court cases where the lawyer was uneducated

What are the 6 captivating court cases that had Americans glued?

Jan 15, 2016 · The court entered drastic sanctions against Goodyear, and the "nail in the coffin" was the fact that Goodyear's in-house counsel had participated in reviewing the false discovery responses before they were filed. Practice Tip: If you are practicing law, take it seriously. 6. People v. Miller, 354 P.3d 1136 (Colorado O.P.D.J. 2015).

What are the essential cases every law student should know?

Aug 29, 2017 · 6 captivating court cases that had Americans glued to their screens. 1. O.J. Simpson. We’d be remiss if we started our list anywhere other than the case dubbed the “ trial of the century. ” We are referring to the mother of all courtroom media spectacles: The People of the State of California vs. Orenthal James Simpson.

What was the case with the DOE and the Attorney?

Mar 24, 2022 · On June 17, 2021, the Section and the U.S. Department of Education filed a statement of interest to assist the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia in evaluating the Title IX and Equal Protection claims in B.P.J. v. West Virginia State Board of Education, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-00316.

What are the funniest cases you’ve ever come across in law?

The court said it was clear that "these excessively high prices constituted `unconscionable contractual provisions'[5] within the meaning of section 63, subsection 12 of the Executive Law," N.Y. Executive Law § 63 (12) (McKinney, 1970-71 Supp.), and further that even if the prices were not unconscionable per se, "they were unconscionable ...

What happened in the Gideon v. Wainwright case?

Wainwright, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 18, 1963, ruled (9–0) that states are required to provide legal counsel to indigent defendants charged with a felony.Mar 11, 2022

What was the Betts v Brady Court case about and what was the ruling in that case?

Brady was decided on June 1, 1942, by the U.S. Supreme Court. The case is famous for determining that the Sixth Amendment did not require states to provide counsel to indigent felony criminal defendants at trial. The holding in this case was later overturned by the court's ruling in Gideon v.

What was the result of the Powell v Alabama case?

Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court reversed the convictions of nine young black men for allegedly raping two white women on a freight train near Scottsboro, Alabama.

What was the Powell case about how did the Supreme Court rule in this case how did it limit its ruling?

Alabama was decided on November 7, 1932, by the U.S. Supreme Court. The case is famous for mandating that, under the Sixth Amendment, counsel be provided to all defendants charged with a capital felony in state court regardless of that defendant's ability to pay.

What case overturned Betts v Brady?

Justice Black dissented, arguing that denial of counsel based on financial stability makes it so that those in poverty have an increased chance of conviction, which violates the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. This decision was overruled in 1963 in Gideon v. Wainwright.

What was the decision in Betts v Brady about the right to an attorney at a state level?

Brady, 316 U.S. 455 (1942) Later overruled by Gideon v. Wainwright, this decision held that defendants who cannot afford to pay a lawyer do not have the right to a state-appointed attorney.

What is the significance of the 1932 Supreme Court case Powell vs Alabama?

158 (1932), is a watershed case in Criminal Law. The Powell case marked the first time that the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a state court conviction because the lower court failed to appoint counsel or give the defendants an opportunity to obtain counsel.

Which Amendment prohibits states from depriving persons of life liberty or property without due process of law?

The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, uses the same eleven words, called the Due Process Clause, to describe a legal obligation of all states.

What was the capital offense charged in Powell v Alabama?

In Powell v. Alabama (1932)—which involved the “Scottsboro Boys,” nine black youths who had been found guilty of raping two white women—the Court had ruled that state courts must provide legal counsel to indigent defendants charged with capital crimes. In Betts v.

In which case did the Supreme Court rule that a person accused of a serious crime must be provided with an attorney if he or she was too poor to afford one?

Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires U.S. states to provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable to afford their own.

What due process rights were covered in the case of Brown v Mississippi Powell v Alabama?

