A typical introduction: âYour Honor, members of the jury, my name is (full name), representing the prosecution/defendant in this case.â If they have already been introduced, some attorneys just go right into their opening to save time, create drama, and make it look more like a real trial.
Opening Statement ChecklistState your theme immediately in one sentence.Tell the story of the case without argument.Persuasively order your facts in a sequence that supports your theme.Decide whether to address the bad facts in the opening or not.Do not read your opening statement. ... Bring an outline, if necessary.More items...â˘
At the beginning of a hearing, attorneys should always state their name and who they represent. This should be done while standing, and oftentimes judges will expect an attorney to speak from a podium rather than at counsel's table. Figure this out in advance.
Brother/Sister: When speaking to the court, attorneys often refer to opposing counsel as âMy Brotherâ or âMy Sisterâ. The attorneys are not related, they use this reference because they are looked upon as brethren in the law. Burden of Proof: The duty to prove disputed facts.
Do'sDO speak calmly and clearly.DO use the proper forms of address.DO be polite.DO stand when you address the court.DO make eye contact with the judge when you are speaking.DO ask for clarification if you are unclear about something.DO thank the judge for listening.DO arrive early to court.More items...â˘
Judge: âProsecution, are you ready to begin.â Prosecution: âYes your honor.â Judge: âThe prosecution may make its opening statement.â âYour Honor and members of the jury, we know that _____________________ is guilty of violating the law.
For a practicing attorney, you address them as "Esquire" or "Attorney at Law." For salutations, you can use "Mr.", "Ms." or "Mrs." followed by their last name.
2:5023:54Tell me about yourself! Introduce yourself in English with EASE!YouTubeStart of suggested clipEnd of suggested clipWe start really simply and casually with your name. I am emma or i'm emma. Now in most situations.MoreWe start really simply and casually with your name. I am emma or i'm emma. Now in most situations. It's much more natural to use the contraction.
Introduce yourself by name and as the plaintiff or defendant, claimant or respondent. Speak clearly and loudly (but don't yell at the judge). Don't rush. Speak at a normal rate.
Have you even wondered why do lawyers refer themselves as learned friend? The legal profession is one of the three professions which is traditionally treated as a learned profession. All the members associated in this profession are learned one as they deal with knowledge, ideas, and ethics.
If the other party is represented by a solicitor you should refer to them as 'My friend'. If the other party is acting as a litigant in person you should refer to them as 'the claimant/defendant' or 'Mr/Mrs/Miss âŚâŚ. '.
In criminal cases heard in NSW, the law is that an accused person can be represented either by themselves, by their lawyer, or by anyone else who the court permits to represent them.
You have to say âI am afraid/I am sorry that/Perhaps I could not make myself clear. It is my fault. May I rephrase myselfÂ.â
We argue before the Honâble Court on the basis of facts we have pleaded in our pleadings, and to elucidate the points of law. However there is a method to our madness.
We prefer to call them âsubmissionsâ before the Court since it is consistent with our peculiarly polite way of putting things.
One of the most important weapons in a lawyerâs arsenal is âargumentâ. The word âargumentâ engenders visions of debate, the heat and fury of positions attacked and defended strongly, though with words.
How these things were formulated has many answers, but the most commonly accepted one is that these hark back to the courtly culture of a High Court of the King, where unless the King was pleased to suffer you speak, you had to keep quiet. What you say must please him. A bit like âHer Majestyâs Loyal Oppositionâ.
The trick is not to be provoked. A case is won by a cool head, and if you are prone to losing your temper, then the opposing counsel will certainly exploit it by sledging, in this context meaning to keep on making sotto voce comments that you can hear, but may not reach the Court or may reach the Court and you but can be passed off as a comment to the opposing counselâs own juniors.
When a learned advocate says that which is not true and he is supposed to know that it is not, the usual formula is not to say âMy Lord he is lying âÂ. That would be a worse solecism than the untruth itself.
DUTY Establish the basis of the duty or obligation that the other party owed you. Typically, this is either a statute or a contract or the "common law." Examples are: (1) I had a verbal contract with my neighbor to paint his house for $500. (2) I found a statute that says my boss cannot blacklist me with other potential employers.
BREACH If there is a duty or obligation that the other party breached, present it quickly without telling all of the ways in which this makes you angry. Example: (1) My neighbor refused to pay the agreed price after I painted his house.
CAUSATION You must then explain how this directly led to your legal complaint. Usually, this means you believe nothing else contributed to the issue. Example: (1) The paint job is beautiful and there is no excuse for my neighbor to not pay.
