Jan 25, 2019 · An explicit request for an attorney requires all questioning to cease. If the suspect makes an ambiguous or equivocal statement concerning the right to legal counsel following an unequivocal waiver of the right to counsel, the officer does not need to stop and ask clarifying questions. Three days later, the detectives interviewed Medina again.
Oct 31, 2017 · The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that when a suspect asks for an attorney, the interrogation must end and a lawyer must be provided. But the police disregarded Demesme’s request, and the trial ...
Jul 24, 2020 · The detectives will tell the person who is calling you to make promises such as “We can get back together if you just tell me the truth” or “I need to hear the truth; so the victim can get closure and move on”. Police will use people close to you to get the information they want. They can even go as far as to put a wire on someone you ...
Mar 09, 2012 · Years ago if you asked for a lawyer it was game over for the cops. Now the US Supreme Court has eroded that bright line rule. It really depends on the totality of the circumstances in your case. You do need a lawyer if you are charged with a crime. You can consult with me if you'd like or any private attorney for that matter.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that when a suspect asks for an attorney, the interrogation must end and a lawyer must be provided. But the police disregarded Demesme’s request, and the trial court ruled that the statements he subsequently made can be used to convict him. Advertisement.
If the suspect’s statement is not an unambiguous or unequivocal request for counsel, the officers have no obligation to stop questioning him. … [H]e must articulate his desire to have counsel present sufficiently clearly that a reasonable police officer in the circumstances would understand the statement to be a request for an attorney.
Demesme appealed, arguing that his Fifth and Sixth Amendment right to counsel had been violated. A state appeals court held that they were not, and now the state Supreme Court has declined to review that judgment, with only Justice Jefferson Hughes III voting to take Demesme’s appeal.
In doing so, Crichton (and the trial court) may well have run afoul of Davis v. United States, the controlling U.S. Supreme Court precedent on this matter. In Davis, the suspect had told his interrogators: “Maybe I should talk to a lawyer.” No lawyer was provided, the interview continued, and the suspect made incriminating statements that were later used to secure his conviction. The Supreme Court held that none of this violated the Constitution. It reasoned that, in order to invoke his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights, “the suspect must unambiguously request counsel.” The court elaborated:
The Supreme Court can forestall this constitutional subversion by taking Demesme’s case—presuming he appeals—and clarifying that a “reasonable police officer” may not deliberately ignore the intent of a suspect who colloquially but unequivocally asks for a lawyer.
He need only get the point across. Yet because Crichton refused to interpret Demesme’s words as a reasonable police officer surely would, he asserted that no constitutional violation occurred.
If you’re contacted by a detective, you should talk to an attorney right away. Your attorney will be able to talk to law enforcement on your behalf and may be able to mitigate circumstances before charges are even brought to light. It is always in your best interest to seek legal counsel before it is too late.
The detectives will tell the person who is calling you to make promises such as “We can get back together if you just tell me the truth” or “I need to hear the truth; so the victim can get closure and move on”. Police will use people close to you to get the information they want.
If someone has something important to say, they’ll leave a message. If a detective leaves you a voicemail, you can easily forward it to your attorney so you don’t put yourself into harm’s way unintentionally.
It’s recommended that you preserve your rights and say nothing to the police. If you’re contacted by a detective over the phone or in-person, just tell them you want to preserve your 5th amendment right against self-incrimination, your 6th amendment right to an attorney, and your 4th amendment right against unlawful search and seizure. By doing this, you protect yourself from admitting something you didn’t mean to admit. This also gives your defense team more room to defend you because they are not restricted by statements you made to the police. You are not stating that you are guilty by protecting your rights. By talking to detectives, you only make their jobs easier and put yourself in jeopardy of being charged with a very serious crime.
Email. In the state of Colorado, detectives can contact you if you’re suspected of a crime, or if you might be a witness to a crime that you didn’t necessarily take part in. Seeing officers come to your door can be a scary thing. Getting a call from a detective is even worse. Read this Blog and it may be the difference between getting arrested ...
Why You Need a Colorado Attorney if a Detective Contacts You. In Colorado, you have the right to have legal representation if a detective contacts you. Never answer a number you don’t know, and if someone shows up at your door, tell them you need to reach out to your attorney to speak with them on your behalf.
