Document B: Why is the rumored deal important to Microsoft? It would show that Microsoft did not have monopoly control in the high-technology industry. It would make Microsoft the leading producer of personal computers. It would allow Netscape's browser to compete equally with Microsoft's browser.
Charges were brought against the company which was sued by the Department of Justice in 1998. The judge ruled that Microsoft violated parts of the Sherman Antitrust Act and ordered the company to break up into two entities. Microsoft appealed the decision, which was overturned.
Judgment was split in two parts. On April 3, 2000, he issued his conclusions of law, according to which Microsoft had committed monopolization, attempted monopolization, and tying in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Microsoft immediately appealed the decision.
The Verdict Microsoft lost the case against the government, and the presiding judge, Thomas Penfield Jackson, ruled that the company violated multiple sections of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
The court ruled in April 2000 that Microsoft had violated the Sherman Act, and later ordered that Microsoft be broken up into two separate companies. The judge ruled that Microsoft had actively tried to crush its competitors, including Apple, IBM, Netscape, Sun, and others.Oct 20, 2020
The District Court ruled that Microsoft had indeed violated ยง 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and analogous state antitrust provisions, and ordered various remedies, including divestiture. Microsoft thereafter appealed the legal conclusions and the resulting remedial order.
The strategy worked: Microsoft succeeded in exterminating Netscape, but in the process also nearly destroyed itself, because the campaign triggered an antitrust (unfair competition) suit which looked like breaking up the company, only to founder at the last moment.Mar 22, 2015
A US federal judge ordered the Microsoft Corporation to split into two companies today, prescribing the biggest corporate breakup since AT&T while harshly rebuking the global software giant for stifling computer-age competition.Jun 7, 2000
The Justice Department's charge that Microsoft is a monopolist rests mainly on the fact that some version of the Windows operating system is currently used on some 80 percent of all personal computers in the world and that Microsoft has required computer manufacturers to install Internet Explorer if they also install ...