The Court held that the Due Process Clause applied to the states through the 14th Amendment and because the trial court had sufficient evidence the confessions were gained through improper measures, it wrongfully permitted use of the confessions as evidence.Apr 13, 2017

How long did the trial of the trial last?

This coverage was so intense that it caused for many delays to the trial, which ended up spanning 11 months. Witnesses began selling their stories to the tabloid press, which disqualified them from testifying in the hearing.

When was John McVeigh executed?

After a series of denied appeals and unforeseen delays, he was executed by lethal injection on June 11, 2001. Among his final statements made as his execution date neared, McVeigh proclaimed that his only regret was not completely leveling the federal building in his attack.

When was Casey Anthony arrested?

America was riveted by the Casey Anthony case from the moment she was arrested for allegedly killing her two-year-old daughter, Caylee, in 2008. The country was shocked by this young mother’s bizarre and frequently shifting stories about what unfolded during the last days and hours of her daughter’s life.

Who did John Wayne propose to?

The fascinating criminal opted to represent himself at trial—of which one of those memorable moments included his proposal to his devoted girlfriend and champion of his innocence, Carole Anne Boone, while he questioned her on the stand.

How old was Trayvon Martin when he was shot?

In fact, it wasn’t until six weeks after Zimmerman shot and killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin—claiming it was in self-defense—that public pressure on law enforcement led to his arrest. On the evening of February 26, 2012, Martin was walking home after picking up some snacks at a local convenience store.

When did Laci Peterson go missing?

The murder of Laci Peterson and her unborn son hijacked the attention of the nation for many reasons. She went missing on Christmas Eve of 2002, was eight months pregnant at the time, her smile was magnetic and her marriage to her husband, Scott, was, by all accounts, picture perfect.

Who killed George Martin?

The 911 dispatcher instructed Zimmerman to stop following Martin. After the call ended, there was a violent encounter between the two that culminated Zimmerman fatally shooting the 17-year-old, who was just 70 yards from his home.

Why was Mississippi sued?

Plaintiffs argued that Mississippi denied equal opportunities to black students and faculty members by favoring the State's historically white colleges and universities at the expense of its historically black colleges and universities, and by failing to remove the vestiges of racial segregation in the former de jure dual system. On April 21, 1975, the Section intervened and joined the plaintiffs in seeking injunctive relief that would bring Mississippi's higher education system into conformity with constitutional and statutory provisions.

When did the Louisiana desegregation case close?

On January 30, 2017, the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana approved a consent order that addresses the remaining issues in the desegregation case and when fully implemented will lead to its closing. The consent order, negotiated with the school district (the “District”) and private plaintiffs, represented by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, puts the District on a path to full unitary status within three years provided it:

What is the Watson Chapel School District?

On December 6, 2016, the District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas approved a consent order to address the remaining issue in the Watson Chapel School District desegregation case, the administration of school discipline. The consent order will replace the use of punitive discipline with more positive approaches as part of an overall focus on improving student achievement and school climate. As part of the consent order, the district will be required to: 1 Revise its Code of Conduct, which currently allows the harshest discipline to be imposed for the most minor offense, to instead strictly limit the use of exclusionary discipline, including prohibiting expulsions or out-of-school suspensions for offenses that do not threaten safety; 2 Stop the use of corporal punishment, which has been disproportionately applied against black students and undermined the creation of a positive school climate;

What was the name of the school district in A.B. v. Rhinebeck?

On March 18, 2004, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the Section moved to intervene in A.B. v. Rhinebeck Central School District and Thomas Mawhinney, a sexual harassment case brought against the Rhinebeck Central School District and the former high school principal Thomas Mawhinney. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on May 9, 2003, by four current and former high school students and a school employee. The plaintiffs alleged that the school district and Mawhinney violated state and federal laws, including Title IX. The United States filed an intervention brief and complaint-in-intervention alleging that Mawhinney sexually harassed the four plaintiff students as well as other female high school students during his ten-year tenure as principal and that the school district violated Title IX by acting with deliberate indifference to known sexual harassment of these students. The district opposed the United States' intervention, and the United States filed a reply. On August 25, 2004, the court granted the United States' intervention motion.

