Douglas R. Richmond, Lawyers as Witnesses, 36 N.M. L. Rev. 47, 50 (Winter 2006) ("In addition to its clear language, there is no policy reason commending the rule's application to lawyers' affidavit testimony at summary judgment. Because it is the judge who reads motions, there is no chance that the lawyer's dual roles will be confusing.
(a) A lawyer shall not act as advocate at a trial in which the lawyer is likely to be a necessary witness unless: (2) the testimony relates to the nature and value of legal services rendered in the case; or (3) disqualification of the lawyer would work substantial hardship on the client.
(b) A lawyer may act as advocate in a trial in which another lawyer in the lawyer's firm is likely to be called as a witness unless precluded from doing so by Rule 1.7 or Rule 1.9. Ann. Model Rules of Prof'l Conduct R. 3.7 ("Lawyer as Witness"). Every state has adopted some version of the Attorney Testimony Rule.
Presenting yourself well is crucial for having your testimony be as impactful and credible as possible. It’s a simple fact of human nature that a person’s physical appearance will influence how they’re perceived, and the judge and jury you’re speaking in front of won’t be an exception.
Meditation is easy to do, but it’s also an excellent way to calm your nerves and improve your focus. Before you’re due in court, find a quiet space and adopt a relaxed sitting position. Close your eyes, focus on breathing deeply and let your mind wander in whatever direction.
Take the time to select an outfit that looks neat and conservative for your court appearance. Looking good will help you make a better first impression, and keeping your clothing relatively toned town will demonstrate that you’re taking things seriously.
The type and amount of research needed will vary greatly depending on the specifics of your testimony, but it’s always wise to refresh your memory on relevant topics beforehand. Go over the things you want to say and think about the questions you expect to be asked.
It’s rarely a good idea to do anything essential or stressful on an empty stomach. Hunger can make you irritable, but it can also make you lightheaded or unfocused. Plus, the last thing you want is to be dealing with hunger pangs while you’re on the stand testifying. Eat something healthy and filling before you get started.
You’ll come off as a more confident and charismatic witness if you’re in a good mindset. If possible, do something you enjoy beforehand. Even if it’s just reading a chapter of your favorite book, watching your favorite movie, or taking a pleasant stroll through the park.
Relax and listen carefully to the questions asked Most people get nervous about testifying in court. There are many reasons for that. It is a very intimidating environment. If you are not truthful on the stand, you could be held liable for perjury. Also, in all likelihood, your testimony is going to make someone upset.
Do not Volunteer Information or Guess Answer only the questions that are asked by opposing counsel. Only testify regarding things you personally have knowledge about. Do not speculate or offer your opinion about something unless specifically asked. And if you don't know the answer to the question, the answer is "I don't know".
Prepare for court In all likelihood, you will know what you are going to be testifying about. It is important that you review all relevant documents ahead of time. If you kept a calendar of important dates, bring it. The wisest choice may be to make a cheat sheet to bring to court with you of all of the relevant dates and events in the case.
Dress Appropriately and Keep your Cool You may not realize it, but part of your testimony on the stand is your personal appearance and demeanor. Both Judges and juries will be judging your credibility. It is important to show respect for the seriousness of court proceedings by dressing appropriately.
The first court appearance of a person being charged with a crime will occur when the defendant is apprehended and charged with a felony.
Consider your words before speaking. Exaggeration may jeopardize your testimony in these hearings.
If you know of someone who has been accused wrongly of a crime, you should immediately call a Phoenix criminal defense lawyer from Snader Law Group LLC.
There are two general classes of matters as to which expert testimony is admissible: (1) matters as to which the conclusions to be drawn by the jury depend on the existence of facts that are not common knowledge and that are specifically within the knowledge of persons whose experience or study enables them to testify with authority on the subjects in question; and (2) matters as to which the conclusions to be drawn from the facts stated, as well as knowledge of the facts themselves, depend on professional or scientific knowledge not within the range of ordinary training or intelligence. In the first class, the facts are stated by the experts, and the conclusion is drawn by the jury. In the second class, the expert sets forth the facts and states a conclusion in the form of an opinion which may be accepted or rejected by the judge or jury.Expert testimony can be extremely useful to the judge and jury as they try to make legal decisions on topic they may not be familiar with. However, it is essential that courts make sure an expert is properly qualified before he or she gives testimony on their opinions or conclusions.Next time: we’ll talk about how to recognize and avoid dual roles, in 10 Essential Differences Between a Therapeutic and a Forensic Relationship.
In our last lesson in our ongoing series, Tips for Testifying in Legal Proceedings, we looked at the differences between lay witnesses and expert witnesses, and pointed out that a lay witness on the stand can generally only testify about facts, while an expert witness can testify regarding the opinions or conclusions he or she draws from those facts. Today, we’ll look more closely at expert witnesses, to learn what makes a person an expert witness and what kind of testimony they can give.
1. In particular, " [t]he tribunal has proper objection when the trier of fact may be confused or misled by a lawyer serving as both advocate and witness ," and the opposing party has such an objection "where the combination of roles may prejudice that party's rights in the litigation.". Id. § 3.7 cmt. 2.
It is equally unlikely that a judge, as compared to a jury , will be unfairly influenced by the lawyer's dual roles."). Some courts have held that the attorney testimony rule applies to affidavits as well as testimony at trial.
However, in general, courts appear to be reluctant to disqualify an attorney for violating the attorney testimony rule solely on the basis of statements made in an affidavit in support of summary judgment, even where the attorney's statements go far beyond merely putting documents before the court.
It is well established that an attorney's affidavit can be used, in connection with a summary judgment motion, for the simple purpose of placing documents produced in discovery before the court. See, e.g., United States v.