In a criminal proceeding, the job of the defense attorney is to vigorously defend his or her client by using the law to cast doubt on the prosecution’s case. It is up to the prosecutor to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.
Full Answer
That’s why attorneys will keep their questions brief and to the point, and will follow up to guide a conversation with the juror. It’s all about seeing through the masks that everyone wears on a daily basis, and finding the truth underneath. Juries fulfill one of the most vital roles in the jury trial.
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, a good attorney in the process of jury selection will understand that nobody in the room is fair or unbiased, and that not a one of them cares about the case. By proceeding from this assumption, they have the best chance of finding a jury that may be willing to accept their position.
Most people called for jury duty don’t want to be there, which makes it even harder for attorneys to choose the right members. Learn about the process of jury selection, how lawyers pick jurors, and why it matters, as well as why having the right attorney can make all the difference.
Since the defense goes second in jury selection, they need to adapt and adjust to the tactics established by the prosecution. They need to listen carefully to what’s being asked and the answers that are given. From a defense standpoint, most of the jurors that look bad for the prosecution are good for the defense.
To persuade, lawyers must appeal to their audience. They must know whom they are trying to convince. In a jury trial, lawyers should establish juror profiles during jury selection to identify individuals likely to render a verdict in their client's favor.
After questioning prospective jurors, each side's attorney may challenge certain jurors using two types of challenges: "for cause" and "peremptory." By challenging a juror, the attorney is asking the judge to excuse that juror from the panel.
Criminal Defense LawyersCriminal Defense Lawyers Represent Both the Guilty and the Innocent. In the U.S. criminal justice system, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. The prosecutor must prove a defendant's guilt. Defendants do not have to prove their innocence.
A defense strategy is a product of a defendant and defense attorney fitting together the version of the truth that is most likely to produce a satisfactory defense outcome–a verdict of not guilty, a verdict of guilt of a lesser charge, or an acceptable plea bargain.
Thus, a prosecutor can legitimately seek dismissal of a potential juror who is likely biased and probably won't be impartial, regardless of that person's race, ethnicity, or gender. Since there are many ways in which a potential juror may be biased, there are many legitimate reasons for challenging a juror.
of the California Code of Civil Procedure.Step 1: Selection of a Jury.Step 2: The Trial.Step 3: Jury Deliberations.
What Does a Criminal Defense Attorney Do? Criminal defense attorneys (private and court-appointed) research the facts, investigate the case against their clients, and try to negotiate deals with their adversaries (prosecutors). These deals might include reduced bail, reduced charges, and reduced sentences.
Criminal defense lawyers must provide "zealous" representation. Another reason that lawyers can defend people regardless of guilt is that our society gives each citizen the right to be vigorously defended in a court of law. The U.S. Constitution assures every citizen due process and the right to legal counsel.
The shortest answer to the concern is that defense lawyers know that in order to protect the innocent every accused person deserves effective representation. They also understand every guilty person deserves a fair sentence, just as the victim of their crime deserves justice.
8 key factors drive what your best defense strategy is:Defendant's explanation of what happened, why and credibility.Witness testimony and credibility.Provable facts and physical evidence.Police reports, errors and credibility.Expert, 3rd party reports and testimony.More items...
It is the defence lawyer's job to ensure that the rights of the accused are protected throughout the criminal process. At trial, a defence lawyer must: question the evidence put forward by the prosecution; examine the importance or relevance of that evidence; and.
To cast doubt on the truthfulness and reliability of prosecution witnesses, a defense attorney can use any or all of these tactics:Demonstrate bias on the part of prosecution witnesses, who, therefore, may be lying.Expose police mistakes in gathering, maintaining, and testing physical evidence.More items...
Selecting the jury is the only time an attorney has the opportunity to discover the life experiences, biases, beliefs, and attitudes of the people who will decide their case. The last thing any attorney wants is for bias to come out during the trial. Thus, how lawyers pick jurors is an essential indicator of the experience and knowledge ...
When the plaintiff picks jurors, they’re looking for those who are very sympathetic, who are willing to view the prosecution as the victim in the case. Very often, union employees make for good prosecution jurors as they are used to fighting injustice.
The plaintiff will tell a jury a story of how their client was victimized by the defense, how they’ve suffered at the hands of the defendant.
In this case, “undesirable” means people who are likely to sympathize with the defense.
Jury selection is a bit like ping pong, volleyball or tennis game where there’s no out of bounds. The ball is always in motion, and there’s a constant back-and-forth going, where it’s important to always react to what you’re getting, without hesitation.
Picking the right jury is the difference between winning and losing a case. The greatest mistake that an attorney will make is trying to find a jury that’s biased towards their side, rather than trying to find one that’s as impartial as possible. Trying to find a jury that’s anything less than fair can be a fast path to losing a case , and a good lawyer knows this.
Good Jurors for the Defense. From a defense standpoint, most of the jurors that look bad for the prosecution are good for the defense. You want people who can relate to the defense, and who were on the defending end of an injury case.
