If your lawyer has actually stolen from you or acted with gross incompetence, the authorities in charge of disciplining lawyers in your state should show some interest. File a complaint with your state's lawyer discipline agency. Every state has an agency responsible for licensing and disciplining lawyers.
Full Answer
Feb 18, 2020 · If you received incompetent counsel, you may have a legal malpractice case on your hands. You could reclaim some or all of the money you should have won in the first place. And your attorney doesn’t need to bumble so badly …
Oct 16, 2013 · Here are some practical tips for dealing with a difficult lawyer: 1) Be Prepared – As the boy scouts say, “Always be prepared.” More often than not, the difficult lawyer is trying to distract you from effectively representing your client. No matter what that lawyer does, focus on your client, the facts, and the law.
Here are some practical tips for dealing with a difficult lawyer: 1) Be Prepared – As the boy scouts say, “Always be prepared.”. More often than not, the difficult lawyer is trying to distract you from effectively representing your client. No matter what that lawyer does, focus on your client, the facts, and the law.
2) The Obstructionist – This lawyer is negative and uncooperative about everything. No matter what you suggest to resolve the case or to even make the trial of the case easier for everyone, this lawyer will disagree. As much as this lawyer disagrees, he or she has no alternate solutions of their own. Phone calls and correspondence to this lawyer go unanswered. Also, even the most mundane of tasks, such as scheduling depositions, turns into a complete nightmare. Overall, this lawyer will do everything they can (mostly by doing nothing) to make sure the case drags on indefinitely and expensively.
Proving that an attorney caused the harm can be relatively easy. If the client’s case was dismissed because an attorney either intentionally or negligently failed to comply with a court order, the attorney caused the injury. Proving that the case would not have been dismissed but for the attorney’s actions, however, is much more difficult. A client may have to go as far as proving that his or her case was a clear winner, and that the only reason it was lost was because of the attorney. If a case could have gone either way based on the facts, a legal malpractice claim is unlikely to be successful.
Being the first of the four mandatory elements of a legal malpractice claim, if no attorney-client relationship existed, a legal malpractice suit will be over before it even begins.
The second element a client must prove is intent or negligence on the part of the attorney. To successfully maintain the suit for legal malpractice, the client must prove that the attorney either intended to harm the client, or negligently failed to use the care, skill, and judgment required of a member of the legal profession ...
The third and fourth elements of a legal malpractice claim are closely related. The third element a client must prove is that the attorney’s action or inaction was the cause of the harm. The fourth and final element is probably the hardest to prove – that the injury sustained would not have occurred but for the attorney’s actions. ...
The first element the client must prove is the existence of an attorney-client relationship. This relationship can be established any time an attorney has given, or promises to give, legal advice to an individual seeking it. A formal acknowledgement made by both parties that the attorney is representing the client’s interests is clear evidence ...
Only when a lawyer has intentionally or negligently done or failed to do something that hurts a client’s case, such that no reasonable attorney would have done the same , has malpractice actually occurred. In general, the lawyer’s client (or former client) must prove four distinct elements to be successful on a legal malpractice claim.
Further complicating matters is the fact that the standard of care is a local standard, based on the rules adopted by the bar in each state, meaning that the standard in Detroit could be different from the standard in El Paso. Examples of attorney conduct generally held to be negligent across all jurisdictions include failing to meet deadlines, not complying with court orders, or simply failing to work on a case.
If your lawyer is unwilling to address your complaints, consider taking your legal affairs to another lawyer. You can decide whom to hire (and fire) as your lawyer. However, remember that when you fire a lawyer, you may be charged a reasonable amount for the work already done.
If you believe you have a valid complaint about how your lawyer has handled your case, inform the organization that governs law licenses in your state. Usually this is the disciplinary board of the highest court in your state. In some states, the state bar association is responsible for disciplining lawyers.
Unnecessary delays can often damage a case. If, because of overwork or any other reason, a lawyer is unable to spend the required time and energy on a case , the lawyer should refuse from the beginning to take the case. A lawyer must be able to communicate effectively with a client.
How a lawyer should act, in both professional and private life, is controlled by the rules of professional conduct in the state or states in which he or she is licensed to practice. These rules are usually administered by the state’s highest court through its disciplinary board.
In a lawyer-client relationship, acting responsibly involves duties on both sides—and often involves some hard work. You have a right to expect competent representation from your lawyer. However, every case has at least two sides. If you are unhappy with your lawyer, it is important to determine the reasons.
Communication. A lawyer must be able to communicate effectively with a client. When a client asks for an explanation, the lawyer must provide it within a reasonable time. A lawyer must inform a client about changes in a case caused by time and circumstances. Fees.
A lack of communication causes many problems. If your lawyer appears to have acted improperly, or did not do something that you think he or she should have done, talk with your lawyer about it. You may be satisfied once you understand the circumstances better. I have tried to discuss my complaints with my lawyer.
Lawyer incompetence. Lawyers must have the knowledge and experience to competently handle any case that they take on. They must also be sufficiently prepared to handle matters that come up in your case, from settlement negotiations to trial. Conflicts of interest.
In most states, you can file your complaint by mailing in a state-issued complaint form or a letter with the lawyer's name and contact information, your contact information, a description of the problem, and copies of relevant documents. In some states, you may be able to lodge your complaint over the phone or online.
When a client fires a lawyer and asks for the file, the lawyer must promptly return it. In some states, such as California, the lawyer must return the file even if attorneys’ fees haven’t been paid in full. Lawyer incompetence. Lawyers must have the knowledge and experience to competently handle any case that they take on.
Lawyers are given a lot of responsibility and often deal with serious matters, from criminal charges to child custody to tax and other financial matters. When you hire a lawyer, you are trusting him or her to represent your interests in the best manner possible. To protect the public—and the integrity of the legal profession—each state has its own code of ethics that lawyers must follow. These are usually called the “rules of professional conduct.”
Conflicts of interest. Lawyers owe a duty of loyalty to their clients, which means they must act with the client’s best interests in mind. This includes avoiding situations that would create a conflict of interest—such as representing two clients on opposite sides of the same case or taking on a new client who wants to sue an existing client.
The American Bar Association publishes the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which lists standard ethical violations and best practices for lawyers. Some states have adopted the model rules as their own ethical rules, while others use it as a guide and modify or add rules.
In most cases, a board of lawyers and non-lawyers will review the complaint. If there’s a potential ethical violation, the board will give the lawyer a copy of the complaint and an opportunity to respond.
If you can’t reach your lawyer you should be able to reach the office or another staff member who can set up an appointment with you or a good time to reach them . Keep in mind that missed phone calls happen to the best of us, but your lawyer should never ignore you.
To avoid this in the future, ask your lawyer how the best way to reach them is during the consultation. This way you’ll know if they prefer email over phone calls and you can avoid any miscommunication.
Unethical/Illegal Behavior. Although some lawyers may have bad habits such as lack of communication, one of the biggest signs of a lawyer is if they practice unethically or even illegally. As important as it is to win your case, your lawyer should never do so by breaking the law or lying and he is a bad lawyer.
If you lawyer is overbilling you, they could be inflating a task time, also know as “padding time”.
One of the biggest parts about being a lawyer is convincing the jury to go in your favor. If your attorney isn’t enthusiastic about your case or seems unsure, that should raise some red flags.
Whether it’s a divorce case or a personal injury case, showing no compassion or empathy is a definite sign of a bad lawyer.
The bottom line is, lawyer’s aren’t cheap. You’re not only paying them to help you with a case, but to communicate and give you their best service. If your lawyer isn’t communicating, you might consider switching to a new attorney.