Sep 29, 1995 · 1. a lawyer must competently represent his client (Rule 1.1); 2. a lawyer must abide by his client ' s decisions concerning the objectives of representation, and must consult with the client as to the means by which they are pursued (Rule 1.2); 3. a lawyer must act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client (Rule 1.3);
Nov 19, 2021 · Rules of Professional Conduct. The Rules of Professional Conduct were promulgated by the Connecticut Superior Court in 1986 and have the force of law with respect to attorneys. The rules, along with official commentary, can be found in the Connecticut Practice Book: Connecticut Practice Book. Call Number: KFC4130 .C6 1998.
The Statewide Grievance Committee (SGC) is a body of twenty-one individuals, comprised of fourteen attorneys and seven non-attorneys, appointed by the judges of the Superior Court to review, investigate and adjudicate attorney ethics matters. Application for Reimbursement - Client Security Fund, JD-GC-15 (pdf)
The Committee on Professional Ethics receives and considers written requests for advice about professional ethics and issues advisory opinions on professional conduct. Generally, advice should be requested concerning one’s own future conduct, not one’s own or someone else’s past conduct. The Rules of Professional Conduct have the force of ...
Any board or entity seeking the approval of the Rules Committee of the Superior Court for authority to certify lawyers practicing in this state as being specialists in a certain field or fields of law as set forth in Rule 7.4A (e), shall file its application with the Legal Specialization Screening Committee pursuant to Rule 7.4B on form JD-ES-63.
Our comprehensive SEO program is designed to get you in the Top 3 Google Search results and keep you there. Contact us today for a complimentary audit and review.
The Connecticut Bar Association Committee on Professional Ethics issues advisory opinions on specific ethical situations facing practicing attorneys. It will issue an informal opinion when a request is made by an individual attorney, but if the committee feels that the matter is of significant interest to the bar, it will issue a formal opinion on the matter.
Rules of Professional Conduct. The Rules of Professional Conduct were promulgated by the Connecticut Superior Court in 1986 and have the force of law with respect to attorneys. The rules, along with official commentary, can be found in the Connecticut Practice Book: Connecticut Practice Book. Call Number: KFC4130 .C6 1998.
Although the Connecticut Supreme Court has on occasion referred to them as well reasoned, the advisory opinions are not authoritative and are not binding on the Statewide Grievance Committee or the courts.
The Committee on Professional Ethics receives and considers written requests for advice about professional ethics and issues advisory opinions on professional conduct. Generally, advice should be requested concerning one’s own future conduct, not one’s own or someone else’s past conduct. The Rules of Professional Conduct have the force ...
The Formal and Informal Opinions are advisory opinions . Although the Connecticut Supreme Court has on occasion referred to them as well reasoned, the advisory opinions are not authoritative and are not binding on the Statewide Grievance Committee or the courts.
A request for a committee opinion should state specifically the facts giving rise to the issue, state the issue upon which an opinion is requested, and refer to any provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct that the writer believes to be relevant. Requests are forwarded to a committee member to prepare a draft response, which is considered by the committee members for discussion, amendment, and then issuance of an Informal Opinion. On occasion, the committee will determine that a matter is of significant enough interest to the Bar that a Formal Opinion is called for, and will refer the matter to a subcommittee to prepare a draft Formal Opinion for submission at a subsequent meetings and referral to the CBA Board of Governors for comment.
A request for a committee opinion should state specifically the facts giving rise to the issue, state the issue upon which an opinion is requested, and refer to any provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct that the writer believes to be relevant. Requests are forwarded to a committee member to prepare a draft response, ...
Requests are forwarded to a committee member to prepare a draft response, which is considered by the committee members for discussion, amendment, and then issuance of an Informal Opinion. On occasion, the committee will determine that a matter is of significant enough interest to the Bar that a Formal Opinion is called for, ...
Informal Ethics Opinions. The Committee on Professional Ethics receives and considers written requests for advice about professional ethics and issues advisory opinions on professional conduct. Generally, advice should be requested concerning one’s own future conduct, not one’s own or someone else’s past conduct.
No one person may serve in more than one of the positions described in this subsection. The Office of State Ethics may employ necessary staff within available appropriations. Such necessary staff of the Office of State Ethics shall be in classified state service.
On and after January 1, 1999, the Office of State Ethics shall make all computerized data from financial reports required by section 1-96 available to the public through (1) a computer terminal in the office of the Office of State Ethics, and (2) the Internet or any other generally available on-line computer network.
Rather, a prosecutor’s duty is to seek justice. A prosecutor should be on time, comply with deadlines, and must not do anything solely for the purpose of delay. Rules 1.3 (Diligence), 3.2 (Expediting Litigation), 4.4(a) (Respect for Rights of Third Persons).
prosecutor must not do anything solely for the purpose of embarrassing or burdening a defendant, a witness or any other person involved with a matter the prosecutor is handling. Rule 4.4(a) (Respect for Rights of Third Persons). As a minister of justice, a prosecutor must not: (1) unlawfully obstruct the defendant’s access to evidence; (2) alter, conceal or destroy evidence or assist another in doing so; (3) falsify evidence; (4) counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely; or (5) offer an inducement to a witness that is not allowed by law. Rule 3.4 (Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel). He or she should not make frivolous discovery requests and should make reasonably diligent efforts to comply with legal discovery requests from the defendant. Rule 3.4(4).
The Rules of Professional Conduct were written with the understanding that criminal defendants have a right to represent themselves. Accordingly, they do not prohibit prosecutors from having contact with unrepresented defendants. They do, however, require prosecutors to take steps to assure that the defendant understands his or her rights. When dealing with a self-represented defendant, a prosecutor should assure that the defendant understands that the prosecutor represents the state and is not the defendant’s attorney. Rule 4.3 (Dealing with Unrepresented Person). Along those lines, a prosecutor should not give legal advice to an unrepresented defendant, other than the advice to secure counsel. If the defendant has not been advised of his or her right to counsel, the prosecutor should so advise the defendant and advise the defendant of the procedure for obtaining counsel. If a defendant indicates he or she wants representation, the prosecutor must make sure the defendant is given a reasonable opportunity to obtain counsel.
There are times when a prosecutor, as a law enforcement official, will need to comment publicly about a criminal matter. For instance, a prosecutor might want to alert the public to an impeding danger, to release information necessary to aid in the apprehension of a suspect, or to inform the public that an investigation is ongoing or an arrest has been made. Such comments may promote public safety and/or dispel widespread unrest.
The failure to disclose exculpatory or impeachment evidence can result in the reversal of a conviction or other sanctions, even if your failure was the result of ignorance or inadvertence. See, e.g., Adams v. Commissioner of Correction, 309 Conn. 359 (2013) (reversing murder conviction obtained with false testimony of key state’s witness, in violation of Giglio). A knowing or willful failure to disclose such information is a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct and could result in the Bench or Bar taking disciplinary action against you. For instance, Rule 3.8(4) requires that a prosecutor “[m]ake timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor . . . .”
78, 88 (1935), prosecutors are in a “very definite sense [servants] of the law . . . .” Justice demands that prosecutors, as representatives of the state, always seek to do the right thing and act in accordance with the highest ethical standards.
83, 87 (1963), the United States Supreme Court held that “suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to the accused . . . violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or punishment, irrespective of the good or bad faith of the prosecution.” A prosecutor who “withholds evidence . . . which, if made available, would tend to exculpate [the defendant] or reduce the penalty . . . casts the prosecutor in the role of an architect of a proceeding that does not comport with standards of justice. . . .” Id., 87-88.