of the firm and get back on track.
A contingency fee agreement is a relationship where an attorney does not require any upfront legal fees. Instead, they will keep a portion of the compensation they recover on your behalf. If they are unsuccessful in your case, they get nothing.
Contingency fee agreements are common in personal injury cases. Other areas of the law do not favor that type of arrangement. In fact, certain areas of the law including family law bar any type of contingency arrangement. Instead, attorneys use flat or hourly fees for their billing.
These fee agreements are spelled out upfront so that you understand what percentage your attorney will keep. However, some conflicts can arise in cases where it is unclear who is responsible for filing fees, the cost of expert witnesses, and other miscellaneous fees. These conflicts can result in a disagreement over what an attorney’s fair share actually is.
If the attorney claims they have earned the entire fee and is steadfast about keeping your money , the bar association could help you arrange mediation with the attorney in hopes of ironing out the disagreement.
When you hire an attorney, you expect their legal advice and guidance to assist you with whatever problem you are facing. Whether you are dealing with a creditor or facing criminal prosecution, your attorney is supposed to be your lifeline.
Instead, attorneys use flat or hourly fees for their billing. Hourly fees are ripe for disagreements, as many attorneys require a retainer to be paid upfront. The retainer represents a pool of money paid to your attorney for fees they have not yet earned.
Additionally, the bar could discipline an attorney if they wrongfully keep a client’s fee. In extreme cases, this sort of financial malfeasance could result in the suspension of an attorney’s license. Given what is at stake, contacting the bar association could be your best option for seeing your money returned.
The main reason why “no lawyer will take my case” in a situation like that, is that each lawyer who looks at the case to evaluate whether the firm will accept representation of the client in that matter, has to estimate whether it will be worth the lawyer’s time, on average, to take that case and similar cases of that nature. That does not mean a lawyer will only take the case if it is a slam-dunk winner; but some lawyers are that picky, especially those who advertise heavily, get a lot of “leads,” and reject all but the cream of the crop. But even the less-picky lawyers (those “willing to go to bat for you” on a difficult case) have to do a cost/benefit analysis to see whether it would be economical, in the long run, for his or her practice, to pursue cases like yours. If you have a potential plaintiff claim for money, and have been rejected by more than 3 or 4 lawyers, you certainly have the right to keep looking, but typically that means your chances of winning a significant recovery are too low to justify the time and effort that the lawyer would have to put into the case. That does not necessarily mean your case is a “dead dog loser” — it could just mean that your case is not worth as much as you think it is, and the lawyer (s) who have looked it over foresee a long, costly, difficult battle even if they win; to take on such a case would give them, at best, a Pyrrhic victory (one that costs more than its worth).
When I hear someone lament (as I often hear) that “no lawyer will take my case,” this is usually coming from someone who believes they are a victim of some injustice, who wants to sue somebody to right that perceived wrong. In other words, they are a potential plaintiff in a lawsuit for money damages. In the USA, and perhaps in some other jurisdictions (which I am not familiar with), the law allows a lawyer to take on a plaintiff client’s case on a “contingency” basis, meaning (A) the client doesn’t have to pay anything up front, (B) the client doesn’t owe the lawyer any fee unless the lawyer wins the case (or negotiates an agreeable settlement before trial), and (C) the lawyer’s fee is based on a pre-agreed percentage of however much money the lawyer ultimately recovers for that client. The expenses of the lawsuit, as well as the lawyer’s percentage fee, are deducted from the recovered fund, as are any other liens against the fund (such as, medical bills related to the injury) before the remaining funds are disbursed to the client. Lawyers who routinely take contingency cases are happy to offer a free initial consultation, during which they decide whether their firm wants to take on your case. For them, that initial consultation (and getting people to call in and set up an appointment for one) is their primary marketing tool.
If you have insurance but are being sued for more than your coverage limit, you are on your own as far as paying for your personal lawyer as to the excess amount. The insurance company will still pay for your defense, but they may be less willing to make an early settlement if they realize they are going to lose the whole coverage amount if they lose, whether or not they have to go to trial, and thus your insurer may be willing to roll the dice — with your risk of personal financial exposure as the ante — in hopes of winning a defense verdict. After all, they have nothing to lose by going to trial (they’ve already written off your coverage amount as a loss reserve), even though that puts you at risk. Or, they may put up their policy limits early on but, if that offer is not accepted, the insurer may then instruct the lawyer they hired to do the bare minimum the law allows him to do ethically, to protect you against a higher judgment. In either of those cases, it is a good idea to have your own independent lawyer to keep your insurance company from throwing you under the bus; your personal lawyer is not beholden to the insurance company for continued defense business (new defense case referrals), and can forcefully insist your insurance company try harder to settle the case within your policy limits, so you will not have to pesonally pay an excess judgment that may be entered against you. Frankly, though, if you did have insurance, the lawyers you consulted would have found this out, and would have told you the same thing I just did — report this to your insurance company, and let them handle it, while offering to stay in as your personal “excess” counsel if your assets required such protection.
