The lawyers who practice before the court are expected to be familiar with the courtâs procedures. They introduce themselves to the judge, who then calls on them and asks them to state their appearances. The parties in the case will also introduce themselves, so that the judge knows who is involved in the case and what their roles are.
How Do Lawyers Introduce Themselves? Introductions are extremely important in any profession. Lawyers introduce themselves when they meet with clients, when they meet with opposing counsel and in court, and often when they go to trial or argue in front of a judge.
If a lawyer wants to apply the case law (âI think my client should get the same result as the previously decided opinionâ), the lawyer has to think of ways the opinion facts are similar to the facts of the clientâs case and create a theme that exists in both sets of facts.
If opening a case you should always introduce yourself and the other side to the Court. For example: Your Honour/Sir/Madam/Master I appear in this case for the Claimant and my friend Mr/Miss/Mrs. appears for the Defendant.
⢠Introduce yourself by name, but let them know that you are an attorney before you give out your business card. ⢠Talk about where you went to school and where you received your undergraduate degree. ⢠Highlight any areas of practice experience in which they might have an interest.
At the beginning of a hearing, attorneys should always state their name and who they represent. This should be done while standing, and oftentimes judges will expect an attorney to speak from a podium rather than at counsel's table. Figure this out in advance.
Opening Statement ChecklistState your theme immediately in one sentence.Tell the story of the case without argument.Persuasively order your facts in a sequence that supports your theme.Decide whether to address the bad facts in the opening or not.Do not read your opening statement. ... Bring an outline, if necessary.More items...â˘
An effective opening statement is built around a theme that can be summed up in a simple word or phrase or in a single sentence. The theme developed should be straightforward, clear, and designed to catch and hold the jury's attention. It should get directly to the heart of the dispute.
If the other party is represented by a solicitor you should refer to them as 'My friend'. If the other party is acting as a litigant in person you should refer to them as 'the claimant/defendant' or 'Mr/Mrs/Miss âŚâŚ. '.
Do'sDO speak calmly and clearly.DO use the proper forms of address.DO be polite.DO stand when you address the court.DO make eye contact with the judge when you are speaking.DO ask for clarification if you are unclear about something.DO thank the judge for listening.DO arrive early to court.More items...â˘
Some examples:âThis is a case about taking chances.ââMary Jones had a dream and a plan.ââRevenge. That's what this case is all about.ââThis is also a case about pain. Mr. Johnson's only companion today is constant pain.ââThis is a case about police brutalityâ
Overview. The opening statement is the lawyer's first opportunity to address the jury in a trial. Generally, the party who bears the burden of proof (plaintiff in a civil case or prosecution in a criminal case) begins the opening statements, followed immediately after by the adverse party (defendant).
Opening statements include such phrases as, âMs. Smith will testify under oath that she saw Mr. Johnson do X,â and âThe evidence will show that Defendant did not do Y.â Although opening statements should be as persuasive as possible, they should not include arguments. They come at the end of the trial.
A strong defense opening statement will do the following:Tell a story. ... Plant the defense themes. ... Make concessions only with great caution. ... Make the defense case concisely. ... Humanize the defendant. ... Make no promises about the defendant testifying. ... Argue the defendant's case. ... End on a high note.
The definition of a solicitor under the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), is a legal practitioner who has completed a law degree and holds a practising certificate.
They were called âlearnedâ because of the disproportionately extensive intellectual preparation required to qualify to practice them, particularly in relation to the other vocations of the time. âLearned professionâ never ever exclusively referred to law.
Brother/Sister: When speaking to the court, attorneys often refer to opposing counsel as âMy Brotherâ or âMy Sisterâ. The attorneys are not related, they use this reference because they are looked upon as brethren in the law.
Here are some tips that will help you make effective communication with your lawyer regarding the proceedings of your case.
For an effective proceeding of the will in the court, proper communication with the relevant lawyer is necessary. There are many benefits of proper communication to both lawyer and client. Here are some of the benefits of proper communication between the lawyer and the plaintiff.
