how to address mass incarceration as a lawyer

The Only Way To Tackle Mass Incarceration Is To Address The Issue Of Those Convicted Of Violent Offenses takepart Violence And Redemption, TakePart's Big Issue Vol. 11 Opinion No. 1: Joshua Marquis, District Attorney. District attorney, Astoria, Oregon; board member, National District Attorneys Association

Full Answer

How can we end mass incarceration?

Jul 09, 2018 · Apportioning a segment of a firm's time and money towards unrepresented juveniles in the justice system and fighting to offer them an option other than youth imprisonment will likely reduce the problem of youth mass incarceration.

Why is mass incarceration a civil rights issue?

Jul 18, 2018 · These three reforms show how it is possible to end mass incar­cer­a­tion. These approaches would remove more than a half-million people from behind bars, save hundreds of billions of dollars, and pose little to no threat to the public. Even with these reforms, the U.S. would remain well above its demo­cratic peers in incar­cer­a­tion rate.

Can we reduce mass incarceration by reducing pretrial detention?

District attorney, Astoria, Oregon; board member, National District Attorneys Association. One of the urban legends accepted by conservatives and liberals alike is the claim that mass incarceration is out of control, that America has become a virtual prison state filled with inmates serving time for nonviolent crimes.

How can we reduce the length of prison sentences?

May 12, 2015 · May 12, 2015 May 12, 2015. Addressing Mass Incarceration. Various readings during this course informed me about injustices in our society inspired me to confront them. After having the opportunity to read Victor Rios’ ethnographic study Punished: Policing the Lives of Black and Latino Boys I become more aware of the issue of mass ...

How do you explain mass incarceration?

What is the issue with mass incarceration?

What alternatives to mass incarceration would you suggest?

How does mass incarceration violate human rights?

Is mass incarceration a social inequality?

What are two of the negative effects of incarceration?

Which community correction alternatives are most successful?

Why are incarceration alternatives good?

What could communities do to help provide alternatives to incarceration?

What are the four legal foundations of prisoners rights?

What are some of the consequences of mass incarceration and poverty?

Who does mass incarceration affect the most?

What percentage of people in jail have not been convicted of a crime?

Yet 65 percent of people in jail have not been convicted of any crime. They are there waiting for trial. This is called pretrial detention. But in many jurisdictions, pretrial detention can be avoided if you pay a certain amount of money — or bail.

How many Americans agree that it is important to reduce the prison population?

More than 70 percent of Americans, including a majority of Trump voters, agree that it’s important to reduce the prison population. But how can that be accomplished? Who belongs in prison and who doesn’t?

What are the three purposes of imprisonment?

Generally, imprisonment has three purposes: punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation . Yet, according to a Brennan Center review of the literature, studies have concluded that these goals can be achieved by meting out sentences far shorter than the ones used today. In fact, as sentences lengthen, their deterrent effect declines. And as far as deterrence is concerned, the incremental difference between a 10-year sentence and a seven-year sentence is not material to decision-making. But those extra three years of prison could cost a state more than $100,000.

What percentage of the nation's prisoners are drug offenders?

But that will only get so far. Drug offenders account for only about 20 percent of the nation’s prisoners. To truly end mass incarceration, we must be more extensive in rethinking punishment. Below are three oft-discussed proposals ...

How much does a prison cost?

Prison costs $ 31,000 a year per prisoner, and often does little to prevent re-offense for these crimes. Probation, treatment, or community service are all more appropriate for many lower-level crimes, not to mention much cheaper ( probation is 10 times less expensive ).

How can we improve the criminal justice system?

These four recommendations walk through how we can achieve a fairer, more efficient criminal justice system. 1. Eliminate prison for lower-level crimes. Prison is often the default criminal justice sanction when someone breaks the law.

How long can you stay in jail for robbery?

But there’s little evidence that staying in prison for such long periods of time, such as the 20 or 30-year sentences imposed, will rehabilitate prisoners. In fact, research indicates that longer stays in prison do not lead to lower recidivism.

