PACER allows anyone with an account to search and locate appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register for a PACER account . Use the PACER Case Locator if you are not sure which specific federal court the case was filed. You may also conduct nationwide searches to determine whether or not a party is involved in ...
• the U.S. Supreme Court. U.S. District Courts The district courts are the first level. That’s where federal cases begin and are decided. This Guide is for one particular federal district court — the District of Colorado. The rules for other district courts may …
Filing a Lawsuit Without a Lawyer. For those who are “pro se” parties to a case and are acting without a lawyer, the U.S. District Court encourages you to seek help from an attorney because federal court cases are complicated and demanding. If you …
Apr 29, 2022 · On January 24, 2022, IER signed a settlement agreement with James A. Scott & Son, Inc. d/b/a Scott Insurance resolving IER’s reasonable cause finding that Scott Insurance committed an unfair documentary practice in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (6) and hiring discrimination in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B).
When court records and case files are eligible for permanent preservation, they are transferred to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) for storage and preservation.
Court opinions are available for free on PACER to anyone with an account. Additionally, access to court opinions from many appellate, district, and bankruptcy courts are available for no fee in a text searchable format through a partnership with the U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO), consistent with the E-Government Act.
After the Answer is filed, a judge (usually the magistrate judge) holds a conference to identify the issues, set a discovery schedule, record any agreements the parties made, and consider other matters that promote a fair and speedy trial.
If you are a participant in a federal civil case, you are also called a “party” or a “litigant”. The party that starts the case is the plaintiff. The defendant is the party you are suing.
Volunteer attorneys give legal information, advice, and/or representation before, during, and immediately after certain hearings and conferences before a judge, in non-prisoner cases only. Available through the Colorado Bar Association’s Young Lawyers Division, by contacting (303) 824-5311 or jham@cobar.org.
All of the jurors must agree on their decision. This decision is called a verdict.
Discovery happens before your trial starts. It is when the parties collect and exchange information and evidence needed to support or defend against a claim. There are rules about:
After discovery, the facts of the case may show there is no real dispute about what happened. One or more parties may file a motion for summary judgment. If the judge grants the motion on all claims, no trial is needed. The case ends. In some cases, the motion decides some of the claims. Only the unresolved issues will remain for trial.
The U.S. Supreme Court is the third and highest level. It hears only certain cases from the appeals courts and from the state supreme courts. The U.S. Supreme Court has the power to choose which cases it will decide. It only accepts a very small number of the cases that are sent for its review. Its website is: https://www.supremecourt.gov/. You may contact the U.S. Supreme Court at:
Asks the Court to decide a lawsuit without a trial because the evidence shows that there is no real dispute about the key facts, and the facts and law show that the opposing party loses.
The person who answers the questions in a deposition; a deponent can be any person who may have information about the lawsuit, including one of the other parties to the lawsuit.
The federal court system is made up of courts on three different levels: United States District Courts, United States Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court.
discovery request served on a party in order to enter property controlled by that party for the purpose of inspecting, measuring, surveying, photographing, testing or sampling the property or any object on the property relevant to the lawsuit.
formal petition or request to the Court asking for a specific ruling or order (such as dismissal of the plaintiff’s lawsuit). Can be made in writing or verbally, in person, during a court hearing.
The formal process by which a party to a lawsuit asks other people to provide information about the events and issues in the case. Discovery methods include depositions, interrogatories, requests for document production, requests for admission, and physical or mental examinations. The general provisions governing discovery are addressed in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26.
trial in which the judge, rather than the jury, determines the law, the facts, and the verdict of the lawsuit. A bench trial is also known as a “court trial.”
(Adaequare) to resolve an independent investigation into whether the company engaged in citizenship or immigration status discrimination in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B). IER’s investigation concluded that the company, which recruits workers for other entities, engaged in discrimination in the hiring or recruitment/referral for a fee processes by considering only applicants who were U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents when filling a job for a client. Under the settlement agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty to the United States, train its employees on anti-discrimination obligations, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements.
On February 18, 2020, the Division signed a settlement agreement with Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC, aka TransPerfect Staffing Solutions , a legal staffing company headquartered in New York, NY. The Division had previously filed a lawsuit in May 2019 alleging that from at least April 4, 2017 to at least July 7, 2017, the company (while operating as TransPerfect Staffing), had implemented a client directive restricting its recruitment and hiring of attorneys for a document review project to U.S. citizens only, and later, to U.S. citizens without dual citizenship. Under the settlement agreement, Chancery Staffing will pay a civil penalty of $27,000, provide back pay to victims identified during the term of the settlement agreement, and participate in Division-provided training on the anti-discrimination provision contained in 8 U.S.C. § 1324b. Chancery Staffing will also obtain supporting documentation from clients that request a citizenship status restriction when staffing a project to help ensure that any such restriction is lawful.
On May 9, 2019, the Division filed a complaint with the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer against Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC, a temporary staffing agency, alleging that the company is responsible for a pattern or practice of citizenship status discrimination in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1). Chancery Staffing is the successor to TransPerfect Staffing Solutions LLC and continues to do business as both TransPerfect Staffing Solutions and TransPerfect Legal Solutions. The lawsuit alleges that from at least April 4, 2017, to at least July 7, 2017, TransPerfect Staffing Solutions LLC discriminated against non-U.S. citizens and dual U.S. citizens in staffing a temporary document review project for a client, and that Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC is liable for the discrimination as its successor.
