1. how can a lawyer ethically defend someone he or she believes is guilty?

Criminal defense attorneys are ethically required to zealously represent their clients, no matter what their personal opinion of the case may be. This means that criminal defense attorneys are required to do their best to advocate for their clients, even if the attorney believes the client is guilty.

Full Answer

How can a lawyer defend someone who is guilty?

How Can a Lawyer Defend Someone Who is Guilty? 1 Defending a Client who Might be Guilty Some of the most common questions defense attorneys get ask are in regard to the potential guilt of a client: “What if your ... 2 Legally Guilty vs. ... 3 Ethics vs. ... 4 What if a Client Confesses? ...

Is it ethical for a lawyer to defend a client against state?

This can fly in the face of both professional and personal ethics/morals, and be very dangerous, to boot.” A lawyer might personally consider murdering lots of innocent people as abhorrent. However, there may be a superseding reason to defend a client against the state.

Can a lawyer throw a case due to personal ethics?

If a lawyer was to ‘throw the case’ due to their personal ethics, they would be going against their professional ethics and vice versa.” Dr. Cole has a huge amount of experience dealing with criminals and lawyers alike. She consulted a lawyer colleague of hers to get his insight:

Why do lawyers defend their clients no matter what?

Protecting the rule of law is perhaps the main reason why lawyers defend their clients, no matter what. If those attorneys didn’t do that, it would be up to the police to determine the guilt of a person. They’d basically be judge, jury, and executioner because all their evidence will be accepted and admissible.

Can a lawyer defend a client he knows is guilty?

Can my lawyer represent me if he knows I'm guilty? Yes. Defense attorneys are ethically bound to zealously represent all clients, the guilty as well as the innocent.

How do you defend someone you think is guilty?

2:363:25My answer to "how do you defend someone you think is guilty"YouTubeStart of suggested clipEnd of suggested clipAs if we were representing our loved ones or as we'd want to be represented. Ourselves. Because ourMoreAs if we were representing our loved ones or as we'd want to be represented. Ourselves. Because our job as defense. Advocates is not to be the jury not to decide who we want to defend.

Is it ethical to defend a guilty person?

Defense attorneys are ethically bound to zealously represent all clients, those whom they think will be justly found guilty as well as those whom they think are factually innocent.

What are the ethical obligations of a defense attorney?

The primary duties that defense counsel owe to their clients, to the administration of justice, and as officers of the court, are to serve as their clients' counselor and advocate with courage and devotion; to ensure that constitutional and other legal rights of their clients are protected; and to render effective, ...

What do lawyers do when they know their client is guilty?

If an attorney thinks their client might have committed the crime they're defending them for, they won't come out and ask their client if they're guilty because they can't knowingly lie in court. The attorneys's job is to provide a vigorous defense… determining guilt or innocence is a job for the jury.

How do you defend someone?

1:035:513 Ways To Defend Someone Pushing You - YouTubeYouTubeStart of suggested clipEnd of suggested clipYou want to do right you don't always have to like try to destroy the guy. So when someone's pushingMoreYou want to do right you don't always have to like try to destroy the guy. So when someone's pushing you push hard you don't really get hurt. Right unless they said the guy's swinging a punch.

Can lawyer defend himself?

It is true that the lawyer–defendant can defend himself/herself (the other defendants have the same possibility), but under no circumstances can he/she defend the other co-defendants.

Can lawyers refuse to defend someone?

Rule 2.01 - A lawyer shall not reject, except for valid reasons, the cause of the defenseless or the oppressed. Rule 2.02 - In such cases, even if the lawyer does not accept a case, he shall not refuse to render legal advice to the person concerned if only to the extent necessary to safeguard the latter's rights.

What if a lawyer knows his client is lying?

(3) offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer, the lawyer's client, or a witness called by the lawyer, has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal.

Do lawyers have ethics?

All of the professionals who work in the legal field to a certain degree have an essential duty to the court and towards justice. This code of ethics takes precedence over all other duties, especially when there may be a conflict of duties and the potential for lawyers to take advantage of their clients' resources.