When a lawyer whom you have engaged dies, the contractual relationship between you and that advocate also comes to an end. The court grants time for you to engage another advocate as your defence lawyer provided that you should engage the advocate as soon as possible. After all, the court doesn't have time for your case only, right?
When I hear someone lament (as I often hear) that “no lawyer will take my case,” this is usually coming from someone who believes they are a victim of some injustice, who wants to sue somebody to right that perceived wrong. In other words, they are a potentia
But that’s not your situation. Every lawsuit has at least two parties: at least one plaintiff (the person who is suing, making affirmative claims for some kind of legal relief, whether that be asking for a money judgment, or some other kind of court order commanding an opponent to do something or refrain from doing something), and at least one defendant (the person who is being sued). Someone who is being sued as a defendant also has the right, in most courts, to counter-sue the original plaintiff (this is called a “counterclaim”) or sue one or more of the other people who were sued by the original plaintiff, his original co-defendants (this is called a “cross-claim”) or, as in your case, sue somebody else entirely, who had not previously been involved in the original case. That’s what happened to you — you were brought into the case as a third-party defendant, which means one of the original defendants decided that if he owed the original plaintiff money, it was in his view because of something wrong that you did, and therefore, he brought you into the case so that the original plaintiff’s claim against him, and his claim against you, could be decided together, in a single trial, to avoid possible inconsistent results if separate trials were held.
If it was a traffic collision, your auto insurance ought to cover this, and you should report the crash to your own insurance company immediately if you haven’t already done so, and you should also report to them immediately that you have been sued for your involvement in the crash. Your insurance company will take it from there, and will hire a lawyer to defend you in the case, as well as pay any damages (up to your coverage limit). If you were driving without auto liability insurance (a very bad idea, but legal in some states), then of course you are on your own as far as both paying for a lawyer, and paying a settlement or judgment if one is entered against you.
Here's a little-known way to get money back from a bad lawyer. Ray Bedell, a retired Phoenix electrician, had borrowed and scraped together more than $5,000 to hire an attorney in a family court case so he could spend more time with his daughter. The lawyer seemed smart, aggressive and talented in the courtroom, Bedell remembered.
The lawyer must have been licensed or authorized to practice law in Arizona. The lawyer must have been disciplined with a suspension for longer than six months, interim suspension, disbarment or a felony conviction related to the claim.
How can I get money if a lawyer stole from me? Call the State Bar of Arizona to explain your case and ask if you may be eligible to apply to the Client Protection Fund. Call 602-340-7280 within Maricopa County or 800-319-0514, extension 7280, everywhere else. Fill out an application on the State Bar of Arizona website.
Examples of Client Protection Fund cases include: An attorney fails to perform work a client paid for and refuses to issue a refund. An attorney improperly keeps part or all of a lawsuit settlement or award. An attorney lies, which causes a client financial harm. An attorney dies in the middle of a case and doesn't leave money to reimburse clients.
Most businesses, such as corporations, bonding agencies, medical providers, companies controlled by the lawyer or other third parties with claims against the lawyer.
Wrongful acts such as theft or embezzlement of money.
The final step is a vote by a board of volunteer attorneys that meets once a quarter on whether and how much money to award.
Ct., Queens Cty., Oct. 2002], outlines the procedure to follow when a single practitioner dies leaving undisbursed client funds in his attorney escrow account. Walter Hynes was a Captain in the New York City Fire Department. He died at the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. Captain Hynes was also an attorney who practiced part-time from his home. At his death, Captain Hynes left an IOLA account containing $54,537.65 in client funds. He was the only signatory on the account.
The application must be made in the judicial district in which the deceased lawyer maintained his law office. Any one of a number of designated persons may make the application [DR 9-102 (G) (2)]:
Walter Hynes was a Captain in the New York City Fire Department. He died at the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. Captain Hynes was also an attorney who practiced part-time from his home. At his death, Captain Hynes left an IOLA account containing $54,537.65 in client funds. He was the only signatory on the account.
A lawyer who assists in the application is not permitted to charge a fee for his services. In addition to designating the successor signatory, the Supreme Court judge who considers the application may direct the disbursement of the escrow funds and may order that the funds be deposited with the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection for safekeeping.