On January 14, 2021, the Division signed a settlement agreement with National Systems America, LP (NSA) to resolve claims based on its independent investigation into whether the company engaged in discrimination based on citizenship status in the hiring and employment eligibility verification processes in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B) and (a) (6). The company recruits employees using a foreign company as its agent, and directly hires them to perform IT work for NSA clients. IER’s investigation concluded that the company (1) engaged in a pattern or practice of recruiting and hiring only U.S. citizens or U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents for certain positions without legal justification, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B); and (2) on numerous occasions, requested copies of Permanent Resident Cards to confirm the citizenship status and work authorization of candidates who identified themselves as lawful permanent residents during the applicant screening process, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (6). Under the settlement agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty of $34,200 to the United States and train its employees on the requirements of the INA’s anti-discrimination provision, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements.
citizens, U.S. nationals, refugees, asylees, and recent lawful permanent residents) in its recruitment and hiring practices, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1). The lawsuit alleges that Facebook routinely refused to recruit, consider, or hire U.S. workers for positions that it reserved for temporary visa holders in connection with the permanent labor certification process (“PERM”). The complaint alleges that beginning no later than January 1, 2018 and lasting until at least September 18, 2019, Facebook used recruiting methods designed to deter U.S. workers from applying to positions reserved for temporary visa holders, refused to consider U.S. workers who applied to the positions, and hired only temporary visa holders for the positions.
On May 30, 2012, the Department of Justice settled a lawsuit against Whiz International LLC (Whiz), an information technology staffing company, resolving allegations that the company discriminated against one of its employees when it terminated her in retaliation for expressing opposition to its alleged preference for foreign nationals with temporary work visas. Under the terms of the settlement, Whiz agreed to pay $21,870 in back pay/front pay to the terminated worker, $1,000 in civil penalties to the United States Treasury, and three years of monitoring and reporting requirements. Whiz will also undergo training by the Department of Justice and has agreed not to discriminate against any employee on the basis of national origin or citizenship status.
1. Click into either Cases or Trial Court Orders from the Westlaw or Westlaw Edge homepage. Then select the Advanced link to the right of the search bar to go to the template. 2.
legal cases by particular judge or entity. The best way for an attorney to ensure that they are relying on arguments that reflect the true nature of the law is to use KeyCite on Westlaw and Westlaw Edge.
Field searching is a Boolean terms and connectors search that looks for specific terms in a particular part of the document–the title or author fields, for example. Field searching is incorporated into Westlaw and Westlaw Edge through the Advanced templates always linked at the top of the page to the right of the search bar.
It is important to know the judge’s background on a case so that you can use your time as effectively, both in court and while you are preparing for a case. If a judge has been involved in similar cases, you can provide a brief summary rather than providing extensive background information and spend more time on your argument.
All complaints must be in English on 8-1/2” x 11” paper and include:
All litigants, including pro se litigants, are required to let the court and other parties to the lawsuit know if their contact information changes. This is to make sure that all case filings can be sent to the correct mail (or email) address. For this reason, you must inform the Pro Se Intake Unit in writing of any change to your contact information.
If you request permission to proceed without prepayment of fees and your request is granted, the Pro Se Intake Unit will complete and issue a summons only if the assigned judge directs it to do so in an order of service.
Performing an internet search for the court where the case is located is a starting point to look for records. The court's website will provide contact information as well as links to online court records, if available. The National Center for State Court's website contains links to court records sites for every state.
Federal cases include civil and criminal proceedings filed in federal district courts as well as appeals in the U.S. circuit courts of appeal and the United States Supreme Court. They also include bankruptcy filings and filings in the U.S. Tax Court. District court filings, circuit courts of appeal filings and bankruptcy court filings are all ...
Civil proceedings are any proceedings that are not for the prosecution of a crime, such as lawsuits for personal injury and wrongful death, bankruptcy proceedings, lawsuits for breach of contract and anything else that is not criminal including divorce and family law proceedings. Criminal proceedings are also generally public record.
Court records are kept in what is called the docket, which is a list of all the documents filed in the case as well as text entries for proceedings like hearings that have been held and hearings that are scheduled.
Criminal proceedings are also generally public record. In civil and criminal matters, certain information may be kept confidential such as the names of parties or victims who are minors or who are victims of sexual assault. Parties to lawsuits can also request that certain sensitive records be sealed and kept private.
The U.S. Tax Court allows docket searches for the public, but no one can view the actual records without registering as either a taxpayer with a pending case or as an attorney. Read More: How to Find Public Court Records for Free Online.
The filings in most lawsuits are public record. Exceptions exist for certain types of criminal proceedings or for cases involving minors, but for the most part, anyone can look at the court's docket and review the documents filed in a court case. All federal courts and many state courts offer online court records for a fee. Interested persons can also go directly to the courthouse or the court clerk's office and search records in person.