What are the four responsibilities of lawyers?

It describes the sources and broad definitions of lawyers' four responsibilities: duties to clients and stakeholders; duties to the legal system; duties to one's own institution; and duties to the broader society.

Why are ethics important to the defense of criminal defendants?

Without ethics, the law would have little meaning because its application would be undependable. Depending on your specific occupation within the criminal justice system, ethics will likely govern your interactions with law-breakers, influence your decision-making processes and affect your interpretation of the law.

Why do lawyers defend people?

Another reason that lawyers can defend people regardless of guilt is that our society gives each citizen the right to be vigorously defended in a court of law. The U.S. Constitution assures every citizen due process and the right to legal counsel. Lawyers are bound to deliver this legal right to their clients.

Why don't criminal defense lawyers ask if you are guilty?

The reason most criminal defense lawyers won't ask you if you're actually "guilty" is that it's not relevant to the case. Also, it's not their job to find out. Their job is to defend you, and put up a fair case. As one attorney put it, their job is to "keep the system honest.".

What is the difference between legal guilt and factual guilt?

First, there is a difference between "legal guilt" and "factual guilt.". Second, lawyers have a legal responsibility to their clients that they must uphold.

What is the duty of a defense lawyer?

According to Canon 7 in the ABA's Model Code of Responsibility, a defense lawyer's duty to his client is to "represent his client zealously within the bounds of the law" because of his inclusion in a profession whose goal is to " (assist) members of the public to secure and protect available legal rights and benefits.".

What is the job of a criminal defense lawyer?

The job of a criminal defense lawyer is to defend you against the charges that are presented. When charges are brought, there only has to be "probable cause" that you might have committed the crime. At trial, the prosecuting lawyer's job is to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that you've committed the crime for which you're being charged.

Why is it important to have a lawyer for criminal defense?

For this reason, the most important thing when seeking criminal defense counsel is to find a lawyer who takes their legal responsibility seriously, and will do all they can to mount a thorough defense in your favor.

What does "putting the burden of proof upon the prosecution" mean?

Putting the burden of proof upon the prosecution means the point of trial is all about either proving or failing to prove that you're guilty of the crime that's been charged - not knowing whether or not you're actually guilty.

Why do defense attorneys represent innocent people?

In the legal sense, a defense attorney that is hired the standard positioning of a case – pre-verdict – always represents an innocent person, because that’s the presumption according to the law. Oftentimes its very unclear for all people involved whether or not someone is factually guilty, that’s why the legal determination is made.

What questions do defense attorneys ask?

Some of the most common questions defense attorneys get ask are in regard to the potential guilt of a client: “What if your client is guilty?”, “How can a lawyer represent a guilty client?”, “What if your client confesses to you and you win?” These queries range from the existential to the practical and affect the practice of every criminal defense attorney in Florida and across the United States. In some circumstances this can amount of an ethical quandary, but the way the criminal justice system is setup prevents there being an issue on a day to day basis.

What is the difference between ethics and morals?

Ethics and morals – while often synonymous – have two different meanings for defense attorneys. Ethics are the strict rules put into place to protect the rights of clients , namely criminal defendants. Morals are the nebulous rules of right and wrong. Many crimes are objectively immoral, but attorney ethics require that those accused (factually guilty or factually innocent) are afforded a competent and an ethical defense. Defense attorneys are able to represent those accused – even those factually guilty – of immoral crimes because of the importance that every individual have fair treatment under the law. The purpose of the criminal justice system is not just to punish those who are guilty, but even more importantly to make sure everyone has a fair trial and every opportunity for a competent defense. An experience and ethical attorney does not ask the internal question, “is my client guilty?” but instead asks themselves, “what can I do to make sure the government is held to their burden, to make sure that they have a proper defense, to fight for their rights because that’s what preserves the system and the freedoms that all Americans are afforded?” It is important if you are accused of a crime to contact a Florida criminal defense attorney that will ask these questions. Don Pumphrey and the firm have years of experience representing defendants every imaginable type of criminal case in Florida. They are dedicated to defending the rights of clients and will fight for the best possible disposition or dismissal of your case. Call (850) 681-7777 or contact us today to discuss your rights during an open and free consultation with our legal team.

