Rule 5.3 (c) makes a lawyer professionally responsible for any conduct of a paralegal that would be a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct if engaged in by the lawyer, when (1) the lawyer ordered the conduct or, with knowledge of the specific conduct, ratified the conduct; or (2) the lawyer has managerial authority or direct supervisory authority over the paralegal and learned of the conduct at a time when its consequences could be avoided or mitigated but the lawyer failed to take reasonable action to avoid the consequences.
Full Answer
Allowing a paralegal to practice law can open an attorney up to disciplinary procedures as well as malpractice claims. We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.
“Lawyers have to be very clear and certain that their nonlawyer staff are helping to ensure that the rules are not being violated,’’ said McGee, who added that there are some guidelines issued by voluntary associations that paralegals are governed by:
Rule 5.3 (a). Regardless of whether the lawyer has managerial authority in a law firm, paragraph (b) of the same rule provides that a lawyer having direct supervisory authority over a paralegal shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the paralegal’s conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer.
Public Nature of Sanctions. Disposition of lawyer discipline shall be public in cases of disbarment, suspension, probation, and reprimand. In all cases of public discipline by the court, the court shall issue a written opinion setting forth its justification for imposing the sanction in that particular case.
For example, if a paralegal is disclosing confidential client information without the client's consent (a clear ethical breach, see Rule 1.6) and the paralegal's supervisor knew about it, but did nothing, the supervising lawyer can be disciplined for the paralegal's misconduct.
Appropriate supervision is key because a lawyer is ultimately responsible for all the actions of any paralegal under their employ.
Lawyers and paralegals must represent the highest ethical standards so they can realistically claim to uphold the law....Avoid Unauthorized Practice of the LawEstablishing an attorney-client relationship.Setting the fee to be charged for legal services.Offering a legal opinion.
Some abuses of the lack of paralegal regulation are: A. Uneducated, inexperienced lay people are preparing legal documents for the public; B. Graduates of unqualified “fly-by-night” paralegal programs do paralegal work for the public; and C.
What should a paralegal do if his or her supervising lawyer does not carefully review his or her work? The paralegal has an obligation to discuss the matter with the lawyer to encourage more careful review.
A conflict of interest, in the legal sense, involves information about a client held by a member of the legal team...an attorney, paralegal or legal secretary. That information does not have to be attorney/client privileged information, nor does it have to include actual documented facts about a client's legal matter.
These are requirements of Competence, Diligence, and Professional Integrity, requirements of Client Confidentiality, rules concerning Conflicts of Interest, responsibilities of supervisory lawyers' regarding nonlawyer assistants; and prohibitions concerning the Unauthorized Practice of Law.
A paralegal, while working under the supervision of an attorney, may do all of the following except for: appearing in court for a child custody case. Ethical conduct is expected of: every member of the legal team.
Using authority effectively is one of the tools that successful lawyers use to communicate clearly, thoroughly, and persuasively. Through practice, you will gain confidence and competence in using authority appropriately.
Illegal or Unauthorized Practice of Law. According to Black's Law Dictionary, the unauthorized practice of law is the practice thereof by a person which is basically a non-lawyer who has not been licensed or admitted to practice law in a given jurisdiction.
1. “Borrowing” client funds — Tapping into a retainer to cover payroll or overhead costs when those funds have actually been set aside for a client's specific matter can trigger an ethics violation — even if you plan on paying the money back “ASAP”.
Delegating some of the substantive legal work that law practices require may, without the proper understanding of the role of your nonlawyer staff (paralegals, secretaries or other staff within a firm), lead to professional and ethical violations that could result in serious consequences for the lawyer and the firm.
Maintaining client confidentiality, of course, is one of the most important ethical responsibilities of the paralegal. Confidentiality is a client right. Compromising it is not only unethical; but it may affect the case, especially if the opposing side were to obtain information that would help their argument.
These are requirements of Competence, Diligence, and Professional Integrity, requirements of Client Confidentiality, rules concerning Conflicts of Interest, responsibilities of supervisory lawyers' regarding nonlawyer assistants; and prohibitions concerning the Unauthorized Practice of Law.
1. “Borrowing” client funds — Tapping into a retainer to cover payroll or overhead costs when those funds have actually been set aside for a client's specific matter can trigger an ethics violation — even if you plan on paying the money back “ASAP”.
Practical Tips for Avoiding the Unauthorized Practice of Law:Avoid being perceived as a lawyer. ... Never give legal advice. ... Do not supervise the execution of documents without a lawyer present. ... Just say no to family and friends. ... When your lawyer stops working, you stop working. ... When in doubt, don't do it.
Ethical rules for paralegals and their supervising attorneys. Paralegals bring many benefits to a legal practice, and with benefits come many ethical responsibilities. These responsibilities involve not only the manner in which paralegals should conduct themselves but also the ethical considerations that the lawyers who supervise them need to make.