It is up to the prosecutor to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. The defense does not have to prove the innocence of the defendant, as the law dictates that a person is innocent by default until proven guilty, but if evidence exists that can exonerate a client, it is up to the lawyer to bring this evidence out ...
Learn More. A defense lawyer represents a defendant in criminal or civil proceedings. A defense lawyer is an attorney who represents an accused party in legal matters, including in a court of law. The accused party is known as the defendant. Many defense attorneys start out as prosecutors for the state. The prosecutor is there as an agent of the ...
Often, when defendants are found “not guilty” in criminal trials, the victims pursue civil remedies for financial restitution. Civil courts do not hand down prison sentences. While a prosecutor can make a respectable salary, a high profile defense lawyer is one of the most lucrative careers in law.
The accused party is known as the defendant. Many defense attorneys start out as prosecutors for the state. The prosecutor is there as an agent of the state, acting in the interest of the victim, but not representing them directly. Criminal proceedings, where there is a prosecutor, don't have a plaintiff, per se, ...
Though there are many talented state-appointed defense attorneys, accused parties with means usually hire their own lawyers. A defense lawyer frequently tries to turn the situation around to make their client appear to be a victim.
Criminal proceedings, where there is a prosecutor, don 't have a plaintiff, per se, as the party that brings charges against the defendant is a public agency. If a party is charged with a crime and cannot afford to hire a private defense lawyer, the state will assign an attorney to represent the defendant.
A lawyer cannot knowingly place a witness on the stand to perpetuate a lie, nor can he or she knowingly lie to the court. For this reason, in high profile cases, it is not unusual that a lawyer will not want to know if the client is guilty. Without that absolute knowledge, the defense strategy can remain more flexible.
One common question presented to jurors is, “Are there any religious beliefs that prevent you from passing judgment on another person?” Frederick says this is to weed out people whose faith might impede their ability to view a case objectively .
The plaintiff attorney or prosecutor will generally look for people more inclined to trust authority.
For example, “if it’s a medical malpractice case and there’s a woman and all of her friends are nurses, that might bias her a little bit,” says Matthew Ferrara, Ph.D, a trial consultant and forensic psychologist. And if you have friends or family in law enforcement, that’s a big red flag. “In a criminal case, relationship to someone in law enforcement is paramount,” Ferrara says. “People who are probation officers, police officers, jailers or are related to the same type of profession would be probably viewed as biased toward the prosecution.”
Indeed, research shows that if you don’t vibe well with an attorney, you’re more likely to decide against their argument. “One attorney told me, 'If I can tell they don’t like me, I get rid of them,’” King says.
Leaders, contrarians, and independent thinkers can be pivotal in a verdict. These people have the potential to rally the rest of the group behind a unanimous decision, which is great for the plaintiff or the prosecutor.
But there are a few general traits attorneys take into consideration when trying to decide whether you’d help or hurt their argument. Attorneys don’t get to pick their jurors.
Just because the defendant says he did it doesn’t make it so. The defendant may be lying to take the rap for someone he wants to protect, or may be guilty, but guilty of a different and lesser crime than the one being prosecuted by the district attorney.
Perhaps no one has ever put the duty as eloquently as Henry VIII’s soon-to-be-beheaded ex-Chancellor Sir Thomas More, who, before going to the scaffold, insisted, “I’d give the devil the benefit of law, for mine own safety’s sake.”.
Defendant a guilty client may mean committing professional suicide. Criminal defense attorneys may vigorously defend guilty clients, but as a couple of examples make clear, they risk committing professional suicide by doing so.
Way back in 1840, Charles Phillips, one of the finest British barristers of his era, defended Benjamin Courvoisier against a charge that Courvoisier brutally murdered his employer, wealthy man-about-town Lord Russell. Courvoisier privately confessed to Phillips that he was guilty.
For these reasons, among others, many defense lawyers never ask their clients if they committed the crime. Instead, the lawyer uses the facts to put on the best defense possible and leaves the question of guilt to the judge or jury.
Feldman knew privately that Westerfield was guilty. Nevertheless, at trial Feldman aggressively attacked Danielle’s parents. He offered evidence that they frequently invited strangers into their home for sex orgies, and suggested that one of the strangers could have been the killer.
Still, the most important thing to remember is that if you identify jurors favorable to your case, those same jurors are the worst jurors for your opponent, so you’ve done opposing counsel a big favor by identifying and prioritizing their cause and peremptory challenges.
A lot of other important things, such as: Personal experiences, specifically those that mirror the experiences of parties and witnesses in your case . Attitudes related to your case themes. Attitudes toward government regulation. Attitudes toward jury damage awards.
Knowing your verdict goal is key because it will shape the focus of your voir dire questions, and risk factors can vary greatly amongst different cases.
Although there are several reasons to conduct mock trials and other jury research – honing your case story and themes being a big one – the data collection that takes place during such research can lead to a statistical profile of the riskiest jurors for a specific case.
Demographics Are Rarely Predictive of Juror Verdicts. Unless your case involves discrimination or issues directly related to a specific set of demographics, such characteristics have very little, if any, influence on a juror’s verdict leaning. Every woman is different and has different attitudes and experiences.