What does it mean to be factually guilty?

This means all the elements of a crime actually occurred and theoretically are satisfied, this is not the same as legally guilty. In the criminal justice system, all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty through a willing and voluntary plea or the ruling by a finder of fact (either a jury in a jury trial or a judge in a bench trial). In the legal sense, a defense attorney that is hired the standard positioning of a case – pre-verdict – always represents an innocent person, because that’s the presumption according to the law. Oftentimes its very unclear for all people involved whether or not someone is factually guilty, that’s why the legal determination is made.

What happens if the government cannot prove their case?

At the end of the day, if the government cannot prove their case, the criminal justice system is designed to find that defendant not guilty. It is crucial when accused of a crime to investigate every possible resolution of the case and find an attorney who is focused not on factual guilt but legal guilty. The attorneys at Pumphrey Law have decades ...

What is the meaning of "pre-verdict" in criminal law?

In the criminal justice system, all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty through a willing and voluntary plea or the ruling by a finder of fact (either a jury in a jury trial or a judge in a bench trial). In the legal sense, a defense attorney that is hired the standard positioning of a case – pre-verdict – always represents an ...

Is the criminal justice system designed to find every factually guilty person legally guilty?

The criminal justice system is not designed to find every factually guilty person legally guilty, namely those who’s rights have been violated. If police barge into a person’s home and find a cache of drugs, that person is factually guilty.

Why do defense attorneys represent innocent people?

In the legal sense, a defense attorney that is hired the standard positioning of a case – pre-verdict – always represents an innocent person, because that’s the presumption according to the law. Oftentimes its very unclear for all people involved whether or not someone is factually guilty, that’s why the legal determination is made.

What is the meaning of "pre-verdict" in criminal law?

In the criminal justice system, all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty through a willing and voluntary plea or the ruling by a finder of fact (either a jury in a jury trial or a judge in a bench trial). In the legal sense, a defense attorney that is hired the standard positioning of a case – pre-verdict – always represents an ...

Can a defendant confess to an attorney?

It is nevertheless a common occurrence for a defendant to confess to an attorney that they are factually guilty, but later be found legally not guilty. This can arise through deferment programs, exclusion of evidence, arguments at trial regarding intent or credibility, ect. At the end of the day, if the government cannot prove their case, ...

Can a factually innocent person be found guilty?

Conversely, factually innocent defendants are sometimes found guilty falsely, in those circumstances the person is not factually guilty, but legally guilty regardless. It’s important when charged with a crime to hire an experienced attorney who is able to handle the case and make sure both of those scenarios result in a finding of not guilty.

Why do lawyers defend their clients?

Protecting the rule of law is perhaps the main reason why lawyers defend their clients, no matter what. If those attorneys didn’t do that, it would be up to the police to determine the guilt of a person. They’d basically be judge, jury, and executioner because all their evidence will be accepted and admissible. But when lawyers go above and beyond to defend their clients, it becomes up to an actual judge and citizens to determine if the defendant is guilty or not. It is left to impartial parties to decide if that person did, in fact, commit the crime they are accused of, and that ensures that justice and law prevail in society.

Why do criminal defense lawyers go above and beyond?

This is why criminal defense lawyers go above and beyond to prove their client is innocent; they don’t care about your actual guilt or innocence, because it’s not their job. They are there to preserve the integrity of the system and keep it honest, and it’s their duty to present a fair case.

Why are lawyers called judges, jury, and executioners?

They’d basically be judge, jury, and executioner because all their evidence will be accepted and admissible . But when lawyers go above and beyond to defend their clients, it becomes up to an actual judge and citizens to determine if the defendant is guilty or not.

What is the job of a defense attorney?

That job is assigned to the prosecution, who is charged with doing everything within their capabilities –– and within the boundaries of the law –– to prove a defendant is guilty.

