Aug 03, 2020 · The first step is to determine whether the defendant owed the plaintiff a legal duty of care. In the context of a condo water leak, the association and owners owe the following duties of care to one another: properly and timely maintain and repair the components they are obligated to maintain and repair. Element #2: Breach of Duty.
Dec 21, 2018 · Per Florida Statute § 718.111 (11) (j) (1), the offending upstairs unit owner would be liable for the damage to all portions of the condominium property not covered by the condominium’s insurance policy. The statute also holds the upstairs unit owner liable for the damage to the neighbor’s condo downstairs. The same rules would hold true ...
Mar 19, 2019 · The Damage Options Absent unique language within a declaration, there are three ways to evaluate who pays for damage to a condominium: 1. If there is insurance coverage and the loss exceeds the deductible, then the association’s insurance should be primary and, if “walls in” coverage exists, pay for damage to common area and unit (s),
Jan 05, 2015 · As a starting point, section 105 of the Act provides that the condominium corporation is responsible to pay the deductible, if any. However, there are exceptions to that. For instance, if the owner has caused the damage to his unit through an act or omission, the owner is responsible to pay the deductible.
The statute also holds the upstairs unit owner liable for the damage to the neighbor’s condo downstairs. The same rules would hold true if the source of the leak is a unit owner’s intentional conduct, or the result of the unit owner’s failure to follow the dictates of the condominium documents, including its rules and regulations.
A unit owner should first know that pursuant to Florida Statute § 718.111 (11) (f), their condo association is responsible for everything but the following list of items, which are the unit owner’s responsibility: personal property within the unit or limited common elements, and floor, wall, and ceiling coverings, electrical fixtures, appliances, ...
That will depend on whether or not the cause of the damage is, to use the Condo Act’s term, an “insurable event.”. While the Act does not define what constitutes an “insurable event”, it is understood to mean an insured peril (as that term is used in many commercial insurance policies) or a casualty. A casualty itself is interpreted as being ...
It’s not unusual for condominium owners to experience leaks that don’t come for their own unit. Being surrounded by other people’s unit above, below, and on the sides, makes leaks inevitable from a neighbor’s condo. When you add in owners who may only live in the unit part time, and other units that may be completely unoccupied, the risk of a leak only goes up. Despite leaks being a fairly common occurrence, many unit owners do not know who will be responsible for the various repairs and remediation that are required after a condominium leak.
But, the owner’s condo unit insurance policy should cover all damage not covered by the association’s policy. If the damage results from the other owner failing to maintain or timely fix a foreseeable, known issue, then different rules apply.
The association has a vested interest in ensuring that standing water and water seepage do not damage the structural portions of the condominium property, or any infrastructure, such as wiring. It isn’t worth the cost of drying out a unit to jeopardize critical elements of the condominium. To learn more about the topic of condominium association ...
In such situations, and where neither party’s insurer will cover the cost, the association should assume the cost. The association has a vested interest in ensuring that standing water and water seepage do not damage the structural portions of the condominium property, or any infrastructure, such as wiring. It isn’t worth the cost of drying out a unit to jeopardize critical elements of the condominium.
Ordinarily, condominium associations “are responsible for the maintenance, repair and replacement of all Common Areas and Association Property.”. These maintenance requirements track the Davis-Stirling Act (see Civil Code § 4775 (a)) and do not alter who pays for what. What this means is there is no “Source Rule” for determining liability ...
HOA and Owner Maintenance Responsibilities. is responsible for repairing, replacing, and maintaining the common area. repairing, replacing, and maintaining that separate interest. Note there is no mention in the statute as to causation or source of the damage. That is because in a sense, condominium living is a “no fault” zone (absent negligence, ...
the loss exceeds the deductible, then the association’s insurance should be. primary and, if “walls in” coverage exists, pay for damage to common area and unit (s), other than personal property. 2. If no insurance and no negligence, misconduct or intentional act, then follow the scheme set forth above.
What this means is there is no “Source Rule” for determining liability for paying for damages in a condominium. Absent intentional or negligent acts of an owner or his or her guests or invitees, an owner is only responsible for repairing his or her unit; while the association is responsible for repairing common areas—regardless of the source of the leak.
Note there is no mention in the statute as to causation or source of the damage. That is because in a sense, condominium living is a “ no fault” zone (absent negligence, misconduct, or intentional conduct). All owners pay into a common fund for insurance, operations and reserves, and should receive the benefit of that community funding ...
One would also have to consider the source of the damage: was the source of the damage a leaking dishwasher or a common element water pipe? Most importantly, the responsibility to repair a unit after damage will greatly depend on the specific language of the condominium’s declaration and of its by-laws. Every case has to be evaluated on its specific facts.