Ethical considerations for attorneys working with paralegals. Lawyers who employ paralegals have certain ethical obligations as well, and the failure to observe them could result in significant financial as well as reputational harm to themselves and their firm.
The attorney’s ethical obligations regarding client-lawyer relationship s and confidentiality extend to paralegals as well as all non-lawyers working with the client. This obligation of confidentiality covers all types of client communication, including documents, files, phone calls, email communications, in-person conversations, posts on social media, and even discussions at home with a spouse or significant other.
According to Guideline 1 of the ABA Model Guidelines for the Utilization of Paralegal Services, “a lawyer is responsible for all of the professional activities of a paralegal performing services at the lawyer’s direction and should take reasonable measures to ensure that the paralegal’s conduct is consistent with the lawyer’s obligations under the rule of professional conduct.”
A paralegal is a critical member of the legal team and can greatly enhance a firm’s efficiency and productivity. But to ensure that an ethical relationship is maintained, a lawyer must provide a paralegal with proper supervision, adequate training, appropriate tasks to perform, and perhaps most importantly, high standards to strive for. ***. ...
Paralegals are not permitted to give legal advice. Lawyers spend years in order to become qualified to give legal advice. A paralegal can share legal advice that comes from an attorney or direct a client’s question to the attorney themselves.
Paralegals are prohibited from setting client fees. Paralegals are not allowed to determine the fee that will be charged for legal services, although they can relay fee information given to them by their supervising attorney to the client.
At the August 1997 American Bar Association (“ABA”) Annual Meeting, the ABA’s policy making body, the House of Delegates, adopted the current definition of “legal assistant/paralegal”, as recommended by the Standing Committee on Legal Assistants (now the Standing Committee on Paralegals).
The State Bar’s paralegal certification program promotes proper utilization of paralegals and helps to ensure that legal services are professionally and ethically offered to the public. Paralegals, like lawyers, should be held to the highest ethical and professional standards.
Regardless of whether the lawyer has managerial authority in a law firm, paragraph (b) of the same rule provides that a lawyer having direct supervisory authority over a paralegal shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the paralegal’s conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer.
1. A lawyer is responsible for the professional conduct of a paralegal performing services at the lawyer’s direction . A lawyer must take reasonable measures to ensure that the paralegal’s conduct is consistent with the lawyer’s obligations under the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Rule 1.5 (a) prohibits a lawyer from making an agreement for, charging, or collecting a clearly excessive fee or charging or collecting a clearly excessive amount for expenses. Numerous authorities, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized that paralegal work may be billed at the prevailing market rate and included in a fee application to a court. See, Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274 (1989). Generally, a lawyer may bill and recover for a paralegal’s work if the work would have traditionally been performed by the lawyer provided the fee charged or collected is not clearly excessive.
Likewise, business cards bearing the name of the lawyer or law firm employing a paralegal may be used by the paralegal for identification. However, the paralegal's status must be evident from the title or other description used on the business card. See CPR 253.
A lawyer may include the name of a paralegal on firm letterhead or other forms of communication, including advertising, provided the paralegal’s title is clearly indicated. A lawyer's letterhead, like other communications about the lawyer or the lawyer's services, must not be false or misleading. Rule 7.1.
Some ways of protecting yourself and your attorney from malpractice suits include: Follow all client screening procedures precisely. Weeding out potential problem clients can greatly reduce your risk of being sued. If you suspect that your firm’s screening process could be modified to work better, tell your supervisor.
Know how your state defines the unauthorized practice of law, and avoid engaging in it. All states prohibit paralegals from forming the attorney-client relationship and giving legal advice, but it may sometimes to be difficult to distinguish advice from information.
Legal malpractice is a form of professional malpractice, based on negligence. Generally, paralegals are covered under their attorney employers’ malpractice insurance, however, with more paralegals performing legal services for the public without the supervision of an attorney, claims of malpractice against paralegals may start to become more common.
Among other requirements, the rule explains that lawyers must make reasonable efforts to ensure those working under them comply with “professional obligations.”. The rule also explains that a lawyer who has supervisory authority over nonlawyers is responsible for the ethical violations committed by such nonlawyers.
The South Carolina court found the attorney violated state ethical rules based on ABA Model Rule 5.3 and also Rule 7.1—which prohibits false and misleading statements regarding the lawyer’s services. This is one of many cautionary tales. For attorneys at all practice levels, paralegals may provide incredible value.
Jenkins, a 1989 school desegregation case, that paralegals provide the “cost-effective delivery of legal services.”. However, attorneys must be aware of ethical issues that can arise from using paralegals and legal assistants. Perhaps the most direct rule on point is Rule 5.3: Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistance in ...