Why is it left to impartial parties to decide if a person committed a crime?

It is left to impartial parties to decide if that person did, in fact, commit the crime they are accused of, and that ensures that justice and law prevail in society. You will never find a lawyer asking their client whether or not they committed the crime because it’s not their job to do so.

What percentage of lawyers prefer to make decisions based on detached objectivity?

They concluded that 78% of lawyers (link) prefer to make decisions based on detached objectivity rather than taking into account personal feelings or values. This might seem the most reasonable approach to take to ensure a fair and effective justice system. After all, everybody is entitled to receive a fair trial.

Who is the lawyer for Zacarius Moussaoui?

This was an interesting point because I had also spoken with French lawyer Isabelle Coutant-Peyre who represented Zacarius Moussaoui while he was awaiting trial for involvement in the September 11th attacks, of which he was later found guilty. Coutant-Peyre is also the lawyer and wife of Carlos The Jackal.

Do lawyers have barriers to representing themselves?

In many cases, there are no barriers to stop people representing themselves when, for example, a lawyer knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are guilty of a crime. This raises some interesting ethical questions for defense lawyers: Does representing somebody a lawyer suspects to be guilty of horrific crimes raise any ethical difficulties ...

Can a lawyer defend a person they believe to be guilty?

And recusing oneself from a case in which a defense lawyer no longer believes they can defend a person they believe to be guilty may be, depending on how one looks at the result, simply pushing the problem on to the shoulders of another defense lawyer.

Can a lawyer suspect a defendant is guilty of mass murder?

There are certain cases that hit you on a human level. But we’re trained to shake it off and deal with it clinically and unemotionally.”. A lawyer might strongly suspect that a defendant is guilty of premeditated mass murder, for example, but they are obligated to help the accused and not their potential victims.

Is everyone entitled to a fair trial?

After all, everybody is entitled to receive a fair trial . There are many heroic defense lawyers out there doing tremendous work; there will be many ethical and unethical prosecutors as well. Take, for example, Marty Stroud, who prosecuted an innocent black man in the 1980s and sought the death penalty for him too.

Do defense attorneys think of their religious affiliation?

For instance, it’s more common to see people with more stringent personal moral beliefs (including religion) as prosecutors (or hopeful future prosecutors), while defense attorneys may not think of their religious affiliation as a guiding principle.”.

Why do defense lawyers set out to convince themselves of a defendant's innocence?

And many defense lawyers set out to convince themselves of a defendant’s innocence, no matter how unlikely, because such a mindset helps them make sure that they won’t subconsciously do a sub-par job out of sympathy for the victims or revulsion for their client.

What was Feldman's ethical duty?

Feldman was meeting his ethical duty to point out to the jury that the prosecution’s argument was not as conclusive as it claimed. Again, his job was to make the prosecution prove its case. Feldman did his job, and the prosecution and jury did theirs: David Westerfield was convicted.

Why was Jeffrey Feldman disbarred?

A few years ago, Fox TV commentator Bill O’Reilly led a campaign to get California criminal lawyer Jeffrey Feldman disbarred because leaked plea bargaining sessions showed that he knew his client, child killer David Westerfield, was guilty of murder while Feldman was vigorously disputing his guilt in court. O’Reilly pronounced Feldman a liar.

What is the ideal of keeping the government honest?

Achieving this ideal means keeping the government honest: no convictions based on false or planted evidence, unreliable or lying witnesses, or confessions extracted from the accused by torture, beatings, or other forms of duress even if the accused is, in fact guilty. All that is essential for the system to work.

Do defense attorneys get satisfaction when they see their clients go free?

It doesn’t produce satisfaction or joy when defense attorneys see their guilty criminal clients go free, guaranteed by the Constitutional prohibition against “double jeopardy” never to have to suffer punishment for terrible crimes.

Is the Simpson trial a fault?

Arguably every componant of the Simpson trial except the defense performed badly, and some aspects of the trial might support arguments for reform, but the failings of the rest are not the fault or the responsibility of Simpson’s defense attorneys.