From the facts mentioned above, the importance of proper communication is evident. With a proper understanding of the best ways to communicate with the lawyer, one can talk to his lawyer effectively. When the client and the lawyer move side by side, it will improve the case. So, learning how to explain the case with a lawyer is very beneficial.
You have to say âI am afraid/I am sorry that/Perhaps I could not make myself clear. It is my fault. May I rephrase myselfÂ.â
We argue before the Honâble Court on the basis of facts we have pleaded in our pleadings, and to elucidate the points of law. However there is a method to our madness.
We prefer to call them âsubmissionsâ before the Court since it is consistent with our peculiarly polite way of putting things.
One of the most important weapons in a lawyerâs arsenal is âargumentâ. The word âargumentâ engenders visions of debate, the heat and fury of positions attacked and defended strongly, though with words.
How these things were formulated has many answers, but the most commonly accepted one is that these hark back to the courtly culture of a High Court of the King, where unless the King was pleased to suffer you speak, you had to keep quiet. What you say must please him. A bit like âHer Majestyâs Loyal Oppositionâ.
The trick is not to be provoked. A case is won by a cool head, and if you are prone to losing your temper, then the opposing counsel will certainly exploit it by sledging, in this context meaning to keep on making sotto voce comments that you can hear, but may not reach the Court or may reach the Court and you but can be passed off as a comment to the opposing counselâs own juniors.
When a learned advocate says that which is not true and he is supposed to know that it is not, the usual formula is not to say âMy Lord he is lying âÂ. That would be a worse solecism than the untruth itself.
DUTY Establish the basis of the duty or obligation that the other party owed you. Typically, this is either a statute or a contract or the "common law." Examples are: (1) I had a verbal contract with my neighbor to paint his house for $500. (2) I found a statute that says my boss cannot blacklist me with other potential employers.
BREACH If there is a duty or obligation that the other party breached, present it quickly without telling all of the ways in which this makes you angry. Example: (1) My neighbor refused to pay the agreed price after I painted his house.
CAUSATION You must then explain how this directly led to your legal complaint. Usually, this means you believe nothing else contributed to the issue. Example: (1) The paint job is beautiful and there is no excuse for my neighbor to not pay.
Check out any legal bases for your claim in addition to what your instinct tells you. For example, go to the legislative website to see if there is a statute that also relates. http://www.leg.wa.gov, "search" and hit the "document" button, then "RCW" for Washington statutes.
If opening a case you should always introduce yourself and the other side to the Court. For example: Your Honour/Sir/Madam/Master I appear in this case for the Claimant and my friend Mr/Miss/Mrs. appears for the Defendant.
It should provide a non-contentious summary of the case. The Prosecution then proceed to present their case. After their evidence has been heard the defence have the opportunity to give an opening speech and the present their evidence.
The opening speech involves taking the judge through the statements of the case and providing an outline and guide to your case. It should provide a summary of the evidence that will be produced and should not go into any details in relation to the content of the testimony. The opening speech will detail the issues to be decided and you should provide a summary of the facts that you seek to establish. However, in the county court the defendantâs solicitor can make the opening speech and if they do they are not entitled to make a closing speech, without the leave of the court. You should hand the judge a bundle of documents and take him or her through the chronology of the matter to provide the judge with a picture of the events in the case. The opening speech should be lively and interesting to engage the court. You should use plain language and use eye contact to build rapport with the judge. You should refer to your client by his or her name in order to personalise them, and refer to the other side, for example as the ârespondent/defendantâ etc.
The closing speech is your final attempt to address the court. It should integrate the evidence the court has heard with your theory of the case and present your underpinning argument. In your final speech you should rebut or explain the evidence that weakens your case and explain how the law applies.
This is done by oral examination and the sequence of the questioning is examination-in-chief of the claimantâs side (to include witnesses), cross-examination by the defendantâs side, re-examination. The defendant will then give their evidence and can make an opening speech.
