If the defendant chooses to remain silent, the prosecutor cannot call the defendant as a witness, nor can a judge or defense attorney force the defendant to testify. (Defendants in civil cases may, however, be forced to testify as a witness in a civil case.
Full Answer
Hearings with defense counsel; in any number of circumstances, a defendant can be absent so long as their attorney is present (e.g. certain motions hearings, status hearings, etc.). Trial in absentia; where the defendant is the cause for his absence (e.g. failure to appear on the trial date, or disappearance mid-trial), the court may elect to proceed without him, deeming him to have …
A "defendant" is a general term used to describe a person who or an entity that has been accused of violating the law in some way. Unfortunately, this term commonly carries a stigma of someone who has done something wrong. However, it is extremely important to remember that a defendant has not yet stood trial, and thus must be presumed innocent.
Apr 10, 2015 · An attorney who has withdrawn from representation has a continuing professional obligation to maintain the confidentiality of all matters within the attorney-client relationship, so for example the attorney cannot become a witness for the client's opponent in the case on matters falling within the scope of the attorney-client privilege.
Criminal defendants are people who are accused of violating the criminal laws of their state, such as burglary or false imprisonment. It may also refer to someone who is accused of violating a federal law.
A "defendant" is a general term used to describe a person who or an entity that has been accused of violating the law in some way. Unfortunately, this term commonly carries a stigma of someone who has done something wrong. However, it is extremely important to remember that a defendant has not yet stood trial, and thus must be presumed innocent. ...
If the circumstances require that the attorney withdraw from representation, the withdrawal is considered mandatory. Situations that could give rise to an attorney's mandatory withdrawal from a case include: 1 the attorney is not competent to continue the representation 2 the attorney becomes a crucial witness on a contested issue in the case 3 the attorney discovers that the client is using his services to advance a criminal enterprise 4 the client is insisting on pursuit of a frivolous position in the case 5 the attorney has a conflict of interest or cannot otherwise continue representation without violating the rules of professional conduct, and 6 the client terminates the attorney's services. (Learn more: How to Fire Your Attorney .)
An Attorney's Voluntary Withdrawal. Where the circumstances permit, but do not require, the attorney to cease representation, the withdrawal is considered voluntary.The circumstances under which an attorney may withdraw mid-case include: there has been a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship that prevents the attorney from effectively ...
As defined by ethical rules, a lawyer's duty to keep clients informed has two primary components: to advise the defendant of case developments (such as a prosecutor's offered plea bargain or locating an important defense witness), and. to respond reasonably promptly to a defendant's request for information.
The duty to keep clients informed rests on attorneys, not clients. But on the theory that if the attorney screws up it's the client who usually suffers, here are a couple of steps that defendants can take to try to secure effective communication with their lawyers: 1 Raise the issue early on. Establish, in advance, a clear understanding about case updates. If an attorney's practice is to initiate contact only when a development occurs, the attorney should communicate that to the client at the outset of the representation. If a client wants (and can pay for) regular updates regardless of whether developments have taken place, that too can be spelled out in advance—even included in a written retainer agreement. 2 Be reasonable. A defendant who phones his or her attorney with a request for information can indicate a willingness to speak with the lawyer's associate, secretary, or paralegal. The lawyer may be too tied up on other cases to return the call personally, but may have time to pass along information through an assistant. And because some lawyers have poor communication skills, the defendant may be better off getting information from an assistant than from the lawyer.
Is it a good idea to have a relative or friend sit in on your meeting with your lawyer?
Despite the general rule, there's an exception in most states: In general, when a third person is present, the attorney-client privilege continues to apply if that third person is there in order to aid the cause. Put more specifically, the third person must be present while fulfilling a role that furthers the defendant's legal representation.
A defendant might very well expect confidentiality when talking with a lawyer in front of a loved one. And it may be unlikely that the prosecution ever finds out about the meeting or calls the loved one to testify.
The law on the attorney-client privilege is complex and can vary in subtle ways from one state to another. That's why you should rely on a lawyer for advice—and a full explanation of the law.
Even a judge who is not serving as the finder of fact (i.e., when the case is to be decided by a jury) cannot be fair and impartial if he or she has personal knowledge of disputed facts, because the judge's evidentiary rulings (in pleadings and motions made by the parties) may be influenced by that knowledge.
If a judge is biased or prejudiced for or against a party or attorney, he cannot be fair and impartial in deciding the case. A party or attorney who believes such bias or prejudice exists must prove it with admissible evidence, and cannot base this belief on mere suspicion.