If you’re the suspect in an investigation, detectives will likely contact you. Do you have to talk to them? Too many people think that if they have nothing to hide that they should go in and talk to a detective, clear the air, fix any kind of misunderstanding. This, however, can make the biggest mistake of your life. By willingly talking to the detectives, you allow them to get something out of you that you didn’t mean to say—or say something just because of the pressure of talking to the police.
Your attorney should move to suppress the statements. While I do not know if that will be successful, it is certainly something that should be done pre-trial or in limine.
The police are not allowed to question you after you have asked for a lawyer. However, if you agreed to talk to them after they read you your Miranda rights and you did so voluntarily (without pressure, duress, coercion, etc), then the questioning is legal and the answers you gave can be used against you.
Can they continue to question you? Yes. Officers are often encouraged to continue asking questions as the answers can lead to evidence indirectly that can be used against you. Can they use your answers against you? Probably not. As posted above, the demand for a lawyer must generally be clear and unequivocal. Officers often read you your Miranda rights and immediately begin questioning. If you answer the...
No police cannot and no, those statements cannot be used against you. However, a lot of the time, the police will state in their report, they you waived your Miranda rights. You would have to prove that you didn't and then you could suppress any statements made in violation of Miranda...
Simply asking for a lawyer does at some stage of a police contact does not prevent them from Mirandizing you and then asking for a Miranda waiver. If they read you your rights and then you asked for a lawyer and admitted that in the police report or recorded it, then you will be able to suppress those statements.
You may think that you have done nothing wrong, or you have nothing to hide, and you may want to call the detective just to see what he wants. If you call the detective yourself, remember that the call will be recorded and anything you say can and will be used against you.
If you find yourself on the telephone or face to face with a detective and he is asking you questions other than who are you, simply say, “I am happy to answer your questions, but my lawyer would be upset if I do it without him present. I will call him and have him contact you to set something up.” That should be the end of the conversation.
If you have been contacted by a detective, a criminal defense attorney can contact the detective for you. He will try to determine the nature of the investigation and the potential risks it poses to your freedom. He will determine the allegations and immediately start to formulate a strategy to prove your innocence or mitigate the damage.
You may have already had a detective leave a message for you, or perhaps you are anticipating a visit from a detective. Now is the time to get help. Howard Snader is a former prosecutor and Board Certified Criminal Law Specialist with decades of experience with serious criminal matters.
Witnesses are rather different, and speaking to a detective can mean giving them information that could useful, or providing a statement that may mean you will appear in court. As a suspect you’re allowed to stay silent or refuse to answer questions. However, a court can take a negative inference from this.
He thinks you’re the crook. You don’t want to talk to him. Politely tell him that and no matter what he says, say nothing else but the word “attorney.”
If you elect to accept their invitation it would be wise to confer with counsel and seek a lawyer’s opinion on whether or not you should speak to the police AND do so prior to any substantive interview with the police. If they believe they have probable cause to arrest and charge you they will come for you but you are under no obligation to voluntarily go to them. You are entirely within your rights to politely decline and seek out competent legal advice for your situation prior to accepting or declining such an invitation.
Your first question should be; do you even want to speak to them about anything or the events they wish to speak to you about? All persons under the jurisdiction of the US constitution have the right to NOT speak to any government official if they so choose. If you engage in a consensual conversation in any locale with law enforcement and you are not in police custody (under arrest, actual or constructive) that encounter and its results will likely be deemed a consensual encounter and information provided to law enforcement may be used and exploited as they deem fit. Accepting any invitation to go to the police on one’s own volition will more likely than not be deemed consensual absent evidence of coercive police conduct.
Never mind if the police have to tell you their intentions. Law enforcement is under no obligation to give advance notice of their intent to arrest. They need not share what they intend to do to you upon your arrival. An officer may arrest when they have probable cause to arrest a person in their presence they believe to have committed a felony offense, an arrest warrant although helpful is not always mandatory. So the “invitation” to come visit them may be a ploy to avoid additional paperwork or to further flesh out their investigation which may or may not have focused on you!
So no, you don’t have to speak to detectives; but it really may be in your best interest.