In criminal matters the prosecution have the right to make an opening speech. If it is a simple case then very often the Prosecution will forgo an opening speech. If the Prosecution do decide to have an opening speech it should be kept brief. It should provide a non-contentious summary of the case.
The judge can, however, dispense with this, particularly in fast-track cases. The sequence of questioning for the defendantâs evidence (to include witnesses) is examination-in-chief by the defendantâs side, cross-examination by the claimantâs side and re-examination.
If a lawyer wants to apply the case law (âI think my client should get the same result as the previously decided opinionâ), the lawyer has to think of ways the opinion facts are similar to the facts of the clientâs case and create a theme that exists in both sets of facts. The lawyer then uses the theme that they created (as opposed to using the facts of either case) to argue that because the theme exists in both the previously decided opinion and the clientâs case, the case law outcome should be applied to the clientâs case . Arguing the theme makes it unnecessary for the lawyer to change the facts of their case to mirror those of the previously decided opinion to âwinâ for their clients.
First, lawyers understand and believe the facts their clients relay to them. Second, after hearing the facts and identifying the legal issues a client is facing, a lawyer must find a previously decided opinion (called case law or precedent) with an outcome that favors their clientâs position. Or, a lawyer may need to distinguish case law ...
The lawyer then uses the theme that they created (as opposed to using the facts of either case) to argue that because the theme exists in both the previously decided opinion and the clientâs case, the case law outcome should be applied to the clientâs case .
Winning a case has much to do with the attorneyâs skill in creating a theme that will stick in the minds of the judge and jury and win the case â the most extraordinary skill to lawyering and client advocacy.
The real magic happens when the attorney articulates the theme that persuades the judge or jury to believe the cases are similar enough to warrant the same outcome. Winner!
Lawyers are notoriously known for changing the facts to âwinâ their case. Yet, the most successful attorneys never change the facts to win. They simply do not need to do so. How, then, does a lawyer win a case? First, lawyers understand and believe the facts their clients relay to them.
Based on different kinds of legal entities, there are different names for all of them. You should call them by their proper name. Here are some well-known types of lawyers and their proper names.
You should learn these terms to call the person with a proper name, whether J.D. or Esquire. Here are definitions of both these terms.
When you write a letter to a lawyer or attorney, address your home appropriately to impart a good impression, you can do this by using any suitable title for your lawyer.
Call with the titles of âEsquireâ or âAttorney at lawâ is the most efficient way R.K. addresses any lawyer. You may add Mr. or Mrs. accordingly. This will add to your reverence for the lawyer.
Addressing someone with a proper title according to their profession is a courteous attitude. This will impart a good impression on the person being addressed. Moreover, addressing your lawyer with a proper name will make him happy. His happy mood will always be a good impression for your case and vice versa.
These may include documents, letters, emails, notes, maps, diagrams, etc.
There are a few ways that you can mark exhibits for court. One way is to mark the exhibit with a marker or ballpoint pen. Other options include using exhibit stickers or having the court clerk label the exhibit. It all depends on the jurisdiction â rules differ.
Evidentiary foundations need to be properly laid to get your exhibits admitted into evidence so that the jury may consider them in deliberations. But before we dive into HOW to introduce an exhibit at trial, let's back up and discuss the basics of exhibits.
Laying an evidentiary foundation is crucial when introducing exhibits at trial. Without a proper foundation, the court may refuse to admit certain exhibits ...
If you can't demonstrate that the court exhibit is admissible under the applicable rules of evidence, you will not be able to enter your exhibit into evidence for the jury to consider.
First, some (even many) exhibits may be agreed upon (âstipulatedâ to) by the parties, in order to save time â especially with non-controversial items. Or, occasionally, the judge may issue a ruling before trial (during a pre-trial hearing) that certain exhibits are admissible.
More and more parties are forced to represent themselves in court simply because they can't afford the substantial costs of hiring an attorney. If you don't want the opposing attorney to eat you alive at trial, you'd better understand evidence.