How many English learners are there in Providence?

Attorney’s Office for the District of Rhode Island examined whether the District was identifying and serving its approximately 8,000 English Learner (“EL”) students, as required by Section 1703 (f) of the Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974 (“EEOA”). On August 9, 2018, the District and the United States entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement to address the noncompliant conditions identified by the United States and ensure the District’s compliance with Section 1703 (f) of the EEOA. Among other things, the agreement requires the District to: identify and place EL students appropriately when they enroll in school; provide adequate language services to all EL students, including those with disabilities, so that they can become proficient in English; ensure that the English as a Second Language (“ESL”) components of its EL program are taught by ESL-certified teachers; adequately train the administrators and teachers who implement the District’s EL programs; ensure meaningful communication with Limited English Proficient parents about District and school programs and activities; provide equal opportunities for EL students to participate in specialized programs; and evaluate the effectiveness of the EL program over time. The parties anticipate that the agreement will remain in place for three school years. For more information, please see this press release.

When was the Monroe City School District desegregated?

On August 5, 1965, the private plaintiffs brought this school desegregation case to enjoin the Monroe City School District from continuing to operate racially segregated schools. The United States joined the case as amicus curiae in 1970 and intervened in the lawsuit in 1978. On July 6, 1992, the Court declared the District unitary with respect to facilities, extracurricular activities, and “the hiring and retention of black teachers and administrators.” However, the Court declined to declare the District unitary with regard to “teacher and principal assignments, student assignments and transportation.” On March 30, 2010, the Court ordered the District to “offer the same courses at every high school in the District;” fully implement a medical magnet program at Carroll High School by the fall of the 2011-12 school year (in an attempt to increase the diversity of the student population at Carroll High); encourage each high school student “to attempt to qualify for the Tuition Opportunity Program for Students (TOPS), which provides scholarships for qualified high school students who choose to attend a Louisiana state college or university;” “work with the Equity Assistance Center for the Intercultural Development Research Association (IDRA) in order to ensure that all students have an equitable opportunity to participate in Gifted, Honors, pre-AP, and AP programming at all schools in the District;” and ensure that all principals, other administrators, faculty and certified staff are informed of the terms of the Court’s order. On September 25, 2015, the Court declared the District unitary with respect to student assignment and transportation, but declined to pronounce the District unitary as to teacher and principal assignments. In addition, the Court found that the District had not complied with the March 30, 2010 Consent Decree. On December 11, 2015, the Court entered a Consent Decree designed to remedy teacher and principal assignment and course offerings. Among other actions, the board must take steps to equalize course offerings and ensure that the racial makeup and credentials of the teachers and administrators at any given school does not indicate that a school is intended for black students or white students. On March 23, 2016, in the interest of securing full compliance with the letter and spirit of the December 2015 Consent Decree, the United States and the District jointly filed a motion for the extension of certain deadlines therein. The Court granted the motion and entered an Amended Consent Decree on March 24, 2016. On April 14, 2016, the Court entered a Second Amended Consent Decree.

Why did the sixth grader not wear a hijab?

On September 11, 2003, school officials told the sixth-grader that she could no longer wear her hijab because of the “no hats” policy in the school’s dress code. The dress code, however, had not been applied consistently, and the school district had allowed students to wear hats for medical, educational, and other secular purposes. When the sixth-grader refused to remove her hijab, she was suspended for eight days.

What was the impact of Brown v. Board of Education?

Board ­of Education of Topeka, the 1954 ruling that struck down the concept of "separate but equal" and declared racially segregated public schools unconstitutional. That decision helped spark the Civil Rights Movement, which changed the course of American history.

Why did John Scopes go to court?

In 1925, in Dayton, Tenn., high school teacher John Scopes went to court for teaching the theory of evolution to his students. The state's constitution banned the subject in schools. But Scopes served as more of a pawn; the true purpose of the case was to formally debate the evolution ban in court and to address the controversy surrounding it.