Obligation to “maintain”. Section 90 of the Condominium Act, 1998 (the “Act”) provides that the condominium corporation has the obligation to maintain the common elements and that each owner has the obligation to maintain his or her own unit. Most declarations will reiterate the owner’s obligation to maintain his or her unit to the standard ...
Section 99 (1) of the Act provides that the condominium corporation has the obligation to obtain insurance to cover damage to both the unit and the common elements caused by major perils, such as a “fire, lightning, smoke, windstorm, hail, explosion, water escape, strikes, ...
Obligation to “repair after damage”. On the other hand, section 89 of the Act imposes an obligation on the condominium corporation to repair both the units and the common elements after damage , subject to any provision of the declaration which may alter the corporation’s obligations and which may impose an obligation on ...
Most declarations will reiterate the owner’s obligation to maintain his or her unit to the standard of a “prudent owner” and provide that each owner shall be responsible for all damages to any and all other units and to the common elements which are caused by his or her failure to maintain his or her unit.
As a starting point, section 105 of the Act provides that the condominium corporation is responsible to pay the deductible, if any. However, there are exceptions to that. For instance, if the owner has caused the damage to his unit through an act or omission, the owner is responsible to pay the deductible. Section 105 (3) of the Act provides for a further exception, which allows the condominium corporation to pass to the owner the responsibility for the deductible if it has adopted a by-law to that effect.
The condominium corporation’s insurance will pay for the cost of repairing the damage to the standard unit. All of this is, of course, subject to contrary language in the declaration.
Section 90 of the Condominium Act, 1998 (the “Act”) provides that the condominium corporation has the obligation to maintain the common elements and that each owner has the obligation to maintain his or her own unit. Most declarations will reiterate the owner’s obligation to maintain his or her unit to the standard of a “prudent owner” and provide that each owner shall be responsible for all damages to any and all other units and to the common elements which are caused by his or her failure to maintain his or her unit.
Section 99 (1) of the Act provides that the condominium corporation has the obligation to obtain insurance to cover damage to both the unit and the common elements caused by major perils, such as a “fire, lightning, smoke, windstorm, hail, explosion, water escape, strikes, riots or civil commotion, impact by aircraft or vehicles, vandalism or malicious acts” or other perils that a declaration or by-law may specify.
As a starting point, section 105 of the Act provides that the condominium corporation is responsible to pay the deductible, if any. However, there are exceptions to that. For instance, if the owner has caused the damage to his unit through an act or omission, the owner is responsible to pay the deductible. Section 105 (3) of the Act provides for a further exception, which allows the condominium corporation to pass to the owner the responsibility for the deductible if it has adopted a by-law to that effect.
While the corporation has the obligation to maintain a certain level of insurance coverage for damage to the units, the owner is responsible to obtain and maintain sufficient insurance to cover any damage to any personal property within his or her unit such as:
The unit owner will be responsible for all costs related to damage to his/her personal possessions and any improvements or additions to the standard unit, whether or not the owner has maintained insurance. The condominium corporation’s insurance will pay for the cost of repairing the damage to the standard unit.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
In sum, in order to determine whether the Corporation or the unit owner is responsible to repair damage caused to a unit or payment of the insurance deductible, it will be necessary to refer to the Act, the Declaration and the condominium by-laws, as there is no “one-size fits all” answer to this question.
While some condominium associations and unit owners may have no trouble resolving their claims for flood damages, others will run into challenges along the way. It’s common to run into serious questions that temporarily derail your efforts at resolution, and those questions might include:
As these kinds of questions throw a wrench in the insurance process that follows a flood, there can also be a “rippling effect” of problems, including:
When a condo association files an insurance claim, the deductible becomes an expense of the condo association, therefore the cost is to be shared in common by all members of the association, just as the sewer line itself is shared by multiple owners of condominium units. Depending on how it’s organized, the condo association might consist ...
One of the reasons why a condo association carries insurance is to cover loss from unexpected events such as a sewage backup. The unit owner’s insurance policy is meant to cover the cost of personal belongings and interior repairs.
That’s because Kerr’s condo association is not willing to cover the high cost to clean up the homeowner’s unit, reportedly more than $7,000. According to the report, following a sewage backup in 2015, Rosewood Manor’s insurance and Kerr’s personal insurance companies covered the cost of cleanup.
If the damage to your unit can be traced to one particular unit owner (or tenants of the unit owner), then the condo association’s insurance company can attempt to reocver its costs from that unit owner’s insurance company, or from the unit owner directly.
Also according to the KUTV report, Kerr was not the individual who flushed an “inappropriate object” down the toilet. So why should she or her insurance company have to bear 100% of the cost to clean up and repair the damage to her home?