I don’ t know about other countries , but generally the British police want to find out if a crime occurred as reported (which is not always the case) and prosecute the right person.
A suspect's assertion of the right to counsel ceases to apply if there is a break in incarceration. The assertion of the right doesn't carry over to the next detention. For example, assume Glen invokes his right to counsel and is released from custody.
If Glen invokes his right to counsel while captive in jail and officers return several hours later and begin questioning him again, while he is still in jail, then they have violated Miranda. However, suppose Glen has been serving time in prison when officers first approach him.
If a detainee invokes the right to counsel for only a limited purpose, the police may interrogate "around" that purpose. For example, suppose that, after being Mirandized, Becky doesn't claim her Miranda rights and answers questions.
Generally, the police must immediately stop probing if the detainee invokes either the right to remain silent or the right to counsel. If the suspect invokes the latter, questioning must cease until counsel is available. But if the detainee invokes only the right to remain silent, the police may reinitiate questioning at a later time, provided that they honor the right to remain silent.
There's no time limit for invoking Miranda rights. After receiving the warnings, a detainee may invoke the rights immediately or after answering some questions. Whenever that invocation occurs, the police must stop investigative questioning. But any statements preceding assertion of Miranda rights are likely to be admissible.
Any Time Now. There's no time limit for invoking Miranda rights. After receiving the warnings, a detainee may invoke the rights immediately or after answering some questions. Whenever that invocation occurs, the police must stop investigative questioning.
Once someone detained by the police invokes their Miranda rights by expressing a desire to remain silent, have counsel present, or both, the police must stop the interrogation. But this isn't necessarily the end of the story: Some circumstances allow the prosecution to use statements a suspect makes after having invoked Miranda. These circumstances constitute a waiver of Miranda rights. (Sometimes prosecutors can use even statements obtained in violation of Miranda .)
If the detective wants to arrest you, then your attorney will schedule your surrender. If the detective wants to arrest you but does not have enough evidence to make an arrest, and your attorney speaks to him, you will not be arrested. If you go to the precinct, any statement you make WILL be used against you and you will be arrested.
Do not even admit to facts the detective already knew because you think there is no problem in confirming what he already knows. This can be problematic if the officer retires or moves away. The case would otherwise not be able to go forward, but the District Attorney would still have the confession you made to use against you. If you had not made a confession, the case would have been dismissed.
If you are innocent of the crime, the detective is investigating, and you deny your guilt while mostly telling the truth, you could easily unintentionally tell a small lie or make a small mistake that will be detrimental to your case. If you are an innocent person, questioning by a detective in a small room at a precinct can be a stressful situation where you are likely to be nervous and just blabber. Although this is human nature, it is important not to do it. Do not even put yourself in that situation.
If you are innocent and only tell the truth, it is likely that you will give the police some little tidbit of information that can eventually be used to convict you. This piece of information could be as minute as where you were on the day the crime took place.
Write down the detective’s phone number, call your attorney and have your attorney speak to the detective. Alternatively, give the detective your attorney’s phone number and have him call your attorney. If the detective wants to arrest you, then your attorney will schedule your surrender.
You may receive a call from a police officer or a detective one day asking you to come to the precinct because he wants to talk to you about a complaint that was made against you or a crime that was committed in the area, or something to that effect. He isn’t specific and doesn’t say whether or not he intends to arrest you. Alternatively, the detective or police officer may tell you that you are not a suspect, and that he just wants to talk.
If you go to the precinct, any statement you make WILL be used against you and you will be arrested. There is no way that going to the precinct will be beneficial, whether you are guilty of a crime or not.
Never, ever speak with a police detective without a Dallas criminal lawyer at your side. If they call or come to your door, politely tell them that you’ll need to contact a lawyer and that you’ll have that lawyer call them. Get their name and contact information.
Ignoring the detective doesn’t make it go away. All it does is waste valuable time. When a Dallas criminal lawyer gets involved in an investigation early, they can sometimes clear it up without a case ever being referred to the District Attorney for prosecution. I’ve done this many times in my career.
When the police are calling/knocking, your freedom and your future hang in the balance. Don’t delay, call a Dallas criminal lawyer immediately.