Who shot Oswald?

Two days later, Jack Ruby shot and killed Oswald. On March 14, 1964, Ruby was sentenced to death by electric chair for Oswald's murder. But the Texas Supreme Court overturned the ruling on the basis that the case's publicity obstructed Ruby's right to a fair hearing.

How many times was Oswald shot?

The president was shot three times on Nov. 22, 1963. Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested for the assassination after investigators discovered a rifle hidden between two boxes with Oswald's fingerprints on them, along with empty cartridges in the Texas Book Depository. Two days later, Jack Ruby shot and killed Oswald.

When was Abby Borden murdered?

The murder of Andrew and Abby Borden happened on Aug. 4, 1892 , in Fall River, Mass. Lizzie Borden, 33 years old at the time, was arrested for the murder based on these facts: She was home alone at the time of the murders and there were no signs of a struggle.

Who was the man who killed Nicole Brown?

O.J. Simpson tries on a leather glove allegedly used in the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman during testimony in his murder trial June 15, 1995, in Los Angeles. Lee Celano/WireImage. ­ Ye­ar: 1994. Charge: Murders of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman.

What happened to Sam Sheppard's wife?

­Rumored to be the basis of the television show "The Fugitive," Sam Sheppard 's trial for the murder of his pregnant wife revolved around an unknown murder weapon and questions abo­ut a possible intruder. Marilyn Sheppard was murdered in her second-floor bedroom early on the morning of July 4, 1954. Sam had reportedly fallen asleep on a daybed on the first floor and was awakened by his wife's scream.

What is the significance of the 1973 Supreme Court decision?

The landmark decision in 1973 upheld a woman's right to an abortion. Synonymous with abortion in the USA. Hundreds of thousands march on the US supreme court on the anniversary of the decision each year.

What is the Belmarsh case?

Foreign detainees. Known as the Belmarsh decision, there is no modern case that better sets the boundary between national security and civil liberties. Decided by a panel of nine law lords, the 2004 decision became an important milestone in judges protecting both the rule of law and human rights.

When was Pinochet arrested?

Pinochet. International human rights law received a global TV audience in 1998 after former Chilean dictator General Pinochet was arrested in London. Under the rules of universal jurisdiction, he was detained following a Spanish extradition request facing charges of crimes against humanity.

What was the impact of the 1991 Factortame case?

Providing the legal backdrop to a decade of EU-scepticism is the 1991 case of Factortame, this case on the rights of Spanish fisherman to fish in British waters is a mainstay on any public law course. It confirmed the priority of European laws over UK acts of parliament and thus struck a blow against parliament's legal supremacy. In so doing it provoked much constitutional debate about the extent of EU legal powers - and Britain's relationship with Europe as a whole.

Was Pinochet extradited?

The law lords declared that there could be a limit to the immunity enjoyed by heads of states. Though Pinochet was never extradited, the case sent out a strong message about accountability for leaders who commit human rights abuses,before the international criminal court was established.

Who sued Michael Jordan?

However, Allen Heckard of Portland, Ore., had often been confused for Michael Jordan and did not enjoy it. He sued the NBA star along with the cofounder of Nike, Phil Knight, in 2006 for $832 million. Heckard’s looks were not far off from the basketball legend, and he even sported a similar earring.

Who sued Anheuser-Busch?

In 1991, Richard Overton sued Anheuser-Busch for $10,000 claiming the company had falsely advertised the scene of beautiful women and men enjoying themselves while drinking beer. Overton was upset when he discovered this type of lifestyle was not a reality from merely drinking beer. His case was promptly dismissed.

What happens when we put all our trust in a weather prediction?

What happens when we put all our trust in a weather prediction? A bad day evidently. An Israeli woman sued a TV station when the weatherman wrongly predicted a nice day. The woman ended up getting caught in the rain, causing her to catch the flu, miss a week of work, and purchase medication. She sued for $1,000, claiming that the incident caused her stress, and won the hilarious, but true court case.