Check out any legal bases for your claim in addition to what your instinct tells you. For example, go to the legislative website to see if there is a statute that also relates. http://www.leg.wa.gov, "search" and hit the "document" button, then "RCW" for Washington statutes.
If a lawyer wants to apply the case law (âI think my client should get the same result as the previously decided opinionâ), the lawyer has to think of ways the opinion facts are similar to the facts of the clientâs case and create a theme that exists in both sets of facts. The lawyer then uses the theme that they created (as opposed to using the facts of either case) to argue that because the theme exists in both the previously decided opinion and the clientâs case, the case law outcome should be applied to the clientâs case . Arguing the theme makes it unnecessary for the lawyer to change the facts of their case to mirror those of the previously decided opinion to âwinâ for their clients.
First, lawyers understand and believe the facts their clients relay to them. Second, after hearing the facts and identifying the legal issues a client is facing, a lawyer must find a previously decided opinion (called case law or precedent) with an outcome that favors their clientâs position. Or, a lawyer may need to distinguish case law ...
The lawyer then uses the theme that they created (as opposed to using the facts of either case) to argue that because the theme exists in both the previously decided opinion and the clientâs case, the case law outcome should be applied to the clientâs case .
Winning a case has much to do with the attorneyâs skill in creating a theme that will stick in the minds of the judge and jury and win the case â the most extraordinary skill to lawyering and client advocacy.
The real magic happens when the attorney articulates the theme that persuades the judge or jury to believe the cases are similar enough to warrant the same outcome. Winner!
Lawyers are notoriously known for changing the facts to âwinâ their case. Yet, the most successful attorneys never change the facts to win. They simply do not need to do so. How, then, does a lawyer win a case? First, lawyers understand and believe the facts their clients relay to them.
If opening a case you should always introduce yourself and the other side to the Court. For example: Your Honour/Sir/Madam/Master I appear in this case for the Claimant and my friend Mr/Miss/Mrs. appears for the Defendant.
It should provide a non-contentious summary of the case. The Prosecution then proceed to present their case. After their evidence has been heard the defence have the opportunity to give an opening speech and the present their evidence.
The opening speech involves taking the judge through the statements of the case and providing an outline and guide to your case. It should provide a summary of the evidence that will be produced and should not go into any details in relation to the content of the testimony. The opening speech will detail the issues to be decided and you should provide a summary of the facts that you seek to establish. However, in the county court the defendantâs solicitor can make the opening speech and if they do they are not entitled to make a closing speech, without the leave of the court. You should hand the judge a bundle of documents and take him or her through the chronology of the matter to provide the judge with a picture of the events in the case. The opening speech should be lively and interesting to engage the court. You should use plain language and use eye contact to build rapport with the judge. You should refer to your client by his or her name in order to personalise them, and refer to the other side, for example as the ârespondent/defendantâ etc.
The closing speech is your final attempt to address the court. It should integrate the evidence the court has heard with your theory of the case and present your underpinning argument. In your final speech you should rebut or explain the evidence that weakens your case and explain how the law applies.
This is done by oral examination and the sequence of the questioning is examination-in-chief of the claimantâs side (to include witnesses), cross-examination by the defendantâs side, re-examination. The defendant will then give their evidence and can make an opening speech.
In criminal matters the prosecution have the right to make an opening speech. If it is a simple case then very often the Prosecution will forgo an opening speech. If the Prosecution do decide to have an opening speech it should be kept brief. It should provide a non-contentious summary of the case.
The judge can, however, dispense with this, particularly in fast-track cases. The sequence of questioning for the defendantâs evidence (to include witnesses) is examination-in-chief by the defendantâs side, cross-examination by the claimantâs side and re-examination.
Between the time that you file the complaint and the actual hearing date, many things can happen. Itâs important to stay up to date with your case.
In many District Court cases, the Clerkâs Office will set the trial date within 60 days after the complaint was filed. When a Notice of Intention to Defend is filed within 60 days of service (such as for a corporation), then the Clerkâs Office schedules the trial within 90 days of filing the complaint.
Whether you are the person who filed the case (the âplaintiffâ) or the person being sued (the âdefendantâ), read and reread the complaint. This is the document that the judge will have in front of them. The judge will be looking for an explanation of all the items in the complaint.
Different court rules apply to different types of cases and different courts (e.g., small claims, District Court, circuit court). The rules are much more formal outside of small claims court, and the advice or representation of an attorney is likely to be very helpful.
