Grievance committee investigations can take three to six months to complete. A grievance committee has several options: Find no probable cause, or no probable cause with a letter of advice, which ends the case with no discipline. Recommend mediation or arbitration of a fee dispute. Issue a finding of minor misconduct.
Like a grand jury, the grievance committee decides whether there is probable cause to believe a lawyer violated the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and whether discipline is warranted. If the grievance committee takes testimony from the accused lawyer, the person who filed the original complaint may attend.
The Florida Bar has branch offices in Tallahassee, Tampa, Orlando, Fort Lauderdale and Miami. About one-third of cases investigated at ACAP are transferred to a branch office for further investigation. When referred to the branch office, the case is assigned to Bar counsel who conducts a further investigation.
3-2.1 (j) Probable Cause. A finding by an authorized agency that there is cause to believe that a member of The Florida Bar is guilty of misconduct justifying disciplinary action.
The Florida Supreme Court is the final authority on lawyer discipline. The court’s decision on guilt and the ultimate sanction imposed are final. The Supreme Court reviews consent judgments and referee decisions from disciplinary trials.
The Bar also may learn of potential problems through media reports or other means. Intake counsel: Intake counsel conducts a preliminary investigation. If intake counsel determines that the allegations would not constitute a violation warranting discipline, the case is closed without further action.
There are 81 local grievance committees across Florida – at least one in each of the state’s 20 judicial circuits. Each circuit’s grievance committees are comprised of lawyers and public members living in that circuit. The grievance committees serve like a grand jury, and are charged with further factual investigation and determining whether there is probable cause that a disciplinary violation occurred.
A lawyer who represents a client in an adjudicative proceeding and who knows that a person intends to engage, is engaging, or has engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct related to the proceeding shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal.
The Florida Supreme Court is the ultimate and final authority on lawyer discipline matters. The Supreme Court reviews consent judgments and referee decisions from disciplinary trials or reinstatement petitions. If either the Board of Governors or the respondent petition for review of a report of referee, then the matter is briefed. If neither the board nor the respondent petitions for review of the report of referee, then the Supreme Court will conduct its review of the report of referee without briefs unless the court requests briefing.
The wife told Respondent about her credit union account containing over $480,000.
The former wife testified that she believed Parenting Education Charitable Trust was an entity that had been or was in the process of being established, that Respondent was going to research the issues as necessary, and that other lawyers in her law firm would be able to perform the necessary legal work to establish the charitable entity.
Respondent argues that the referee erred in finding that she knowingly allowed false evidence to be presented by way of the wife’s deposition testimony about the withdrawal and redeposit of the funds in the credit union account without taking any remedial action.
“A lawyer shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer.”
After a formal complaint is filed, an attorney will only have 20 days to submit an answer. The Florida Supreme Court will then assign a case to a county court judge or circuit court ...
At Pike & Lustig, LLP, our Florida bar complaints & grievances attorneys are committed to providing strong and sophisticated legal representation to lawyers and law firms. We defend legal professionals facing grievances and complaints filed with or by the Florida Bar. Our legal team assists clients during every stage of the complaint and grievance process. To arrange a fully private initial consultation, please contact us right away.
The rules provide the lawyer must respond to the Bar’s request for information and that the lawyer must do so within 15 days. Short extensions are usually granted for good cause.
The ACAP telephone number is toll-free, 866-352-0707.
The grievance committee reviews complaints with much the same purpose as a grand jury. That is, the committee decides whether there is probable cause to believe a lawyer violated the professional conduct rules imposed by the Supreme Court of Florida and whether discipline against the lawyer appears to be warranted.
A lawyer may be disciplined only for violating the standards of conduct set forth in the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. For lawyers, The Florida Bar operates an ethics hotline to offer guidance when a lawyer is unsure of the ethical obligations in a particular situation.
There are 81 local grievance committees across Florida – at least one in each of the state’s 20 judicial circuits. Each circuit’s grievance committees are comprised of lawyers and public members living in that circuit.
Stage 1: Complaint Intake & Preliminary Investigation. The process starts when the Bar receives a complaint against a lawyer. Clients, opposing counsel, or judges may file complaints, or the Bar may discover potential misconduct through other means, such as media reports or notice of a bounced check from a lawyer’s bank.
After a complaint is submitted to the Bar, but before charges are filed, intake counsel conducts a preliminary investigation. If intake counsel determines that the allegations do not warrant discipline, then the case is closed immediately without further action against the attorney.
The Board of Governors can overturn a decision to close a disciplinary file, reviews grievance committee actions, and reviews reports of referees from disciplinary trials and petitions for reinstatement and decides whether to appeal to the Supreme Court.
The Florida Supreme Court is the ultimate and final authority on lawyer discipline matters. The Supreme Court reviews consent judgments and referee decisions from disciplinary trials or reinstatement petitions.
For example, if a lawyer is accused of practicing law while suspended, the suspended lawyer will be brought before the court on a petition for contempt and new discipline may be imposed. Such discipline is typically increasingly harsh. Thus, a lawyer who is suspended, if found guilty of contempt, may be disbarred.
While every jurisdiction has its own process and procedures for regulating its attorneys, The Florida Bar’s disciplinary system has many participants and levels of review. Florida Bar attorneys and professional staff, county and circuit court judges, Supreme Court justices, and a number of volunteers — from the lawyers and public members who serve on the grievance committees to the members of the DRC and the Board of Governors — spend a substantial amount of time dedicated to ensuring fairness and integrity in the process for the profession, the public, and the respondent.
When a disciplinary file is referred to mediation, the disciplinary file is closed without the entry of a sanction and will remain closed. It is a violation of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar for an attorney to fail to attend or fully comply with the terms of a written mediation agreement without good cause.
Alleged instance of incompetence by a lawyer that is not part of a pattern of incompetence, when the act is not committed in conjunction with any other rule violation, and the lawyer has not been the subject of prior disciplinary sanctions for incompetence;
Types of Disputes That May Be Mediated 1 Alleged instance of incompetence by a lawyer that is not part of a pattern of incompetence, when the act is not committed in conjunction with any other rule violation, and the lawyer has not been the subject of prior disciplinary sanctions for incompetence; 2 Alleged refusal of a lawyer to timely return a client’s file or copies thereof; 3 Alleged refusal of a lawyer to release a lien on a client’s recovery in a case in which the lawyer has been replaced by another counsel; 4 Alleged refusal of lawyer to properly withdraw from representation after being fired by the client; 5 Alleged failure of a lawyer to conclude legal representation by failure to prepare an essential document; 6 Alleged failure of a lawyer to comply with a letter of protection issued on behalf of a client; 7 Alleged failure of a lawyer to adequately communicate to a client not causing substantial harm to the client; 8 Alleged neglect by a lawyer that does not cause substantial harm; and 9 Any other matter involving the private rights of the complainant and respondent wherein the public interest is satisfied by a resolution that dismisses the disciplinary case without further action.
Mediation is a private, informal way to resolve a dispute. A mediator is a neutral person who tries to aid disputing persons in reaching a mutually agreeable solution to their differences. The consent of both persons is needed if bar counsel or a grievance committee recommends mediation.
A mediator is a neutral person who tries to aid disputing persons in reaching a mutually agreeable solution to their differences. The consent of both persons is needed if bar counsel or a grievance committee recommends mediation.