Why did Melissa Cooper get sued?

In 2011, Melissa Cooper was awarded $50,000 after she sued Christopher Kelley, her former fiancé and father of one of her children, for fraud and breach of promise. Kelley gave Cooper a ring in 2004. After a 10-year relationship he broke off their engagement for another woman.

How did Daniel Dukes die?

He hid himself from the Sea World security guards and was killed by an Orca whale after the park closed. Daniel’s parents filed a multi-million dollar lawsuit against Sea World for failure to display public signs warning of the dangers which whales can cause to humans. The suit was quietly dropped later with no explanation for the family’s change of heart.

What happened to Trina Thompson?

When Trina Thompson of New York was unable to find a suitable job following graduation from Monroe College, she filed a $72,000 case in 2009 against her alma mater. Thompson, who graduated with a 2.7 GPA, claimed the college’s career services department didn’t provide sufficient help with her job search and gave preferential treatment to students with excellent grades. She sought to regain the $70,000 she had spent on tuition for her bachelor’s degree in information technology plus an extra $2,000 for the stress caused during her three-month job search.

What happened to custom cleaners pants?

He claimed that the pants he dropped off for alteration had been lost and the dry cleaner did not meet the claim of the “satisfaction guaranteed” sign that hung in the dry cleaner’s window. The $67 million, which later was lowered to $53 million, Pearson says was equal to claims for common law fraud violations. Pearson eventually lost the pant case after he failed to prove the trousers he picked up were not his.

What was the case of R v Dudley and Stephens?

Necessity isn’t always an adequate defence against murder, and that was vividly shown in the case of R v Dudley and Stephens. In 1884, Tom Dudley, Edwin Stephens, Edmund Brooks and Richard Parker were shipwrecked and adrift in a lifeboat 700 miles from the nearest land with no freshwater and only two tins of turnips to eat. This was on the 5th July. By 17th July, they had eaten the turnips and the entirety of a turtle they had managed to catch, and by 24th July, Parker had slipped into a coma. Realising there was no other way to survive, Dudley and Stephens killed Parker, and the three remaining men (including Brooks) resorted to cannibalism in order to survive. On the 29th of July, they were rescued.#N#When the case was brought to trial, public opinion was highly sympathetic to Dudley and Stephens, to the extent that their defence was paid for by public opinion. At the same time, the judiciary wanted it established that necessity was not a defence for murder. The ultimate outcome of the case was something of a compromise: Dudley and Stephens were convicted of murder, but sentenced to just 6 months in prison.

Who was Wayne Rabey?

Wayne Rabey was a 20-year-old geology student in Canada in 1980, who was interested in a female student in his class. So far, so much like normal university life. But when they were studying together, Rabey found a letter than the woman had written to a friend of hers, where she said that Rabey “bugged” her, and described him as “nothing”, while also mentioning that she was interested in someone else.

Where did Neville Presho live?

In the 1970s, Neville Presho, an engineer, visited the remote Tory Island off the north-west coast of Ireland and fell so deeply in love with it that he gave up his career to make a film about life there. In 1982, he bought a house on the island, though he then settled down in New Zealand.

What happened to the twins in 2001?

In the second half of this list, we look at some of the more unpleasant (though still odd) cases that the law has had to address.#N#Re A was a case in England in 2001, where two twins – Gracie and Rosie – were born joined at the abdomen, with Rosie dependent on Gracie to oxygenate her blood. If surgically separated, Gracie had a strong likelihood of survival, but Rosie would die. But if left conjoined, both twins were unlikely to see their first birthdays.

What is VAT in the UK?

In the UK, VAT is a tax, currently set at 20%, charged on products that are considered luxuries – so there’s no VAT on apples, milk, or tea, but there is on ice cream, cake decorations, cereal bars, and – crucially – crisps.