Attorney usage of paralegals and legal assistants is a respected reality in today’s legal climate. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports there will be a 15 percent increase in paralegal jobs from 2016 through 2026—a rate it lists as “much faster than average” compared to other professions. Paralegals perform a litany of tasks—including drafting ...
Call cautions that lawyers should “train paralegals to avoid talking about confidential matters with family members and friends.”. Paralegals might not have the same level of training on confidentiality as attorneys, who have the concept “drilled into them in law school, bar exams and CLE programs,” he says.
Paralegals sometimes switch law firms, just like attorneys do. Law firms must have proper screening mechanisms in place to guarantee that paralegals have no conflicts of interest. A classic textbook case is In re Complex Asbestos Litigation (1991), in which the California 1st District Court of Appeal ruled that a law firm was disqualified from asbestos litigation because the firm hired a paralegal who had worked on the same case with the law firm on the other side. The firm failed to properly screen the paralegal, leading to the disqualification of the law firm from nine related asbestos lawsuits.
The lawyer had hired a paralegal to post the material on the website, but some of it was inaccurate . For example, the paralegal created Facebook posts that congratulated clients after their real estate closings but did not obtain clients’ permission to use their names.
Another risk paralegals face with regard to the practice of law is pressure from friends and family for advice or assistance with their own legal matters. When it comes to legal matters, you are likely to be the most knowledgeable person that they know.
When in doubt, don’t do it. A legal assistant can avoid the unauthorized practice of law simply by being aware of the rules and using common sense. If you are not sure if a particular activity would violate the prohibition on the unauthorized practice of law, don’t chance it. When in doubt, insist that the lawyer do it.
The ethical consideration that likely causes legal assistants the most concern is the prohibition against nonlawyers engaging in the practice of law. The primary reason for this concern is that the distinction between what is and is not practicing law can oftentimes be blurred. Some pitfalls of unauthorized practice of law are easy to avoid.
1. Avoid being perceived as a lawyer . You risk inadvertent practice of law if you are perceived as a lawyer rather than a legal assistant. You should start every client relationship by identifying yourself as a paralegal or legal assistant and by defining your role in contrast to that of the lawyer. Establish a clear understanding of the difference in the role of the lawyer and the role of the legal assistant by introducing the client to the lawyer at the first meeting. The client may need to be reminded on occasion that you are not a lawyer and cannot give legal advice. Throughout the course of the representation, and at all times while acting as a representative of the lawyer, a legal assistant should identify himself or herself as a paralegal or legal assistant in all conversations and correspondence. If you sign a letter, include your title on the signature line. If your name appears on law firm letterhead or business cards, insist that you be identified by your title.
You can help a lawyer who is suffering from mental or physical impairment by contacting your state bar’s or Lawyers Helping Lawyers ( LHL) or Lawyers Assistance Program (LAP) (this can be done anonymously). It is better to have a lawyer who was placed on incapacity status on your resume than one who was disbarred.
Running an office without the lawyer present or reasonably available is working without supervision. If you reach the point where your attempts to keep things going during an extended absence of your boss turns into the unauthorized practice of law, get out of the situation.
Unfortunately, some lawyers find themselves in situations that make them unable to come into the office. Depression, financial problems, addiction, abuse, disciplinary sanction, etc. can lead to unexpected and extended absence from the office.
Protecting client confidentiality. Lawyers may rely on nonlawyer assistants to gather information from clients and then relay the lawyer’s advice to the client, provided the lawyer takes steps to prevent the assistant from elaborating on or adding to the lawyer’s legal advice.
According to Wilkinson, a member of the ABA Standing Committee on Professionalism, any nonlawyer at a firm, district attorney’s or public defender’s office, or even a nonprofit legal service provider, is indirectly subject to the rules of professional conduct that have been adopted in every state except California.
The court, the board, or counsel may impose probation. If probation is imposed by the board or by counsel, the consent of the respondent is required. If the respondent objects, the misconduct must either be made the subject of formal charges or a recommendation that probation be imposed must be filed with the court.
A reprimand issued by the court shall be published in the official reports for the guidance of other lawyers. A reprimand imposed by the board shall be published in the journal of the state bar and in a newspaper of general circulation in each judicial district in which the lawyer maintained an office for the practice of law.
The court should not suspend a lawyer indefinitely. It should specify the minimum period of time which must elapse before the lawyer may seek reinstatement. Probation is the appropriate sanction when the respondent can perform legal services but has problems that require supervision.
Commentary. Since the court has exclusive responsibility to license lawyers, it has the sole authority to remove the license. The duration of a suspension should reflect the nature and extent of the lawyer's misconduct and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances involved. See Rule 10 (C).
A reprimand should be in writing and imposed either in person or served upon the respondent by certified mail. A reprimand issued by the court should be published in the official reports for the guidance of other lawyers.