during the 1940s and 1950s who was the head lawyer for the naacp legal defense fund quizlet

by Tatum Marks 8 min read

When did Thurgood Marshall establish the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund?

When Did Thurgood Marshall Establish the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund? After founding the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in 1940, Marshall became the key strategist in the effort to end racial segregation, in particular meticulously challenging Plessy v.

What did the NAACP do in the 1920s?

The NAACP’s public campaigns against lynching in the 1920s drew increasing attention to the importance of fund raising and lobbying within the organization’s mission of challenging Jim Crow inequalities. In 1925 the IRS first rejected the right of donors to the NAACP to claim tax deductions on their federal income tax.

When did the NAACP start its own LDF?

But increasing pressure from the Internal Revenue System (IRS) in the 1930s forced the NAACP to establish the separate LDF in 1940. It operates independently today as part of an ongoing struggle against racism in the United States.

What did Thurgood Marshall do in the 1930s?

Immediately after graduation, Marshall opened a law office in Baltimore, and in the early 1930s, he represented the local NAACP chapter in a successful lawsuit that challenged the University of Maryland Law School over its segregation policy. In addition, he successfully brought lawsuits that integrated other state universities.

What was the NAACP's goal in 1936?

In 1936, Marshall became the NAACP’s chief legal counsel. The NAACP’s initial goal was to funnel equal resources to black schools. Marshall successfully challenged the board to only litigate cases that would address the heart of segregation.

What did Marshall do to ensure that America would forever remain a divided society?

To fail to do so is to ensure that America will forever remain a divided society.”. In particular, Marshall fervently dissented in cases in which the Supreme Court upheld death sentences; he wrote over 150 opinions dissenting from cases in which the Court refused to hear death penalty appeals.

What did Marshall do after he graduated?

Immediately after graduation, Marshall opened a law office in Baltimore , and in the early 1930s, he represented the local NAACP chapter in a successful lawsuit that challenged the University of Maryland Law School over its segregation policy. In addition, he successfully brought lawsuits that integrated other state universities.

What did Marshall say about segregation?

Board of Education, which he argued before the Supreme Court in 1952 and 1953, finally overturning “separate but equal” and acknowledging that segrega tion greatly diminished students’ self-esteem.

What was the Supreme Court opinion in Marshall v. Logan Valley Plaza?

Among Marshall’s salient majority opinions for the Supreme Court were: Amalgamated Food Employees Union v. Logan Valley Plaza, in 1968, which determined that a mall was “public forum” and unable to exclude picketers; Stanley v. Georgia, in 1969, held that pornography, when owned privately, could not be prosecuted.

What did President Johnson say about Marshall's nomination?

On the appointment, President Johnson later said that Marshall’s nomination was “the right thing to do, the right time to do it, the right man and the right place.”.

Who was the first African American to serve on the Supreme Court?

Marshall founded LDF in 1940 and served as its first Director-Counsel. He was the architect of the legal strategy that ended the country’s official policy of segregation and was the first African American to serve on the Supreme Court. He served as Associate Justice from 1967-1991 after being nominated by President Johnson.

What was the purpose of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

In the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Congress vastly expanded the role of the executive branch and the credibility of court orders by. requiring that federal grants-in-aid to state and local governments for education be withheld from any school system practicing racial segregation. United States v.

Why was the statue of liberty called the greatest hypocrisy of the nineteenth century?

1. Suffragists called the Statue of Liberty "the greatest hypocrisy of the nineteenth century" because. it was supposed to represent "liberty," yet women could not vote in the United States. How many civil rights acts were passed during the first decade after the 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown v.

Why was the Women's Movement important in the 1960s and 1970s?

was a valuable tool for the women's movement in the 1960s and 1970s because it added the Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution. was a valuable tool for the women's movement in the 1960s and 1970s because it prohibited gender discrimination. significantly hurt the women's movement in the 1960s and 1970s because it required government ...

Why was the 'Second Amendment' declared unconstitutional?

It declared the act unconstitutional because it protected against acts of private discrimination, not state discrimination. The Supreme Court never heard a case concerning the constitutionality of this act. It declared the act unconstitutional because Congress had violated the separation of powers.

Why did the Women's Movement in the 1960s and 1970s hurt the women's movement in the 1960s

significantly hurt the women's movement in the 1960s and 1970s because it required government to treat men and women differently in many areas of public policy. significantly hurt the women's movement in the 1960s and 1970s because it only outlawed discrimination on the basis of race. ??

What was Bill Clinton's policy on gays in the military?

In dealing with the issue of gays in the military, President Bill Clinton established a. "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. had no effect on the women's movement of the 1960s and 1970s. was a valuable tool for the women's movement in the 1960s and 1970s because it added the Equal Rights Amendment to ...

Which is more powerful, the legislature or the courts?

The courts are far more powerful than the legislature and, therefore, can advance political change on their own. Legislatures need constitutional authority to act from the courts, and the courts need legislative assistance to implement court orders and focus political support.

Early life and education

Image
Marshall was born on July 2, 1908 in Baltimore, Maryland to William Marshall, railroad porter, who later worked on the staff of Gibson Island Club, a white-only country club and Norma Williams, a school teacher. One of his great-grandfathers had been taken as a slave from the Congo to Maryland where he was eventually fr…
See more on naacpldf.org

Early career

  • Immediately after graduation, Marshall opened a law office in Baltimore and in the early 1930s, he represented the local NAACP chapter in a successful lawsuit that challenged the University of Maryland Law School over its segregation policy. In addition, he successfully brought lawsuits that integrated other state universities. In 1936, Marshall became the NAACPs chief legal couns…
See more on naacpldf.org

Significance

  • After founding the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in 1940, Marshall became the key strategist in the effort to end racial segregation, in particular meticulously challenging Plessy v. Ferguson , the Court-sanctioned legal doctrine that called for separate but equal structures for white and blacks. Marshall won a series of court decisions that gradually s...
See more on naacpldf.org

Leadership

  • In 1957 LDF, led by Marshall, became an entirely separate entity from the NAACP with its own leadership and board of directors and has remained a separate organization to this day.
See more on naacpldf.org

Later career

  • In 1961, President Kennedy nominated Marshall to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in which he wrote 112 opinions, none of which was overturned on appeal. Four years later, he was appointed by President Johnson to be solicitor general and in 1967 President Johnson nominated him to the Supreme Court to which he commented: I have a lifetime appointment and I intend to …
See more on naacpldf.org

Criticisms

  • As a Supreme Court Justice, he became increasingly dismayed and disappointed as the courts majority retreated from remedies he felt were necessary to address remnants of Jim Crow. In his Bakke dissent, he wrote: In light of the sorry history of discrimination and its devastating impact on the lives of Negroes, bringing the Negro into the mainstream of American life should be a sta…
See more on naacpldf.org

Legacy

  • In particular, Marshall fervently dissented in cases in which the Supreme Court upheld death sentences; he wrote over 150 opinions dissenting from cases in which the Court refused to hear death penalty appeals. Among Marshalls salient majority opinions for the Supreme Court were: Amalgamated Food Employees Union v. Logan Valley Plaza, in 1968, which determined that a m…
See more on naacpldf.org