Identify and prepare the important documents and physical evidence that you plan to bring to trial. Your evidence must be:
Organized documents will help you be calm in court. You cannot be too organized.
To prepare for trial, both parties have a right to find out information from the other party. This process is called âdiscovery.â
The lawyer for the plaintiff or government usually goes first. The lawyer sums up and comments on the evidence in the most favorable light for his or her side, showing how it proved what he or she had to prove to prevail in the case. After that side has made its case, the defense then presents its closing arguments.
The judge usually indicates to the lawyers before closing arguments begin which instructions he or she intends to give the jury. In their closing arguments the lawyers can comment on the jury instructions and relate them to the evidence.
Closing Arguments. The lawyersâ closing arguments or summations discuss the evidence and properly drawn inferences. The lawyers cannot talk about issues outside the case or about evidence that was not presented. The judge usually indicates to the lawyers before closing arguments begin which instructions he or she intends to give the jury.
This is a chance to respond to the defendantâs points and make one final appeal to the jury.
Occasionally the defense may choose not to make a closing statement. If so, the plaintiff or government loses the right to make a second argument.
These may include documents, letters, emails, notes, maps, diagrams, etc.
There are a few ways that you can mark exhibits for court. One way is to mark the exhibit with a marker or ballpoint pen. Other options include using exhibit stickers or having the court clerk label the exhibit. It all depends on the jurisdiction â rules differ.
Evidentiary foundations need to be properly laid to get your exhibits admitted into evidence so that the jury may consider them in deliberations. But before we dive into HOW to introduce an exhibit at trial, let's back up and discuss the basics of exhibits.
Laying an evidentiary foundation is crucial when introducing exhibits at trial. Without a proper foundation, the court may refuse to admit certain exhibits ...
It will likely include the exhibit number, description of the exhibit, and information on the court, case number, whether the exhibit list is for the plaintiff or the defendant, and other information to help identify, organize, and prepare the exhibits for trial.
If you can't demonstrate that the court exhibit is admissible under the applicable rules of evidence, you will not be able to enter your exhibit into evidence for the jury to consider.
First, some (even many) exhibits may be agreed upon (âstipulatedâ to) by the parties, in order to save time â especially with non-controversial items. Or, occasionally, the judge may issue a ruling before trial (during a pre-trial hearing) that certain exhibits are admissible.
The side bringing the case is the side that bears the burden of proof, and thus always goes first. This is the prosecuting attorney in a criminal case, or the plaintiff in a civil case. The defense then follows with their opening statement.
1. Opening Statements. Every trial proceeds in basically the same way. Both parties are seated in the courtroom. In a criminal trial, this includes the prosecuting attorney for the government, as well as the defendant and their defense attorney . In civil cases, both the plaintiff and defendant, and their respective attorneys, if any, ...
A criminal defendant who is found guilty, or who voluntarily pleads guilty, is scheduled for a sentencing hearing approximately 90 days after the verdict. This gives the U.S. probation officer time to research and prepare a pre-sentence report for the judge. This report is used by the judge to determine punishment for the crime. The judgeâs primary goal is to order punishment that is suitable for the crime committed, but no more than needed. Other goals include keeping the community safe, deterring similar crimes in the future, and rehabilitating the individual to prevent them from committing future crimes. The judge also wants to avoid unfair differences in sentences for similar crimes committed by different defendants. Types of punishment can include imprisonment, house arrest, supervised release, substance abuse treatment, counseling, educational training, payment of fines and/or restitution. When assigning the appropriate punishment, the judge uses the advice of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines . These guidelines take into account the seriousness of the offense, and the criminal history of the person. For some types of crimes, there is a mandatory minimum sentence set by federal law. In many cases, there may be a term of imprisonment, followed by a period of supervised release . During that term of release, the offender will be supervised by a U.S. probation officer while living back in the community, and will be required to adhere to various conditions.
Actually, the most common type of evidence is provided by witness testimony . Often witness testimony may be the only evidence presented. Itâs up to the jury, or the judge in a bench trial, to decide the true facts from what is said by each party and each witness.
Types of punishment can include imprisonment, house arrest, supervised release, substance abuse treatment, counseling, educational training, payment of fines and/or restitution.
Physical evidence â Physical objects and documents can be used by either side to prove or disprove issues. An example would be DNA, fingerprints, or a photograph.
Evidence. Objections. Evidence is used by the parties to prove or disprove unresolved issues in the case. There are rules in place to govern how evidence is collected, what evidence can be admitted in the case, and how the judge and jury may consider evidence to render a decision.