Full Answer
Yes, they can bill you even after two years. Whether the bill is accurate or justified is a different question. I am not your lawyer unless we enter into an engagement agreement in writing. This is general information that is given for legal education only. It is not legal advice, and it may not work for your specific situation.
Even If You Have Already Paid Your Lawyer, You May Be Entitled to Get Your Money Back Fee disputes occasionally arise after the client has either (1) advanced money in anticipation of services to be rendered (often called a “retainer” or “advance”) or (2) tendered full payment for legal services already rendered.
But be realistic about how many hours you can bill in a day. Not everything lawyers do is billable; an 11-hour day at the office might only yield eight billable hours. And that is OK. Practice makes perfect, but knowing a few techniques will reduce the billing burden and help you become a more proficient biller.
For example, if you call your lawyer to discuss your bill, and you see that call reflected on your next bill; Bills that have not been itemized to reflect services rendered. If you are being billed by the hour, you have a right to a bill that shows what your lawyer was doing, and when he was doing it;
A: The lawyer should be responsive to your questions within 24-48 hours after you left a message. If the lawyer is not responsive, perhaps he or she is on vacation and unable to return.
Technically you can be sued for anything at any time, but in most cases can succeed on a motion to dismiss because the statute of limitations for most claims is less than ten years.
Dennis BeaverThe attorney does not return phone calls in a reasonable amount of time, and;In a meeting with the client, if the lawyer is being very short, taking phone calls, trying to re-schedule, not giving enough time to the client, does not listen, ignores what is asked or is not answering questions.
If your attorney is not experienced or efficient, they may have missed a deadline or made another mistake and aren't willing to confess their error. There could also be some bad news that is entirely outside of the attorney's control.
No, you can't sue after the statute of limitations runs out. But there are situations where the statute of limitations begins late. For example, in a case of medical malpractice, the injury may have occurred weeks, months, or possibly years before the harm and cause of harm are discovered.
No, but statutes of limitations generally allow at least one year. Except for when you sue a government agency, you almost always have at least one year from the date of harm to file a lawsuit, no matter what type of claim you have or which state you live in.
Five things not to say to a lawyer (if you want them to take you..."The Judge is biased against me" Is it possible that the Judge is "biased" against you? ... "Everyone is out to get me" ... "It's the principle that counts" ... "I don't have the money to pay you" ... Waiting until after the fact.
Yes, some lawyers lie, cheat and deceive their clients. But they are the exception, and an embarrassment to most lawyers.
No matter what name the agency in your state goes by, they will have a process you can use to file a complaint against your attorney for lying or being incompetent. Examples of these types of behavior include: Misusing your money. Failing to show up at a court hearing.
There is no set formula for how often you will hear from your attorney. However, the key to a successful attorney client relationship is communication. Whenever there is an important occurrence in your case you will be contacted or notified.
Perhaps the most common kinds of complaints against lawyers involve delay or neglect. This doesn't mean that occasionally you've had to wait for a phone call to be returned. It means there has been a pattern of the lawyer's failing to respond or to take action over a period of months.
Throughout the process of getting your financial settlement after becoming injured, there may be periods of time that you do not hear from your attorney. Although this can be unnerving, it is a normal part of the legal process.
As long as one attempts to collect the debt within the statute of limitations (which is the time frame in which a claim must be made withing), then in simple terms, yes. Two years is likely within the statute of limitations in AZ. Good luck.
Yes, it is legal. They can send a bill 50 years later, but they will not be able to collect on it after the statute of limitations has passed. In AZ, that would be 3 or 6 years, depending.
Yes, they can bill you even after two years. Whether the bill is accurate or justified is a different question.
Some firms require that lawyers enter their billable time daily or weekly, though bills usually go out monthly. Even if your firm doesn’t require you to enter time daily, this is the best approach to ensure you capture all the billable work you perform. Any lawyer will tell you that this is easier said than done, but I promise that you will lose time if you put it off, especially as a young lawyer. You’ll forget about emails you sent, phone calls you took, and other “small ticket” items that add up over a month. This hurts the firm and your progress toward your billable-hour goal.