Should the minimum and maximum sentencing guidelines be reduced?

State and federal legislatures should reduce the minimum and maximum sentencing guidelines, and make them more proportional to the crimes committed. We suggest in the report that legislators consider a 25 percent cut as a starting point for the six major crimes (aggravated assault, drug trafficking, murder, non-violent weapons offenses, robbery and serious burglary) that make up the bulk of the nation’s current prison population. This will make our system smarter while still protecting public safety.

Should sentencing laws be changed?

State legislatures and Congress should change sentencing laws to make alternatives to prison the default penalty for certain lower-level crimes, like drug possession and petty theft. 2. Reduce sentence minimums and maximums currently on the books.

Is prison a bad thing?

Prison is often the default criminal justice sanction when someone breaks the law. It shouldn’t be that way. For those who commit a lower-level crime like drug possession, petty theft, or selling marijuana, prison is not just unfair, it is also a bad sanction for society at large.

Does longer jail time increase recidivism?

In fact, research indicates that longer stays in prison do not lead to lower recidivism. Sometimes, longer stays can even increase recidivism. With prison stays growing longer each year, lawmakers should consider reducing the time many inmates spend behind bars when it’s not necessary.

Why is mass incarceration a problem?

The issue of mass incarceration is a result of the government’s attempt to solve rising crime rates. Legislation such as the “Three Strikes” law proved to be ineffective and unjust because it did not take into consideration the individuals who were involved in the stated problem.

What is the key to reentry?

We believe that employment is the key to successful reentry and breaking the cycle of incarceration. There are three general areas in which we aim to collaborate with other organizations:

When did mass incarceration start?

The rise of mass incarceration, spanning the 1970s to the early 2000s, was characterized by continuous, unified growth in both prison and jail populations across states and counties. In contrast, the past decade has given rise to what is widely recognized as an era of reform, with prison admission rates declining by 24 percent since 2006 and jail admissions rates down 25 percent since 2008. The national declines, however, mask the new dynamics of mass incarceration.

What is the growth of mass incarceration?

The growth that characterized mass incarceration’s rise has fractured into four dynamics that vary from state to state and county to county. Contemporary decarceration exists alongside continuous growth, stagnation, and jurisdictional shifts between prisons and jails, akin to a shell game. This report provides a first-in-kind look at the state of incarceration by moving beyond the convention of using state prison populations, illuminating both where meaningful change has happened and where true reform has remained elusive.

How did the prison population decrease?

Several factors contributed to this decline: ongoing decreases in crime rates leading to fewer felony convictions; scaling back “war on drugs” policies; increased interest in evidence-based approaches to sentencing and reentry; and growing concerns about the fiscal cost of corrections and its impact on other state priorities. The state of California alone was responsible for 36% of the overall population decline, a function of a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court ruling declaring its overcrowded prison system to be unconstitutional and subsequent legislative responses to reduce the use of state incarceration.

How many states have slashed prisons?

Thirty-nine states and the federal government had downsized their prisons by 2017. Five states—Alaska, New Jersey, Vermont, Connecticut, and New York—reduced their prison populations by over 30% since reaching their peak levels.

How many people were in prison in 2017?

By yearend 2017, 1.4 million people were imprisoned in the United States, a decline of 7% since the prison population reached its peak level in 2009. This follows a nearly 700% growth in the prison population between 1972 and 2009.

How long does it take to reduce prison population?

Despite the decline, the overall pace of change is quite modest. A recent analysis documents that at the rate of change from 2009 to 2016 it will take 75 years to reduce the prison population by half. And while 42 states have experienced declines from their peak prison populations, 20 of these declines are less than 5%, while 8 states are still experiencing rising populations.

What are the challenges of criminal justice reform?

Criminal Justice Reform - Mass Incarceration. The United States faces two distinct but interconnected challenges: violence and mass incarceration. Ensuring safety is an urgent and essential responsibility of a society and is a core dimension of delivering on the promise of justice. The United States has been remiss in attempts to fulfill ...