Depending on how it’s organized, the condo association might consist of a single multifamily building or dozens of buildings. Regardless of whether or not your condo unit is affected by a sewage back up (or any other damage involving common property), if you’re a member of the condo association affected, you are responsible to pay your share ...
If you don't have a copy of the building policy, it can be obtained from a member of your condo association. Determine the cause of the water damage. If the water damage occurred because your toilet overflowed or a pipe in your kitchen burst, the claim will likely go through your personal condo insurance policy.
Condo associations maintain insurance to cover common areas in the complex, while individual condo insurance policies cover the interiors of individual units, such as the walls, flooring and contents.
File a claim with either the insurer of the master building policy or your individual policy, depending on who is liable for the damage. If neither insurer accepts the claim because the damage occurred in an adjoining unit, discuss the issue directly with your neighbor. Make sure to collect all the details regarding his insurance policy so the issue can be dealt with promptly. If the neighbor is uncooperative and denies responsibility, litigation might be necessary.
Contact a professional plumber to have the situation evaluated if the exact cause of the water damage can't be located. A plumber can search for leaky pipes and assess the hidden cause of damage.
Some policies cover fixtures in each of the individual units, while other policies provide coverage only for the building exterior, basement, roof and other common areas.
Toxic mold growth can begin within 48 hours of the water damage, so be persistent and request an immediate response--particularly if the damage has made your unit uninhabitable.
In most condominiums, the common elements include the drywall that is contained in each condo unit. Typically, the condo unit owner is responsible for the finished interior surface or the covering of the drywall, however, the condominium is responsible for the drywall itself.
If you have suffered damage to your condominium unit which was the direct result of the association’s failure to maintain the common elements such as the roof, common element water pipes, the exterior building walls or failure to weatherproof the exterior of the condominium, then you may be able to require that the association repair the condition that caused the damage and pay damages to reimburse you from all resulting damage to your individual unit and the contents contained in that unit if the damage was the result of the association ’s failure to maintain the common elements.
Although each condominium has its own rules which are contained in the condominium’s governing documents, the general rule is that the condominium is responsible for the common elements of the building. Most associations have a non-delegable duty to maintain the common elements of the association and cannot refuse to maintain ...
Most associations have a non-delegable duty to maintain the common elements of the association and cannot refuse to maintain and repair damaged common elements in the condo on the basis that it was the fault of a third-party such as a contractor or neighboring unit owner.
In Florida, water and mold damage to the drywall of the walls and ceiling of condominium units is a frequent problem. When unit owners bring water and mold damage issues to the attention of the condo association, many associations usually try to point the finger at someone else. Although each condominium has its own rules which are contained in ...
If the roof leaks and personal property (furniture, clothing, rugs) of a unit owner is damaged as a result: The unit owner’s personal property is never the obligation of the association for MRR. Here again the unit owner is blameless in causing the damages to his/her personal property.
Generally speaking, at Illinois common law, the elements of a claim for premises liability are existence of a duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, breach of the duty, and injury (or damage) caused as a result. Keating vs. 68th and Paxton LLC, 401 Ill.App.3d 456 (1st Dist. 2010), appeal denied 237 Ill.2d 559.
Overall, issues of liability for the failure of the CE as a result of failure to properly maintain, repair and replace them are a complex combination of common law, statutory, documentary and insurance analysis. Basic liability law mandates that the association will, in almost all cases, be liable for all such damages. The Act, and the given association’s documents and insurance may result in that liability being covered by insurance and/or waived/released. But there is no basis, in my opinion, for automatically concluding that, in the ordinary course, the association’s liability for damages to the unit, LCE or the personal property of the unit owner or other occupant, is limited solely to putting the CE, up through the primer paint, back into good repair.
The association is obligated by statute to carry both property (casualty) insurance and liability insurance. Act, Section 12 (a). The property insurance is required to be in the full insurable replacement cost of the property (including CE, LCE and units, up through the primer coat on the walls, subject to certain board decisions). Act, Section 12 (a) (1). If a unit owner makes certain improvements to his/her unit, the increased value of the building doesn’t have to be covered by the property insurance. But if such improvements are covered, the association may bill the increased premium costs for those improvements back to the relevant unit owner. Act, Section 12 (b).
The association’s liability insurance is not at issue, as the damaged party is not a 3rd person, but is the association itself. A roof leak, not caused by an “occurrence”, may not be covered by the property insurance.
Important: The Act does not control many aspects of the issues discussed below. Since there is no one standard form of condominium declaration in Illinois, the following analysis cannot be deemed to be always correct for every condominium association. What follows are what I consider to be general rules in this area. It is always possible that a given declaration may have language that mandates a different result. Review of any given situation by the association’s attorney is always proper.