Don’t short yourself that billable time. But be realistic about how many hours you can bill in a day. Not everything lawyers do is billable; an 11-hour day at the office might only yield eight billable hours. And that is OK.
Double billing is simultaneously billing two clients for work performed during the same block of time. The temptation to do this occurs most often when lawyers travel. Say the lawyer spends two hours flying to attend Client 1’s deposition. While the lawyer is on the plane, she uses that time to work on projects for Client 2. Some clients don’t allow lawyers to bill for travel time, and under that circumstance, the lawyer could only bill the time spent working for Client 2 anyway. But when clients will pay for travel costs, the lawyer may be tempted to bill Client 1 for the time spent traveling and simultaneously bill Client 2 for work on their projects. Voilà —the lawyer has magically made four hours of billable time out of two hours. While none of the comments to Rule 1.5 or Rule 8.4 explicitly address double billing, legal ethics experts agree that double-billing violates these rules.
You need to know what you can and can’t bill for so you can avoid both spending excessive time on work that clients won’t pay for and entering time for unbillable tasks.
You’ll get more proficient at both, but it will take a few years, and during that period, expect that your billing entries may be cut. Unless someone told you otherwise, bill all the time you spend on a task, even if you know some of it will be marked down.
But at most firms, you can and should bill for tasks like reading and sending emails; taking and making phone calls; reviewing accident reports, medical records, and discovery documents; and speaking to clients, opposing counsel, and witnesses.
Most seasoned lawyers recognize that summer associates and young lawyers generally are not good at billing. Most new lawyers don’t get comfortable with billing until they are third- or fourth-year associates.
If your lawyer is unwilling to discuss the bills, you should put your concerns in writing, and consider ending the relationship.
The downside of not raising billing concerns with your lawyer is substantial. You lose the chance to obtain a mutually-agreed upon reduction. The billing practice that offends you will no doubt continue. Finally, if the fee dispute ever gets litigated or arbitrated, your lawyer will claim that you consented to the disputed billing practice.
Lawyers frequently try to coerce payment by asserting an “attorneys’ lien” on all or part of a former client’s case file pending receipt of payment. Depending on whether the case or transaction is over, this can leave the client in the unenviable position of having to pay the fee to get much-needed papers for an ongoing legal matter. However, in practice a client operating in good faith has little to fear. If the client has a need for the documents in an ongoing matter, and a good faith basis for not paying a portion of the fee, lawyers cannot withhold critical papers. Even after the attorney-client relationship is over, the lawyer has a duty to assist in an orderly transition to replacement counsel to minimize prejudice to his former client.
Lawyers will often refer to agreements they have with clients, typically drafted by the lawyer at the beginning of the engagement, as evidence that a client agreed to certain payment terms. For example, there may be agreement as to hourly rates, staffing, or contemplated courses of action.
Despite this, lawyers often tell their clients they are entitled to a “bonus” over the agreed-upon fee because the matter has become more difficult than expected or because of an unexpectedly favorable result. It is common for such a lawyer to “negotiate” the increased fee in the middle of an engagement.
There are steps you can take both during and after the engagement to communicate your concerns to your lawyer. Appropriate questioning of bills often leads to a mutually-agreed upon reduction, and can even strengthen the attorney-client relationship. Should all else fail, fee dispute litigation provides substantial relief from some relatively common examples of attorney overbilling, while protecting an attorney’s right to a reasonable fee. Ten points for clients to consider:
If the representation is over, you may feel compelled to pay outstanding bills, even if they are outrageous, since your lawyer is the last person you want as an adversary in litigation. You recognize that your lawyer possesses superior knowledge about the legal system that will determine any billing dispute.